ML20215J047
| ML20215J047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 11/25/1981 |
| From: | Crews J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215J042 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-151 NUDOCS 8610240272 | |
| Download: ML20215J047 (9) | |
Text
_ _ _ _
k ' I#"%,,,
A t
unnrso sans 1>
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r
Q
' s 9}0
.i, REGION V 2
maum wa.mnno g
,/ -
wumn cam.cAuroam um NOV 2 51981 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Frank J. Miraglia, Chief, Licensing Branch No. 3 Division nf Licensing, NRR FROM:
J. L. Crews, Director, Division of Resident, Reactor Projects and Engineering Inspection
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM This is in response to your memorandun of November 20, 1981, to R. H. Engelken, et. al., subject as above. Attached is a breakdown of the various tasks, as we see them, for the staff's response to the Conunission's order of November 19, 1981 to PGAE suspending fuel loading and low power test operations for Diablo Canyon, Unit No.1.
The attachment also includes those tasks associated with the additional information needs outlined in H. R. Denton's letter to PG&E dated November 19, 1981.
Recommended assignment of responsibilities, resource estimates (for Region V only) and schedule infonnation are also included in the attactrnent. Our resource estimates and schedules are based upon the assunption that Robert L. Cloud Associates wi.11 be found acceptable for the performance of the actions specified in Attachment 1 to the Commission's Order, or that selection / approval of an alternative company (ies) will not delay significantly the actions specified. The latter is not likely to be the case, and the schedule will need to be reassessed when the NRC decision is made regarding company (ies) proposed by PG&E.
Should you have questions, please/ al
,.m r Bobby Faulkenberry.
I i ector Divi ion of Resident, Reactor Projects and gineering Inspection
Contact:
B. H. Faulkenberry 463-3738 Enclosure a/s cc:
E. Case, NRR D. Eisenhut, NRR R. Vollmer, NRR R. H. Engelken, RV E. L. Jordan, IE:N J. P. Knight, NRR W. P. Haas, t'RR we. -
\\.
(
ENCLOSURE 4
4 NRC TASKS AS RELATED
{
TO DIABLO CANYON ACTIVITIES Region V Effort To Be' Task Responsibility Required
, Performed
).
Review draft report by Cloud on NRR-!E Joint Effort 2 an-wks Wk of Nov 30, 1981 revicw work he has already completed on URS/Blume (Benefit of review is to inform Cloud of additional work needed to complete pre-fuel load r:quirements) 1.
Revicw corments received from NRR-lE Joint Effort 1 an-wk End Doc,1981 public on qualifications of contractor to do pre-fuel load reverification act 61 ties.
Q. Review of program plan for NRR-IE Joint Effort 2 an-wks Mid-Jan 1982 reverification activities required for pre-fuel load.
).
Review final report' of reveri-NRR-!E Joint Effort 3 mn-wks End of March 1982 fication work activities required prior to fuel load.
3.
Inspect and prepara reports on IE only 6 mn-wks Dec 81 - March 82-installation of modifications.
at Diablo Canyon Unit 1.
f.
required prior to fuel load.
3.
Review of semi-monthly status NRR-IE Joint Effort 6 mn-wks Dec 81 - April 82 reportsandongoinyworkat PGAE and contractor s offices.
(Includes 2daysevery2wks foron-goingworkreview.)
9.
Review coments received from NRR-!E Joint Effort 1 an-wk public on qualifications of contractor to do go,s,1 fuel load reverification activities.
Note: This may be done in conjunction with item 2 and may not require any additional effort.
,___n..
'./.,'
. Region V Effort To Be Task Responsibility
, Required
_ Performed
).
Review program plan for reveri-NRR-IE Joint Effort 2 an-wks fication activities required for post fuel loading.
Note: This may be done in conjunction with Item 3 and may not require any additional effort.
).
Review final report of post fuel NRR-IE Joint Effort 3 mn-wks End of March'1982 lead reverification work activities.
.).
Inspect and prepare reports on IE Only 3 mn-wks Jan-April 1982 all modifications required at Diablo Canyon Unit I prior to exceeding 55 power.
.N,o_tig,:
It may be possible to do this in conjunction with item 5 and may not
. require any additional effort.
TOTAL REGION V MANPOWER REQUIRED Minimun - 23 man-weeks Maximum - 29 man-weeks
~~
.c. '..
, g.
t 9
0 omoms-w~m
p__ - ~ --
yp3.;;e ~,
- r..T.; ;~'.~.
T'.
