ML20215N616
| ML20215N616 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1986 |
| From: | Julie Ward SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215N615 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8611070077 | |
| Download: ML20215N616 (25) | |
Text
,
'D Qsuun SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT C 6201 S Street, P.O. Box 15830, Sacramento CA 95852-1830,1916)452 3211 AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING THE HEART OF CALIFORNIA RANCHO SECO ACTION PLAN FOR RESTART MONTHLY REPORT OCTOBER, 1986 1
I s
Prepared by:
J.
E. WARD DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, NUCLEAR 8611070077 861030 DR ADOCK 05000312 PDR
y o
l ACTION PLAN MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT j
l CONTENTS I.
Highlights l
II.
Introduction
.1 Purpose
.2 Scope III. Action Plan Progress
.1 Changes and Revisions to the' Action Plan
.2 New Issues
.3 Closure of Issues
.4 Systematic Assessment Program
.5 Management, Operations, and Administrative Process Improvements
.6 Plant Modifications and Maintenance Improvements
.7 System Reyiew and Testing Program
.8 Non-Action Plan Related Activities l
.9 Resource Commitments and Utilization
.10 Schedule IV.
Appendixes
.1 Closure Status Update
.2 Monthly Report Slides
.3 Schedule l l l
lC
r 1
=
i,
l I.
HIGHLIGHTS l
l September was a productive month for progress toward restart of Rancho Seco.
l The Systematic Assessment Program, which has taken an introspective look at the facility and its operating history, was completed. Approximately 1800 recommendations have been forwarded to either the Systems Engineers, or to the Department Managers for disposition and implementation.
The System Review and Test Program (SRTP) is fully functional and producing the i
detailed System Status Reports, which address system related problems and needed enhancements. These are being resolved into detailed test programs for each system, the first of which are already underway.
During the month several NRC Review Teams made extended visits to the site to investigate in detail the technical basis and progress being made with the ICS,
(
j
'NNI, and EFIC systems, the modifications to the Control Room, and the status j
and content of the SRTP.
These reviews went very well.
A good dialogue has been established between the NRC and our technical people which is expected to aid appreciably in insuring the NRC that they receive the information they need to prepare their Safety Evaluation Report (SER).
The TOI Diesel Generators will be installed for restart.
This decision will 1
l cause a delay in the return to full power to May 1, 1987, but will insure that adequate supplies of standby power are available during operation.
Although additional costs are associated with this decision, they are primarily due to acceleration of the installation date from the previous commitment of the 1988 refueling.
The detailed costs of the restart effort are still being developed, particularly the details for 1987 expenditures.
At this time forcast costs at completion are with.in 2% of the original restart budget estimates, including the costs for the TDI Diesels.
Major project completed during September was the sleeving of 507 Steam Generator tubes.
This major first-of-a-kind effort was completed within three days of its original schedule, and at a cost below budget.
This project provides Rancho Seco with Steam Generators whose resistance to leaks should be much improved, leading to measurable improvement in plant reliability..
, 1
.(
II.
INTRODUCTION This report describes the progress in implementing the " Action Plan for Performance Improvement" at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station.
The Action Plan was submitted to the NRC on July 3,1986, and this monthly report covers activities during the month of September,1986.
III. ACTION PLAN PROGRESS 1.
Changes and Revisions to the Action Plan Amendment 1 to the Action Plan was submitted on September 15, 1986.
This Amendment was a result of the decision to install the Emergency Feedwater l
Initiation and Control (EFIC) system as the appropriate Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) control scheme that is independent of the Integrated
. Control System (ICS). The second major area of change involved additional detail regarding the expanded System Review and Test Program (SRTP), which is now functioning with assigned Systems Engineers. The SRTP consolidates the input from the Plant Performance _and Management Improvement Program (PP&MIP) and develops a systems approach to the resolution of issues leading to the demonstration of the plant material condition.
The NRC asked that NURtG-0560, " Staff Report on the Generic Assessment of Feedwater Transients in Pressurized Water Reactors Designed by B&W", be included in the Systematic Assessment Program as an element of the Action Plan. A check of the documentation developed in the Precursor Review program confirmed that this had already been done. Subsequently it will be called out as a commitment within the Action Plan.
2.
New Issues Affecting Restart The following ' items, which could affect restart, became known during September.
Each is being investigated to determine its impact in terms of new requirements, costs, schedule changes, and appropriate disposition.
Testing of the "A" Diesel Generator, following overhaul, indicated a.
high vibration on the unit. The manufacture was called out and a balancing program begun, in addition'to seeking out the cause of the vibrations.
It is not expected to impact restart.
b.
It has been determined that the TDI Diesel Generators will be required for restart.
In addition,'it has been confirmed that some loads will have to be shifted from the Bruce-GM Diesel Generators to resolve a potential overloading situation.
