ML20214V623
| ML20214V623 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 06/04/1987 |
| From: | Mark Miller Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | James O'Reilly GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| References | |
| IEIN-86-098, IEIN-86-98, NUDOCS 8706120195 | |
| Download: ML20214V623 (2) | |
Text
,
Docket No.: 50-425 4 Juli 1937 Mr. James P. O'Reilly Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30830
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Subject:
Request for Additional Information Regarding Offsite Medical Services for Vogtle Unit 2 Enclosed please find IE Information Notice No. 86-98: Offsite Medical Services which was distributed on December 2,1986, to all nuclear reactor facilities holding an operating license or a construction permit. The information notice transmitted Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Guidance Memorandum (GM) MS-1, " Medical Services," that addresses implementation of the Commission policy on offsite medical services published on September 17, 1986, in the Federal Register (51_FR 32904).
A critical deadline is approaching for plants that did not have a full power operating license on the effective date of the GM (November 13,1986). The implementation section of the GM states, " Plans for plants that do not have a l
full power operating license should reflect the provisions of this GM within 9 months of the effective date of the CM" (i.e., August 13,1987). Because Vogtle Unit 2 will receive a full power licensing decision after August 13, 1987, it will be necessary for the offsite plans to reflect the provisions of Guidance Memorandum MS-1.
Therefore, it is important that this infonnation be submitted to FEMA in a timely manner to support the unit's full power license.
The NRC would like to be aware of the status of the offsite medical services arrangements in order to determine any potential delays in FEMA findings.
Within 15 days of the date of this letter, please provide a brief report on the status of arrangements for medical services in the offsite plans for Vogtle Unit 2 vis a vis the guidancc in MS-1.
In particular, please identify the schedule for submission of offsite medical services information to FEMA's regional office (s).
Since ely, Mela i A. Miller, Protect Manager Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION: See next page cc:
See next page I
f P.D#
/bRP-I/II MDun'c{'an-PD#1-kDRP-I/II PD#I P-I/II FNi'Mg/mac TTer BJYot h bTood 06/ [f' /87 06/$/87 06/
87 8706120195 870604 PDR ADOCK 05000425 G
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly Georgia Power Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant cc:
Mr. L. T. Gucwa Resident Inspector Chief Nuclear Engineer Nuclear Regulatory Comission Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 572 P.O. Box 4545 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Mr. Ruble A. Thomas Despish Kirkland, III, Counsel-Vice President - Licensing Office of the Consumers' Utility Vogtle Project Council Georgia Power Company /
Suite 225 Southern Company Services, Inc.
32 Peachtree Street, N.W.
P.O. Box 2625 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 James E. Joiner Mr. Paul Rice Troutman, Sanders, Lockeman, Vice President & Project General Manager
& Ashmore Georgia Power Company Candler Building Post Office Box 299A, Route 2 127 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Danny Feig Mr. J. A. Bailey 1130 Alta Avenue Project Licensing Manager Atlanta, Georgia 30307 Southern Company Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 2625 Carol Stangler Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Georgians Against Nuclear Energy 425 Euclid Terrace Ernest L. Blake, Jr.
Atlanta, Georgia 30307 Bruce W. Churchill, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 2300 N Stmet, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20037 Mr. G. Bockhold, Jr.
Vogtle Plant Manager Georgia Power Company Route 2, Box 299-A Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. R. E. Conway Senior Vice President and Project Director Georgia Power Company Rt. 2, P. O. Box 299A Waynesboro, Georgia 30830
- w:/ l0. -? f 4
SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-98 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 December 2, 1986 IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-98:
OFFSITE MEDICAL SERVICES 1
Addressees:
All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license or a con-struction permit.
Purpose:
This information notice is provided to bring to the attention of licensees a i
new Commission policy on offsite medical services around nuclear power plants t
and a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidance memorandum addressing that policy.
It is suggested that recipients review the information for appli-cability to their facilities.
No written response is required.
Description of Circumstances:
Attached is FEMA Guidance Memorandum MS-1, " Medical Services," that addresses
)
implementation of the Commission policy on offsite medical services published l
on September 17, 1986 in the Federal Reaister (51 FR 32904).
