ML20214W648

Requests Transmittal of Encl Technical Evaluation Repts (TER) SAIC-86/3067 & SAIC-86/3070 Re Dcrdr.Licensee Requested to Provide Addl Info for Inadequate Items in Ter. Response Requested within 30 Days

ML20214W648
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	09/29/1986
From:	Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Vissing G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20214L289	List: ML20214L287 ML20214L988 ML20214W648 ML20215L608
References
TAC-56100, TAC-56101, NUDOCS 8610030160
Download: ML20214W648 (2)

Text

pMt h q'o UNITED STATES g

[, p, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 D 'j

% ,/ SEP 291986 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 MEMORANDUM FOR: Guy Vissing, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate No. 6 Division of PWR Licensing-B Robert Lee, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate No. 7 Division of PWR Licensing-B FROM: Dennis M. Crutchfield, Assistant Director Division of PWR Licensing-B

SUBJECT:

TRANSMITTAL OF TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT (TER) AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR ARKANSAS 1 AND 2 (TACS 56100 and 56101)

You are requested to transmit the attached TER to the licensee for Arkansas 1 and 2. The TER was prepared by SAIC and addresses the Detailed Control Room Design Review Evaluations, Phase III-IV.

The licensee is requested to provide additional information for those items in the TER described as inadequate, not satisfactory, unacceptable or without a schedule. Most of these items were discussed with the licensee during a presentation at NRC on August 7, 1986. Many of the licensee's responses were found to be satisfactory, however, documentation regarding the resolution of these issues is required. The licensee's response should address the following items:

• the basis for not correcting those HED's identified by SAIC and rejected by the licensee t

• the schedule for completion of all safety significant HED's f

• the basis for continued plant operation in the presence of identified and uncorrected safety significant HED's l

Upon receipt of the response to the staff's request for additional infonnation, an SER, based on the SAIC TER and the licensee's response, will be issued for the DCRDR in approximately two-months. The licensee's response should include the text of the August 7, 1986 presentation. Copies of the viewgraphs supplemented with text as necessary, should be included.

l During the August 7, 1986 meeting, the licensee described various HED resolutions as being optimal in terms of resolving conflicting demands but,

Contact:

C. Morris q QF l @) ~

X27358 }

[kl i

SEP 29 ggg

-j[ not strictly in agreement with the guidance contained in NUREGS-0700, -0737 and -0801. The resolution of these HED's should address the considerations that were used such as color matrix conflicts and surface enhancement. Also, the licensee should notify the staff when the Arkansas 2 ESS panel has been painted so it can be evaluated for acceptability. ,

The requested information should be provided within 30-days of receipt of the TER and should be complete such that additional RAI's will not be required.

O m.

Dennis M. Crutchf eld, A 9

stant Director Division of PWR Licensi -B

Enclosure:

As stated cc: J. Stolz G. Knighton C. McCracken J. Stokely, SAIC J. Moyer, SAIC R. Ramirez L. Beltracchi G

, , - ---- - ,