This has lead to a restart delay of approximately 60 days, j
The NRC is processing a request by the Mayor of Los Angeles, that c.
public hearings be held regarding his request that Rancho Seco be permanently closed. The Petition is being treated pursuant to 10CFR 2.206. Th6 NRC is promising appropriate action within a reasonable time. r
l n
III. 3.
Closure of Issues provides the current status of NRC identified items required for restart.
These items are listed in Appendix C of the Action Plan, which cross references the item to specific paragraphs or Appendix B items, (NUREG 1195 Findings) or to related comitments within the Action Plan. This report shows that, to date, thirteen closures have been documented in NRC Inspection Reports against their list of 54 items.
Note that the term " closure" is being reserved for indicating that an item or issue is " closed with HRC concurrence." The term " complete" is being used to indicate an item which is " work complete," that is, the activity comitted in the Action Plan has been done, yet paperwork and/or NRC concurrence for " closure" remains.
A comprehensive effort to define the specifics of comitments made in the Action Plan (particularly the Management Improvement Items within Section
- 48) is being initiated. This will provide the comitment closeout program l
with the specifics necessary to substantiate completion and closure of l
comitments.
4.
Systematic Assessment Program This program provides the input to the QCI-12 " Plant Performance and Management Improvement Program" (PP&MIP).
For all practical purposes the program is complete, as shown in the following status of each input area.
1 a.
December 26, 1985 Event Analysis A total.of 150 analyses, studies, repairs, and modifications were initiated to investigate and recover from the overcooling event.
These resulted in approximately 495 recomendations, which have been submitted,to the RRRB for review and processing.
This entire effort is $95% complete, with final completion dates established for all remaining open items.
b.
B&W Owners Group SPIP The program inputs remain at 37 recomendations of an expected 140, I
the balance of which may not be available until the first quarter of 1987. Six of these recomendations have been prioritized for restart, by the PP&MIP.
Ron Colombo has been assigned as the District SPIP Coordinator and representative and reports that the next batch of recomendations is due in October.
c.
Precursor Document Review Approximately 1396 documants, applicable to Rancho Seco, have been reviewed to determine the appropriateness of previous reviews and implementing actions. This review was completed on August 20the and 457 recommendations were submitted to the RRRB in accordance with the QCI-12 process. Over 3,000 secondary documents were reviewed in support of the primary reviews, and nearly 10,000 manhours expended on the project. A comprehensive, four volume, closure report has been produced which details the project and how it was accomplished. _ -_.. _. -.. _. -
j.,
l l
i III. 4.
d.
Deterministic Failure Consequence Analysis This completed project produced 1,232 recommendations to the RRRB and QCI-12 process. These recomendations have been processed and delivered to the System Engineers for incorporation into their System l
Status Reports.
e.
Recommendations Review and Resolution Board (RRRB)
The RRRB completed the processing of all submitted recomendations during September.
Future meetings by the RRRB will be called whenever new items are delivered, such as receipt of recommendations from the BWOG SPIP. To date the RRRB has received in excess of 4400 l
recommendations with approximately 3000 being tracked as valid.
l Approximately 1782 unique recommendations have been assigned to Department Managers and System Engineers for disposition.
5.
Management. Operations and Administrative
~
a.
Changes in Organizational Structure j
On September 3,1986 Nuclear Directive ND-86-10-A was issued.
It established the office of the Deputy General Manager to provide administrative and technical support directly to the Deputy General Manager, Nuclear. This action was taken to support Action Plan commitments is sections 48,1, 48.8, and 48.10.
On September 29, 1986 the Restart Implementation Organization (RIO) was established with each major department managers position identified to contain the names of an interim manager and deputy manager.
The purpose of this dual assignment being the support /t. raining of the interim District Manager. At the same time, efforts were initiated to develop lists of eligible applicants for i
permanent assignment by the District to each function.
It will be.
late in the year before any of these positions could be permanently filled. The organizational chart in Attachment 2 details the interim i
assignments and the organizational structure.
b.
Changes in Supervisory and Management Staff On September 8, 1986 the following assignments were announced:
Restart Implementation Manager (RIM)
Ken Perkins (MAC)
Deputy Restart Implementation Manager George Coward (SMUD)
Plant Manager (Acting)
Dan Poole (MAC)
Deputy Plant Manager Bob Croley (SMUD)
Implementation Manager Ted Lutkehaus (MAC)
Deputy Implementation Manager Jim Shetler (SMUD)
Concurrent with the September 29, 1986 Organizational Structural changes, the following were assigned into the new organizations reporting to the Restart Implementation Manager (RIM):
~6-
i s
III. 5.
b.
(Continued).
Nuclear Support Services l
Headed by Roger Huebner, this new department will be coraprised of Materials Management, Information Services, Budget, Contracts, and purchasing coordination with Headquarters.
Plant Modifications Management Headed by Tom Robertson of Bechtel, this department will coordinate all construction and modification activities.