This Guidance Memorandum was prepared in coordination with the NRU staff.
As noted in the referenced policy statement, the Commission has determined that these modifi-cations fall under the backfit rule's exception as necessary to bring facili-ties into compliance with a rule of the Commission.
q No written response is required by this information notice.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator of. the appropriate regional office or this office.
f lL.
gh-,
Tdward rdan, Director Division Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attachments:
1.
FEMA Guidance Memorandum MS-1 2.
List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices Technical
Contact:
Edward M. Podolak, IE (301) 492-7290 o
1 j
4611260006 -
l IN 86-98 1
December 2,1986 Page 1 of 12 P4 Federal Emergency Management Agency d
A Washington, D.C. 20472 MDORAND05 FDR: Regional Directors M jg%
Acting Regional Directors FPm:
cloughlin puty Associate Director State and Iocal Programs and S@prt Sul.TECT:
Guidance Memorandum (GM) MS-1, Medical Services ne attached GM MS-1, Medical Services, is forwarded for your use in providing guidance to State and local officials in developing their i
radiological energency response plans and in evaluating the nadical services capabilities of State and local governments.
Se origins of this m and its development and approval have been acmewhat' different fran other m's.
his m was developed as a result of a series of legal decisions involving NRC which determined that the existing interpretation of the required pre-accident medical arrangements for contaninated injured individuals as not sufficient. Those decisions led NRC to issue a policy statement (Attachment B) on September 17, 1986, -
indicating that the NRC staff (in consultation with FDIA) would develop detailed guidance on the necessary pre-accident arrangements fbr medical services by Nmember 11, 1986.
i We have worked closely with NRC in recent weeks in the preparation of this guidance. Unforttnately, the short deadline did not permit our j
usual procedure of obtaining Regional and other connents before issuing
~
this final guidance.
If you have any questions about MS-1, you may contact James tomas at 646-2808. A list of all current operative G4's (Attacknent C) is also prcvided for your information.
ATTACHMDfTS:
A.
2 MS-1, Medical Services B.
Dnergency Planning - Medical Services, September 17,19 86, 51 FR 329 04 C.
List of Operative Gt's r-,-*-
--'"v
- '"# ' ' ' ~ ~ ' ' ' ^ "
"~
A%2achment,1 IN 86-98 December 2, 1986 Page 2 of 12
['k h Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM MS-1 MEDICAL SERVICES i
_ Purpose This Guidance Memorandum (GM) provides interpretation and clarification of requirements contained in the Nuclear Regulatory Cornission rule,10 CFR 50.47 (b)(12) and the associated guidance in NUREG-0654/FEVA-REP-1, Revision 1, re-
)
lated to the provision of medical services for members of the general public.
Background
The background is contained in a policy statement from the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NkC) titled " Emergency Planning - Medical Services" (51 FR 32904).
In this policy statement, NRC states its belief that 10 CFR 50.47(b)TI2)
(" arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated injured individuals") requires pre-accident arrangements for medical services (beyond the maintenance of a list of treatment facilities) for individuals who might be severely exposed to dangerous levels of offsite radiation following an accident at a nuclear power plant. As used in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(12) and planning Standard "L" of NUREG-0654/FEPA-REP-1, Revision 1, the tem " contaminated injured" means
- 1) contaminated and otherwise physically injured; 2) contaminated and exposed to dangerous levels of radiation; or 3) exposed to dangerous levels of radiation.
Guidance i
10 CFR 50.47 (b)(12) requires.that " Arrangements are made for contaminated injured individuals." In its policy statement the NRC determined that this standard requires pre-accident arrangements for medical services for offsite individuals who might be exposed to dangerous levels of radiation following an accident at a nuclear power plant.
The following guidance applies to the eval-wation of the medical services aspects of State and local emergency plans under the criteria in NUREG-0654/TEMA-REP-2.
i Standards. Evaluations Criteria. Areas of Reviews and Acceptance Criteria A.
Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) i Plannino 5tandard Primary responsibilities for emergency response by the nuclear facility licensee, and by State and local organizations within the Emergency Planning Zones have been assigned, the emergency responsibilities of the various sup-l porting organizations have been specifically established, and each principal response organization has staff to respond and to augment its initial response on a. continuous basis.
l Attachm:nt 1 IN 86-98 December 2, 1986 l
Page 3 of 12 i
- A.3. Evaluation Criterion Each plan shall include written agreements referring to the concept of operations developed between Federal, State, and local agencies and other support organizations having an emergency response role within the Emergency Planning Zones.
The agreements shall identify the emergency measures to be provided and the mutually acceptable criteria for their implementation, and specify the arrangements for exchange of infor1r.ation. These agreements may be provided in an appendix to the plan or the plan itself may contain descriptions of these matters and a signature page in the plan may serve to verify the a g reements. The signature page femat is appropriate for organizations where response functions are covered by laws, regulations or executive orders where separate written agreements are not necessary.
Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria State or local governments should obtain written agreements with the listed redical facilities (Planning Standard L. Evaluation Criteria 1 and 3) and trans-portation providers (Planning Standard L. Evaluation Criterion 4). The written agreements should contain simple assurances that the providers have adequate technical information (e.g. treatment protocols) and treatment capabilities for handling " contaminated injured" individuals.
An indication of Joint Comission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) accreditation will suffice for such assurance.
(Note:
Veterans Administration (VA), military and other government hospitals are not usually accredited by JCAH but usually have the desired capabilities.)
If state or local governments do not obtain written agreements, the licensee should obtain written agreements with the listed medical facilities and trans-portation providers.
If good faith efforts are not successful in a particular case, the licensee shall provide or arrange for adequate compensatory measures, e.g., obtain written agreements with other providers or provide temporary field i
medical care.
L.
Medical and Publit Health Supoort
_ Planning Standard Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated injured individuals.
L.I. Evaluation Criterion Each organization shall arrange for local and backup hospital and medical services having the capability for evaluation of radiation exposure and uptake, including assurance that persons providing these services are adequately prepared to handle contaminated individuals.
i IN 86-98 December 2. 1986 Page 4 of 12 i
. Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria There should be one primary local hospital and one backup hospital for each site for the evaluation and emergency treatment of " contamination injured" members of the general public. Nospitals are generally distributed proportional to the population. Thus, at sites with low population and few hospitals, the primary local and backup hospitals for members of the general public could be the same as those for the utility emoloyees and emergency workers.
)
L.3. Evaluation Criterion Each State shall develop lists indicating the location of public, private and military hospitals and other emergency medical services facilities within the State or contiguous States considered capable of providing medical support for any contaminated injured individual. The listing shall include the name, location, type of facility and capacity and any special radiological capabili-ties.
These emergency medical services should be able to radiologically monitor contaminated personnel, and have facilities and trained personnel able to care for contaminated injured persons.
Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria The lists should be annotated to indicate the ambulatory /non-ambulatory capaci-ties for providing medical support for " contaminated injured" members of the general public and any special radiological capabilities. This will enable state and local officials to direct members of the general public to those institutions capable of handling contaminated injured" patients.
In the event that local and regional medical resources need to be supplemented, additional medical re-sources would be available through the Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
These resources would include the Rediation Emergency Assistance Center /
Training Site at Oak Ridge Tennessee and the National Disaster Medical System with headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.
4 L.4. Evaluation Criterton Each organization shall arrange for transporting victims of radiological acci-dents to medical support facilities.
i Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria Because the early symptoms of persons exposed to dangerous levels of radiation are usually limited to nausea and vomiting, ambulances may not be required to transport such persons to medical facilities. Rather, non-specialized public and private vehicles can be used, supported, if necessary, with agreements in accordance with A.3. above. For other types of contaminated injured individ-vals, specialized transportation resources (e.g., ambulances) would be necessary and should be assured by agreements, if necessary, in accordance with A.3. above.
(
Provisions should be made for the use of contamination control in transporting contaminated persons to medical facilities.
