ML20217D118

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission ISSUANCES.July- September 1997
ML20217D118
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/31/1998
From:
NRC
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V46-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V46-I1, NUDOCS 9803270317
Download: ML20217D118 (31)
v • d • e


Text

- -- --

NUREG-0750 Vol. 4S Index 1

- .. w. .m y s.+ e . .

- . c. y. ..,. ..

3,w!.w m;(,.m. - ;. .. ..mm.;n, c1

- ~

i a. .. > .

3..

"y... 4i ,. , .+.'s,;.w, n,.,..n,

  • ,.v...,

d e v . ., * ,-

,~A c. w . , y&;pr'p'i

  • .';t' y c - u:.tst. > n i.rn;

$fn ./.f , f, r .

% csh Ny . e Ll q ~.,$.,

b. ..

, ' & *'. .. %_fi llQT'* l j ., )?

. nn.ars w.m pyt a, W.wtM T< NOCLEARiREGULATdB@

$m a1N DEXESROP.py W ,:y.p i cgh.,

,l +.~. u

$MM yM._M C O M M I S S. I.O N. -ng 4 y. j f*;f*

$ sh i h . p , * { ' '. \

.T",.3p*

Cs,lESW.,M..._L S m. S U d q%: &

AN.f e

' g. 4.n j $.> ,.' ' e ',,s 'p{V.yj,:l.'

. . > . . r . . ' . * , . "1' * - k, l, a,...~:%'+a,'.

. &'u' .',l',s yy' y 4 Y ^'

  • q.

, ,, . * > ;t sr .k. n ., ; .) g,,5cq'

,. ,kh 'b

  • tI ,,** f,

> . 3,' ivb.a l) f,, , l r 8,

y)),p. ': en.1 xx .,.. .. .u.

wy r.

a .m .~ g.y.  :

.y v, . .qw.s.f. v . =t.a aM.DA [s./t .-y. D

MW; ,JulyASe' ' - ate u..u. + .

..r. e

.n., .o .u ~rnb.c.,8=to v.< ]%,3 .s.y(.p* :" H a. . . e u ~ cq,mmyaywG19 me .m q.. , gt, T7'p[fa :G.$) ,a. N . ge g

,e.p<;

ty;M.Wl
s4 S*;, 'y 4:j9

},Vp N yM, ,s + ',, '.7 f ,: A. 1cql. , , .: . ~ ., : .' ' % e v ytr4 7 . y g W~ .

p..M.. m .

. .. n - @3.p , r,.;.C

r. . s , .. .s :m.;gy: .,.,4 ,a % . . . ,.7 q, s a
M;ufh..r.,N.. . .fb . m. N '$li m . , ,w\ :"':.@';w.h R, 'N* E nG%,r' i 72M '. '. D [ b, N,,R i S4 O

$ ;j. N< m.6/.I y .Y f M ;,3,)f'g v . NO & +4% .ffA#eu&w. .%hQ 4' tb3. ...s  ? *.* h r.

  • y . . r.s .

' M:: O' f

m y.,.. .

4,:m;y,;a y

.. .ym , m 3'y, h.. h  ;;. m.:e y' .

h n, ,p.ns.::n.

. g O w. %

. o h w n.. y n Qnf 3e

  • 5

. g, s mQ:;  ;.;Q,,g... lp,lQ%5%..

T g r .,e .;... ;.",y.. w t, l .' '

c;e.pse y A; u. J ' N.', g . . y . < d ~ ,M. . . y[.,ba\

, ,1 . . . ,

9 gw, ). . .

E ,NJ D r. .4 +

I'. r l'

,.\'_ fpp*;Y b ~

f?{!.

..,g.ti, y .t;-lk i' u .I'),*d' w'.kh.x!'&, .%

l igygd$hkChW. .. ,"

r, g

.  :.u.

M:c mu ma

~

c 1t. c

.o

,m x$ y%.o. ul1' w ;5W, . w l\' I V Q h, Q-  ;) b iRC,G Lib <y #mh f,d?ql kQi i

h.h+n & fW;p 3 ..c L . .<

9. py

.g m n w .? :E u ; '..n

g

, W. g yl vdf .}! (m $n m

4:.Q. x .o 3 g/ , %T w '. mU. >

, q w ,Q w,Q. 4 ,.

Wly}f*f:f. k .K..,g-e4%g, W.v'n nw..f. w.  %. m. amG.*lr: h .y

_p e gr9,,,,, y.w

. . N. o. a ,. . n.v Mv eL ..;e .e,.. oh .y *g

.n. rw . n.;yi p, y ..

g.m m , m 2, s . w,; wwza.A.y.

- : v g c.n .;

e.L . + . - = Sy,y w;yqf p

%.h*6.G..

..,.a

  • b#

.6- ,p.d, S@.

M.;,',.4 w vNw

?%m Fp s.s. , , .

$p .<3 W 4'M6d%.~ d4. x,ltW:Nm.~4; @:<&,@m, g m3,9 U n . ,. r . .

,W,14,. ,i,h.1ym ISSION

  • ~

9803270317 980331 PDR NUREG 0750 R PDR .,

Available from Superintendent of Docurnents U.S. Government Printing Office RO. Box 37062 Washington, DC 20402-9328 ~

A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues, 4 indexes, and 2-4 hardbound editions for this publication.

Single copies of this publication are available from National Technical information Service Springfield, VA 22161 U Errors in this publication may be reported to the Office of the Chief Information Officer U.S. Nuclear Flegulatory Commission

' Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301-415-6844)

NUREG-0750 Vol. 46 Index 1 INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES i

July - September 1997 U S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Prepared by the Office of the Chief Information Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301 -415-6844)

Foreword Digests and indeses for issuances of the Commission (CU), the Atomic Safety and ucensing floard Panel (UIP), the Administrative Law Judges (AU), the Directors' Doculons (DD), and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM) are presented

~ in this document. These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

Information elements common to the cases heard and mied upon are:

Case name (owner (s)of facility)

Full text reference (volume and pagination)

Isauance number Issues raised by appellants ,

Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)

Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter of issues and/or rulings of hearing rating license, operating license amendment, etc.)

of issuance memorandum, order, decision, etc.)

These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged a: follows:

1. Case Name ladex The case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type ofissuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.
2. Headers and Digests The headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows the Commission (CU), the Atomic Safety and Dansing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative LawJudges (AU), the Directors' Decisions (DD) and the Decisions on

' Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM).

The header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance.

The digest is a bricf narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers morg than one issue, then separate digests are .nsed for each issue and are designated alphabetically.

3. Legal Citations hdex This index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alpha-numerical arrangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. These citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statu tes may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

The references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally followed by

_ phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

iii

sm swm

4. Sundect ladex

- Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues and subjects covered in the issuances. The subject headings are follomed by phrases that give specific information about the subject, as dh in the issuances being fre mad .j These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

5. Feellity lades This indes consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names fnwn the issuance. The name is follomed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of issuance, issuance number, and full text referera.

iv

I

__I .

CASE NAME INDEX AHARON BEN 41 AIM, Ph.D.

ENIORCEMLNT ACTION; PREHEARING CONII.RENCE ORDER (Denying Resension and Establisinns Schedules); Docket No. IA 97 068 (ASLBP No. 97 73101 EA) (Order Supenedmg Order Prolubiting Involvenent in NRC-Licenied Activiues Effective Imnediately); LBP-97-15,46 NRC 60 (1997) -

ATLAS CORPORATION MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 40 3453-MLA; CU-97-8, 46 NRC 21 (1997)

CONNECTICLTT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY REQUEST FOR ACTION; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R. 6 2.206; Docket No j 50 213, DD-97-19, 46 NRC 91 (1997) _ -

FIDRIDA POWT.R & LIGifT COMPANY  ;

REQUEST FOR ACTION. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R. 6 2.206; Docket Non $4250, /

50 251, 50-335, 50 389 DD-97 20, 46 NRC % (1997)

IRANK J. CAlABRESE JR. 2 REACTOR O ' PERATOR LICENSE; INTTIAL DECISION Docket No. 55-61425 SP (ASLBP No. 97-725-02-SP); LBP 97-16, 46 NRC 61 (1997) /

INTERNATIONAL URANIUM (USA) CORPORATION MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 448681-MLA 7-(Alternate Fred Matenal); CU-97 9. 46 NRC 23 (1997)

MATI' RIALS LlCLNSE AMENDMTNT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying a Heanng); -

Docket No. 448681 MLA (ASLBP No. 97-726-03-MLA) (Re: License Amendnwnt) (Ahernate Fred Meterial); LBP-97-12,46 NRC 1 (1997)

MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMEfff; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Macons for Reconsideration.

To Reopen the Record); Docket No. 448681-MLA (ASLBP No. 97 726 03-MIA) (Re: License Arnendnwas) (Alternate fred Matenal), LBP-97-14, 46 NRC 55 (1997)

LOUISlANA ENTRGY SLRVICES, LP.

MATERIALS LICENSE; ORDER; Docket No. 70-3074ML; CU-97-II,46 NRC 49 (1997) CLI-97-12, ,

46 NRC 52 (1997)

MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY REQUEST ICR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R.12.206; Docket No. 50-309; DD 9717, 46 NRC 13 (1997)

NATIONAL INSTTTlTTES OF HEATTH -

REQUEST IOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206; Docket No. 030-01786 (Ucense No.194X)29610); DD'97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

NORTHEAST UTILTriFS REQUEST FOR ACTION. PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. 6 2.206; Docket Nos. 54245, 54336, 50-423, 54213 'Ucense Nos. DPR-21, DPR-65. NPF-49, DPR-61); DD-97-21, 46 NRC 108 (1997)

NORTHERN STA1T.S POWER COMPANY l INDEPENDENT SPfRT TUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER l (Tertrunaung Proceeding); Docket No. 72-18-ISFSI (ASLBP No. 97 720 01 ISFSI); LBP-97-13, 46 I NRC ll (1997) s I

1 I

I

_.I I CASE NAME INDEX REQULST IOR ACTION, DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. 62 206 Docket Nos M282, 34306, 7210, DD 9718, 46 NRC 33 (1997)

REQUFST IOR ACTION, DIRLLTOR'S DiflSION UNDER 10 C.F R.12.206, Docket No. 72-10, DD-97 24, 46 NRC 189 (1997)

RAIJH L TITRICK REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR; Docket No 55-20726-SP; CLI-9710,46 NRC 26 (1997)

SOUTHIRN CALilORNIA LDISON COMPANY, er al.

