ML20217K046

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SER Accepting Topical Rept BAW-10193P, RELAP5/MOD2-B&W for Safety Analysis of B&W-Designed Pwrs, for Referencing in Licensing Applications to Extent Specified & Under Limitations Delineated in Rept
ML20217K046
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/15/1999
From: Stewart Bailey
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Joseph Kelly
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO., FRAMATOME
Shared Package
ML20217K053 List:
References
PROJECT-693 TAC-M93346, NUDOCS 9910260034
Download: ML20217K046 (2)


Text

g ?

J q1p

$h l fut[Q g

C

.. UNITED STATE 8

-[

NUCLEAR REGULATORY-COMMISSION

' ' j,*

- 2J

- WASHINGTON, D.C. - M 44 j

s

?

7...m

.-October 15, 1999 N Mri J. J. Kelly, Manager' [

B&W Owners' Group Servh Framatome Technologies 13315 Old Forest Road,

' P. O, Box 10935 f

Lynchburg, VA124506-0935

SUBJECT:

SAFETY EVALUATION OF TOPICAL REPORT BAW-10193P, "RELAP5/ MOD 2-B&W FOR SAFETY ANALYSIS OF B&W-DESIGNED

- PWRS" (TAC NO. M93346)

Dear Mr. Kell'y:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has completed its raview of the subject topical report that was submitted by Framatome Technologies, formerly B&W Nuclear Technologies, 1

7

by letter dated August 14,1995. The intent of the submittal was to use the RELAP5/ MOD 2-B&W computer code to perform future non-loss-of-coolant accident (non-LOCA) safety -

analyses on B&W-designed pressurized-water reactors (PWRs), replacing two previously

. approved non-LOCA codes,- CADDS and TRAP 2.L The topical report presented benchmarks of RELAP5/ MOD 2-B&W calculations to data from test facilities and plant transients, as well as.

, comparisons to CADDS and TRAP 2 predictions, to demonstrate that RELAP5/ MOD 2-B&W properly predicts the phenomena exhibited by B&W-designed PWRs during non-LOCA events.

The staff finds that the subject topical report is acceptable for referencing in licensing
applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and in the associated NRC safety evaluation. The safety evaluation, which is enclosed, defines the basis

< for acceptance of the topical report. This closes the staff's efforts on TAC No. M93346.

The staff will not repeat its review of the matters described in the subject report, when the report bppears as a reference in license applications, except to ensure that the material

- presented applies to the' specific plant involved. In accordance with the procedures established

- in _NUREG-0390, the NRC requests that Framatome Technologies publish' accepted versions of

the' submittal, proprietary and non-proprietry, within 3 months of receipt of this letter.' The i accepted versions'shall incorporate (1) this letter and the enclosed safety evaluation between l
the title page and the abstract, and (2) an."A".(designating " accepted") following the report -

identification symbol

/

U

. lf'the NRC's criteria or regulations change so that its conclusions about the acceptability of the report are :.walidated, Framatome Technologies or the applicant refe b, 9 or f

will be expected to revise and resubmit its respective documentation, or su P

38%N W/

A%1 9910260034 991015 f

YDR D:Ik

. :q.

h D

7..

. J. J. Kelly F-the continued effective applicability of the report without revision of the respective documentation.

Sincerely, Stewart N. Bailey, P anager, Section 2 Project Directorate 111 Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regu;: tion Project No. 693

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/ encl:

Mr. Michael Schoppman Licensing Manager Framatome Technologies, Inc.

1700 Rockville Pike, Suite 525 Rockville, MD 20852-1631

.