~
December 2, 1986 Page 5 of 12 Planning Standard O.
Radiological Emergency Response Training Radiological emergency response training is provided to those who may be called on to assist in an emergency.
0.4. Evaluation Criterion Each organization shall establish a training program for instructing and quali-fying personnel whc will implement radiological emergency response plans. The specialized initial training and periodic retraining programs (including the scope, nature and frequency) shall be provided in the following categories:
h.
Medical support personnel Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria Each hospital listed under Evaluation Criteria L.1 and L.3. shall have at least one physician and one nurse on call within about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> who can supervise the evaluation and treatment of radiologically " contaminated injured
- members of the general public..There are several sources for this training including NRC licensee sponsored training. Transportation providers should have basic training in contamination control. Examples include but are not limited to:
1.
FEMA handbook, videotape, slides and instruction manual titled " Hospital Emergency Department Management of Radiation Accidents,' SM 80/1984 2.
Courses from The Radiation Emergency Assistance Center / Training Site (REAC/TS) at Oak Ridge Associated Universities.
3.
Audiocassette and text course, " Radiation Accident Preparedness:- Medical and Managerial Aspects" by Science-Thru-Media Inc., 303 Fifth Avenue, Suite 803, New York, NY 10016.
N.
Exercises and Drills Planning Standard Periodic exercises are (will be) conducted to evaluate major portions of emer.
gency response capabilities, periodic drills are (will be) conducted to develop and maintain key skills, and deficiencies identified as a result of exercises or drills are (will be) corrected.
9 o
In 86-98 December 2, 1986 Page 6 of 12 5-4 M.2. Evaluation Criterion 1
A drill is a supervised instruction period aimed at testing, developing and maintaining skills in a particular operation. A drill is often a component of an exercise. A drill shall be supervised and evaluated by a qualified drill instructor. Each organization shall conduct drills, in addition to the biennial annual
- exercise at the frequencies indicated below:
c.
Medical emergency drills A medical emergency drill involving a simulated contaminated individual which contains provisions for participation by the local support services agencies.
(i.e., ambulance and offsite medical treatment facility) shall be conducted annually. The offsite portions of the medical drill may be performed as part of the required biennial annual
- exercise.
Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria State or local governments should provide for the conduct of appropriate drills and exercises which include " contaminated injured" individuals. These medical i
emergency drills involving the primary local (L.1.) hospital for state and local governments should be conducted annually.
These drills should also test the capability of relecation centers to direct " contaminated injured" members of the general public to the appropriate hospital.
If State or local governments cannot 1
provide for the conduct of the drills, the licensee shall. provide for the con-duct of such drills.
If good faith efforts are not successful in a particular I
case, the licensee shall provide or arrange for adequate compensatory measures.
l implementation State and local emergency response plans should reflect the provisions of this l
GM at the next annual update following 9 months from the effective date of this SM.
Plans for plants that do not have a full power operating license should reflect the provisions of this GM within 9 months of the effective date of this GM. The first medical drill reflecting the provisions of this GM should be conducted by the end of the next biennial exercise following 1 year from the effective date of this GM.
4
- Changes reflect language inco pr orated into GM PR-1.
i 1
..r-a.--.
. -. -. -,... - ~.,,,, - - -. - - -
.--,---.,,-,-n-
,.,----,n.-,--.n-.-n--,--,-..-,.,,_,,.,,.-w.
+-..---,nn
,w,--.,,
, -e--e,--
f 3
[
IN 86-98 December 2, 1986 Page 7 of 12 6-NRC Coordination This Guidance Memorandum has been prepared in coordination with the NRC staff, As noted in the referenced NRC Policy Statement, the Comission has determined that these modifications fall under the backfit rule's exception as necessary to bring facilities into compliance with a rule of the Comission.