REQUEST FOR ACTION, DIRILTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R. 6 2.206, Docket Nos. 54361, 50 362. DD-97-23, 46 NRC 168 (1997)

YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY REQUEST IOR ACTION, DIRECTOR'S DECIslON UNDER IC C.F R. 52.206, Docket No. 34309-,

DD 97-17, 46 NRC !) (1997) l I

l l

4 i

1

)

i 2

1 l

l T I o

.)

_l I i

5 DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

. ~

CLI 97-8 ATLAS CORPORATION (Moab, Utah Facihry), Docket No. 40 3453-MLA, MATERIALS f LICLNSE AMENDMINI'. August ( 1997; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A The Commission concluded that the Peuconer for meervenuon had failed to demonstrate standing 7 The Cornmission therefore desed his appeal of de Presiding Officer's order denying lus peution to intervene. [

H The Commisuon or6nanly defers to Licensing Board stan&ng deternunauons, and sees no legal C error or abuse of diurcuon m the Presidmg Ofhccr's refusal to grant stan&ng to a Peutioner to intervene, f given has failure to offer morc than general responses to the Presi&ng Othcer's reasonable and clearly -

~

aruculated requests for more spvinc informauon about his prounuty-based stan&ng clama De four opponuruues that the Petiuover had a specify his clams were entnely adequate. $

CLI-97 9 INTERNATIONAL URAN!Uwl (USA) CORPORATION (White Mesa Uranium Mill). Docket No. 40 8681 MLA (Alternate fred Matenait M ATERIALS LICENSE AMENDMENT; August 7.1997, 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R A in response to a letter that included (l) ah appeal of a Preu

  • Ofhcer's deasion denying 2 Peuuoners standmg, (2) movmg for reconsideranon of the & cision, and (3) c- ivmg to reopen &e record. I J the Comnussion instructs the Preu&ng Ofhcer to pass upon the two monons The Comnussion concludes ~ }

that the Prcudmg Ofhccr's gremer fanshariry with the pnor proceedmg and pleadings in this case rendered g him better equipped than the Comnunion to make prompt irunal ruhngs ou the nrnts of the two motions. *Zi it The Comminion daapproves of the pracoce of simultaneously seding reconuderauon of a 3-Prenang Ofhccr's decision and hhng an appeal of the sane ruhng, because taking that approach would [

call for ruhngs on the sane suues at the same une from teth a trial and appellate forum.

C Decause the Presidmg Olheer's greater fanubanty with the pnor proceeding and pleadings in this '_

case renders lum better equipped than the Comnusuon to make prompt inmal ruimgs on the ments of the a ,

monons for reconsideration and reopemng of the record, the Conmussion instructs him to pass upon those 2 monons. notwithstandmg the pendency of the appeal _

CLI-97-10 R ALPH L TETRICK (Demal of Apphcahon for Reactor Operator License), Docket No. 55-20726 C SP, REACIOR OPERATOR LICENSE. August 7,1997; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDLR e

~

A The Comnusuon grants the NRC Staff's Nation for Review and reverses the Presiding Ofhcer's dectuon requmng issuance of a Semor Reactor Operator (SRO) heense. The Comnusuon disagrees with the 7 Preudmg Ofheer's conclusions that the NRC Staff should have anticipated the need to offer evidence hnd argunwnts on the issue whether the candidate's SRO u munation score should be rounded up to a passing 7 pa'e of 80%, and that the Staff's fasture to anucipate this need precludes their raismg such rguments and i evidence on reconsiderauon. The Comnuuton also diungreed with the Presiang Officer's decision to round -

up the SRO emanunanon score, but agreed with lum that de can&date had incorrectly arnwered Quesuon 63 of the exanunauon.

B Although the Staff could reasonably have anuapated both that he might rule in the SRO can&date's favor on one of the exam quesuons and that such a ruhng would rune his score to either a 79 59 (question deleted) or 79 It0 (Cuesuon graded in candidate's favor), the Staff need not have further anticipawd that the Presi&ng Ofhcer would then tourul the revised score upward to the next integer C The veruon of NUREG 1021 in effect at the time the can&date took lui exam did not address roun&ng erectly but did state that a successful appbcant must answer correctly "at least 80 percent" of die questions on the wntien exanunauon. De phrase "at least" on its face suggests strongly that it0% is the mirumal acceptable score and that roundmg up tower scores is impernussible 3

_ l 1 DIGESTS -

ISSUANCES OF THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION D .'. Agency practice is one in&cator of how an agency inscrprets its regulations. Given that de Staff itself set the 80% threshold an de Brat place, du Conumanion is &sinchned to disturb its consistently held view. -

E- - he NRC's mcent revision of NUREG 1021 to replace the minimum passmg grade of *80 percent" with '8000 percent

  • does not support an implication that the former term perruted roundmg and therefore needed correction. Rather, the revision was akin both to the clarifymg regalatory amendnrms that the

' Commission and other agewies regularly promulgate and to the clanfying legislauon that Congress regularly

enacts. .

- F._ - Tlw decision whether to round up near; passing scores regeres a puhey chuce. Esther option is plausible. Here. in de adjudicatory setung. the Comnussion dechnes to set aside the NRC Staffs pokey judgnwrd, supporwd by the language of NUREG 1021, so draw the pass fail hne at 80% nuairnum.

whhout roun&ng up. When the Presi&ng Ofhcer ordered rounang up on the ground diat the SRO wntren enanunauona are not so precise that tenths of a percent have any mranmg and essentially reduced the pensing score from 80% to 79.5%. he stepped into a Staff area of tesponsMhty-CLI-97 l1 - LDUIS!ANA ENERGY SERVICES. L.P. (Claibone Ennchment Center), Docket No. 70 3074Ml; MATERIALS LICENSE; September 3,1997; ORDER A The Conunission remands to the Atonne Safety and Licensing Board one issue for clanhcation, before taking actmn on three pen &ng peuuons for reyww of de Atonus Safety and Ucensmg Boar (s Partial Initial Decision LDP-97-), 45 NRC 99 (1997), resolving deconumassomng fun &ng matters Tte termnded issue concerns the Board's hn&ng that the NRC Staffs calculanons of dose impacts from deep-nure disposal of waste to be produced at de Claiborne Enrichtnent Center was reasonable.

~ CLI-97 !2 - LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES LP. (Claiborne Enrichnent Center). Docturt No. 70 3070 ML.

MATERIALS LICENSE; September 19.1997. ORDER .

A. The Comerussion denies Cstizens Against Nuclear Trash's rnation for reconsiderauon of CLI 18,46 NRC 49 (1997), In CLt-97 ll, the Comnussion remanded for clari6 cation one issue decided by

. the Atonne Safety and ucensing Board in its decision on waste dispo6al and decomnussiomng fun &ng,

' LBP 97-3,45 NRC 99 (1997) The remanded issue involves the Boar (s finding that the NRC Staffs calculabons of dose impacts from deep mine disposal of waste to be produced at de Claiborne Ennchnent center is reasonable, j

e I

i

/

I, l 4 Fi: ,

c f ,

-y. x m

__ l I DIGESTS ISSUANCidli Ol' THE 4TOMIC SAf'ETY AND I,1 CENSING BOARDS LBP 9712 INil.RNATIONAL URAN 1UM (USA) CORPORATION (Wlute Mesa Ursuum Ma!!). Docket No. 448681 M1A (ASLBP No. 97-726MMLA) (Re: Ucense Anendarm)(Alternate feed Macrial); ", ;

MATERIA!J LICENSE AMLNDMINf; July 23, 1997, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying a 4 lleanag)  ;-

A Even after receivmg detsled guidance from the Presi&ng Officer, Peutionere have nos Aled /,

plea &ngs that denenstrate an injury in fact resulung from du proposed hcease anendnum They are, I tirrefore, nos enutled to a heanng. '

D A nramum null requested a hcense anendnrnt to receive a efferent kind of feedstock naterial [*

without any sncrease in tis amount of radioacuve matenal processed or esposed of. An allegauon by sons  ;

nauve Anwrican neighbors thn they have been &scnnunated against by de hcense amendnwnt does not _

dennonnuste any inymper discrmunauon agamat them.

J LilP 9713 NORTHERN ST ATES POWI R COMPANY (Independent Spent twl Storage Installauon). Docket -

No. 7218151 SI (ASillP No.97-720 01 15l S!); INDLPENDENT SITNT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLA. ,.

TION, July 30, 1997; MLMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ternunating Proceceng) / -

A The Ucensing Board grams de Apphcant's mopon to withdraw its apphcauon and sernunate de proceeding, (Tim Board thereafter on August 7,1997, considered a peuuon for reconsideranon of this 7-: 3 Order ) J ^

LDP 9714 INTL:RNATIONAL URANIUM (USA) CORPORATION (White Mesa Uramum Mill). Docket I,.

