ML20215M266
| ML20215M266 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 10/27/1986 |
| From: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | White S TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8610300133 | |
| Download: ML20215M266 (4) | |
Text
- - _
o Docket Nos.: 50-327 and 50-328 Mr. S. A. White Manager of Nuclear Power Tennessee Valley Authority DCT 2 7 1986 6N 38A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 i
Dear Mr. White:
Subject:
Status of Information Needed to Support Sequoyah Restart The staff is in the process of reviewing the NRC schedules and the allocation of resources to support the TVA restart of Sequoyah. There are many items where input is needed from TVA in order for the staff to continue their review of those areas. While the need for some of this information has developed during recent review efforts, many have been rescheduled numerous times.
In order to assist you in providing us a meaningful schedule of forthcoming activities, the enclosed list has been developed from previous schedules, letters requesting additional infonnation, technical meetings and discussions with your staff.
Please note that the list does not address any of the Employee Concerns Task Group submittals, allegations, or Nuclear Safety Review Staff issues. Although these subjects are not addressed in the enclosure, the schedules of all of the information needed by the staff to complete its evaluations in a timely manner to support a restart determination for Sequoyah should be factored into your projected startup date.
It should be noted that the items identified in the enclosure do not cover issues which are required as part of the staff's inspection efforts. Those issues are usually addressed by the responsible office.
A meeting has been established for November 6,1986, in Bethesda, Maryland to discuss this matter.
8610300133 861027 Sincerely, S PDR ADCCK 05000327 P
PDR B. J. Youngblood, Director PWR Project Directorate #4 n
censing-A
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
Docket FHe TPoindexter SAConnelly TVA0P (3) S. Richardson NRC PDR' BKSingh DMuller AR 5029 Local PDR HDenton TNovak MReinhart PRC System HThompson, Jr.
WLong PWR#4 Reading JTaylor XHooks MDuncan BHayes OGC/Bethesda BJYoungblood Rdg GZech, RII ACRS (10)
JHolonich NGrace JPartlow CStahle LSpessard BGrimes TKeny n/
KBarr, RII EJordan
'\\
/DPWR-A PWRd'DPWR-A Pk PWR-A PW@#hle PWR#
R-A cst MUdncan Ba blood JH @
h/mac 10/
/86 10/tT/86 10/j7/86 10 86 L
r
)
Mr. C. C. Mason Tennessee Valley Authority Sequoyah Nuclear Plant cc:
Tennessee Department of Public Regional Administrator, Region II Health U.S. Nuclear Regulatory ConTnission, ATTN: Director, Bureau of 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Environmental Health Services Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Cordell Hull Building Nashville, Tennessee 37219 J.A. Kirkebo ATTN:
D.L. Williams Mr. Michael H. Mobley, Director Tennessee Valley Authority Division of Radiological Health 400 West Summit Hill Drive, W12 A12 T.E.R.R.A. Building Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 150 9th Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Mr. Bob Faas Westinghouse Electric Corp.
County Judge P.O. Box 355 Hamilton County Courthouse Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 R. L. Gridley Tennessee Valley Authority SN 1578 Lookout Place Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 M. R. Harding Tennessee Valley Authority Sequoyah Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 2000 Soddy Caisy, Tennessee 37379 Resident Inspector /Sequoyan NPS c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2600 Igou Ferry Road Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 H.L. Abercrombie Tennessee Valley Authority Sequoyah Nuclear Plant P.O. Bcx 2000 Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379
I ENCLOSURE REVIEW INFORMATION NEEDED TO SUPPORT SEQUOYAH RESTART A.
Design Control 1.
New submittal needed on alternate analysis approach and revised interim acceptance criteria.
(Results of NRR audits) 2.
Overview of programs to verify plant adequacy and complete system evaluation on systems required for restart.
3.
Responses to the staff request for additional infonnation on the Sequoyah Design Baseline and Verification Program.
(See Youngblood letter to White dated September 9, 1986) 4.
Responses to the staff request for additonal infonnation on anchor point movement loads.
(See Youngblood letter to White dated September 29,1986)
B.
Electrical Design 1.
Additional specific information on:
a.
diesel generator overload; b.
Instrument accuracies; c.
containment penetrations; d.
short circuit; Sargent and Lundy grounding and other e.
electrical issues; and f.
C.
Equipment Qualification 1.
Equipment qualification letter to certify compliance with 10 CFR 50.49.
D.
Operational Readiness 1.
Revised submittal on containment isolation valve design per October 16, 1986 conference call.
2.
Formal submittal of NMRG Report No.: R-86-02-NPS, " Review of Maintenance et the Browns Ferry, Sequoyah and Watts Bar Nuclear Plants.
3.
Results of TVA survey of employee attitudes.
4.
Respond to the staff request for additional information Re: Inservice Testing program.
(See Youngblood letter to White dated Septebnier 18, 1986)
- E.
Quality Assurance Program 1.
Formal submittal of NMRG Report No.: R-86-02-NPS, " Review of Maintenance at the Browns Ferry, Sequoyah and Watts Bar Nuciear P! ants.
2.
Responses to staff questions on the QA topical report.
(See Grimes letter to Gridley dated August 1,1986) 3.
Responses to questions on how the Division of Nuclear Ouality Assurance is involved in developing and reviewing the implementation of programs described in the QA plan.
(See Youngblood letter to White dated June 10,1986) 4.
Revised Quality Assurance (QA) Topical.
(Note: Although it is not part of the QA topical, TVA should provide separate infomation for the Engineering Assurance Organization, including organizational structure, staffing levels, and technical qualifications.)
F.
Cable Pulling 1.
Responses to staff requests for additional infomation on cable pulling and cable bending radii at Sequoyah.
(See Youngblood letter to White dated August 29,1986)
G.
Organization and Management 1.
Furnish information regarding the sub-tiers of the organization, at least down to branch level (third tier), together with staffing levels and technical qualification.
2.
When available, TVA should provide information regarding the revised staffing at the corporate senior level. That is, what changes have been or are being made to accormiodate changes in the status of contract managers?
l l
l l
l l
l i