l 1
O 9
h
i i
ut be-se Decemaer 2,1986 Page 8 of 12 Attacheent 8'
)
3 9N Tederal Regfeter / Vol. 51. No.180 / Wednesday. September 17. 1988 / Roles and Rejtulatione sur.h ed&tional arrangemente. the decisten") the Commleeren itself faced l Commission leaves to the informed for b hret time se question whether Judgment of the NltC etoff. subject to p!mning etandard (b][12] spphed to general pidance from the Commlulon, ambm of the public who were se euct paramete.e of the minimelly espued to offeite radiation following as necessary anangemente for medical accident at a nuclear power facility but services.To fulfill this mandate the staff wm not otherwise injured, and if so te (and IT.MA) willissue appropriate what estent. In eensidering this guidance to licensees, applicante, and geestion, the Commission eevght the state and local governmente..-
elews of es parces la the SONGS The United States Court of Appeals proceeding. reviewed the prtacipal for the District of Columble (" Court")
pwpoon of te planning standard, vacated and romanded a previous analysed the likelihood of serieue Commisalon laterpretation of plannine espoeares to se public seguirtag sienderd (b)(12)d maintenance of a lletwhich required only the eme gency me development an evolusted the type of emergency eItrestment feelfilles en which post.
greatment likely to be required. Sued en event. edoe arrangemente for medical thle mview, h Commiselon eencluded treatment could be besed. CUAAD e.
NAC. 753 F.2d 1144 (DC Cir.19tS).
as a generic ma tter that: (1) Planning standard (b)(12) applied to individuale Pending flas! Commission action in both enalle and offelle:(2) response to the CUAAD romend the eentaminated injured ladividuele" wee Commission issued a statement of laterim guidance which permitted.
latended te include seriously treadiated members Fthe public as we5 as purveant to 10 CTR 30 47(c)(1). es members o. Je public who are act Isevance of Mipowerlicenses where settovely irradiated but alas are te applicant setlefied the requirements of planning standard (b)(12) as treamatically iniured kom other causes and rodiologica!!y sentaminated; and (3) laterpreted by the Commlesion prior to Adquete, poet. occident arrangements CUAAD. and where the opplicant committed to fu!! compliance with the for necessary medical testment of Commission's Snel reopense to the esposed members of ee publis ecold be CUAAD remend.The Commlesion*e mode se as other beels if emergency priot isterlm guidance will continue to lu!ans ecstained a list of loca! treatme n
m6u.
govem the leeuance of full powee On appeal. 6e United States Cost of g,",",'",$(I*',"g*b.a C siafFs.
f Appeals for the D C. Circuit esaduded e,eae uius.e.
ne,. e
- i a c-da'** =' a==*r which po, int the new policy will apply.
(*,',pped j
tornetwa satt September 17.1988*
seside senau,nt list of treatment fac,ilities e.a,
,,s.n a, e,a,,
..,r vied a,,.gement, e,,est.
C.Sebastien Aloet. Office of the GeneralCounsel.U.S Nuclear accident medical treatment. CUAAD e.
efUCtCAR RgGift.ATORY Regu! story Commiselon. Washington, AOIC. Ps3 F.2d 1144 (DC Cir less). Fee gh a mason, the Court escated and COMMISSION DC 30655. Telephone (202) SM-3224.
semanded that part of the Commtulon's sureuststraer eeroomatises SONGS decisies that badinterpreted
= 'a" c;;g,*;* eczy;,rdein.
a
-ir us.wuc es
-.e r-
-., ma = e e - si
.e wak
.eaenna,.e.of.
Conweei rN e aree we isi.ad
.e.imentf..oe a e.e.ve
.. e nuoea,.egaster, si.e Cem e C.w.ae osa, e.ee. uoes,,e, aster,
C er m. m - so m mouu en temar,un as seva ComWuien.
goufgeled regulattens requiring its diesetion. Realbility la feeksening a actiese Statement of policy en e a"8 4Ad *pplicants for licenses toposeenable Interymtalles of pleanlag n8 sme,,e,,c, nanning Stande,d 10 CrR
==ai n=5e--
anaox*
U 8#IN n e le c e to e It oc nee.