Y ** *
^
m.
i?;1 p.,:.. :~.s. Q:. W. m;; n $.k'N :.&,9. 4 Y
[- k.
h'Y
- % EY~. $ $....-
h :,p.,:;*.}y :pt. p. W*...m 4 L-fi&~:],m%;&: pv.W'MhO ;. :$5 {'
w
.; m.
s -
Q
? A-4~.p,\\.. ) -
- i5p.y,A.R.y'q; J. n.is 1. r-4 w~
- a. '.t:.e.u -
.s
....s n
.,.. s. M., n u a M. ~3. m.. =.,y
.1 :;4 ~
w h.: - 1
.v.C. L'W;::.y=.7
- r.< m. 9 m t;; y yp d..e,y -
r
- ;.;:F.:ps' n
- 3 u *.j- "--- '
-. n.. :. '
d h.s %..,
b,
) J 'a
....g.
. ;.. y n..: ;,
e mr
.,, # a..
. 9 1-.P, *-.,.,.'.. [me-b. ;,..
s N
8 7'... a.'4 - b t*.
~
.W'.hf'.
b 5u
,.7N
~
I.O.NUfMfjG.idO. M. R ; p Q %'^-N.Vs N* ms._"..
W 1.# t t+,7; ris kf
. N "M T : -i, '..,
f.s..tN.4fM;..M.4".M.%9Wd-r 4'O,.1 -
"g,.
4 we.
7.MtN.@NUCI. EAR REGUI.ATORY COMMISSIONi MW D..
p' %,4;N ) 7..'.'da 6@I
[
E.'IE 5.V 0 I.'M -
!4'Os(*Y'7.-[O.
i h['[M:i ilCEfhWdWID.S1990 NO CuifornTa B10d'.',' Suites
/
i:4.d 'T* Region.V @S I.
%~ %bV :-d. O 'NI.EIIN N
h5,[j MNihY Wal'aut Creek,P 202 ##r.-6@ifC N O'Ci WF California 194596' d Q.$ $ j$.y Q yN1 h i d I
E E
S M.y$$-M h~agp ;;;:d:d.hM M.$MMUN..,NdN;.$_~3-f h[:..Id[rM^' $ AiW M M f40 W P'@~MNNMNd hN.hfI
.WrM;i$$
.[N# N. Dat'e7
.'.1 / 9 6/M:dMNM f
T 3NM-h:MD
)+.
ib.c.- t + w w 3*
.M " ' Z 1" i '9 L
5 -nM -~~. ggm}h.'..aM...1:<.r.:vw.Ag.i."&d,s%g' i.-:'NC/.W= 9GNd
~ ~ - -
- ss?g E YY n.
-$,y* m 9t rum 4 d
fSb$
Y Y.1 Y
o h
.h '$:#,MtC/R'#,h"'l%,E%' 9,M. d7 f.'PdMd3D.'d'yd'W:f[FJM$$ [
tt f1MIM$A M " d @ % d % M "! Y "#
s ef1prg
.nstruct' ion-sheetprit f
__.g 1 w-hoh'M[MENM!9khNhf.bbb hb$55(if_Nhf)h hTN[455NW.*.='-M 'f*"#PW W~74
- t,$.MM*.,.' J 2 NDIY'E [lO '.'S T
' 'V r N2-7S h'd 3
- b.,,,,;a.ification numberf. ' i
't H.-
.E. I.h'Y _
b:-.
4
,4. ~n. 4...y.M..I.s.2,v,N',.'.
- Ar.s > m.'.
i WMY 4
h.
[# " '
s "h
. ;w w s.... r
. < m n v.;,I.-)..b;
-~
'Eg2frs=:
/
. TE.u4A&..*i.hlil b ~
O w
i'
}h-
.0 55.
- C.'. W YL ib rN.% RZ *' &- $M*k kM3iMMnM44WWMWsEMi!M@ ism 3GMss fN[
$ 5.N ; D
[N b
?1 hu f
ummeowasm@ifMm.;y,& ' --2;Q;.;Qgg1[-. m-Yk.fp?p!=4'g -
W'y'7M&
MtA.h W WM$~5 2*
%Q so m 1.L:hI 7 M 'Rapi.fa.x.y.,.i,'t*i -?. M. St TRC 'Aut.omat.ihR.M. -1L'*C-Q.W'W:- Mq.dh+,
n ct 7 0 n
ff i.
a.
.. :p e
$[
%yt.wn;.y.&:.:#& '}.k b., $}W I~
4;*=."