The Systems Review and Test Program (SRTP):
c.
Recssessment of the staffing requirements for the SRTP has concluded that 90 people will be required vice the 110 reported previously.
During the month another twenty system /startup engineers were brought into the program. The program is now staffed at the 82% level.
It is expected that full staffing will be accomplished next month.
6.
Plant Modifications and Maintenance Improvements Section 4C of the Action Plan details the modifications and maintenance.
required for restart.
Actual work is underway on each of the identified projects, but none have yet reached the point of closure.
Completion of work tasks is occurring, although item closeout is pending full operation.
of the QCI-12 Tracking System (QTS) which incorporates the closeout documentation process.
Efforts are underway to provide a cross reference for QCI-12 items to the various Section 4C commitments. This effort is showing that some of the -
areas in Section 4C were not substantiated by the Systematic Assessment' Program as requiring resolution prior.to restart. Since all issues presently contained in Section 4C were developed by the " Top Down" process, prior to the QCI-12 Systematic Assessment for recommendations, it is becoming apparent that these commitments need to be reviewed for appropriateness and priority.
The Action Plan makes provisions for a programmatic review of this nature.
During the month of September two NRC Technical Review Teams visited the site to review elements of the modifications program identified in Section 4C. The first team addressed the ICS/EFIC items.while the second addressed Control Room Modifications; specifically, CRDR, SPDS, and Reg Guide 1.97.
The two teams looked into overlapping areas and provided much useful critique to the designers and systems engineers. The overall assessment by the team leaders was that no major problems were uncovered, l
though they did provide requests for a number of specific documents determined to be necessary for development of their Safety Evaluation Report (SER).
Plans are being developed to support the NRC's announced Review of the Maintenance Program, scheduled for early November.
This will be a comprehensive review targeting those issues and commitments identified in the Action Plan. 4
,.,_---ce.~.--.m.-_.._,----.-wm,n-ww-%_wm--,-
m-m.
_,-.mmm m_
y. _, ~r_m,w.m.._ _ _.,
,.,-__..w._..
.--..,--_.-e....--r..,-
III. 6.
(Continued)
A significant accomplishment during the month was_ completion of the OTSG tube sleeving operation. The project, the first of its kind, was completed three and one-half days over schedule, but under budget.
Significantly, 507 tubes were successfully sleeved which should significantly enhance the reliability of the steam generators, and thereby, the plant.
7.
Systems Review and Test Program This program is described in Section 4D of the Action Plan and is rapidly becoming the comprehensive effort envisioned in the plan.
As noted above, the program is now about 82% staffed.
The detailed system review documents are being developed and input to the review and test development Some testing is underway, while progress is being made in process.
defining the prerequisite modifications and changes necessary to support the testing of individual systems.
During preparations for the NRC Review Team audit of Control Room Modifications, it became apparent that the Control Room would benefit from treatment as a " System". This resolves the developing concern that "everyone" was fixing process system problems in a manner which affected the Control Room, and the matrix of previous commitments and studies which support it. The Perf ormance Analysis Group (PAG) agreed to this treatment, which was subsequently accepted by the NRC. This effort will assure that the Control Room, as defined by the Control Room Design Review (CRDR), will not be invalidated by modifications coming from subsequent programs.
A large number of system problems were identified this month f rom the final stages of RRRB activity and the systems engineers.
This prcmpted a delay in the identification of the comprehensive test program while these This effort will i
problems were evaluated to identify restart items.
I continue into early October.
Engineering initiated a series of reviews of system status reports by the System Design Engineers. Although it has resulted in changes to the priority and resolution of some problems,. and has impacted the work load and schedule for report completion, the effort has improved the quality of the SRTP and has cemented an important interface between the System Engineer and the System Design Engineer.
The first five " selected" systems have reached the point in the program to identify prestart testing requirements. This resulted in the refinement It of the process and the product-expected for all remaining systems.
also helped clarify the role of the Test Review Group and its relationship The NRC reviewed the process and product, of these to the PRC and PAG.
five systems, and indicated that the program and the level of detail in the reports displayed no significant problems although the list of
" Selected Systems" may require some further revision.
The Auxiliary Steam and Radiation Monitoring Systems were presented to PAG and upgraded from " Additional" to " Selected" Status. l
\\
III. 8.
Non-Action Plan Related Activities a.
Foothill Fault Study The NRC request for additional information regarding the Foothill Fault Seismic System is based on a March 1981 SMUD report titled
" Review of Recent Geologic and Seismologic Information Pertinent to Seismic Safety" and a follow-up field trip by the NRC project manager i
and staff geologist in May 1985.
Per telecon on July 9, 1986, it was indicated that the NRC request was not an urgent matter and a
" normal" schedule to answer it would be satisfactory.
Geologists from Bechtel were given the task to perform a field reconnaissance I
(July 11 & 12) and to develop a detailed plan and schedule to respond 4
to the NRC request. We expect to have this plan by the end of August.