R. Arraegmosta Seyend A W Of outerasre no Nudeer Regulatory Among those requirements was to CFR D'*'"**' I**EN" I*9"I'd Comrniselon ("NitC" se "Commloelon")
80 47(b)(12)("pfes staaderd Whas originally faced with the believes that 10 GR S&47(b)(12)
$X12)") which provt s:
question whothet the phrase
(" planning etandard (b)(12]") squires (b)ne seeas ud e5ene emergemey "tentaalasted injured ledividuals" was pre occident anangermente for medical sospense plan fee oesleet poww seessees bilended le encompose. inter alia services (beyond the maintenance of a meet ***t te felle=las standardes members of the public who. as a neult Wet cf treatment facililles) fee (131 A'rangemente are made let medical tndividuate who ofght be severely servlere fee sentaminated injured individuale* of an occident,wm esposed to dangemus levele of radiation. De esposed to dangerous levels of offsite he Seudern Californle SWises Commloolen found no esplicit and sedi:tionIstfewing on occident et a Company, et el. (Sea Onofre Nucleet eencleelve definition of the phreee la lhe.
seclear power plant. While sencluding Ceneratine Statien. Unite I and 31. CIJ-seguletlenitself eeits endertying Anat planales standard (b)(12] req CEf9C Nt
=.
.i' M -96 l
l 2-we,
? I ow..
Page 9 Of 12 Federal Resseter / Vol 31. No.180 / Wedneedey. September 17.1pse / Rules and Regute' ions 32905 Comtr.;ssion senc.!wded that h ymdent The minimsfly necepory The Cor.m(ssion has determined that risk nduction prpose of the arrangemente for the person that may be the er argemente conterep!sted ander Commission's reg 4!stione ergutted esposed need not be elaborete. As this Statement of pohey are the i
interpreting pfenn!ng standard (b)(12) te predouefy sieled b) the Comroleston, minimum requind by a nuonable app!) to such of!s.te esposed "li]t m n never the intent of the ne Ang of plannitta standerd (b 121 ledmdmels gNen the underipng ngutetiene lo ngulm directly or Accord r:gt), e!though implemen)(tation of l
essumption of the NRC's emergency ind.rectly est state and local this ree&ng of the standard Mllentet!
j plannmg reguleuens lhet a seriosa gesemmente adopt entraordseery some ed&none to, and some i
cecadent asutd occur and the meseune. each as construction of mo&ficehens of. the emergency Commission presumpt on that such en ed&tional hospitale or recruieneet of procedone and organitehone for which i
cecident could neuf le oNeite subetennel odditional me& cal beensees are ultimately nsponsible, the b&viduals being esposed le doneerous personnel. fust to deel w!th esclese mquiremente of the backal rule.10 Q1 I
levels of reestion (e presurnption plant accidents?17 NRC et 53t Rather, 30109 (1946). for e cost benefit analyste concurred in b) ee Federel Emergency the Commission believes met and a fin &ng that the sosta of the Efenerement Ageney). Aher seusfactor5 ovengements shestd mo&fications en tueuhad by a eetonsidersten of this metter fo!!owing include (1) e list of loca! er regtenal substenba!lacrease in esfe4 tre met the CUAAD decision, the Cerr.nlosion medical tnetment facihties eed opphcable. elece these mo&ficauona fall has dec:ded to re ehm this prior transporteuon providers appropriately seder the backfit rule's encepton for interpretation of plantdr,g standard annotated to show their capaciuse, mo&ficeuene necessary to bring 1
(b)(12).
