|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARLIC-99-0094, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Eliminating Requirement for Licensees to Revise Their Inservice Insp & Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME Code1999-10-0101 October 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Eliminating Requirement for Licensees to Revise Their Inservice Insp & Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME Code ML20216F6761999-09-17017 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & NUREG-1022,Rev 1 LIC-99-0082, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to NRC Emergency Preparedness Regulations on Use of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans1999-09-10010 September 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to NRC Emergency Preparedness Regulations on Use of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans LIC-98-0168, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Concerns Raised by NEI Well Founded & Endorses NEI Comments1998-12-0909 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Concerns Raised by NEI Well Founded & Endorses NEI Comments ML20248C0491998-05-21021 May 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R for Plant, Unit 1.Exemption Re Unpressurized Leakage Sites in RCP Lube Oil Collection Sys Granted LIC-98-0052, Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal LIC-97-0034, Comment on Proposed Rev to RG 5.62, Reporting of Safeguards Events. Generally Draft Suggests More Stringent Reporting Requirements than Industry Now Following in Generic Ltr 91-03.No Analysis Performed to Determine Cost/Benefit1998-03-0202 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rev to RG 5.62, Reporting of Safeguards Events. Generally Draft Suggests More Stringent Reporting Requirements than Industry Now Following in Generic Ltr 91-03.No Analysis Performed to Determine Cost/Benefit LIC-98-0025, Comment on Proposed Communications Re Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at NPP1998-02-24024 February 1998 Comment on Proposed Communications Re Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at NPP ML20203B2031998-02-0606 February 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24, Criticality Accident Requirements. Exemption Granted ML20199E2941997-11-19019 November 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effectively Immediately).Fs Bandy Prohibited from Involvement in Activities Licensed by NRC for Period of 5 Yrs LIC-97-0136, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Frequency of Reviews & Audits for Emergency Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans & Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors1997-08-28028 August 1997 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Frequency of Reviews & Audits for Emergency Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans & Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20151L9901997-07-24024 July 1997 Comments on NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments) ML20217J6521997-07-22022 July 1997 Demand for Info Re NRC Question Re Arrest Info Supplied to OPPD in Mar 1993 for Unescorted Access to Plant ML20141B8821997-05-0606 May 1997 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements.Rule Should Not Be Limited to Designated Licensee or licensee-owned Vehicles,For Listed Reasons LIC-97-0052, Comment Opposing Proposed safety-conscious Work Environ Strategies1997-04-17017 April 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed safety-conscious Work Environ Strategies ML20128F6571996-09-26026 September 1996 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations LIC-96-0110, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements1996-08-0505 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20117P0961996-06-18018 June 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Any Addl Costs Imposed on Licensee Due to Change in Decommissioning Funding Will Aggravate Potential Investment LIC-96-0069, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.76, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & Equipment1996-06-11011 June 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.76, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & Equipment LIC-95-0193, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of NPPs1995-10-11011 October 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of NPPs LIC-95-0165, Comments Supporting Revised Salp1995-08-29029 August 1995 Comments Supporting Revised Salp ML20086T3911995-07-20020 July 1995 Comments on Proposed Generic Communications Re Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits LIC-95-0116, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control1995-05-25025 May 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control LIC-95-0106, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial1995-05-22022 May 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial LIC-94-0236, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Feels Proposed Change Would Be Beneficial in Terms of Cost Savings1994-11-11011 November 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Feels Proposed Change Would Be Beneficial in Terms of Cost Savings LIC-94-0137, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50 & 73 Concerning Frequency for Conducting Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program1994-07-18018 July 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50 & 73 Concerning Frequency for Conducting Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program LIC-94-0072, Informs That Implementation of Proposed Rulemaking at Plant Would Require Numerous Procedure Changes,Addl Dosimetry for Members of Public, & Changes to Chemical Effluent Release Software Due to Deletion of Term Controlled Area1994-03-31031 March 1994 Informs That Implementation of Proposed Rulemaking at Plant Would Require Numerous Procedure Changes,Addl Dosimetry for Members of Public, & Changes to Chemical Effluent Release Software Due to Deletion of Term Controlled Area LIC-94-0047, Comment on Draft NUREG-1482, Guidelines for IST Programs at Npps. Licensee Should Not Have to State in IST Program Methods of Ensuring Code Compliance,If Licensee Complying W/ Code1994-02-18018 February 1994 Comment on Draft NUREG-1482, Guidelines for IST Programs at Npps. Licensee Should Not Have to State in IST Program Methods of Ensuring Code Compliance,If Licensee Complying W/ Code LIC-94-0035, Comments on Proposed GL Guidance for Mod of Tech Specs