~.-
h %v.:
b I c cc s
' - " 3
~
~
D ij Q.. e '.~,.'; d 6 } @Ld. h.f b 9 2=s i pl i i NYNQUL.1 %M'5.. '>B ".L
-M.C
. N.hSt.@*" b.p'9 #
y;s,;. W% f. Gi & Q M & i % &jg. W 5 W & e n't W
fP:'f w
A.r%
.t N W. Q 41-e C V. m,g.TMMJ.F &
W%+FV,T. Am#m
@i.W@.'e;
. &, Y Q Y.
3 gRTW4 e
m ww
' %w. i&o.ms,.u.s'. vaca.~ n
- . ng-a.
'; -t, 'ihc-a-gds:. ' g.+ -
.. a mr--/
- -9f..
j kl.-
- -.t.py[..+ gra I. <*,N(.7 * +s}.p@gi-4. i.g4w.i. p J, *. ' r 4... N._,
J' 1
o g " >.
g g4 P
3
. r..
y.
p w
'A.. r n
qrW,,.kc. h,... i.. /, h.:) t..,n:.&- +%.1GT
),*va re m.e. l74Csi.dt,::..
b.M I e<
I
(
4 1..
y
^
if i
.-.s
, ;w.Q ~ y,?ut ),' V ).T &..y.<
.- 1
- y' y
.,.m
,.u-p... G. &s.
~- ;.
. y.
.c.n...?y. N.,a,. w.
. o : p'Q.a. y 7
'e
.u.
,A g.
.... w. :
.y.
c v. >
.: e f
IE'V B
n' yN gy i %j;p@ @.T W MO.<'+.." % w - p Ki -
4, +. '.'.
. :. W F" NE.;
3..c.
e-j3'"-.,?3 hy,t y..3;Jfi.;.44 i'.,
h
. J e :..t.l.t, 9 P. %n,q '. :. $ w %n..r.,+ ' e N' M:.i i R
- Q..g N.y.y k,
~ ;g..a y:
@.t.spe:f.f; % $it g. y :t. %v s
- .a u
.n;;.,,...
t
'm"f~~
-rf:4~'
~
s s
- g.
- ..a.
.s..
w,u e.--
-e w..--..4
.y.
m g
s c~
y.'
{.df E
,.,..s..
NRC TASKS AS REl.ATED TO DI ABLO CANYON ACTIVITI_ES 1
- i.;
,i t
]
j I. yin1hbil I
f u; t. _n;g e. Algg 0 Z'"Responsibilitypr
! r.
5 i',
Task; Lead Responsibilit 3:
j
. p._ }; EU M'M
. d. %._. g 0...; y, ~ ',l'l 3@ :p-y:+
Evaluate program plan forLths;Ml.S NRR-IE-Region 1 Jo' int Effortt l' 'itFP Miragliad@
h c i n l.h pr_e.-fuel 1oad, design' verifjpp;:4hi$MITH'-
p:
i.f." -
cation program and evaluate pryp. @M@dd@liW $ N % 4 @
-'W Tf W
,, hmim q
stut7 ep.7 ;Il H Eidi
' e
' U1 M i 4
qualifications of ' companies @dj?.Ql h'jp1 n U '-
- H d pi~
u m a m w % pen-W M, W igl.jp.i4u
..m O 1 proposed to conduct inde 4, 5 W yi.i.. p.3 9. - o W::D j
W' h
hj& M. *M P.dj!..$dy %}.lW 4 RjMmmmv%m g.M I i dent reviewg g p k &g t
Pr Review and evaluateTcoments _. 4.NRR-IE-Region V Joint Effort hi JJ F. !MiraglW IPf.
ag,
- ggg3yp,;MH3iFi5M S
- .6 N5'isugg,d 4 2.-
. g9p g g r,, g 3.J received from Governor;ofir,
t iM.iM $ 1 M.
M California and' joint-intTrliews F regarding pre-fuel l' ad ~ prograrii KfMt;M IM L t !'.i:5 2. h i p t..Nia.
o j
y~{,.
plan and. qualification ~sl off.pk 't$Q'y y f il.k! F, F56 % -, 0 J M MJ T 4
f proposed components.N.d g ep5 F L K htl.-.' m
. ~ - 9, t M mu
+
~
- r
-T e
.p a
Obtain results of evaluations 4g.l@.. rM r..d4
~,.