~-

No. M8681.MLA (ASLilP No 97-72643 MLA) (Re: Ucenne Anundment)(Ahernate fred Matenal);

MA1ERIALS UCENSE AMLNDMENT, September 4,1997, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Mutmns for Reconsiderauon, To Reopen de Record)

[

A fvutioners' mouon for reconsiderauon is deraed becauw tiry inve not provided any informanop.

beyond conjecture, that the tehngs of wluch they complain represent an increased health or safety hazard .

IYunoters sult have not net tte prerequisisc for standmg that they show that they are injured by the proposed 3 acuan in ilus ancruiment case, Ituunners must show that the amendnunt nmy injure ttrm or somerme they are aushortzed to repre.sent They have not &me that hence, de nwoon for reconsiderabon is dened  ;

~

for failure to simw that the Presi&ng Ofhccr has made a inatenal error v4 law or fact.

B The rnouon to reopen the record also is denied. No adenonal evidence han heen presented for i adnussion into de record and dere was no showing that the neuon was unely.10 C.F R. 4 2.734 LI5P 9715 AHARON BENHAIM, Ph D (Upper Montclmr New Jersey), Docket No IA 974m8 (ASLBP No. /.

97-731-01.EA)(Order Superse&ng Order Prohshaung involvenent in NRC.ucensed Activines, Effective finnweately), LNf0RCEMLNT ACTION; September 25.1997; PREHEARING CONI 1RENCE ORDER 7 (Denying Rescission and Istubbstung Schedules) .#-

A The Atonne Safety and Ucensing floard issues a Memorandum and Order that confirms an oral

]

l ruling at a prehranng conferena denying, pursuant to 10 C F R 6 2 202(c M2NI), a request for rescassnm of  :

an smnreately effecove order issued by the NRC Staff B An inwne&arely eff, cove enforcenrnt order issued by the NRC Staff rnay be challenged pursuant J

to 10 C.I' R. I 2 202(cN2Xi).

C An inune&ately effective order nmy be challenged as not bawd on adequaw evidence, which tie Commission has equaird so " probable cause."

l l

._ l I DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TifE ATOMIC SAFETY AND t ICENSING ROARDS D The rnovant challengmg an imnreately effecuve Staff enforcemem order bears the burden of going forward to denenstrate that the Staff's order as not founded on adequate evidence, but the Staff has the ulumate burden of persuauon on whether the requisite standard has been satided E Claims of a movant under 10 C F R.12.202(c)(2Xi) may properly suggest the caistence of factual d sputes. but they may not be sufhcient to demonstrare lack of probable cause for a Staff imnr&asely effecove order.

LIIP-9716 IRANK L CALABRESE JR. (Demal of Senior Reactor Operator license). Docket No. $5-68425 SP (ASLDP No. 97 725 02 SP), REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSE; September 26.1997, INff!AL DECISION ,

A in this informal procee&ng concermng a challenge by Ivank J Calabrese Jr. to the NRC Staff's proposed denial of his apphcanon for a semor reactor operator (SRO) heense, the Presi&ng Ofncer concludes the Staff's acuon should be afhrmed and the applicauon demed because the appheant did not follow facshty procedures regar&ng rapid depreuunzauon dunng the simulator poruon of lus SRO emanunauon operaung test.

B When the credbshty of vanous afhants is at the center of the parties' espute, de presidsng ofheer would have to convene an oral presentauon session to receive tesumony. See 10 C F R.12.l235.

C Docurrents heanng de NUREG designation generally do not estabbsh regulatory requirenrnts.

See, e g , General Pahlic Urdmes Nuclear Corp (Oyster Creek Nuclear Generaung Stauon) LBP 971. 45 NRC 7,23 (1997)(ciung cases).

D While heedful of the dacreuon afforded the Staff in malung sts reactor gerator etanunabon determinauons a presieng ofHcer properly can look to NUREG-1021 as an important source in anessmg whether the Staff has strayed too far aheld ofits stated twin goals of " equitable and consistent" exanunadon adnumstrador.. C/ Aalph L Terrick (Denial of Apphcanon for Reactor Operator I) cense). CLJ-9710,46 NRC 26, 3132 (1997) (because agency practice is one indicator of how agency interprets regulations.

consisteruly held Staff view on operator tesung pohey matter will not be d:sturbed).

E Given the " snapshot" nature of de simulator portion of the operating test process, the quahry of an apphcant's critical decisionmaking dunng a crucial test interval, no matter how bnef in reladon to the rest of the test was an appropriate yardstick for taking the nuasure of de appbcant's performance.

F Although there muy well be a &fference between the Staff's muessment of the safety sigm6cance of

" actual" and "potennal" events at a functionang facihty, in the samulator poruon of the operator test process in whach de Staff ja muening whether it shnutd pernut an apphcant to be placed as a reactor opermor at such a facility when his acuan (or inacuan) can cause such an " actual" event, the &sunctson between

" potential" and " actual" events is one that has sigmhcantly less resonance, particularly if the consequences of die apphcanfs acuvines ultinately can resuh in senous reactor core damage.

G The following techmcui issue is discuned: Reactor operator resung.

l 6

7 l

_l 1 I ,

/

DIGFSTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS 2

4 DD 9717 MAINE YANKLE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY and YANKi1 ATOMIC EllLTRIC COM.

PANY (Maine Yankee Atonuc Power Stauon), Docket No. 54309; REQUEST IUR ACTION, July 30, 1997; DIRI4 TOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. I 2.206 A The Director of the Of6ce of Nuclear Reactor Regafanon grants in part a peuuan dated August 19,19%, subervued to the Nuclear Regulatory Comnussion by Patrick M. Sears (Peutioner). The peuuon requests 1 hat tie NRC: (1) Ane Maine Yankee Atorme Power Conpany (MYAPCO) and Yankee Atonue /

Ilectric Company (YALC)if records regarding use of the computer code RELAPSYA have not been las in f accordance with YALC's computer code quainy assurance procedures, and (2) impect all users of RELAP 2 and Ane those users not operaung withan required computer code verincation procedures. I B Decause there is no basis to conclude the the problems idenoned with the RELAPS/ MODI vintage .

ECCS code used by flYAPCO are or tray be present en the different RELAP code vintages at other NRC.  ;

hcensed plums, because de two other users of the RELAPS/ MODI vmtage code have been inspected or  ;,

we permanently shut down, and because the NRC will conduct computer code inspecuons of selected NRC 2 licensees and vendors, not hnuted to mers of RIIAP, Peuuoner's first request is granted in part By virtue of the NRC Sta#'s previous and current inspecuon and review acovines, Ituuoner's second request is

(,.

f ,

} ,#

granted in part - -

DD 9718 NORTHF5 a UTES POWLR COMPANY (Prairw Island Nrclear Getermung Plant, Prmrie Island y3 Independent Spnt hiel Sim ige Instalianon), DD-9718,46 NRC 35 (1997); R14UEST IUR ACTION, C2 August 29,19t 7; DIRECTOT$ DECISION UNDLR 10 C.F R. I 2 206 --

A 1he Director of th; Ofhce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation demes a prouan 6ted by dw Prune -

Island Insa, Comnerury Mrsuant to 10 C F R. 9 2.206. The penuon asked thm de NRC. (!) had that ,

tim Ucenwe violated NRC reguistions by using an independent Spent hiel Storage intallauon t= fore i estabbstung coneuuns for safely unloadirig TN-40 dry storage centsiners (2) suspend the license until all sigruhcant assues concermng de unloaang process have been resolved, (3) provide de Peuboners with an

(

opportusty to parucipaw fully in reviewmg the unloa&ng procedures for the casks, and (4) update de f relevant technical specincauons to incorporate mandatory unlomang procedere requnenents for de TN.40 -

dry storage conteners.

DD 9719 CONNILTICUT YANK 12 ATOMIC POWER COMPANY (!!addarn Neck Plant), Docket No.

$0 213. RT QULST IOR Act"ON; September 3,1997; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R 6 2 206 A Hy letter dmed March 11, 1997, Ms Rosemary Dassihikis subnuned a peuuan on behalf of de '

Ciuzens Awareness Network and the Nuclear Informauon and Resource Service (Petitioners) pursuant to 10 C F R. 6 2 205, requesung that the NRC (1) issue a large civil penahy against the Connerucut Yankee Atonne Power Company (CY) to ensure its canphance with safety-tuned ta&ological control rouunes; (2) mo&fy C'."s bcense for de Haklam Neck facility to protutnt any deconwrvisiumng acovity at dw facihry untd a 6-month period passes without my comanunauon events occurring; and (3) place de Haddam Neck facihty on the NRC Watch Us:

D in a Director's Decision dated September 3,1997, the Director of Nuclear Reactor Peguimion respecovely deferred and denied Peuuoners' requests. The Director concluded that h would be premature j at this time to rule on IYuuoners' hru request, as de NRC is currendy considering enforcement acuon with -

reged to failed radiation program controls at de Haddam Neck faclhry. Peutioners'second request was j denied on du basis of past environnental and esposure reports, as well as the presence of an onute NRC j Senior Remdent Inspector and certma nrasures numanalized in a Conhrmatory Acuan titter. Similarly, 1 7

l 1

~l l 1

l l

_J I DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS de Director demed Peduoners' third request due both to the Haddan Neck facihty hemg permanendy shut down as well as other acuons taken in response to idenuhed dehciencaes at de facility.