speclol copsblhties er other urdque facihties into comphance with a rule of j
Hom ever, the Commission has come characterutics. (2) e good felth the Commissioek Kee 10 CFR 30108 to e d.fferent result with respect to the reasonable effort by Leonom er leealer (e)(2) and (e)(4)(1984 i
i l
eunimus arrangements neceuery for state goverrunents to fac1Liste er obtain whsch the beckfat rule). The snelyste eequine be done i
ladwidsels who might be serionry wmten og uments with the hated le jushfy the appbcahen of any ofice
}
esposed. but not othermise injured la e me&cel facibute and tenoportenen esception previelene seestitutes the radiolog : emergency b enginally providers. (3) Prevision for mekang eere of ihne $le teneet of pebey. See /d, i
nsolvics the seepe of errorementa eteifeble secessary troising for j
leswe. the Com russicm focund on the emergency nopease perseaselto III~ laterim Ciddesse i
partie6!ar needs of offsite espeeed idenuf. transport. and provide in its prior statement of pelley. 6e t
In&ndvals for emergency medical ernergency first aid to severely esposed Comminise idaskLed thne fastare Westment of their reestion Intury h in&dduals. and (e) a good faith l
this fashion. the Comm!nton made a nosonable effort by lir.easese or state er which tesuhed enlaterim peticy of I
locsi gosemmente to see that granting appbcaste for fuD power distinctier, between se need for tmmed.ete er meer.ters medical can, oppropriate drde end esercises are mquiremente of planning standard beense en equitable escapuen to the wiuch wee la its view the goel et senducted which include simulated (b)(12) under 10 CTR to efic)(1) where
]
planning etenderd (b)(12). and the seed severely.esposed ineviduals if good the oppbcast sehened the seguiremente forlens.teren me&celeere As to faith efforte ore not successfulle e of p!anning etenderd @)(12) es espowd indmdwets, the Comsninios particu!st sese, the licensee shall interpreted b) the Commission prior to 4
{
found that proude er errenge for adequets the CUAAD detielen and osmaltted J
4 te spessel hamd to pend b ne red;st;en esepeneetory mesearea sessistaat with itself to fut sempt.ence with any i
i c peme so the patient The serure of the Gemaisoierre letest to halt the odd tional requiremente imposed by ee j
eed,et.w. mbo w that.while meecal need for entreerdmary measures noted Cominiuien in nopense to the C#MD evetm n
- me3 he e m tvett eswe of essenw upowe.s regwed to obeve. The sempenestory measures amend Sistement of pehey es i
etw patiease ese ant be opproved b)(NRC, This level of Ernergency Planning Standard to CFR en!.hefy as and eseyecy sesset osas i
planning would help 1l provide 30 47tb)(1t). 90 FR sert (kle) EL 1886).
Ifestnew emitted) The sea lamed.eer of the j
evetmeer segwee le red.etmeurused ed&benal enurance er the eseperellem The three letters warm (t) the bda nd=ste p'evidu eneew and ellede Wme&celfacildies (2)euure propee penibihty ht te scope Mp!mming training (3) ensure te availabdity of a
tw esegmue d.eal temportetlen, and (4) desenatete a standard (b) 12) would be breited (2) the peasibikty that deley in eseplasse tit patC sas as) espebihty to prodde necessary servlees with the poet 4&MD requiremesse through dnlle and eseraleee eeufd be found to be insigdcant dueis i
From thle.$e Csamlesien mesoned The Commlulen hu directed to stat hlow probability of esandente dunas Cet the lona term meetment neede of c: pend in6vidole seuld be to g,velop, sens! stent with thle the interim perled and(3) the adequately met en ed Acebeste.
interpr,tellen of h pterintas standsed, of "other seppelhns reseese" possibihty JulJytag detailed and specifie guldense se the e brief encerboe where appbceals had After moonsideration to $sht of 6e CUA AD decialen, h Coevelesien bas notore of the med calservices to be alied h good felth open pner i
i evellebte la espoud ledividuele and as Commissise hier i
seneJuded that some ed&tional planned the opphcetion of planning standard standard (b)(12). pretetese af planning errengemente beyond the development (b)(13)le NRC heeneees and appbcante in thle Statement of policy laterpreties l
ef a het of ersteens facil. ties are im heensee to opnete esmmensen planning standard @)(13)the j
secessary to provide additlenet euclear yewer netters The Commlesles directe me NBC etelf to Coeuronse of effective mensgement of Commleelen has else directed the star developlie teneuhetles with FD4A) j Cmergency me&sel servlees in the bows to tenetder the$er sad under what andlun by 31/17 er days following a serem eastdent.
ertlerie it le netteury or oppropriate fee detailed guldense e/8e appropriela However, the Commtesten eentinues to the staff to vertfy the appreerfstenose of of the necessery arvensements s the esect aselews beliewe theI h long term treefseet treining and dnlle er esenfees constetent sie ee Ceemissies's seeds of espeeed Lodividuele see be a
eseecteted with the bandling of severely determinellen that planntng standard edequetely met en adAct boele, espeeedpeesene.