It was the geologist's initial assessment that a review of any new information developed since SMUD's 1981 report would be necessary and, if needed, some geologic exploration for the purpose of mapping could be done. This schedule indicates that the NRC does not consider this to be a " restart issue."
A letter has been sent to the NRC which documents our agreement to complete the additional studies and field work so that the final report can be submitted by July 1, 1987.
Neither the NRC, nor Cole McClure of Bechtel, expect that this study 1
will impact the plant design bases.
i 9.
Resource Commitments and Utilization I
As a part of the expansion of programs necessary to support the Action Plan, programs have been strengthened or put in place to provide I
management information and control of activities and resources.
Theso efforts allow for -the budgeting and allocation of resources to accomplish the commitments of the Action Plan. Status of the major elements are:
a.
Budget j
Final approval of the Restart Budget was givea by the SMUD Board of Directors on September 4,1986. That budget was based en a February 15, 1986 restart date, and excluded the incorporation of the installation of the TDI diesels prior to plant restart.
However, a dollar contingency and schedule slip were associated with the potential of having to install the diesels prior to plant restart.
Based on additional analysis by Nuclear Engineering, it was determined by mid-September that the TDI diesels would have to be l
installed before plant restart. On September 23, 1986, the SMUD Board of Directors approved the installation of the TDI diesels prior to plant restart, the associated dollar increase in the budget, and I
schedule slip.
1 l
_g.
1
s III. 9 a.
(Continued)
The current Restart Budget includes costs for all identified Restart and Plant Performance Improvement activities through May 31, 1987, approximately one month af ter the schedule return to full power date.
Expenditures which had previously been planned for April and May of 1987 as Plant Performance Improvement activities have now been added to the Restart Budget, and will be tracked in the Restart cost system.
Through the end of September 1986, several significant budget variances have been identified. As of the end of September, the total forecasted budget variance through the end of 1986 is -$400,000 i
and through the end of the Restart program - $2,400,000.
As of the end of September, only two major scope changes have been approved and their costs have been incorporated into the Restart Budget. Both are as a result of the requirement to have the TDI diesels installed and operational prior to Plant Restart.
They are as follows:
i 1.
TDI Diesel Installation - A total of $4,000,000 ($3,000,000 in
.1986 and $1,000,000 in 1987) was added to the budget to account j
for the physical work associated with the installation and startup of the TDI diesels and related modifications.
This money had been previously held by the SMUD Board of Directors as contingeuy for this activity.
1 2.
Schedule Extension Due to TDI Diesel Installation - A total of
$17,600,000 (all in 1987) was added to the budget because of the l
two month delay in the plant restart date. The majority of the ir. creased budget is to account for improvements that will now be accoinplished during the restart time period, and therefore will be tracked as Restart rather than as subsequent Plant i
Performance improvements.
Less than $1,000,000 is as a result of added management costs associated with the time delay.
i A management reserve of $500,000 for.1986 and $4,000,000 through the end of May 1987 has been established as a part of the overall Restart 4
Budget. This money is controlled by the Deputy General Manager, Nuclear and can only be allocated with his approval.
As of the end of September 1986, no management reserve has been allocated to other accounts.
A determination will be made during October, whether or not to use the reserve to offset the forecasted negative variance, b.
Personnel and Staffing During the month of September, the total number of staff assigned to the Nuclear Organization increased by approximately 200 people as efforts to l
staff up to accomplish Action Plan commitments continued.
1
, l;
1 t
III. 9.
b.
(Continued)
)
As of the end of the month, there were 836 SMUD employees (includes 57 temporary SMUD employees), 224 craft labor, and 802 consultant /other contractors assigned to the nuclear organization, with a small number of SMUD and consultant personnel assigned to various locations other than Rancho Seco. A total of 1862 people are now on the project.
The following is the approximate overtime utilization of the Nuclear Organization as percentage of straight time hours worked for September and the prior month of August; AUGUST SEPTEMBER 22%
34%
SMUD Craft Labor 15%
11%
Consultants /Other Contractors 18%
28%
1 (located at Rancho Seco and submitting site timesheets) l c.
Contracts Action by the SMUD Board of Directors on August 26, 1986, gave the.
Deputy General Manager, Nuclear broad power to award service contracts, in support of the Rancho Seco Restart effort, without going through the normal contract approval cycle.
The control of J
these contracts is in the budget dollar limits established by the Board of Directors for the award of work through individual tasks.