DD 97 20 IlDRIDA POWER & LIGrf COMPANY (St. Lucie Nm. lear Power Plant. Umts I and 2; Turkey Pennt Nuclew Generaung Plant, Umtr 3 and 4). Docket Nos. 50 250, 54 251, 54 335, % 389- REQUEST ,

FOR ACf10N, September 8,1997; DIRfCOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206 A The Director of de Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatio has granted in part and demed in part a petidun Aled by Thomas J. Saponto, Jr., on behalf of himself awl the National Utiganon Consuhantt The Peudoners requested that the NRC take certan actions with regard to Flonda Power & Light Company (I'PL). inclu&ng taking escalated enforcenent accoa agmast in and certan of its employees, granong the fYouoners an interview, and taking various other accons. As grounds for their request, the ittitioners asserted that the NRC's failure to take enforcenent acdon against FR on the basis of a Secretaryl LWs Aneng shat FPL violated the Energy Reorgamzadon Act (ERA) when se retaliated against Mr. Sape..e for raining nuclear safety concerns has resuhed m a "ctulhng effect* and conunued diactmunation aganst other IR employees, that FPL and na managers are hable for creanng a hostile work environrnent at FPL's Turkey Point facihty and have failed to stop hwassnent ofimd esenminauon agasnst Mr Saponto, and that de record in this case shows the erect participation of Mr. Saponto's "chan of command"in de retahacon agenst Mr Saponto. With regard to the Peutioners' request for an interview, tius has been granted,in all other cespects the peauon in demed.

B An employee may not be disenrrunated agasnst by an employer for conung erectly to the NRC with safety concerns. Nonedeless, an employee may also be required by the employer to hnng these sane concerns to the employee's managenent. Wtetter an employee must hnns issues to beensee managenent is dependr nt on the facts of each specific case.

DD-97 21 NORTHEAST UTILfrlES (Mailstone Nuclear Power Stauon, Umts 1. 2. and 3; Haldam Neck Plano, Docket Nos. 50 245,50-336, 54423,50 213 (license Nos. DPR-21, DPR-65. NPF 49, DPR-61),

REQUI3T IOR ACTION. September 12,1997; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R.

I 2.206 A The Director, Ofhee of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon, issues a Parbal Director's Decision, responeng so a vanety ui requests made in a peouon 6 led by the Citizens Awareness Network (CAN) and tie Nuclear Informanon and Resource Service (NIBS), heremafter referred to as Peutioners. Petitioners' requests were erected at Ncrtheast Utihues (NU) and specihcally its operanon of its nuclear facehues in Connecdcut.

Petiuoners' requests for rehef included imme& ate suspension or revocation of NU's bcenses, conunued shutdown of NU facihues. conunued haung of NU facibues on the NRC's Watch Ust, hautauons on precanunissioning or iecomnussiomng of any NU facihty, and investigations by the NRC into asserted wrongdoing on the part of NU.

R The Director deferred Peudoners' requests concerning asserted NU wrong &>ing unul NRC Staff consideration of thas issue is completed A l'inal Director's Decision will then be issued. With regard to Pentioners' remamng requests, those requests were granted or denied in whole or in part as set forth in the Paruni Director's Decision.

DD-97-22 NATIONAL INSTITIJrES OF HEALTH (Bedrada, Maryland), Docket No. 03401786 (license No.194029610); REQUEST FOR ACTION, September 17,1997; DIRECTUR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. I 2.206 A The Director of the Ofha of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards grants in part and denies in cart a peution dated October 10.1995, submatted to the Nuclear Regulatory Comnussion (NRC) by Maryann Wenii Ma. M D., Ph D., and Bsil Wenhng Zheng, M.D , Ph.D. (Pentioners). The peuuon requests that NRC suspend or revoke the matertals license of the Nanonal Institutes of Health (NDl) pen &ng resoluuon of the issues raised by the peution, and that NRC take other appropnate enforcenrnt action, mclueng die imposinos of civil penalues against N14 for willful and reckless violations of 10 C.F.R. Pat 20. Broadly

{

stated, de lYtiooners assert thai, as the erect and proximate result of NIH's (1) debberate failure to control j and secure radioactive materials la violadon of 10 C F.R (( 20.1801 and 20.1802 (2) failure to maintan i an effective bionssay program, and (3) future to otherwise adhere to the requirernents of Part 20. Dr. Ma )

was contaminated with phosphorus 32 (P-32), resulung in both her and her unborn fetus receiving intakes j of radioactive material sigmacantly in escess of regulatory linuts, ad&tional NIH employees also bems j internally contarmnated with P 32, and failure of NIH to take proper accons to assess accurately the level of Dr. Ma's internal contaminanon or provide appropriate toedical care and followup treatment.

l 8

i I

s

_l I.

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS 11 The Director demes Ivouoners' requests for enforcenum acuon against NIH. for the exposure of Dr. Ma beyond regulatory bnuts, for the esposure of Dr. Ma's fetus, and for the contanunation of the waar cooler; regwding nouhcanon to Dr. Ma of her lewl of contanunauon, regarding Dr. Ma's declaration of pregnancy; regarding the conduct of surveys after Dr. Ma's conaumnation; and for the fa !ure to accurately calculate Dr Ma's occupanonal radiation done. The Director demes these requests, as weu as the requent

- to suspend or revoke the NIH hcense, because Peaconers did not provide sufficient bases to warrant such actions. The Directar granted in part Pentioners' request for enforcernent action agenst NIH for violanons of NRC secunty and control requirenwnts and for violation of NRC requirements related to radiatico safety training, ordering radicartin materials, inventor,y control of radioacave matenals, momtonag, and the issuance, use, and collecuon of dominrtry. The Duector granted Petitioners' rec,uest for NRC action to ensure adequate procedures and insuuctior's to exposed persons for sample collection as described below.

DDL97 23 SOlffHERN CALIIORNIA EDISON COMPANY, er af (San Onofre Nuclear Generaong Station, Unita 2 and 3), Docket Nos. S361. D362; Septeneer 19,1997; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF R. I 2.206 A The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulauon demes a peution hied pursuant to 10 C F.R. 6 2.206 by Stephen Dwyer on September 22,1996, asking the Nuclear Regulauwy Cr,nurussion to shut down the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unita 2 and 3, pending a complete review of the seismic risk based on new information gadered at the Landers and Northndge carthquakes DD-97-24 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY (Goodhue County Independent Spent hief Storage Facihty), Docket No 72-10; REQUEST FOR ACTION, September 26,1997. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. I 2.206 A The Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards denies a pection hied by r'lorence Township, Minnesota, on August 26,1996. The Peuuoner ai,ked that the NRC And that Northern Simes Power Company (NSP) had violated NRC regulations by not pernutung Lake City, Mannesota, the opportunity to comrnent on the enwrgency plan for a proposed independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSD before submming the plan to the NRC. On that basis, Petinoner asked that a civil penalty be irnpowd. In aktiuon, Petitioner asked that the NRC reject NSP's application and tequire NSP to take certain actions with regard to the ISFSI applicanon.

9

c . . . ..

_I I i

4 LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASFS Ash v. Folke Commusmner of Boston, il Mass. App. 650, 653, 418 N.E.2d 622, 624 (1981) roun&ng-up of test scores; CU-9710, 46 NRC 32 n 8 (1997)

Clewland Dactric Illammaring Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plans, UrJts I atul 2), CU-86 7, 23 NRC 233, 235 (19 % )

standard lor grant of innuon for reconsideradon; LBP 9714, 46 NRC 59 (1997)

Commonwealth Muun Co. (Byron Nuclear Power Stabon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-770,19 NRC 1863.

!!68, 1181 82 (1984) jurishetion to proceed oc remanded issue that is pendsng on appeal; CU 9712. 46 NRC 53 n.1 (1997) /

Curators of the Universary of Musauri, CU-95-1,41 NRC 71,94 (1995) --

junsectmo to rule on trouens for reconsideranon and to reopen, CU.97-9. 46 NRC 24 (1997) f Curators of the Universary of Mussourt, I. BPM 18, 31 NRC 559, 566 (1990) -

interpretauon of injury in~ fact standard for intervenuon in matenals hcense anrndment proceeeng. /

LBP 9712. 46 NRC 6 o 4 (1997)

Desrort Eduon Co. (Enrico fernu Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2). LBP 78 37, 8 NRC 575, 583 (1978)

(

i auttmrization for orgamzational stan&ng to intervene; LBP 97-14, 46 NRC 57 n 2 (1997) -/

Eastern Testing sad Inspection, Inc., LBP 949. 43 NRC 211,21516 (1996)

Mequate evidence" standard for imnweately effecove order; LBIL9715, 46 NRC 63 (1997)

((

General rubtsc Urlines Nuclear Corp. (Oyster Creek Nuclear Genernong Station), LBP-971,45 NRC 7. -

25 (1997) status of regulatory gmdes, Lisp 9716, 46 NRC 86 (1997) I Georgia Instatsse of Technology (Georgia Tech Research Reactor, Atlanta, Georgia), CU-95-10, 42 NRC 1,  ;

2 (1995) _

remand of issue to licensing board for clan 6cauon. CU-97 II,46 NRC 51 (1997)

Horne Arathers, Inc. v. loerd, 463 F.2d 1268,1271 (D C. Car 1972) ,,

adequato evidence standard for imnedsately effective order; LBP 97-15, 46 NRC 63 (1997)

Houstra Urhiins and Power Co. (Allena Creek Nuclear Generaung Station, Unit 1) ALAB-535,9 NRC 377, 393-94, 3 % (1979) authonzanon for organizaconal stan&ng to intervene; LBP-9714, 46 NRC 57 n 2 (1997)

Housma Ughtmg and &mer Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Generaung Sutuon, Unit I), ALAB-630,13 NRC 84, 85 (1981) appeal fled simultaneour,1y wnh motion for reconsideranon, Comnussion posiuon on, CU-97 9, 46 NRC 24 (1997)

Houston Ushring sad Amer Co. (South Texas Project, Umts I and 2), ALAB-549, 9 NRC 644. 646-47 (1979), ed'd, LBP-7910, 9 NRC 439, 447-48 (1979) authonzauon for organizouonal standing to intervene; LBP-97-14. 46 NRC 57 n.2 (1997) ,.<

/emudana ruwer A Dght Co. (Waterfo d Steam Electnc Stadon, Umt 3), CU 861,23 NRC 1,6 (1986) standard for grant of monon for seconsiderauon; LBP-97-14, 46 NRC 59 (1997)

Marquez v. University of Washinprost 32 Wash. App. 302, 309, 648 P.2d 94. 98 (1982) roun&ng up of test scores; CLI-97-10, 46 NRC 32 n 8 (1997)

Mdninsh v Borough of ManAanan Community Collere, 78 A D 2d 839, 433 N Y.S 2d 446, 447 (1st Dept.

