ML20216H204

Forwards Revised Final Element Repts for Three Elements Addressing Plant Employee Concerns in Engineering & Qa.List of Rept Number,Related Employee Concerns & Previous Submittal Dates Also Encl

ML20216H204
Person / Time
Site:	Sequoyah
Issue date:	06/15/1987
From:	Martin M TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML20216H211	List: ML20216H204 ML20216H239 ML20216H268 ML20216H306
References
NUDOCS 8707010351
Download: ML20216H204 (8)

Text

.

A 1Jp.

L

'~

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Watts Bar Nuclear Plant

-f P. O. Box 800 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 t

June 15, 1987 U.S. Nuclear-Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

In'the Matter of the Application of

)

Docket Nos.

50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority

)

50-328 EMFLOYEE CONCERNS TASK GROUP (ECTG) provides a listing'of the report numbers, the related employee concerns, and the previous submittal dates if applicable. To assist you in your review of these reports, Enclosure 2 provides a comparison between the ECTG Writer's Guide recommended report formet'and the transmitted reports.

'1 transmits the revised final element reports for 3 elements i

addressing Sequoyah Nuclear Plant employee concerns in the following categories:

l Engineering

- 1 report Quality Assurance - 2 reports As indicated by the report cover sheets, these reports have completed final review by the Senior Review Panel and the Employee Concern Task Group management.

Please telephone Martha Martin at (615) 365-3587 (Watts Bar) if you have any questions.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY G707010301

f. b.

G70615 7-PDR P

AcoCK oSoo 7

M. S. Martin Watts Bar Nuclear Plant ECTG Licensing Manager cc (See page 2.):

D

< i An Equal Opportunity Employer C 1

--i

<D-e ic2 U.S.. Nuclear RegulatoryLCommission l

cc (Enclosures):

l-Mr. G. G. Zech, Assistant Director' Regional Inspections Division of TVA Projects Office of Special Projects U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

' Region II-101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta,' Georgia. 30323 Mr. John A. Zwolinskif Assistant Director For Projects Division of TVA Projects

.0ffice of Special Projects U.S. Nulcear Regulatory Commission 4350 East West Highway-EWW

2 Bethesda, Maryland 20018 l

Sequoyah Resident Inspector Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 2600 Igou Ferry Road.

Soddy-Daisy Tir'nessee 37379

'5485T l

b

r i

s'

~p l

l i

l r

4 1

I I

s

(

e rp ENCLOSURE 1 Page 1 of 1 SEQUOYAH EMPLOYEE ELEMENT REPORT CONCERN NUMBER ISSUE l

Engineering 20404

• WI-85-100-034 Design Document - Inadequacy (Revised Final)

WI-85-100-017 Constructibility Concerns EX-85-061-004 Missing Detail G-Specs WI-85-100-038 IN-86-133-004 I

IN-85-886-001

• Concern WI-85-100-034 transferred from EN20302 Note: Engineering 20404 was submitted final 1/15/87. This report was revised to incorporate TVA comments related to Revision 1 of the e

Sequoyah Design Baseline and Verification Program.

Quality Assurance 80501 IN-85-463-006 Engineering Document Quality (Revised Final)

• SQM-86-003-001

• • XX-85-071-N05

• Concern addressed in 80503

• • Concern addressed in 30713 Note: QA 80501 was submitted final 4/06/87. This report was revised to incorporate NRC comments.

Quality Assurance 80203 00-85-005-003 Inspection Performance.

(Revised Final)

SQM-86-009-001 XX-85-023-X02 L

I-86-101-SQN Note: QA 80203 was submitted final 3/31/87.

It is being revised to incorporate NRC comments.

i I

l l-l l

l i

T' p.

I l

l' I

t i

i

' ).

ENGINEERING CATEGORY Page 1 of 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE ELEMENT REPORT FORMAT 1.0 Issue 1.

Characterization of Issue (s)

Characterization 2.0 Summary 9.

Discussion, Findings and Conclusions 3.0 Evaluators Cover Sheet Information 4.0 Evaluation 8.

Evaluation Process Process

5.0 Findings

9.

Discussion, Findings, and Conclusions 6.0 Root Cause

• • Overall Root Cause will (Collective Significance)x*

not be considered at this report level.

{

7.0 Attachments /

Attachments as required List of Concerns Other items included 2.

Have issue (s) been identified f

in Engineering Element in another systematic analysis?

l Reports 3.

Document nos., tag nos.,

locations or other specific descriptive identifications stated in element.

4.

Interview files reviewed o

5.

Documents reviewed related to the element l

1992T l

l l

1 b

ENGINEERING CATEGORY Page 2 of 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE ELEMENT REPORT FORMAT Other items included in Engineering Element 6., What regulations, licensing commitments, design require-l Reports ments, or other apply or (cont'd) control in this area?

7.

List requests for information, meetings, telephone calls, and other discussions related to

element, i

W' 9

$8 I

i i

]

i

!