As of September 30, 1986, nine contracts have been awarded, including four during the month of September. Thirteen additional contracts are in varici; stages of approval. The following contracts were awarded d aring September:
Contractor _
Start Date Services to Be Provided Southern Electric 09/0!/86 Software and Program Support SCP Technical Services 09/0!/86 Staff Augmentation Volt Information Sciences 09/3(/86 Staff Augmentation Quadrex Energy Services 09/3C/86 Engineering Services During the month of September, a t)tal of 21 tasks with a committed value of approximately $5.9 milli)n were issued against the nine active contracts in effect under t1e August 26, 1986 Board action, llie ihdjority nf the takes extend lito the second and third quarter of 1987.
j i
- s III. 10. Schedule 1
l A new schedule showing the impact of the TDI-Diesel Generator l
installation, was developed at the end of the month. A copy is provided as Attachment 3.
This is a preliminary effort which does not show the impact of scheduling and planning activity to accelerate the critical path i
tasks. Management of the critical path tasks will allow them to be shortened to achieve the desired May 1,1987 date for full power operation.
IV. Appendices 1.
Closure Status Update 2.
Monthly Report Slides 3.
. Schedule I
'I i
\\
I I
]
i Y
1 l
i 4
}
- i,
{
ATTACilMENT 1 September 30, 1986 l
8 RESTART ACTION PtAN CLOSURE STATtl5 UPDATE APPENDIX *8*
APPENDIX APPENDIX "C" ACTION PLAN FTNOING
- B" TITLE 5TATUS ISSUE REFERENCE NO.
B.5 FEEDPUMP TRIP CRITERIA B.5 REVIEW PROCEDURES TO PREVENT WATLR
-CLOSED-A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR 48.3.2 IN MIN STEM LINES (NUREG 1154)
NRC (06-07), 0-2 PERFORMNCE B.6 PRIORITY OF PTS OR B.6 CONDUCT TRAINING ON OVERC00 LING
-CLOSED-A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR PRE 55URIZER LEVEL EVENT NRC (06-07), 0-9 PERFORMNCE NRC (86-07), 0-10 B.7 TRAINING Otl LOSS /
B.7 CONDUCT EVENT AWARENESS 1 RAINING
-CLOSED-A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR 4C.1, 4C.3 iEESTORATION OF ICS POWER FOR 12-26 EVENT NRC (06-07), 0-9 PERFORMNCE l
j 8_& RECOGNITION OF ICS B.O CONDUCT EVENT AWARENESS TRAINING
-CLOSED-A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR 4C.1, 4C.3 l POWER CONDITION FOR 12-26 EVENT NRC (06-07), 0-9 PERFORMNCE ;.
.' ;O l
48.3.2.1.C 8.9 OAMAGED llAND OPERATOR B.9 CXm0UCT TRAINING ON PROPER VALVE
-CLOSED-A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR i
l ON AFM VALVE OPERATION METH005 INCLUDING Tile NRC (86-07), 0-14 PERFORMNCE I
l OVERRIDE OF AIR-OPERATED VALVES B.12 REACTOR VESSEL TERML B.12 (XWOUCT TRAINING ON OVERCI)0 LING
-CLOSED-A.4 OVERC00 LING EFFECTS ON l Sii0CK EVENTS, ETC.
NRC (86-07), 0-9 REACTOR VESSEL & STEAM CENERATORS 8.13 REACTOR VESSEL B.13 CONDUCT TRAINING ON OVERC00 LING
-CLOSED-A.4 OVERC00 LING EFFECTS ON l I;TEGRI1Y EVENTS, ETC.
NRC (86-07), 0-9 REACTOR VESSEL & STEM GENERATORS cerc B.14 USE OF ICS IN FSAR 8.14 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CREDIT MY NOT BE
-CLOSED -
ALL RETROSPECTIVE ISSUES 8.14
~
i DESIGN BASIS EVENT ANALYSIS TAKEN FOR ICS/NNI MITIGATION A58tLEY 10 KNIGli M
MEMD OF 10-2-86 8.16 TIMELY ID OF LOSS OF 8.16 CONDUCT EVENT AWARENESS TRAINING,
-CLOSED-A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR 4C.1, 4C.3 ICS POWER CONDITION FOR 12-26 EVENT NRC (06-07) 0-9 PERFORMNCE 8.24 SYSTEMTIC TROUBLE-8.24 LICENSEE TO PERFORM TROUBLE-
-CLOSED-Sil00 TING SHOOTING OF ICS NRC (86-07), E-5 PERFORM ANALYSIS OF STEM LINES
-CLOSED-A.6 FLOODING OF MIN STEM 4C.3.d.1.3 TO INCLUDE STRESS CALCS S NRC (06-07), E-8 HEADERS - EVALUATE STEM 6MLKD0bM INSPECTION MADER SUPPORTS
y la s
e
- u. d.
d.
-m eCO Ch r=
5 3..
3
.R
.m.
... e g.
g3 W
O f g - --
..y c
E a. --
G.
. 3. ee a
w-s.
u
?