1980), af'd, 55 N.Y.2d 913, 915, 433 N.E 1d 1274,1275, 449 N Y S 2d 26, 27 (;982) roun&ng up of erst scores; CLl 97-10, 46 NRC 32 n.8 (1997) 11 4'

1 H:

s. . -. - 3.

_ l. I 1

r -

k LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES

' Metropolitan Edswn Ce v. PANE 460 U.S. 766,172 79 (1983) spintual and psychological effects of hcensing accons. LBP 97-12, 46 NRC 9 (1997)

PANE v. NRC, 678 F 2d 222, 249 53 (D C. Cir,1982) spiritual and psychological effects of licensing accons; LBP 97-12, 46 NRC 9 (1997)

Philadelphia Electek Ca (Umerick Generming Stacon, Units I and 2), ALAB 726.17 NRC 755, 757 -

'(1983); AIAn 823,22 NRC 773 (1985)

" junsdiction to proceed on remanded bsue that h pemhng on uppeal; CU-9712. 46 NRC 53 n.1

~

. ! (1997) forrland General Electrk Ca (Trojan Nuclear Plant), ALAB-627.13 NRC 20, 21 a 6 (1981) junsdiction of presiding ofncer to rule on nusuo,na for reconsideration and to reopen; CU 97-9,46 NRC (1997) . . .

Publie Service Ca of Indiana (Marble Hs!! Nuclear Generating Station. Ucits i and 2), LBP 86 37, 24 NRC 719,724 (1986) ternunation of proceeding where no Notice of Heanng has been haned; LBP 9713,46 NRC 12 (1997)

Ralph L Terrki (Denial of Applicanon for Reactor Opermor License), CU.97-5, 45 NRC 355, 356 (1997)

- remand of haue to licensms board for clan 6 cation; CLI 97 II. 46 NRC 51 (1997)

Ralph L Terrki (Denial of Apphcation for Reactor Operator License). CLI-9710, 46 NRC 26, 3132 (1997) authonty of presiding ofhcer tc assess Staff adherence to " equitable and consment" enanunation adnunistration goals: LBP 97-16,46 NRC 86 l1997)

Arifty v. levirt. 1988 WL 49187 m *4 (S D N1 May 6,1988) roumbng-up of test scores; CLI-97-10,46 NRC 32 n 8 (1997)

Rodwell insernasmnal Corp (Rocketdyne Dsvision), ALAB-925, 30 NRC 709. 722 a 15 (1989), afd, CLIW5, 31 NRC 337 (1990) . .

weight given to NRC Staff policy judgments; CLI 9710. 46 NRC 32 (1997)

St. Joseph Radhology Aswelates. Inc., LBP 92-34. 36 NRC 311 (1992) interpretatior. of "other evidence relied on"; LBP-9715, 46 NRC 63 n.2 (1997)

Wons r<ms Jung v. McGrash. 339 U.S. 33, 47, modified. 339 U.S. 908 (1950) weight given to NRC Staff pokey judgments; CU-9710, 46 NRC 32 n.7 (1997) '

LnAre Atomk Electric Ca (Yankee Nuclear Power Stauon), CU 96-6, 43 NRC 123.129 (1996) agency practice as indicator of ho= agency interprets its regulations; CLI-9710, 46 NRC 3132 (1997)

Laker Atomk Eterrrec Ca (Yankee Nuclear Power Stauon) CU 96 7. 43 NRC 235, 247 n.6 (1996)

- argument on appeal by prevaihng pany, scope of, CLI 9710,46 NRC 28 n 1 (1997)

EnAre Atomk Electrk Ca (Yankee Nuclear power Station), CLI 96-7,43 NRC 235, 248 (1996, weight givra to licensing board determinations of manding to intervene; CU-97 8, 46 NRC 22 (1997) c jk-t.

12'

'a n .

a

._ I I

\

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 C.FA 2.105 /

hearieg rights on materials Dcenses; DD 97 24, 46 NRC 191 (1997) 10 C.F R 2.107(s) authonty to grant mouon for wnnination of proceeding; LBP-9713,46 NRC 12 (1997) 10 C.F.R. 2.202 rnodshcauon of bcense to prevent decornnussiomng activ uu, DD.9719,46 NRC 92 (1997) 10 C F R. 2.202(cX2Xi) interpretation of "other evidence rehed on"; LBP 9715, 46 NRC 63 o 2 (1997) -

hcenmng board authonty to consider rwission request; LBP-97-15,46 NRC 62 (1997) /

10 C F IL 2.206 -

decommisasoning activmes, safety concerns; DD 97 21, 46 NRC 109-29 (1997) -

nuierial misrepresentauons and quahty assurance violadons request for acuon on; DD 97-21, 46 NRC ,

109-29 (1997) I f opportunity to comntnt on ernergeucy plan for proposed independent spent fuel storage installation; (^

DD-97 24, 46 NRC 189-93 (1997) -

radiological controla dunng decomrrussioning, dehciencies in; DD-97-19, 46 NRC 92-95 (1997) recordkeeping og use of computer-code quality assurance procedures, dc6ciencies in; DD-9717,46 NRC 14 20 (1997)

][

seismic risk in hght of landers and Northndge earthqv.kes; DD'97 23, 46 NRC 168-88 (1997) --

une of independent spent fuel storage installauco before establishing standards for safely unloading dry ,- [

storage casks. DD-97-18. 46 NRC 35-48 (1997) willful and reckless violations of Part 20, request for accon for; DD97 22,46 NRC 13!47 (1997) f work environment for raising safety concerns; DD-97 20, 46 NRC 97-107 (1997) 10 C F R 2.714a review of decision terminanng proceeding; LDP 9713, 46 NRC 12 (1997) 10 C F R 2.734 standard for grant of muuon for reconsiderabon; LBP 9714, 46 NRC 59 (1997) standard for grant of neuon to reopen; LBP-9712,46 NRC 9 (1997) timchness of nmtion to reopen; LBP 9714, 46 NRC 59 (1997) 10 C.F R 2.700 Anahey of decision acrminating proceedmg; LBP 9713, 46 NRC 12 (1997)

  • 10 C F R. 2.771 . g content of petitions for reconsiderataon; LBP 97-12, 46 NRC 9 (1997) 10 CF.12 771(b) starulard for grant of motion for reconsiderauon; LBP-9714, 46 NRC 59 (1997) 10 C.FR 2.786 deadline for peutions for revww of intu41 decision; IEP 9716, 46 NRC 90 (1997) ,

10 C.F R 2.786(bX2)(3) pleading regturements for peutions for teview; LBP 9716, 46 NRC 90 (1997) 10 C.FIL 2.786(bX2F(6) pleading requirements for peucons for review; LBP-9712, 46 NRC 9 (1997) 13 4

-h

~

__I I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGl)LATIONS 10 Cf R. Part 2, Subpart L challenge to results of reactar operator heense exanunanon. LBP-9716,46 NRC 68 (1997) anocons to reopen informal proceedings. LBP 9712, 46 NRC 9 n 9 (1997) 10 Cf.R. 2.1203(e) ceruncare-of.rervice requirements for pleadings in informal proceed ngs; CLI-97 9. 46 NRC 24 n.1 (1997) 10 Cf.R. 2.1205(n) appeal of denial of intervention pedtions; LBP-97-12, 46 NRC 9 (1997) 10 C F R. 2.1231 NRC Staff responsibihty to subnut hearing 6te con *cermng its accon on senior reactor operator apphcanon, LBP-9716, 46 NRC 69 (1997) 10 CJ R. 2.1233(a) opportumty of applicant to respond to Staff's written presentauon on its acdon on senior reactor operator license; LBP 9716, 46 NRC 69, 82 (1997) 10 Cf R. 2.1235 credibihty of afRama in informal proceedings; LBP-9716, 46 NRC 85 (1997) 10 Cf.R. 2.1237(b) burden in challenging NRC Staff scoring of reactor operator exanunauon; LBP-97-16,46 NRC 68 (1997) 10 Cf.R. 2.1251(a) nnahty of 6mtial decision; LBP 9716,46 NRC 90 (1997) 10 C F.R. 2.1253 deadhne for pentions for review of imual decision; LBP 97-16. 46 NRC 90 (1997) 10 Cf.R.1911(c) posung of form desenbing ernployee rights and protecdon, licensee responashihty for; DD-97 20, 46 NRC 106 (1997) 10 Cf R.1913 licensee obligations following radiological esposure events; DD-97-22, 44 NRC 152 (1997) 10 Cf R.1913(d) nou8 canon of contaminated indmdual about radiacon exposunt level, requirement for; DD 97-22,46 NRC 162,164 (1997)