to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 & 10CR50.36,related Current Industry Initiatives & Miscellaneous Related Editorial Clarifications1994-02-0404 February 1994 Comments on Proposed GL Guidance for Mod of Tech Specs to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 & 10CR50.36,related Current Industry Initiatives & Miscellaneous Related Editorial Clarifications LIC-93-0300, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs1993-12-20020 December 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs ML20045H3231993-07-0606 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20096A0351992-05-0101 May 1992 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking, Elimination of Requirements Marginal to Safety ML20094K7831992-03-17017 March 1992 Comments Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-57 Re Insurance Requirements for Shutdown Reactors ML20092D2791992-01-31031 January 1992 Comment Supporting & Endorsing Positions Submitted by NUMARC & BWR Owners Group Re Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys ML20086F8931991-11-11011 November 1991 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-30-59 Re Rev of Decommissioning Regulations to Provide for Means of self-guarantee of Decommissioning Funding Costs by Licensees Meeting Stringent Financial Assurance Requirements ML20085K1581991-10-23023 October 1991 Supports Proposed Rule 10CFR50,requiring That NRC Evaluate Decommissioning Funding Plans for Power Reactors That Shut Down Prematurely on case-by-case Basis LIC-91-0063, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986- 1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a1991-04-15015 April 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986- 1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a LIC-91-0046, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule (Misc 90-10), Regulatory Impact Survey Rept1991-01-25025 January 1991 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule (Misc 90-10), Regulatory Impact Survey Rept LIC-90-0820, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses NUMARC Comments1990-10-12012 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses NUMARC Comments ML20012C6471990-03-12012 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Thermal Shock Events. Recommends That Use of Credible Surveillance Data Be Allowed to Establish Consistent Calculational Method W/Reg Guide ML19353B2091989-11-30030 November 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Supports NUMARC Position ML20246K2441989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Enactment of Generic Ltr 89-02 Requirements & Info Sharing Would Achieve Desired Results LIC-88-1031, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Believes That 100% Annual Testing Frequency Appropriate as Adequate Deterrent & More than 100% Would Install Burden of Excess for Certain Employees1988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Believes That 100% Annual Testing Frequency Appropriate as Adequate Deterrent & More than 100% Would Install Burden of Excess for Certain Employees ML20206C1081988-11-0404 November 1988 Requests for Renewal or Extension of Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Regulations ML20204C1721988-10-14014 October 1988 Corrected Page 1 of Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i), Increasing Amount of Onsite Property Damage Insurance Required by NRC Licensees ML20155F7021988-09-30030 September 1988 Temporary Exemption from 10CFR 50.54(w)(5)(i) Requirements Until Completion of Pending Rulemaking Extending Implementation Date Specified But Not Later than 890401 ML20236X6881987-11-25025 November 1987 Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(1) Requirements Re Util Maint of Min Insurance Coverage for Operating Plants.Exemption Extends Date for Acquiring Full Amount of Property Insurance Required to No Later than 881205,per Util 851005 Request ML20206C1341987-11-0202 November 1987 Requests for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Requirements Due to Licensees Inability to Provide Equivalent Protection in Lieu of Purchasing Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd Coverage ML20236F7601987-10-0202 October 1987 Request for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54.Util Will Not Be Able to Comply W/Requirements by Effective Date or within 60 Days Thereafter ML20238E0891987-09-10010 September 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Identified During Insps on 850916-20, 1001-08,1106-08,18-22 & 1209-17 1999-09-17
[Table view] Category:OTHER LEGAL DOCUMENT
MONTHYEARML20217J6521997-07-22022 July 1997 Demand for Info Re NRC Question Re Arrest Info Supplied to OPPD in Mar 1993 for Unescorted Access to Plant ML20206C1081988-11-0404 November 1988 Requests for Renewal or Extension of Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Regulations ML20206C1341987-11-0202 November 1987 Requests for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Requirements Due to Licensees Inability to Provide Equivalent Protection in Lieu of Purchasing Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd Coverage ML19294B0331980-01-30030 January 1980 Notice of Withdrawal of 791008 Request for Hearing.Nrc & Util Do Not Object to Withdrawal.Certificate of Svc Encl 1997-07-22
[Table view] |
Text
. - . . .. . .. - .- - - --
o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION in the Matter of )
) IA 97 057 Finis Scott Bandy ) ;
)
DEMAND FOR INFORMATION I
Finis Scott Bandy was employed by Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) as an
- instrumentation and control (I&C) technician at OPPD's Fort Calhoun Station nuclear power plant, Blair, Nebraska. OPPD holds license No. DPR 40, issued August 9,1973, by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part
- 50. The license authorizes the operation of the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS)in accordance with the conditions specified therein.
4 11 In August 1996, the NRC inspected access authorization files during an NRC security inspection at Fort Calhoun Station. The NRC raised a question about arrest information that Mr. Bandy had supplied to OPPD in March 1993 when he applied for unescorted access to the plant. The information in question pertained to whether Mr. Bandy had been arrested for theft, as certain documents in his file appeared to indicate, or had been arrested for excessive speed, as Mr. Bandy claimed. As a result of NRC's questions, OPPD ngreed to interview Mr. Bandy in the presence of the NRC inspector.