\\/. o F. Miraglia j
3.
i: j M Mi ' '.13 ;
]
f rom tasks 1 and 2 above and A" d y " r.,-
1r' e/
i t
i submit results and recommenda'-
i
- 9..
tions to the Commission fora.i 4 M M h
(
E their approval. <,o 4. d
%$4-A
% t.,. % L M M Q H N &. dg
'9-4M Q{4L, Review:.and evaluatePf.inaTirep&{s n,yW L
...-k..iy<t1
- Mfid b
E 3
- .
- =
iinnsh%$g@yRegion V Joint E 1 NRR41E D.
o
!r $ 1p g K; (
HM coverin'g'the pre,fpe hicad3 g#L4A lyjtQg;7rdty);g$g,[.dm.hsAgr n desi.gniverificationh)programg
~
a e'~+
"{:n W.M p$
$ii,tdjac4;i 3
b
~
F-pt M W ME M 4C M M
I.pg& ENRR:
NIDI!.:.::
F. MiragliaN J
- MM i
A -v EDbtafnr results Iof;: evaluations hfromjiask 4:and-submitrresulifE %"ty}SiWssd M G44k b '.s 6.w hRW 3
p C ~and recommendations' to -the#fMir ?.'N.1 a h t : m ' 9 i
C'
- A.i 9
4'
]
dil Comission for :their approval!W'0@~,FU M'/. Wd W i i b vi:
i
.JU!.1";]!L 3.,'
~ ' ~
.HpT U.M i.6'
' Conduct : inspect 1ons' ofionLgoiM/ s di. ~ i.q i.!. - Region.V[%$
B. Faul kenberry
% pre-fuel load design verific'c' pl
. $ Hi.i :5 ? d iIT P
w W n; 5
o 4 i
& tion program work activities'at Sim contractor's offices and report'h L 1.. ' Mp iw ti.
. ; I. 4. '.
=>
+ E OM M ' L1hY. 14 - R' h 4
17idi 56r@W%%
h i :results (estimate 2idays evenp % CiN:}i
- b p,0A ( '}'i. 9 : 4i d
n t1 4m b - [I W,
'i inspection Eji h Q y%
?;2 1
- w. :2l week's for on-going $.g (bi Mig Q M # "
- l hi [ ' W h I 'i.k d d y d
. l l
beffor.t}1$ q Uc'J3
]
G.WrhMWe h3 h.Y'hI fY %
'NY l
O B. Faulkenber&
l Y
y L 4 d3 Region Vd J "
n'ductiinspections !of 41n
, sf me ry; 5 h..hlation 'of required pr_e,-.fifel *1'oa'd 21% h
.L :~ Dit WNH Z h modifications at Diablo.-Canyon %p:[Ny 15 ' p)@MWhm W ;
l M M fhy ff! N
' E. > Qg..j[' YF U'F@UJ H
.O %
.ip hih%1i.c FM l
N tJntih:end report resultsM
@ "NNM dDS hib i
g..f p,t@:p11M:
[q@p.~. g.*
1 t a8En Reviewisemianonthly status-y.th /(,.'NRR,IE-Region 1Y JointiEffort t
F. Miragliadly i j
- ai dL
'N~
n!'O M a i
,$Ei. reportsi provided by lPG&E on li-3'
] 4 Mgf:DMtit 7 i
g w.. i cation factivities and. provid@e,: r m%FL.MMg can o m.' @! M 1
'.4 "" W t ' ~ @
j p'M prg-fuelJ1oad desigk /erifi-Of%g}tp.@ @ I.1 '-
n;.u,w.,t p;t it O M.u M. d
."dany needed feedback so PG8.E W ad.n p q u,. M h W ]'
4 2
4
- . ga p a cc y
N,.
f i
..i.
. ~. -
- . h w;$
4 F.f nyf.
&p 4 ggp, f[g%y %.y.kyg.e '.1*"
' ~ '7 j
w
- y
+
~~'
I t.
J, t
4 m
K.
g as i
..a m.
i
..i.
.[
..i :
.s
~
~~
t.
s' 4; [
i
~.
i e,..
- n. '
- s i
..a
::d1 6:'i.
g:
4 c
.,, m..-
-. ; 4 h a' J. t T..
' T_a s_k :.N...c..,..L P. 1, dl
/,;T
_R.e.s.ponsibility I.ead Responsibilii y.
m
,... :.. L
- i..
,u
,...u.
g -9.M Evaluate ~ program plah for.'the t.::.; NRR-IE-Region"V Joint Effort i J.
- FdMirkgliaEMI.-
W.W. lost-fuel 1oad design i. er.j,f.ica,;
i.