- 10 C F R. Part 20 procedures for handbng failed fuel in dry storage casks; DD 9718,46 NRC 42 (1997) radiation control program for decommissiomog. adequacy of. DDL9719, 46 NRC 94 (1997) willful and reckless violations of; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 13),137 (1997) 10 Cf R. 20.201 radianon surveys after contaminauon incidents; DD 97 22, 46 NRC I48 n 18 (1997) 10 Cf.R. 20.201(b) rasadon surveys after contanunation incidems; DD 97 22, 46 NRC 147 (1997) 10 Cf.k. 201003 occupational workers as dehned by; DD-97 22. 46 NRC 159 (1997) 10 C F R. 201101 ALARA standard upphed to unlomhng of dry storage casks; D(197-18,46 NRC 43 (1997) 10 Cf.R. 20.1201 responsibihty for contamination of employees; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 166 (1997) 10 C.F.R. 20.1201(a) entens of licensee obhgation to monitor occupational exposures DD 97-22, 46 NRC (1997) 10 Cf R 20.120!(aXIXi) assessment of occupation radiation exposure; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 163 (1997) occupr.tional exposure linuu for phosphorus 32; DD-97 22, 46 NRC 134,159 (1997) 10 C F.R. 201202, 20.1204 auessment of radiauon caposure; DD 97-22, 46 NRC 140 (1997) licensee obhgauons fotbwing raaological exposure events; DD 97 22, 46 NRC 152 (1997) 14 l

~

r

__l i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGt'LATIONS 10 C F R. 201204(a) masessment of internal contanunation; DD 97-22, 46 NRC 153 (1997) 10 C F.R. 2fA1208 declarauon of pregnancy and rruninuzauon of radiacon exposure; DD-97-22,46 NRC 164,165 (1997) 10 CF R. 20.1208(a) fet.d occupuuonal exposure huuts. DD 97-22, 6 NRC 165 (1997) 10 CF A 20.1301 phosphorus 32 dosages to employees from coraanunated water cooler; DD-97 22,46 NRC 135 (1997) responashibry for contarrunacon of employees, DDw97-22,46 NRC 166 (1997) 10 CFA 20.1301(a)(1) phosphorus 32 done hmits for members of the pubhc; DD 97 22,46 NRC 159 (1997) 10 C.F.R. 201501 asacssment of radiauon esposure; DD 97-2146 NRC 140 (1997) licensee obligauona following ra&ological exposure events; DD 97-22, 46 NRC 152 (1997) 10 CER. 20.1501(a), (b) radianos surveys after contarmnauon incidents; DO 97-22, 46 NRC 148 (1997) 10 CF.R. 20.1502 assessment of radiauon exposure; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 140,141 n.ll (1997) licensee obhganons following radiological exposure events; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 152 (1997) 10 C F R. 20.1502(a) entent of hcensee obligauon to momtur occupauonal caposures: DD-97 22,46 NRC 141 (1997) 10 CF.R. 201801 failure to control and secure radioacuve matenals; DD47-22, 46 NRC 131,136,137,138 (1997) 10 CF.R. 20.1802 failure to control and secure rahoactive materials; DD 97-22, 46 NRC 131,137,138 (1997) 10 C.FA 20.1905(a) ra&oacuve materials exempted from labchng requirernents of, DD-97 22, 46 NRC 138 (1997) 10 C F R. 20 2l06 applicability where monitanng of occupauonal caposures is not necessary; DD-97 22, 46 NRC 141 (1997) hcensee obligations following radiological esposure events; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 152 (1997) 10 C.F.R. 20.2106(a) recordkeeping on in&vidual momtoring results. DD-97 22, 46 NRC 141 (1997) 10 CF R. 20.2107, 20.2202 heensee obhgauons following radiological exposure events; DD 97 22, 46 NRC 152 (1997) 10 CF R. 20.2202tbXI)ti) heensee obligauon to noufy NRC of occupational exposures; DD-97 22,46 NRC (1997)

.50 CF.R. 20.2203 licensee obhgabons following radiok>gical esposure events; DD-97 22, 46 NRC 152 (1997) 10 C F R. 20 2203(aX2)(i) repurung requirements for ra&auon exposure inculents; DD 97 22,46 NRC 164 (1997) 10 CFA 20.2205, 20 2206 bcensee obligations following radiological exposure events; DD 97-22, 46 NRC 152 (1997) 10 CF.R. Part 20, Appendix H annual linut on intake of phosphorus-32; DD-97-22,46 NRC 154 (1997) 10 CF.R. Part 20, Appendan B, notes to Table i occuputional caposure hmits for phosphorus 32, DD-97-22, 46 NRC 161 (1997) 10 CF.R. Part 20 Appendia C exemptions from secunty requirements for ra&oactive matenals; DD-97 22,46 NRC 136,138 (1997) 10 C.FA 35 25, 3532

" implicit authority" to act as Radiamon Safety Of6cer; LBP 9715,46 NRC 63 n.3 (1997) 10 CF R Part 40. Appendix A receipt and pmessing of alternative fuel material, cluillenge to license amendment allowmg; LBP-9712, 46 NRC 2 (1997) 15

)

] l

_I I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 Cf R. Part 50 procedures for handhng failed fuel in dry storage casks; DD9718,46 NRC 42 (1997) 10 C.F R. 50 7 prosecuan of individuals who raise nuclear safety concerns; DD 97-20,46 NRC 97,99 n.1 (1997) 10 CER. 50 34(aHIXi) earthquake ground nmtion cons derauona in seisnue design basis; DD-97-23, 46 NRC 169 (1997) 10 CF.R. 50 46 imposioon of restricuons on upphcanon of computer codes to support bcense apphcanons; DD 9717, 46 NRC 17 (1997)

  • 10 CER. 50.54(f) computer code for analysis of small break loss-of coolard accidents; DD 97-17,46 NRC 14 (1997) heensee obbgauon to inform NRC pnar to restat of shutdown unst; DD-97 21,46 NRC lit, 112,116 (1997) 10 CER. 50 82 deconunissiomng activities repwt and cost enomates required for ternanation of license; DD-97 21,46 NRC i17 (1997) 10 CER. 50.82(aXIMi) and (ii) licensee ceruficauon of iment to cease operations; DD-97-21, 46 NRC 117 (1997) 10 C F R. 50.100 suspension of hcense pending resolution of issues regarding safe unloadmg of dry storage casks; DD-9718, 46 NRC 36, 45 n.1 (1997) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appendia A, Critenon 2 carthquake ground motion considerations in seismic design basis, DD-97-23. 46 NRC 169 (1997) 10 CER. Part 50, Appendas B calculanons in response to reactor venel mirogen imrusion evem; DD-97-21, 46 NRC 109-10 (1997) computer code verincation procedures, compliance with; DD9717,46 NRC 16,17 (1997) 10 CER. Part 50, Append s B, Cnterton Y Notice of Violabon issued for procedural dehesencies in loading anu unloading dry storage casks; DD 97-18,46 NRC 38,47 (1997) 10 C F R. Part 50, Appendia B, Cnterion XVI variation in respome to idenufied de6ciencies, DD-97-21, 46 NRC 113 (1997) 10 CER. Part 50, Appendix K nuxhhcanon of computer codes to support licenw apphcations; DD-9717,46 NRC 17 (1997) 10 C F R. Part 55 weight given to regulatory guides for examiner standards; LBP-97-16. 46 NRC 86 (1997) 10 C.F.R. 55 4 distinction between reactor operator and senior reactor operator; LBP 9716, 46 NRC 68 n.1 (1997) 10 C.F.R. 55.45(a) quahEcation items for operating test portmn of neruor reactor operatur exanunauon; LBP-97-16, 46 NRC 70, 78 (1997) 10 C.F.R. Part 72 procedures for handhog failed fuel in dry storage caks; DD-97-18, 46 NRC 42 (1997) storage system design for independent mm fuel storage installation; DD'97-18,46 NRC 37 (1997) 10 CER. 72.32(a)(l4) oplurtumty to comment on emergency plan for proposed independent spent fuel storage installation; DD-97-24,46 NRC 190,192,193 (1997) 10 CER. 72.44 technical specihcanons for independent spent fuel storage instalianons; DD 9718, 46 NRC 46 (1997) 10 C F.R. 72 60 suspension of licenes for independent spent fuel storage facihues; DD-9718, 46 NRC 45 (1997) 10 CF R. 72.82(e) preoperational testa required pnor to loading of apent fuel imo dry storage casks; DD-97-18, 46 NRC 37 (1997) 16

J. I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGUI.ATIDNS 10 C F.R 72.122 Icchnical spec 16 canons for unlomhng of dry storage casks, DD-97.!8, 46 NRC 47 (1997) 10 CER, 72.122(f) design of in& pendent spent fuel storage installacon for ready remeval of spent fuel, DD-97-18, 46 NRC 37 (1997) use of independent spent fuel storage installauon before establiesng standards for safely unlomhng dry storage caks Di>9718, 46 NRC 36. 40 41 (1997) 10 C F R. 72.150, 72.151 sechnical speci6 canons for unkmuhag of dry aurage casks; Di>9718,46 NRC 47 (1997) 10 CER. Part 100 Append:s A, !!!(c) deAnsuon of safe shutdown earthquake; DD-97-23, 46 NRC 169 a 4 (1997) 10 C.F.R. Part 100, Appendas A, Ill(d) dennition of opersong-basis enthquake; DD 97 23,46 NRC 187 (199')

10 C.F R. Part 100, Appenda A, til(g) dehnidon of capable fault;.DD-97 23, 46 NRC 170 a 6 (1997) 10 CER, Part 100. Appends: A, IV investigauons required to deternune site suitalnhty; DD-97 23, 46 NRC 170,188 (1997) 10 C F R. Part 100, Appendis A V(a) earthquake ground rnotion considerauons in scianne & sign basis, DD-97 23. 46 NRC 169 a 3 (1997) 40 C F R. Part 192, Subpats D and E considerations in grant of enarertals bcense arnendnent; LHP 9712, 46 NRC 2 (1997) 17

_l I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES Atomic Energy Act, IB2a hcenice abhganon to infmn NRC prior to restart of shutdown unit. DS97-21, 46 NRC 111 (1997) 1994 Mann. laws ch. 641, arts.1,6 (codded er %nn. Stat. SilleC77. 80 (1996) asthorizados to store spent fuel at independent spent fuel storage instalianon; DD.97-24, 46 NRC 190 (1997)

/

~

/

/ /

C~ .

