ML20217J698
ML20217J698 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 08/08/1997 |
From: | Federline M NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
To: | Abueid R, Bykoski L, Eisengberg N NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
References | |
REF-WM-3, RTR-REGGD-GENERA NUDOCS 9708150016 | |
Download: ML20217J698 (21) | |
Text
. -- _ - - . _. . - -- -
=* Ct:
p+ A. UNITED STATES g ,j#
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 806664 001 9..... August 8, 1997 l
l HEMORANDUM TO: Those on Attached List l FROM: Marg 6 ret V. Federline. Deputy Director
- N 3 b ~
Division of Waste Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
SUBJECT:
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF REG GUIDE.
DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE RADIOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR LICENSE TERMINATION" The purpose of this memorandum is to formally establish a DWM team for participating in the development of the subject document and assign responsibilities for that development. The RES plan for developing the Reg Guide including an outline and schedule. is attached.
The staff should be aware that the DWM budget does not include resources for this effort and therefore, this effort will consume resources originally budgeted for other activities. Staff should keep their supervisors informed of the anticipated level of effort for each assignment and the impact (s) of each assignment. if any. on other work.
LEAD ASSIGNMENTS Sgoervision and Coordination Supervisor: B. Nelson Lead Technical Reviewer: D. Fauver ;1
\
Decommissicntng framework: F. Ross
}
Lead Resoonsibility by Section
- 1. NUREG 1549 - 0 Fauver (bg
- 2. Final Radiation Survey - D. Fauver [q 3 i
- 3. Release Under Restricted Conditions- g.I
- a. Institutional Controls - J. Kennedy (Lead) & J. Kotra
- b. Public Participation - N. Orlando
- c. Financial Assurance - T. C. Johnson '
- d. Alternative Criteria - N. Orlando
9708150016 970000 97- 00 3 PDR -
- o
-'_, . i l
Those on Attached List 3- ;
- c. Obtain appropriate level of management concurrence.
- d. Inform supervisor & DWM management of progress / problems.
- 4. Lead Reviewers -
- a. Coordinate review with lead Technical Reviewer, managers, and other l technical staff, as required,
- b. Forward review comments to Lead Technical Reviewer.
- c. Identify problems / issues as they arise to the Lead Technical Reviewer.
I
- 5. Branch Interfaces Keep Branch and Section Chiefs informed of progress.
RITS CHARGE Timespentinsu]portofthis)rojectshouldbechargedto232BL. Site Decontamination )articipatory Rulemaking Process
Attachment:
As stated TICKET: N/A DISTRIBUTION: Central File LLDP r/f~ DWM r/f NMSS r/f JGreeves Hiederline MBell JHickey KStablein JHolonich DGillen DBrooks KMcConnell LBell CTrottier SMcGuire EBrummett SWastler RBellamy BJorgensen CHosey JPotter FWenslawskiDSpitzberg TDecker PUBLIC To receive a copy of this document in small box on *0fC:" line enter: 'C = copy without attachment / enclosure: *E' -
Copy eith attachment / enclosure: 'N' = No copy Path & File Name: S:\DWM\LLDP\RAN\REGGUIDE.REV .
OFC LLDP * [ LLDP
- h LLb E. DWM NAME RNelson' DFauver Mkey 4 DATE 7/18/97 7/18/97 [/h/97 ~ % /1/97 -
0FFICIAL RECORD COPT ' ,
.ACNW: YES X NO Category: Proprietary or CF Only
- IG
- YES NO X 7 LSS : YES NO X Delete file after distribution: Yes X No NRC RE CENTER COPY ;
4
.a . . . .- . _ . _. . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . _ . . _ . _ . _ , . . , _ _ _ . . _ , _ _ _ . . . , _...,.__.._._..c.._...-,,..._...__, . _ , _ _ _ . _ . _ .
- v. ' -
4 Those on Attached List c. Obtain appropriate level of management concurrence.
- d. Inform supervisor & DWM management of progress / problems.
4 Lead Reviewers l
- a. Coordinate review with Lead Technical Reviewer managers. and other technical staff. as required. 1
- b. Forward review comments to lead Technical Reviewer.
- c. Identify problems / issues as they arise to the Lead Technical Reviewer -
I
- 5. Branch Interfaces Keep Branch and Section Chiefs informed of progress.
RITS CHARGE :
Time spent in su) port of this )roject should be charged to 232BL. Site Decontamination )articipatory Rulemaking Process. >
i
Attachment:
As stated l .