Wm5 L
sw EW Ess 58 x
'=
ia n-285 ne
\\
<e
<ms I
a=
e=
0 0
1 8
8 y
w sa As a$
E g
we we
=
6 8.J 8.a A
gg g
U H
b 1 2 N2 Nk I
C E c
v s m
i mg i
m s
'l d
g o
5 ",
EW l
m5 al i
1 v
WW EE S
we ga sin je g$w WW tg wl3
=
r w
I 5-E t
54 se in Esu 9.
WP E
l l
ME ss (E
-. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - = _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _
ATTACllMENT 2 PRGE 1 0F 9 i
1 l
OCTOBER 1986 MONTHL Y REPORT -
l
~
-RANCHO SECO ACTION PLAN
~
FOR RESTART l
1 i
Action Plan Progress During. September.1986
(
l Major Projects Underway' l
l J
Updated Schedule i
e J
i Prolect Staffing i
i t
\\
e Budget i
i l
j
ATTACHMENT 2
,'d Page 2 of 9 OCTOBER MONTHL Y REPORT ACTION PLAN PROGRESS NRC Interaction e
-Submitted Amendment 1 to Action Plan
($ncluded Response to Sept. 5 Request for Additional info)
-NRC Site Visits for Review of e Control Room Design Review, SPDS, Reg. Guide 1.97 e ' System Review and Test Program System Review and Test Program (SRTP) o
-27 Selected Systems, Expect to " Select" 4 more
-SRTP Requires 90 People, 74 On-Board,. Staffing increased from 52% to 82%
during September.
Will be completcly staffed by November 1.
-System Status Reports,, Making Significadt Progress
-NRC On-Site Review Meeting, Pleased with Progress
-Work on 50 "Additio'nal" Systems Underway '
- Submittal of Action Plan Amendment 1
-As of September 16,1986
-Includes Details of EFIC
-Includes Responses to NRC/NRR from Sept 5mber 5' letter
-Includes Details of SRTP
-Expands Detail in Schedule
-issued over 300 copies j-g g
~
ATACllMENT 2 7.
Page 3 of 9 m
OCTOBER MONTHLY REPORT ACTION PLAN PROGRESS (con't)
Major Project Status: '
-Systematic Assessment per PP&MIP (OCl-12) 12/26 Event Analysis, 99% Complete, 495 Recommendations Submitted e
e B&W Owners Group, 30% Complete,140 Recommendation's Expected e Precursor Document Review,100% Complete, 457 Recommendations Submitted e Plant Staff Interviews,100% Complete,1,631 Recommendations Submitted
- Deterministic Failure' Consequences,100% Complete, 1,232 Recommendations Submitted
-Recommendations, Review and Resolution Board (RRRB) 2,987 Recommendations Being Tracked e
1,782 Valid Recommendations Being Resolved
- RRRB Completed its Phase 1 Work 9/22/88
-Performance Analysis Group (PAG)
Wet 11 times to Review System Status Repotts, etc.
e
- Covered 349 Items Developing Revision 2 to QCI-12 e
-Priority Review Taskforce (PRT) a
- Two week effort to Review "3 0 items Review all Priority 1 Tasks which Riequite' Engineering Assure that QCl-12 Criteria Properly Applied
- Results to RIM / PAG l
~
i
ATTACilMENT 2-
~
Page 4 of 9 CEUiI OCTOBER MONTHL Y REPORT ACTION PLAN PROGRESS Major Project Status
-Systems Review
- 22 of 27 Rev 0 System Status. Reports (Functions & Problems), increase of 7 e 5 of 27 Rev 1 System Status Reports (Test Requirement),' increase' of 5 e 0 of 27 Rev 2 System Status Reports (Results & Acceptance)
- 6 of 50 Rev 0 System Investigation Reports (Functions & Problems), increa.se of 6
~
e 0 of 50 Rev 1 System Investigation Reports (Results & Acceptance) '
- Staffing of SRTP, 74 On-Board of 90 Required
-Test Program
- Developing Test Specifications
- Developing Test Procedures
- Beginning Field Testing
-NRC SRTP Review 1
e Site visit by NRC Team Webk of.9/29/86, pleased with progress e Full Time On-Site, NRC Team to Monitor SRTP, due October s
4 e
9
s
~ATTACllMENT 2 pggg 5 of 9 s
N i
OCTOBER MONTHLY REPORT ACTION PLAN PROGRESS
~
- e. Major Project Status
-0TSG Tube Sleaving
- Completed Sleeving 507 Tubes o Completed Prolect Onder Budget
- Completion Required 3 Days Beyond Original Estimate
-Motor Operated Valve Program o All 163 Limitorque Valves at Rancho Seco in Program o Uses MOVATS. Equipment e Program Expanded to include Motor Overhaul e Project On Schedule E
e'
,e e
9 e
I
ATACHMENT 2 rTD.D '