Z_ *

'~

Z

'v~

/

a l

19 r

'l

__I I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX OTHERS Compact Edstion of the Or/ord Entf uh Dec wnary, Vol.1, kner L, p 160, cot 2 (Oxford Umv. Press 1979) dehmuon of "at least"; CLi-9710, 46 NRC 31 a 4 (1997)

Webster's Third New louernaswaal Dwtwnary (G AC Memam Co. l976) at 1281 Y dc6mdon of "at least"; CU-9710, 46 NRC 31 (1997)

/

\

/

/

$/

==

~C

.'- Z W T W

m 21 l

i l

i i

1

__l l a

SUBJECT INDEX ACCIDENTS, LOSS-OILCOOLANT trnall break, recordkeeping on analysis of; DD-9717, 46 NRC 13 (1997)

ADJUDICATORY DOARDS role of, CLl-9710, 46 NRC 26 (1997)

APPEALS argunents by prevailing party, senpe of, CLI-9710, 46 NRC 26 (1997) rnation for reconsideracon nied sinultaneously with; CLI 97-9, 46 NRC 23 (1997)

See also Review. Appellate ASSESSMENT of internal contarmnation, DD-97-22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

S BOARDS See Adjuecatory Boards, Licensing Boards #

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 requirenrnts for informal procee&ngs, CL1-97 9, 46 NRC 23 (1997) 7 COMPtTTER CODE I

RELAP5YA, recordkeepmg on use of DD-97-17,46 NRC 13 (1997)

CONTAINMENT [ $

air recirculanon fans service-water piping; DD-97-21,46 NRC 108 (1997) -

isolaion valves, design-related issues; DD-97 21, 46 NRC 108 (1997)

CONTAMINATION 7 enrrgency response to DD-97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997) j internal, assessrnent of; DD-97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997) j rne& cal care to reduce effects of, DD-97 22,46 NRC 130 (1997) . .

l ta&ation surveys following incidents; DD-97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

COOLING SYSTEMS i See Energency Core Cooling Systems i C01TER CONCENTRATES ra&oactivity of; LBP-97-14, 46 NRC 55 (1997)

CREDIBILTTY of witnesses, LBP 97-16, 46 NRC 66 (1997)

DiiCOMMISSIONING acoviues report and cost esumates required for termmanon of heense; DD-97-21,46 NRC 108 (1997) _

I ra&ation control program for; DD 9719, 46 NRC 91 (1997)

DECOMMISSIONING I1JNDING for deep-nune dnposal of triuranium octaoude; CL1-97-II, 46 NRC 49 (1997)

DOSE ralculanon for deep-nune esposal of waste; CLI-97-II, 46 NRC 49 (1997) l DOSIMETRY for phosphorus-33, Di>97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

DRY STORAGE CASKS reineval of failed fuel from; DD 9718. 46 NRC 35 (1997) j unloa&ng of DD 97-18. 46 NRC 35 (1997) . .

l 23 l

_I l SUHJECT INDEX EARTHQUAKE MOTION regulatory requirenrms associated with. DD-97-23. 46 NRC 368 (1997)

LARTilQUAKES tanders and Northndge, risk to SONGS in hght of, DD-97 23. 46 NRC 168 (1997)

EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS anmil break, loss of coolant accidents DD-9717, 46 NRC 13 (1997)

EMLRGENCY PLANS for proposed independent spers fuel storage instalianon. opportumty to comnent on; DD 97-24, 46 NRC 189 (1997) ,

EMERGENCY RESPONSE to cornanunauon incident; DD-97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

EMPLOYEES See Licensee Employees ENERGY REORGANIZATION ALT protected activity under; DD'97-20,46 NRC % (1997)

ENFORCEMENT ALTIONS immediately effective orders; LBP-9715,46 NRC 60 (1997) protubiuing in&vidual from NRC-hcemed activines; LBP-9715. 46 NRC 60 (1997)

ENVIRONMEMAL JUSTICE apphcabihty to noterials beenw amendment proceeeng; LBP 97-12, 46 NRC 1 (1997)

EXAMINATION simulater poruon of senior reactor operator hcense; LBP-9716, 46 NRC 66 0997) weight given to NRC Staff policy on adnunistrauon of LDP 9716, 46 NRC 66 (1997)

EXPOSURE See Raaauon Exposure FAULT capable, de6nition of; DD 97-23, 46 NRC 168 (1997)

GROUNDWATER contamination from deep mine chsposal of triuramum octaoxide. CLI-97 II 46 NRC 49 (1997)

HIGil PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM design related issues; DD-97-21,46 NRC 108 (1997)

INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION at away-from-reactor site, withdrawal of heense apphcanon for; LBP-9713, 46 NRC 11 (1997) opportunny to comment on emergency plan for; DD-97-24,46 NRC 189 (1997) unloading of dry storage casks; DD-9718,46 NRC 35 (1997)

(NIORMAL PROCEEDINGS ceruncate-of-service requurments. CLi-97 9, 46 NRC 23 (1997) creabihty of affiants. LBP 9716, 46 NRC 66 (1997)

IN)URY IN FALT standard for intervention in materials license amendment proceceng; LBP-9712,46 NRC 1 (1997),

LBP-9714,46 NRC $5 0997)

INTERPRETATION of regulations, agency practice in; CL1-9710, 46 NRC 26 0997)

IEERVENTION appeals of denials of; CLI 97 9,46 NRC 23 0997)

INVENTORY COMROL of raanacuve nuterials, DD-97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

JURISDILTION over mouon for reconsideration of intervenuun denial; CLI 97.9. 46 NRC 23 0997) to proceed on remanded issue that is pen &ng on appeal, CU 9712,46 NRC $2 (1997)

LICENSEE EMPLOYEES

. hosole work environment; DD 97 20, 46 NRC % (1997) nanagement handling of concerns of, DD-97-21,46 NRC 108 (1997) protected activines; DD-97-20,46 NRC 96 0997) 24 l

_i (

SUBJECT INDEX LICI NSELS handbng of ernployee concerns; DD-97-21. 46 NRC 108 (1997) 1.lCLNSING BOARDS authonty to grant rnation to ternunate proceeding; LBP-9713, 46 NRC ll (1997) authonty to consider recismon request; LBP 9715. 46 NRC 60 (1997)

Junsdiction over rnouons for reconuderanon. CL1-97-9. 46 NRC 23 (1997)

Jurisdiscon to proceed on remanded issue that es pending on appeal, CL19712,46 NRC 52 (1997) review of NRC Staff actions; C1197-10. 46 NRC 26 (1997) weight given to standing deternunanons; CLI-97 8.,46 NRC 21 (1997)

MATLRIAIS LICENSE willful and reckless vioiauons of Part 20, request for acuon for; DD-97 22. 46 NRC 130 (1997)

MATERIALS LICENSE AMENDMENT for receipt and processing of alternauve fuel rnaienal, LBP-97-12, 46 NRC 1 (1997)

MATERIALS LICENSE AMENDMLNT FROCEEDING standing to intervene in; LEP-9712. 46 NRC I (1997), LBP 9714, 46 NRC 55 (1997)

MLDICAL CARE to reduce effects of radsological contanunanon, DD 97 22. 46 NRC 130 (1997)

M!$ REPRESENTATIONS matenal request for shutdown pendmg mvesuganon of; Di>97 21. 46 NRC 108 (1997)

MONTTORS See Raannon Mon tors MOTION TO REOPEN juns,'cuon over; CLI-97-9. 46 NRC 23 (1997)

NITROGEN INTRUSION EVENT calculanons in response to, DD97-21, 46 NRC 108 (1997)

NRC PROCEEDLNGS appellate review of. CLI 97-8. 46 NRC 21 (1997)

NRC STATT dose calculauon for deep-nune dnposa' of wate; C1197 II,46 NRC 49 (1997) licennmg board review of acuans of. CLI-97-10, 46 NRC 26 (1997) pahey on almimstranon of esattunauons, weight given to, LBP-97-16, 46 NRC 66 (1997)

NRC WATCil LIST charactensitics of plants on DD-97 21, 46 NRC 108 (1997) stand.ard for placing a bcensee on; DD 97-19, 46 NRC 91 (1997' NUCliAR REGULATORY COMMISSION obbgation to grant peution for review, CLI-9712,46 NRC 52 (1997)

OPLRATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE dehmuon of; DD-97 23, 46 NRC 168 (1997)

OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT on energency plan for proposed italependent spent fuel storage installauon. DD 97-24, 46 NRC 189 (1997)

ORAL RULING at prehearing conference, order confirnung; 1 BP-97-15. 46 NRC 60 (1997)

ORDERS imnedsately effectne, challenges to, LBP 97-15, 46 NRC 60 (1997)

PHOSPilORUS-32 secunty and inventory control requirenrnts for; DD 97-22. 46 NRC 130 (1997)

PIPING containnent aar recirculation fans service-water; DD-97-21, 46 NRC 108 (19C7)

PREGNANCY declarauon of and nunimiranon of rad:stion exposure; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 130 (1997) ra&auon exposure dunng; DD-97 22,46 NRC 130 (1997)

PSYCIIOIDGlCAL EFITCTS as injury in fact for purpone of standing to intervene; LBP 9712. 46 NRC 1 (1997) 25 se g l

SUBJECT INDEX QUALITY ASSURANCE recordkreping on une of computer code related to. DD-9717. 46 NRC 13 (1997) variation in respome to i&nuhed denciencies, DD 97 21, 46 NRC 108 (1997)