9708140404 97G722 PDR ADOCK 05000285 (D PDR g
e
.. j 2
During the interview, Mr. Bandy denied that he had been arrested for theft and asserted.
that the only charge he was' aware of involved excessive speed.
Based on further questions about the accuracy of Mr. Bandy's statements and the information provided by him, Mr. Bandy's unescorted access to FCS was temporarily ,
t suspended on August 22,1996. On August 26,1996, OPPD terminated Mr. Bandy's employment and revoked his unescorted access to FCS. OPPD then conducted an investigation and determined: 1) that the only charge brought against Mr. Bandy in 1991 was a charge of theft of personal property; 2) that court records provided to OPPD by Mr. Bandy had been altered to make it appear that the charge had been for speeding; and 3) that Mr. Bandy made false statements when questioned about his criminal history in 1993 by OPPD and in 1996 when questioned by OPPD and the NRC during its inspection. The NRC's investigation of this matter concluded that Mr. Bandy deliberately falsified criminal history information in 1993 and provided false information to an NRC inspector when questioned about this in August 1996.
i Based on the above, it appears that Finis Scott Bandy, a former employee of OPPD, engaged in deliberate misconduct as defined by 10 CFR 50.5 by deliberately providing
~
false information of a material nature to a licensee and to the NRC. The information
- which was false is material because it is required by NRC regulations (i.e.,10 CFR-
, 73.57) to be reviewed in determining whether an individual should be granted unescorted
3-access to a nuclear power plant Mr. Bandy's conduct raises serious doubts as to whether he can be relied upon to comply with NRC requirements and to provide complete and accurate information to licensees and to the NRC in the future.
1 III Accordingly, pursuant to sections 161c and 161o of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 2.204, the Commission needs the following information to determine whether enforcement action should be taken against you to ensure future compliance with NRC requirements:
A. Information as to why the NRC should not conclude that you engaged in deliberate misconduct as defined by 10 CFR 50.5; and B. Information as to why, if the NRC does conclude that you engaged in deliberate misconduct, the NRC should not take action to prohibit your involvement in NRC licensed activities, and other action as appropriate, in accordance with the
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
NUREG 1600.
. 4 You may provide c.ny other information that you want the NRC to consider, including i
whether the statements made in Section 11 are correct. The information is to be l submitted to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 4
Washington, D.C. 20555, within 30 days of the date of this Demand for Information, and !
l must be in writing and under oath or affirmation. I 1
.l You may respond to this Demand for Information by filing a written answer under oath !
or affirmation or by setting forth your reasons why this Demand for Information should i not have been issued if the requested information is not being provided. Copies also shall be sent to the Assistant General Counsel for Hearings and Enforcement at the same address, and to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza I
Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011.
- Upon review of your answer, or if no answer is filed, the Commission may institute a proceeding pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202 or take such other action as may be necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Your response to the Demand for J
6 4
6
=
4
, , ,v- , - -
. -c l
5-Information will be considered before a decision is made in this matter. However, if no answer is filed, we will proceed on the basis of available information, j i
i FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p Me ames Lieberman, Director ffice of Enforcement Dated at Rockville, Maryland this;ydlay of July 1997 t
4 4
6 4 ,
- s. ,
l Mr. Finis Scott Bandy .
bec w/ Enclosure 1:
lPDR IE 14 LPDR NUDOCS SECY EC's: RI, RII, Rill CA- PA (0 2G4)
EDO (017G21) 01G (T-5D28)
DEDO (017G21) OE (0 7115)
OE:EAFile (0-7115) 01 (0 3E4)
OGC (015B18) OGC (015B18)
NRR (0-12G18) NRR/ADP (012G18)
NRR/PSGB (011E22) OC/DAF (T 9E10)
OC/LFDCB (T-9E10) AEOD (T-4D18)
RA Reading File GSanborn EAFile RWise Allegation File RIV Files MIS Coordinator LWilliamson, 01 RIV Files BMurray E-MAIL DISTRIBUTION:
OEMAIL
, JDyer (JED2)
WBrown (WLB)
GSanborn (GFS) GMVasquez (GMV)
Blienderson (BWH) Milammond (MFH2)
Cilackney (Call) DKunihiro (DMK1)
Art 110well (ATil) DChamberlain (DDC)
KPerkins (KEP) WJohnson (WDJ)
BMurray (BXM) - BEarnest (ABE)
DOCUMENT NAME: g:\occases\97293rl.dn 0\
O E l5 V \ RIV s OE:DA' DNelson EMersbhoff JLiefter(nan 07/ty/97 07/jf/97\ 07/2//97 07/ /97 07/ /97
- Ol'F CIAL RECORD COPY
- "/fl Ik e-w& L A We sju q. ,
7-d A J
-