Page 6 of 9 i
OCTOBER MONTHL.Y REPORT l'
~
A CTION PLAN PROGRESS Major Project Status
-Emergency Feedwater Initiation and Control 1EFIC) System i
L
~
Obtained PRC 8'MSRC Approval of EFlC Design Basis o
Purchased EFIC Control Panel-Delivery 12/1/86 e
Developed Engineering, Construction, and Test Plans e
Estimated Craft Labor Required for EFIC, <82,000 MH's e
i
,a O
e
- ATTACHf1ENT 2 Page 7 of 9 t
OCTOBER MONTHL Y REPORT 4
ACTION PLAN PROGRESS Major Project Status
-TDI Diesel / Generator Installation initiated TDI Diesel Project Organization e
Developing Procedures for Startup and Functional Test Programs e
First Licensing Submittal, To Allow Operation,. Completed e
e ' initial Engine Runs Scheduled for October e
-Transition Programs -
- Established Nuclear Organization fot Restart implementation
.Over 90% of Organization is Staffed and Operating e
- Developing Details of Prohram to Transition to All'SMUD Organization 46 e
e I#
1 m
ATTACHMENT 2
- " i Page 8 of 9 NUCLEAR ORGANIZA TION RESTART IMPLEMENTA TION bRGANIZA TION M
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, i
NUCLEAR John Ward 1
1 I
I I
I MANAGEMENT EMERGENCY PUBLIC QUALITY EXECUTIVE A SSIS TA N Y fgfq q"ggE INFORMA TION ASSURANCE A SSIS TANT
~
e Dick Weber
+
Don Martin
- +
' Brad Thomas ste Knight
+
' John Vinquist e
++
Kerry Shearer DEPUTY
. paa OA MANAGER
. u
.a p,enee,.
+
(Vacant)
RESTAR T IMPLEMENTA TION
+ S htUD
"^"^*'"
ORGANIZA TIONAL
- SI A C PRACTICES &
EFFECTIVENESS OINPO PROCEDURES DEPUTY ASSISTANTS Bob Crosby RESTART COORDINATION O CECH TEL
+
Don Ell!att IMPLEMENTA TION Laine McDaniel Vic Johnson e
' A.J. TudurT MANAGER 3
Geer Roy x C ON TRA C TOR
- MA TRIXED
+
George Coward Joe Brishin FROM NO,
?
l I
I I
I I
I I
- U'#*"'
PL A NT PLANT IMPLEMENTA TION TRAINING L'ICENSING gyg y gqyg gggy;ggg MANAGER MODIFICA TIONS MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER yyygggy yyygggy Dan Poole o
To,n Robertson e
Ted Luthehaus
+
Paul Turner e
' Ray Ashley Den GilHsole
+
Roger Huebner DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTf DEPUTY SU PL A NT PLANT IS*PLEMENTA TION TRAINING LICENSING ENagyggngyg ggR VI S I
MANAGER MODIFICA TIONS MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MA NA GER MANAGER
+
Bob Croley
+
(Vacant]
+
Jim Sheller x
Don Ouleley
+
LVacant)
+
Greg Cranston (Vacant) u
.'.v....,
..l..,u.......
. u......:.
. os...,,...
. u.aon..,,...
.A...c.......
Ic;;;,,,8 -
...........s
.,,...u.
. c..,u.... g.
..s,.....o..,,,.
.c...,....
- * " ' " =
~ *
.s.......
.r..n..., sear,...
,,,,,,n,,
.n.u. son,y sar..,..
y;,,,
~-*
.,ase
.I....
+.........
. ro, N.le...
= CurrentlT stud ing the method T
e c. men.... @
ler combining with Licensing.
'ATTACllMENT 2 Page 9 of 9
( #70s ) t
. OCTOBER MONTHLY REPORT RESTART e Baseline Budget
-Total 1986 Cost
~
$170 Million, Approved 1986 Rancho Seco Budget, September 4,1986
~
-September 23,. Board 4pproved installation of TDI Diesels e Personnel, As' of' 9/30/86
-Permanent SMUD Nuclear Staffing 779 of 974 Authorized
-Temporary SMUD Nuclear Staffing 57
-Contractor Support: NPS (Latior) 224 Other 802 (Includ'es At-Home Offices)
Total 186g i
-Increase of 158 from 8/29/86 Report
- Schedule
'~
-Heatup: Early March 1987
-Unrestricted Operation: May 1,198 7
-Refueling for Cycle 8 Scheduled 'For Fali 1988
-Detailed Schedule Prepared 9/30/86
)
~
e
ATTACHMENT 3
'd Page 1 of 2 d
M S M d M d hT M '
bMG ff k bb $#5 Ae'o sEco t N N Mxt Cast nmar my so,ww tm i Ste mar memfS E Simr
$Nig!ygi a sq2E12)
EDEMAA.MUNGL
' E pfxT_3].DAl m fr,_2pgap SCFY;3 OCTOS l
POVOS ECCOS l
JAN07 l
FED 07 l
HAA01 l
APn07
(
MAYD7 JUN87 21l20l 5 l12l19l26l 2 l 9 l16l23]30 7 l14l21l20] 4 l11l10l25l 1 l 8 l15l22l 1 l 0 l15l22l29] 5 l12l19l2Gl 3 l10l17l24l31 7 l14l 4 samm 7emxn2 malN Rc3 Fati Arc vtNT e
4 20NLM5 791NEYD$ IEGIN OECAV lEAT SYSTOG DJTMr
$ $JAtal?