RADIATION CONTROL PROGRAM for decomnussiomns activities, dehciencies in; DD 97-19. 46 NRC 91 (1997)

RADIATION EXPOSURE anessment of. DD-97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997) during pregnancy; DD-97 22. 46 NRC 130 (1997)

RADIATION MONITORS operminbty for venung of dry storage cads. DD-97tl8. 46 NRC 35 (1997)

RADIATION SAfl.TY umaning requirenwnts for handhng of pimphorus-33. DD'97-22. 46 NRC 130 (1997)

RADIATION SAfl.TY OITICER

implicit authority" to act as, LBP 9715,46 NRC 60 (1997)

I'ADIATION SURVEYS after contananauon incidents; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

RADIOACTIVE MA1ERIALS procurernent of, DD 97-22. 46 NRC 130 (1997)

RADIOACTIVE MATERIA!S CONTROL wolauona of NRC requirements for; DD-97-22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

RADIOACTIVITY of Cotter Concentrates. LDP-9714, 46 NRC 55 (1997)

RLACTOR OPERATOR LICENSE camminer guidehnes, LBP-9716,46 NRC 66 (19971 REACIOR VLSSEL mtmgen intrusson event; DD-97 2L 46 NRC 108 (1997)

RECONSIDERATION r.ppeal hied simultaneously with monon for; CLI 97-9, 46 NRC 23 0997) demal of monon for failure to provi;le informauon beyond conjecture; LBP-9714. 46 NRC 55 (1997) juriadiction en rule on mocon for, CLI-97-9,46 NRC 23 0997) of inue remanded for clanhcauon, rnation for. CL1-9712, 46 NRC 52 (1997)

RECORDKEI PING sudmdunt radiological monitonng results; DD-97-22,46 NRC 130 (1997) on une of computer-cade quality assurance pmcedures; DD-97-17,46 NRC 13 (1997)

REGULATIONS agency practice in interpretauon of. CLt.97-10. 46 NRC 26 (1997)

REGULA10RY GUIDES regulatory status of, LDP-97-16,46 NRC 66 0997) scoring of reactor operator esaminat4ons; CLt-9710. 46 NRC 26 0997)

RLMAND for clarincation of issue; CLI-9711, 46 NRC 49 (1997). CLI 9712, 46 NRC 52 (1997)

RLOPlWING A RECORD ewentiary stambud for; LBP-97-14, 46 NRC 55 (1997)

See also Mouan to Reapen REVIEW, APPELLATE circumstances appropriate for grant of; CLI-97-12,46 NRC 52 0997) of licensing board staixhng deterrmnacons; CLI-97 8, 46 NRC 21 (1997)

See also Appeals RULE 5 OF PRACTICE appeals of intervention denials, CLt 97-9, 46 NRC 23 0997) burden of going forward and of persuasion LBP-9715,46 NRC 60 0997) immediately eficctive orders, challenges to; LBP 9715,46 NRC 60 0997) witness credibihty; LDP-9716,46 NRC 66 0997) 26

4 1

i

)

1 l' l l )

l l

i SUBJECT INDEX SAIE SHlTTDOWN EARTHQUAKE dehnsoon of, DD 97 23,46 NRC 168 (1997)

SLCURITY of heensed matenal, DD-97 22, 46 NRC 130 (1997)

SElsMIC DESIGN BASIS carthquake ground muuon considerauons in. DD 97 23, 46 NRC 168 (1997)

SEISMIC RISK to SONGS in hght of Landers and Northndge earthquakes; DD-97 23, 46 NRC 168 (1997)

SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR UCENSE examinauon score, rounding up of, CLI 9710, 46 hRC 26 (1997) scope of inquiry- CL19710,46 NRC 26 (1997)

, - simulator examinauon; LBP 9716, 46 NkC 66 (1997)

I SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL 3 Cotter Concentrate, contposinon of, LBP 97-12, 46 NRC l (1997)

SPENT FUEL STORAGE See Independent Spent Fuel Storage Instalianon SPIRITUAL EIRCTS as injury in fact for purpose of standmg to intervene; LDP-97-12, 46 NRC 1 (1997)

STANDING TO INTERVENE in licecae arnendnent proceeding, injury in-fact showing necessary for grant uf; LilP-9714, 46 NRC 55 (1997) in matenals hcense unendnent proceedang, injury in fact as baus for; LBP 97-12, 46 NRC 1 (1997) orgamzauonal, authonzauons for; LilP-9714 46 NRC $5 (1997) weight given to licensing board delernunations on; CL1-97 8, 46 NRC 21 (1997)

STEAM DlfilDUP l during introducuan of spent fuel pool water to dry storage cask dunng unioMing; DD-9718, 46 NRC

(

.35 (1997)

SURVEYS See Radiacon Surveys TECilNICAL SPECITICATIONS for unloading of dry storage casks; DD-97-18,46 NRC 35 (1997)

TERMINATION OF LICENSE decommissioning actmues report and cost est: mates required for; DD-97 21,46 NRC 108 (1997) i TERMINATION OF PROCEEDING

[ authonty to grant LBP-9713,46 NRC 11 (1997)

I condinons on; LBP-9713. 46 NRC ll (1997) on license appbcation for independent spent fuel storage installauon at away-from-reactor site; LBP-9713,46 NRC 11 (1997)

TRAINING j radianon safety, requirements for handhng of phosphorus-33, DD-97 22, 46 NRC 110 (1997) i TRIURAN!UM OCTAOXIDE dose calculanon for deep-nune disposal of, CLI-97 il, 46 NRC 49 (1997)

VALVES containnent isolauon, design-related issues: DD-97 21, 46 NRC 108 (1997)

' VENTING of radioactive games from dry storage cask: DD-9718,46 NRC 35 (1997)

WASTE DISPOSAL deep nune, dose calculation for; CLI-97 II,46 NRC 49 (1997)

WHISTLEBil)WERS harassnrnt and inumidation for raising nuclear safety concerns: DD-97-2a 46 NRC 96 (1997)

WTrilDRAWAL OF APPLICATION for heense for irZependent spent fuel storage instalianon at away-from-reactor site; LBP-9713, 46 NRC 11(I997) 27 l -

l

_. i j SUHJECT INDEX wirNLSSES creetulity of, t.llP 97-16, 46 NRC (4 (1997) t I

i-1 1

l 1

28 i

I y.~ 1

,, ,s

__l l l

1 P

FACILITY INDEX CLAlf50RNE ENRICHMENT CENTER; Docket No. 743074 ML MATERIAIS LICENSE; September 3.1997, ORDER; C1197-!!. 46 NRC 49 (1997)

MA70RfA13 LICENSE; Sepember 19, 1997, ORDER, CLI-9712, 46 NRC 52 (1997)

GOODHUE COUNTY INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE FACILITY, Docket No 7210 REQUEST IUR ACTION; Sepember 26,1997 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R.

6 2 206; DD 97 24, 46 NRC 189 (1997)

HADDAM NLCK PLANT; Docket No. 54213 REQUEST FOR ACTION. Sepember 3.1997; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R, 6 2.206; DD-97-19, 46 NRC 91 (1997)

REQUf ST FOR ACTION; September 12, 1997; PARTIAL plRiff0R'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R 6 2 206; DI197-21, 46 NRC 108 (1997)

MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC K)WER STATION. Docket No. 50-309 REQULST IOR ACrlON, July 30. 1997; DIRECIOR'S DLCISION UNDER 10 C F R.12.206; E DD-9717, 46 NRC 13 (1997) /

~

l Mll1510NE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Uruts I, 2. and 3. Ducket Non. 54 245, 50'336, 54 423 l

Rt. QUEST f OR ACTION, Sepember 12. 1997; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 [

f C.F R.12 206; DD-97 21, 46 NRC 108 (1997) -

MOAB, UTAH FACILITY; Docket No. 40'3453-MLA =

MATERIALS LICLNSE AMENDMENT; August 4.1997 MEMORANDUM AND ORfsER; CLI-97-8. 46 NRC 21 (1997)

PRAIRJE ISLAND INDEPENDENT SPINT FULL STORAGE INSTALLATION, Docket No. 72-10 -

REQUEST TOR ACTION. August 29. 1997; DIRlflOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R.12.206.

DD-97-18, 46 NRC 35 (1997)

PRA!RIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT; Docket Nos 50 282, 50006 REQUEST FOR ACTION; August 29. 1997 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDLR 10 C F R. 6 2.206; DD-77-18, 46 NRC 35 (1997)

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, Umts 2 and 3. Docket Nos 50 361. 50-362 REQUEST JOR ACTION; September 19. 1997, DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206. DD-97 23, 46 NRC 168 (1997)

ST. LUCIE NUC1IAR POWER PLAMI, Units I and 2 Docket Nos 50-250, 50 251 REQUEST FOR ACllON. Sepcmher 8,1997, DIRECTO !'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. 5 2.206, DD-97-20, 46 NRC % (1997)

TURKEY POLVT NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos 50L335,50 389 REQUEST TOR ACI10N, Sepember 8.1997; DIRirTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. 6 2 206-,

DD 97-20, 46 NRC % (1997)

WHTTE MESA URANIUM Mill; Docket No. 40-8681-MLA MATERIALS LICENSE AMENDMENT; July 23, 1997; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Denying a Heanng); LBP-9712,46 NRC 1 (1997)

MATLRIA13 LICENSE AMLNDMENT; August 7,1997; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, CLi-97 9. 46 NkC 23 (1997)

MATERIAtJi 1.lCENSE AMENDMENT, Septemher 4,1997, MLMORANDUM AND ORDER (Motions for Reconsiderauon. To Reopen the Record); LBP 9714. 46 NRC 55 (1997) i 1

29

_- _- __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20217D118&oldid=3203268"