T N
4 e
i l
6 1
i t'
,.-.. .,,.-.,,.._...y. -..~..,v, e .,,.r,~,c.,.r-,,v.. ,.,y w.- ~..v.m.m-me,,m. - - ..m,_...,,,_,,.,-, ...-....m. , , __ ... , -- .. ..r-,,
Those on Attached List .
l Appendices A - Demonstration of Compliance for Licensees with Little Residual Radioactivity - D. Fauver B Standard Format and Content for Final Raoiation Survey Report - D. Fauver 1
SUPPORTING ASSIGNMENTS The following staff will provide assistance. as required. The Lead Reviewer and, as necessary the Supervisor will coordinate requests for assistance with the supporting staf f's Section Chief.
Lou Bykoski - Financial assurance Boby Eid - Health physics. dose assessment Norm Eisenberg - Uncertainty analysis, decision analysis Jim Kennedy - LLW interface Janet Kotra PNiL interface Bob Neel - Health )hysics, dose assessment Jack Parrott - RESTAD acceptability Fred Ross ENGB interface Duane Schmidt - Health physics. dose assessment. URB interface Mark Thaggard - Ground water, performance assessment RESPONSIBILITIES
- 1. Supervisor
- a. Overall responsibility for timeliness of the DWM review and resolution of major policy issues,
- b. Hold weekly strtus review meetings and take follow-up action as required.
- c. Resolve questions concerning scope of development / review. Consult with DWM management, as required, to resolve related issues.
- 2. Lead Technical Reviewer
- a. Overall responsibility for technical quality. '
- b. Coordinate activities of lead reviewers.
- c. Consolidate review comments and revise as necessary for technical quality. Obtain appropriate level of management concurrence.
Forward to RES.
- d. Inform supervisor & DWM management of progress / problems,
- 3. Decommissioning Framework Coordinator
- a. Overall responsibility for integrating Decomissioning Framework with the Reg. Guide.
- b. Project Manager for Sandia contract.
=, -. -- . . . . . -
Those on Attached List 4 Attached List for Memorandum dated August 8, 1997 Rateb Abu Eid. LLDP '
Louis Bykoski. LLDP Norm Eisenberg. DWH DdVid fauver, LLDP Timothy Johnson. LLDP James Kennedy LLOP Janet Kotra. PAHL .
Chris McKenney. PAHL !
Robert Neel. LLDP ;
Robert- NelsoneLLDP Dominick Orlando. LLDP '
Jack Parrott. LLDP Fred Ross. ENGB Duane Schmidt. URB Hark Thaggard. PAHL i
4 0
i .
l -l Plans for developing a Regulatory Guide
" Demonstrating Compliance with the.
- Radiological Criteria for License
~
Termination" l Stephen A. McGuire l Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research ;
! 301-415-6204, SAM 2@NRC. GOV
- Attach:nent i
e O
Scope of guide:
- 1. Derived concentration guidelines
- 2. The final radiation survey
- 3. Release under restricted conditions
- 4. ALARA analyses
Detailed outline:
~
~
1.0 Derived concentration guidelines 1.1 Buildings and structures 1.1.1 Dose calculational models 1.1.2 Dose calculation parameters 1.1.3 Elevated measurement concentrations 1.1.4 Application to special cases ,
~
1.1.4.1 Embedded residual radioactivity 1.1.4.2 Embedded pipmg 1.1.4.3 Ventilation ducts 1.1.4.4 Building exterior surfaces and unoccupiable areas
! 1.1.4.5 Sewer and waste plumbing systems ;
1.1.4.6 Equipment 1.1.5 Mixtures of radionuclides
.. -l 1.2 Soil- -
1.2.1 Dose calculational models -
a 1.2.2 Dose calculation parameters ..
1:.2.3 Elevated measurement concentrations
- 1.~2.4 Application to special cases l 1.2.4.1 Subsurface residual radioactivity
-1.2.4.2 Parking lots and other paved surfaces i
1.2.4.3 Rocks and debris 1
1.2.4.4 Surface water 1.2.4.5 Sediments 1.2.4.6 Groundwater l 1.2.4.7 Residual radioactivity offsite 1.2.5 Mixtures of radionuclides
- i I
1
i 2 0 The final radiation survey -
2.1; Classification of areas by residual radioactivity levels 2.2 Selection and size of survey umts - i
- 2.3. Selection of background reference areas and materials 2'.4 Grid location system
l 2.5 Instrument selection and calibration l 2.6 Scanning coverage and investigation levels L 2.7 Determination of the number of samples 2.8 Demonstration of compliance 2.8.1 Indistinguishable from background.