.f.M_.~4. 3.'!.L.y M..,!wn.14. M. '.n,t. i. 4 3.:.4. i. i..r. Q...-MH..p.
f r
1 w
s r.5,,, '.. tion' program a..nd eval.ua. t.e.%.ty@.rv.m-cd.tuf".;:
N.
M-n+q. et.
s nkt:o m.n:I.t i s..?.1 n m. ',:g s. r.. i e. W. m.,Mi;rpi'.:mr.'d m&
e W
c-w
..c
'f... qualifications of, companles'ppoposed'to' conduct"indep'en@:*n
- 6.Q
(
m r e.:.c e t :.nM dr,. M.
-:n-c r e:
h? n. :..t,s,9M)-> u...wim-v.s: 79 f..w,p:w~ Tw&r d.
.}
. dent review.@.
W s h e t m e~ ri m r.e%,.e.n.:,w-M s u.w
,. > : - p -
u q:n..
w.::::. :
...~ y ; ; e, g
.... n....p
.w
.. -. : p-$
- e c; _.r ut,:,
.4
. -m.:.m h10ll Review andievalua,r.te'icomments' ig,RNRR-lE-Region;;;V Joint Effort a v F.S Mifagli :
Hl".N, receiyed' from' Gov'ernor.bfMf(p@a.%, $m.$.1,
,1.~, if.4::w.i.a,i.e..+ y -~Q;~f.n.itib.h n.
+
$W fi b i n.s h i r M &
ld E
- m. Califo.r.ni.a and : joint ii. fuel r..b....
m.b....t.
n ter..-.q.g; -
c.I r
- v..
..N a..+s.,
Lpdil..'.%.. g.t g.r...
~
s.
c-w m
- W.
ifM.n W $ 5 L-bT6fSM.m..s;;m.W.
6 ne..wW...
. im.
'A.1 i venors regardin~g "m,. "
p W n
. i.n..:!-
i+'T':lo..ad1p'ro. gram planp_ost-: aWM.~.iM..n'Wl@..-
nf.M.;.0..v. W....
2 W W :,. 4p,. @1)H.
.. i d.
mQ
~
m a
.11,. Qu.al.i.ficat. i,r. n.s.W,...ropose,d.
.u o
ofip
. :4 d< W,b.W....,...
. nl. !.E..
^ n...m.q..t.t-7. 7,t pmq:c m W....m. Q, f.l N...*u-:#.. n.,C....is J
2 a,i
- w
~
comoanies.
y5.
we.-
.a s./':%fr--.w;W1.ta e@"%,.
.M mm N'?,
i v., <. f. M.w
. v..
v/
- M-uh
- .:,...r..
c f:j. from ta sks 9 and '10 above and.ii.. Y"G.t $ W ' ' ym. t,.h...;
u c.e,.we.c...:,:..; _4~
A t
.S.
.11. 'Obtain res'ults of evaluations.
(i.yNR J
G"'
F. -Miraglia T" -
M.rM'
" m. a r N. m,
- n..i...; 'i &. A r 6.
. + A rt. t
. ",... submit..to.PG&E A. e. r
~
- . a.. r: :. r,.. -
e.
a.3 J.
m i;12..: Review and evaluat:e final.. report.h,n.Nxx-It-Megion v Joint t.ffort
- F. Miraglia :.
Wignvn b. g.;; g4 m..p >g. j..,.
,G i'..coveri.ng post-fuci. load,. h. 6
, M
- a.N q.i't. @,,p @YL w.m...i.
.t.
N.
- . :. a.. -
,w.s..-
QM. @p 8;QJ.g design', ' verification program:..
t-u
., ?.:_ W.g<.. E. ". : phb....il
~ *- ".. W.. K ieW:.,.
e.,
i.. W,4.1. L'.i.4.W......f..t.",d M. ~.i.".
P.
i.
- t-sTm,10bta ini re s bi ts ief ;ta sk ! 12J:i$11 P
+
p
.s.
S.M3.j i,. p...F.' ~ Miraglia 1F16 E13.
.hNEI,11Ms'd b.-gTL Milfij (d ;LGi&;{p?;%.
tie'b' sal ua' tion iand ~ submit' to.PS&Ef H$
i :'W itM ilcm M ww ey: tt.p.u,.s. :.<g,7.. g u - c
-A.p'.M.t - -2 n..; W W. M; :..=.... M a..:.,... s L
~
314&mnConductMnspeetions! ofion4g65ng4M il i-!3: Region W.
w-n u.. ~.
w Mi!P post;.fu' l. load.: design)verif15an.4n c,$ l.Liihijii:c.Miy!.ig'&gf'J..:. i i:B.'::Faulkenb
.i.p F W. % -:.M.iSp lie e
l 9>
w:. '.
