ML20215K779

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of 870302 Suppl Response Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-259/86-25,50-260/86-25 & 50-296/86-25.Util Requested to Address Lingering Concern Re Inadequate Equipment Anchorage
ML20215K779
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  
Issue date: 06/16/1987
From: Zech G
NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To: White S
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
References
REF-GTECI-A-46, REF-GTECI-SC, TASK-A-46, TASK-OR GL-87-02, GL-87-2, NUDOCS 8706250438
Download: ML20215K779 (2)


See also: IR 05000259/1986025

Text

L

C

b

'

.

..

_4

.

.

JUN 161987

Tpnnessee Valley Authority

LATTN: Mr. S. A. White

Manager of Nuclear Power

6N 38A Lookout Place

1101 Market Street

Chattunooga, TN 37402-2801

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

REPORT NOS. 50-259/86-25, 50-260/86-25, AND 50-296/86-25

Thank you for your supplemental response of March 2,1987, to our Notice of

Violation issued on September 11, 1986, concerning activities conducted at

your Browns Ferry facility.

The supplemental response was in reference to

violations concerning a blocked fire protection preaction sprinkler system and

the lack of documentation prescribing the anchoring details of the control

room emergency ventilation system (CREVS) filter blower assembly un'it (e.g,

violation items 2.a. and 2.c., respectively). We have evaluated your response

and found that violation item 2.a. meets the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201. We

will examine the implementation of your corrective actions during future

inspections.

With regard to violation 2.c., we are not fully satisfied with your supplemen-

tal response.

In our judgement, there still appears to be a question regard-

ing the adequacy of the anchorage for the train B CREVS filter / blower assembly

that needs to be resolved prior to Unit 2 restart. We consider this particular

item to be an outlier to the USI A-46 program. The equipment anchorage guide-

lines per the USI A-46 program have not been fully developed as you have stated

and thus they cannot be used to qualify the existing train B CREVS unit instal-

lation for seismic acceptability.

Finally, while we recognize the appropri-

ateness of including the Browns Ferry facility under the review of Generic

'

Letter 87-02, " Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical

Equipment in Operating Reactors, USI A-46", we think the mounting of equipment

that may be outliers such as the subject CREVS unit, should be reviewed more

quickly once the problem is identified. Therefore, we request that you provide

us an analysis that demonstrates the adequacy of the existing train B CREVS

filter / blower assembly mounting or propose and implement an acceptable anchor-

l

'

age modification if it becomes necessary to meet the seismic requirements.

Your response to this item is requested within 60 days of this letter date.

This is a Unit 2 restart item.

h

G

I, %

ZECI

>

. '. . I

,,

i

Tennessee Valley Authority

2

'

I

We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

Gary G. Zech, Assistant Director,

Inspection Programs

Division of TVA Projects

l

Office of Special Projects

cc: tlk P. Pomrehn, Site Director

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

J<L.Gridley, Director

Juclear Safety and Licensing

L4. A. Kirkebo, Director

pelearEngineering

N. J, May, Site Licensing Manager

bec: O/G. Keppler, OSP

LS

D. Ebneter, OSP

M[. A. Zwolinski, OSP

.

D. Liaw, OSP

'

4

D. Richardson, OSP

(ST R. Connelly, OIA

I

K. P. Barr, OSP/RII

LNKC Resident Inspector

,

NRC Document control Desk

i

State of Alabama

!

>

i

)

-

'

k'II/OSP

R

RII

PJ

/

l1

O

CA

Algna onis

parr

6//0/87

(/87