2.8.2 Below DCGL
! 2.8.3 Elevated measurement comparison
[ 2.9 Measurement quality assurance program l 2.10 Surveys of embedded piping
[ 2.11 Surveys of subsurface residual radioactivity
- 2.12 Surveys of groundwater
! i
).
l !
L
_-l .
2.13 Surveys of surface water -l 2.14 Records -
3.0 Release under restricted conditions 3.1 Institutional controls i 3.2 'Public participation !
l 3.3 Financial assurance r 3.4 Alternative criteria 4.0 ALARA analyses !
i Appendix A Demonstration of compliance for licensees with little residual radioactivity Appendix B Standard format and content for final radiation survey report
. - - - -_ .___ _ _-___ n
..l .
Method i
i l
- 1. Guide to be developed in 4 modules
- 2. Drafts of modules to be sent to e-mail group
- (stafflevel) for comments l
- 3. Discussions, meetings, and revised drafts, as l
necessary l 4. Division concurrence to allow modules to be l
made public
- 5. Public meeting
- 6. Formal Office concurrence draft Jan.1,1998 i
- 7. To Commission February 21,1998 l
t
~
SCHEDULE: RESifRICTED REuEASE
.\
JULY AUGUST SEPT OCT NOV DEC Final Public Office informal PDR meeting concur-draft rence
/
_ draft Concur-rence draft .
SCHEDULE: SURVEYS .
JULY AUGUST SEPT OCT NOV DEC First Final Concur- Office informal informal rence PDR concur-draft draft draft rence
/ -
- draft 1
Public
! meeting I
'i SCHEDULE: ALARA .
JULY AUGUST SEPT OCT NOV DEC .
i First Final Concur- Public Office informal informal rence meeting concur-draft draft draft rence
, , _d _
draft _
PDR i
i i
~. _
SCHEDULE: DCGLs .
i t JULY AUGUST SEPT OCT NOV DEC .
Information First
, transfer informal
~
start draft ,
_ m
. i I
i i
I i
I
. . -l l
~
Regulatory framework :for decommissioning
- Initiating events 30.36(d). etc.]
- 1. License expires, or
- 2. Licensee decides to cease operations, or
- 3. No activities for 24 months i
i 3 f Notify NRC within 60 days and
- 1. Complete decommissioning within 24 months, or
- 2. Submit decom.miesioning plan within 12 months l
e +
Need for decommissioning plan
, 1. If required by license, or
- 2. "If the procedures and activities '
- necessary ... have not been approved previously ... and could increase potential health and safety impacts ..."
4
- 3. Restricted release
- 4. If decommissioning is to exceed 24 months a partial decommissioning plan is required.
6
~
Contents of c ecommissioning plan
- l. Description of the conditions ... sufficient to evaluate the acceptability of the plan (this would include the DCGL),
- 2. Description of planned decommissioning activities, 3 Description efradiation protection during decommissioning,
- 4. Description of planned final radiation survey,
- 5. Updated detailed cost estimate, and
- 6. Justification for exceeding 24 months, if applicable. ,
i
i After submission of decommissioning plan -
l NRC approval of plan l
4 5
T I Licensee must complete decommissioning and submit final radiation status report within 24 months
! (or approved longer time)
[
i Those on Attached List 3- l RITS CHARGE Time spent in support of this project should be charged to 232BL, Site f Decont'n Particpatory Rulemaking Process.- i
Attachment:
'As stated TICKET: N/A DISTRIBUTION: Central file LLDP r/f DWM r/f NMSS r/f JGreeves MFederline MBell JHickey KStablein JHolonich DGillen DBrooks
-KMcConnell LBell CTrottier SMcGuire EBrummett SWastler RBellamy BJorgensen CHosey- JPotter FWenslawskiDSpitzberg TDecker PUBLIC To receive a copy of this document in small box on '0FC ' line enter: *C = Copy without attachment / enclosure 'E' = '
Copy cith attachment / enclosure: *N' = No copy Path & File Name: S:\DWM\LLDP\RAN\REGGUIDE.REV l OFC LLDfI//j LLDP- UN '#
b/ DWM I
NAME Rf[eIs'on MakJver 6Itckey i DATE 7/h3 /97 ~7 ////97 7/8/97 / /97 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY ,
ACNW: YES X NO ,,_ Category: Proprietary ,_. or CF Only IG : YES NO X LSS : YES ._ NO. X: Delete file after distribution: Yes X No l
t I
1 1
4 r 9
a c .e