.. tion work activities :and reportmii.g.t? @M M.i-itt.o.= T p$7' re's'ults;; (Estimate 2 days eveiy; l. :iQ-91:. W '.f:i.M ul
- f:.:
Wcscn -
e.f $
2 weeks for on-going inspection:- WK e'N si an h -
'.; s 5 h L'
'n.:i :
effort)..
8.I.Y lY U "ri.t i.M 5%d4 E ', M:...
- f. w.
.;.15h. Cond' ctLinspections of.insta'l-g.h $.C" i n....... t... Faulkenber.ryi
-l.
ipp :o 1.BJ.
dim lation of required post-fuel;W j ihl'.D JI-T;.it M. Region V ' O.
W.
mM,..:. ::.115.1.
B-u E%'
e.cr.q.
i d $r & T. Q.i r
[.'lMin' ? !i@
- q1
- iB' M tW.
-loadimodifications;at DiabloT$e
!S i. dg 4.y".y..q$.n. W:,.:.v i:,,.,7 7 m :,1. i 6 a,:'i 5 s M hTF p,4,m-. 3 Uni t.1 ;a nd ' repo. r.t'.r,.es'ults bili.Qs.x -Q iC.anyon
. -". ' c r
.~.&w.a u. m w
w '.,.,., W-.
v
~
- L#r.
d1Sr fReWewr' eqi-monthlyiireportsitt p HNRR.;IE RegionPValoint.fiEffort: h M c.F. !Mira.gliaI]M-gi
.s 7
M[W proii ded iby :.PG&E). on : post-fuelFU n dtiiriti ssdridfprov
,..M@9p4.pM. &d@ahiMTd ' 4 c.i s Wfie91 h MiM@ nim 4Si L 1 P,ti i
E dida'dldsigri yerificationc =
y4 M Q W M' ' nhib fi!H M.O Mi %:.
. 3.ie,edEdifee'db'ackitoiPG&E.4.M.?Q 3 F.d4TpjllIQ+:I S E4Hd"I M iU: #n Iit JAM ~W:
O M j @. u (M$. '.. a. w,i, *y g h
,e
.;...i:;.' :4. %...:.@K t.iJn,,:..f R ;.2.d d b.. H.,y.
% :':e. m -
gm,.
c.:.1
- +
< L. p. 9 i:
-Q
-+
=-
, 9!w.~ 1 QV: ;v.:,;r.
~'
t.. 0.-
~
- 6
. ' ;. "i
,,, 4, y.u.'. 3 a
.n <
I.
j..-
l i-e ?
- QT
- vw -
.. m: 1:.. ' ;i.,t, g.g. _3 a /
[;a. ip(;...t
,v. g. [.....,. :s. y~ s s'..
s g.
t...
+
, i J ys p;,.-:.
..q3,,,.
e x
- ",. p iw.
,c,.
3
.,.. s
- j... ~.. = -
p.p. ;:ir. q,3.-
..i,:;,, ~;
- .f r.. '...
.,.p....
- ..q-
. ':,. y..
2
. :w.y
.m i c- -
.e.;.rk;f. m.:. t;w:.r.=&.",r...i:
y; y, ::. '.
.F nl.
o
. c.
- Qij.c.~ m..g;Th ac4.,o p -L F.
..c.-
..-:)e '1:
k
'c.'::
- k. 4d:' v 4."..t
- M;; pM;.*. 3... y y! w j;m p:.:~r.:L#.,Qyyt[,.,y. W. n,.:j.i.',pl. :
q :J..Tg b J:A.;;i?fs.'. f.
. 3'-ah 1
.,;l
.):
- d. <.,f.
ja; ;tu I.,
.,s..
- n.o...
.s j
t
- r.' +
.t n
dv
.s 1 dm....~Lw.2 g : :
.....< kq.
- s i s.
s 3..c
- m*
,y.u a.
...n.... 4. < 4,..sq.w,
,- s. '.w '..
s.,;.
.. + -
D. Y..:-
Q.i....
E T. 5... WW F;5 5,.
W:
- q *;. C h ;$*~n. W IM....y. v...g
..y g.co m$.,. - Y-.
.,.T i b' o
n.-:
- ~' -:..
L n
~ ; e.c a
c.e
~; ;
- t.
e
.._ ~.-
p t
1
(}
c'( M
. NUCLEAR RECULATORY CO.'DfISSION
{
Region V 1
1990 N. California Blvd., Suite 202 l
Walnut Creek, California 94596 FACSIMILE SERVICE REQUES I
to
/2 /1}f)
/.