7axxxxxn n eiN ofsn eJrur D PMIDl?
7sx00005 CENIN'EJR VACLAN ESTAR.19fD 41> 10MAA87 7sxxxD50 CDMETE TDI DIFML PEMP TESTING 41> sew 187 7EEIxx04 EWGIN (UT93 KTTH1ARY 6ffUU
$ 19WWB7 790000005 NOIN INTEtytAIED (1#f RAlt TEST 4f> 5AreWF 7mxxxxxn tuulN ruws etAne
(!> 12M997 7mxxxTIxt KGIN 60T 94fTDaet TESfleG TENI ST ARI-tP e 3 4]> SOMAvW7 7ExxyE10 KGIN EFIC ACTUATION TEYf (f0f TR8PR
$ 201ATF7 7mxxxDit LMIT SAP "IUMMJR TO 3lyATO4 4]> 25Mave?
790000012 KGIN IGN P0WUtTE'gTIM3 41> 16JtHIP 7sxInDt3 M81M EFIC SUCTIONAL TEST Eft 4 TRIPD 4t> seJteen 7BIxTx214 MTUTI LMIT TO *005 PO43t TENTATIVE & PRIllMINARY
. son Discus 5lON PUnrO5t5 ONLY
'. s TENTATIVE & PRE 1tMINACY
- FOR DISCUS $lON PUEPOSIS ONIT
$?
2[l2F3j 5 l12l19l26l 2 l 9 l16l23l30 7 l14l21l20] 4 l11l10l25l 1 l 8 l15l22l 1 l 0 l15l22l29] 5 l12l19l26l 3 l10l17l24l31 7 l14l SEPO6 l OCT06 l
NOVOS DECOS l
JAt487 l
FEB07 l
HAR87 l
APR87 l
HAYO7 JLN87
' ATTACHMENT 3 Pege 2 of 2
'bMN bY Nu"Se 52.m dA 4Y.1stCo N fstsYAsif sortur TIINMNMM prar c/sc h ?' %
Sa.tA.M. Limes suettttral_ t sonT se nsa E sTAnr twig g, g L e st somma.E assagtL 7
SEPUG [
OCTOG
}
NoVHG DCCOG l
J,Jd37 l
FED 07 l
HAR07 l
APRG7 l
MAYG7 JiE417 21l2f1] 5 l12l10l2Gl 2 l 9 l1Gl23l30 7 l14l21l20l 4 l11l10l25l 1 l 8 l15l22l 1 l 0 l15l22l29l 5 l12l19l26l 3 l10l17l24l31 7 l14l21l CF h+
t#iNis]
70tusus) IMPARAllM f ul (SM GRAff CMTFi 4M4Ag7 I 7010nJ05 M.LLCit0 SYSif.M MUDlF8 Called A IESI AM) 70 m U4 108 OBESEL PemlF JCAllLN WLEM E 1 rr Iam IfMAI557 I 70tas.ILNJ3 LF8C $V$1EM MD8F ICAtl(N WUM lN IJAP417_ E '
70tauma (s.C.w out system mRAat
. L1LANB1 14F C 70somicu2 013G SYSTEM OJIAGE teMAA07 I I SASTWIP 7030tuun CQ.D 98R-00We TESTara3
$AMW7 I I *MAV97 FutuiuuuF gwi DEAF 4P MC H)I SER0rhH TE9flM3 31 Ave? I i 39tAVD7 70soutum grit staRf 47 LOW POWrit TESTIMB 3 944WB7 2flMAve?
701000000 POWUt A9r.KNSIGe TE3flNG JMPtavg7 i n 17JLMI7 7080u00s0 stAL pus): CPS S TESTING t 7Jue7 C 2nses7 70:0 mot 3 sEftsee To Fu.L POWD CFUt4flOd TENTATIVE & PRttiMINARY
. IOR DISCUS $lON PURPOSES ONLY TENTATIVE & PRELIMINARY
- IOR DISCUS $10N PURPO515 ONLY na (
2il:el s lirl mlE{.- l 9 lir.la130 > li 12il2a14 liilie12 l l e l1sl2:l i l e I tsl2.'laj s Iirliols4,1 I nil rilialsi
'7 l ia 1. i I scroGl OCros l
novos OcCas l
- Ass 7 l
rte 87 l
nano 7 I
=P 1o7 I
we7 si eu r
-