ML20215D199
| ML20215D199 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 12/11/1986 |
| From: | Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Goldberg J HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215D202 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8612160256 | |
| Download: ML20215D199 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000498/1986039
Text
a
p* **%q
4,,
UNITED STATES
e
'
[
g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
r R
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20566
7;
% * * * * * */
DEC 11 M
Docket Nos. 50-498
50-499 .
Mr. J. H. Goldberg
Group Vice President - Nuclear
Houston Lighting and Power Company
P. O. Box 1700
Houston, TX 77001
SUBJECT:
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROGRAM (EAP)
INSPECTION REPORT 50-498/86-39, 50-499/86-39
Dear Mr. Goldberg:
This letter conveys, the results and conclusions of NRC's evaluation of cor-
rective actions associated with the following Stone and Webster Engineering
Corporation (SWEC) EAP Independent Technical Assessment Tasks:
85-1, Control
Room HVAC System; 85-2, Component Cooling Water System; and 85-3 Offsite AC
Power and Medium-Voltage AC Power Supply Systems.
The inspection was conducted
by a team of personnel from the NRC's Office of Inspection and Enforcement and
consultants at the offices of Bechtel Energy Corporation (BEC), Houston, Texas,
August 25, 1986 to August 29, 1986. Additionally, the status of all outstanding
items from previous NRC inspection reports Nos. 50-498/85-09, 85-14, 85-22 and
85-26 were reviewed.
Based on our inspection, it was concluded that corrective actions for Tasks
85-1, 85-2, and 85-3 have been acceptably completed and that all previous inspec-
tion report items have been adequately resolved.
In tt.e process of resolvint
previous inspection report open items, the staff identified a new civil / structural
technical issue regarding the application of a 20% factor to live loads when
combined with seismic loads in the design of the reactor containment building.
This issue was referred to NRR for resolution since it was viewed by IE to be
a deviation from an FSAR licensing commitment.
The results of the inspection were reviewed with your EAP manager in an exit
meeting on August 29, 1986; notwithstanding this I regret the delay in issuing
the inspection report.
The next inspection of your EAP is tentatively scheduled for the week of December 15,
1986.
The purpose of this inspection is to verify the adequacy of corrective
Q21boassos3g33
G
ADOCK 05000490
..
J. H. Goldberg
-2-
actions associated with EAP Tasks 84-4, Separation and Fire Protection Criteria;
85-4, HELBA; 85-5, ASME Class 1 Pipe Stress Analysis; and 86-1, Field Walkdowns.
Sincerely,
'
-
Brian K. Grimes, Director
Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor,
and Technical Training Center Programs
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
,