7,
~
l
!assnge to:
3
/ /*a d's~rc k.e d /7), / Add on $92 r buedLfJ
~ A'/6 a
I i
/
To. of pages A
plus instruction sheet Telecop-/ nc=ber:
Y73 fa'/ / D1 I
Verifiestian nue.ber:
'assage frcn:
.a 3 W t/ggs,*2 2,)
fps,ars_ Y 7
Verification nu:.ber:
M (.t"$' 3 7 @ [
name:
4 k.v,w
.) ~
l Rapifax 3M VRC Automatic 1
Special Instructions:
fyy.,gn jj 7s'//
hescas V b f f*M' ***/
W
% 54s AMD A$s*Ct"ffu L~ rr, n
%c 0 you.
ll.,,,,is,s.. y
,n voeu,rae
,a
,s,s,occa p u' uns ns se D.sc.oss as Pero u
oo bode l s bel'<**/!&
-y' za pas,gg; 0 0,/ / / O.9 n c e dl'H/D"i 10 5 4' r
J.'CC Yrn l cesc
'7Tonf.
fr./CM d)o w r d'f'd "
Y'M j)r
-nai-(%.
l l
IE:V form 2163 g
o W
NRC TASKS AS RELATED_TO DIABLO CANYON ACTIVITIES Task kO,
,Resoonsibil_i_ty.
Lead Responsibility PJa J 17 1.
Evaluate program plan for the NRR-lE-Re5 on V Joint Effort F. Miraglia 1
pr.e.-fuel load design verifi ffi cation program ard evaluate qualifications of companies proposed to conduct indepen-rient review.
2.
Review and evaluate coments gn3 NRR-IE-Region V Joint Effort F. Miraglia received from Governor of California and joint interviews regarding p_re-fuel load program plan and qualifications of pron W 3.
Obtain results of evaluations 8
(Y NRR F. Miraglia from tasks 1 and 2 above and submit results and reconrnenda-tions to the Commission for their approval.
4.
Review and evaluate final report j NRR-IE-Region V Joint Effort F. Miraglia Q
covering the pre-fuel load q
design verification program.
O i
4 5.
Obtain results of evaluations g
/TL NRR F. Miraglia from task 4 and submit results and recomendations to the Comission for their approval.
d Q
( Y' M k; Q
6.
Conduct inspections of on-going Region V B. Faulkenberry (Q ;1 pre-fuel load design verifica-l tion program work activities at
(
contractor's nffices and report O
results (estimate 2 days every 2 weeks for on-going inspection effort) 7.
Conduct inspections of instal-Region V B. Faulkenberry lation of required pre-fuel load modifications at Diablo Canyon Unit 1 and report results.
8.
Review semi-monthly status y
NRR-IE-Region V Joint Effort F. Miraglia reports provided by PG&E on pr_e.-fuel load design verifi-cation activities and provide any needed feedback to PGAE.
v.
~
g4 2-Task ResjLqnsibility lead Responsibilitj 9.
Evaluate program plan for the
$6NRR-IE-RegionVJointEffort F. Miraglia post-fuel load design verifica-tion program and evaluate qualifications of companies proposed to conduct indepen-dent review.
- 10. Review and evaluate comments g5 NRR-IE-Region V Joint Effort F. Miraglia received from Governor of California and joint inter-venors regarding p_qs,t-fuel load program plan and qualifications of proposed companies.
m
/
- 11. Obtain results of evaluations % 5
/2V/NRR F. Miraglia from tasks 9 and 10 above and submit to PG&E.
- 12. Review and evaluate final report NRR-IE-Region V Joint Effort F. Miraglia covering p,qsg-fuel load 33 design verification program.
- 13. Obtain results of task 12 s,13 PNfNRR F. Miraglia evaluation and submit to PG&E.
- 14. Conduct inspections of on-going i,9,3 Region V B. Faulkenberry p,ost-fuel load design verifica-tilin work activities and report
, hN O h
results. (Estimate 2 days every 2 weeks for on-going inspection effort).
- 15. Conduct inspections of instal-i, 2,, 3 Region V B. Faulkenberry lation of required poM-fuel g) load modifications at Diablo fh M Canyon Unit 1 and report results.
- 16. Review semi-monthly reports g
NRR-IE-Region V Joint Effort F. Miraglia provided by PG&E on po_s_t-fuel load design verification activities and provide any needed feedback i.o PG&E.
i l
9 m
- ~ -
o y
a-,
ym w
-e-w
i C/t t.
r NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r **
a i
I nacen v 4
\\e....
1450 MARIA LANE, SUITE 210 WALNUT CREEX, CALIFORNIA 94588 l
MAY I 01982 MEMORAN0tM FOR:
J. L. Crews, Director Division of Residen.. Reactor t
Projects and Engineering Programs FROM:
T. W. Bishop, Chief, Reactor Construction Projects Bmuh 4
4
SUBJECT:
REGION Y INSPECTION OF ACTIONS RELATED TO THE DIABLO CANYON REVERIFICATION PROGRAM In anticipation of a request to support the office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the Diablo Canyon Reverification Program, it is suggested that we clarify our areas of input. Our input should reflect, among other things, the results of our inspections. Accordingly, it is intended that, within Region V, j
the scope and responsibilities for inspection /SER input will be as identified below.
It is expected that Headquarters support (IE/NRR) will be provided for this inspection effort.
l 1.
Implementation of Independence Requirements for Technical
?
Reviewers Selective examination of individual technical reviewers
" independence statements"; selective examination of employment j
resumes to confiru " independence statements"; selective interviews with technical reviewers to confiru " independence statements" and assess the reviewer's freedom to fully' explore concerns.
This process shall be performed for each organization involved in the independent reverification (Teledyne, Stone & Webster, R. L. Cloud Associates, and R. F. Reedy, Inc.)
Lead Responsibility:
J. H. Eckhardt 4
2.
Examination of Implementing Procedures for Controlling Work i
Activities l
Verification that appropriately approved procedures have been developed to control work activities; selective examination of procedures to assure compliance with approved program plans, SAR/ Tech Spec requirements, NRC Order, NRR letter of Nov. 19, 1981, and pertinent QA requirements.
I fO3bo sff
~
~
l
i J. H. Eckhardt.
This process should be performed for each organization involved
.I in the mverification activity and followup / technical program i
actions (Teledyne, Stone & Webster, R. L. Cloud Associates.
R. F. Reedy, Inc., and the integrated PG&E/Bechtel organization).
Lead Responsibility:
P. J. Morrill 3.
Examination of Implementation of Procedures for Activity and Program Control Verification that independent mverification activities and followup / technical program actions are perfomed in accordance l
with controlling requirements (approved program plans and l
procedures, SAR/ Tech Specs, and QA documents). Examination is to be achieved by: auditing to determine if personnel i
are knowledgeable of program mquirements; and auditing l
implementation of controlling requirements.
i' This process should be performed for each organization i
(Teledyne, Stone & Webster, R. L. Cloud Associates, R. F.
Reedy, Inc., and the integrated PG&E/Bechtel organization).
Lead Responsibility:
J. H. Eckhardt 4.
Assist NRR Reviewers in Examination of Technical Adequacy j
of On-going Work Activities Verification of technical adequacy of independent reverification activities and followup / technical program activities through selective sampl.ing of individual work items. Examination should assess such things as depth, scope, and thoroughness of a review activity; appropriateness of engineering assumptions; and adequacy of corrective / followup measures. During this j
examination the inspectors shall be alert for, and identifyi any observed areas where undue pressure is applied to technical personnel.
l This process should be performed for each organization (Teledyne,. Stone & Webster, R. L. Cloud Associates, R. F.
l Reedy, Inc., and the integrated PG&E/Bechtel organization).
Lead Responsibility: NRR (Regional contact:
P. J. Morrill) 5.
Examination of Plant Modifications
' Verification that plant modifications are accomplished in
{
accordance with approved design documents and in accordance with established quality requirements. Examination shall i
involve a large percentage of field modifications and shall include physical inspection of the modification and examination j
of quality related records.
Sample selection shall include some of the specific work items examined under paragraph.4, above.
Lead Responsibility:
J. F. Burdoin
- - ~
m.wo-- w-1_
. _... _ ~,, -
m.-s
y.
6L.
J. L. Crews,
j Many of the above inspection activities have been in progress for j
some time and are documented in Region V inspection reports and NRR/IE trip reports. This form of documentation will be continued, o
-l with a sumation to be provided in the Region V SER submittal.
- l. %!
p T. W. Bishop, Chief Reactor Construction Projects Branch i
i cc:
J. F. Burdoin i
J. H. Eckhardt J. R. Fair, IE K. S. Herring, NRR P. J. Morrill H. E. Schierling, NRR D. M. Sternberg T. Young i
e I
+ - ~..
~
w.
-