(b)(12) nquire errangemente for medieel i
i 4
- nt eng I ti. d6-98 December 2, 1986 Page 10 of 12 32906 Federal Re Ister / Vol. St. No 100 / Wednesday. Se ternber 17, teos / Rufee and Resulatione services (be)and the maintenance of a list of pre eafsting treatment fact!tues) for offsite esposed individuals The Commission belieges that the last two factors discussed in detaillalta May 21.
less Statement of Policy, conunue to lust.fr reliance on the Interim guidance for the period necessary for the h1C atef: to issue and licensees. applicants, and state and localsovernroents to imp'ement the detaded guidance.
Therefore, until appropnete detailed guidance consistent with th! policy statement is issued and irnpfemented.
the utensing Boards may continue te l
reasonably find that any hearin l
regarding compliance with 10 30 4?(b)(12) shall be limited to issues which could have been heard before the j
Court's decision in CUAAD v.NAC Dated at We:Mnstoa. DC this 12th day of,
September, tees.
l Tor et Nucleat RerJetery Ceeuniasion.
SamvelI Chilk, 3reretary ofde Commissu y D..a. m,. Fire. t
.....i awnsegetream e l
4 4
1 O
- es e e
_,..,__,._--_y__
7,_
.___.4___.
f.
~.
IN 86-98 December 2,1986 Pace 11 of 12
- /I9[s Federal Emergency Management gency Washing an, D.C. 20472 Attach ~ent C Noverber 13, 1986 OPERATIVE GJICANCE POORANM N rber Date Title 4
4/1/80 Radio Transmission Frequencies and Coverage 5
4/1/80 Agreemnts Among Gcuerrnental Agencies and Private (Revised-Parties 10/19/83) 8 4/2/80 Regional Advisory Ccmnittee Coordination with Utilities (Revised-10/19/83) 16 8/7/80 Standard Regional Reviewing and Reporting Procedures for State and Local Radiological D ergency Respcnse Plans 17 1 / 8/ 81 Joint Exercise Procedures 18 5 /2 1 / 81 FEMA Action to Qualify Alert and Notification Systems (Fevised-Against NURm-0654/rD%-RD-1, Rev.1 10/19/83) 20 10/19/83 Foreicn Larvaage Translation of Public Education Brochures and Safety Messages 21 2/27/84 Acceptance Criteria for Evacuation Plans 22 10/19/83 Recordkeeping Requirenents for Public Heetings 24 4/5/84 Radiological Emergency Preparedness for Handicapped Persons m -1 7/15/85 Remedial Exercises m-2 7/15/85 Staff Support in Evaluating RIP Exercises PR-1 10/1/85 Policy on NURDG-0654/FDtA-REP-1 and 44 CTR 350 Periodic Requirements
IN 86-98 Dece-ber 2. 1986 Page 12 of 12 2
IT-1 1 0/1/115 A Guide to Documents Related to the RD Program PI-1 10/2/85 ITMA Action to Pilot Test Guidance on Public Information Materials and Provide Technical Assistance on Its Use FR-1 12/3/85 Federal Response Center Ms-1 11/13/86 Medical Services N-2*
11/13/86 Protegtive Actions for School Children
- GM-21 will be retitled as GM W-1 when it is revised.
I i
i i
l I
L 1
l\\
q k
s 9
_,,,r..
.--._m.,.._.--wx
IN 86-98 December 2, 1986 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED IE INFORMATION NOTICES Information Date of Notice No.
Subject Issue Issued to 86-97 Emergency Communications 11/28/86 All power reactor System facilities holding an OL or CP and fuel facilities 86-96 Heat Exchanger Fouling Can 11/20/86 All power reactor Cause Inadequate Operability facilities holding r
Of Service Water Systems an OL or CP 86-95 Leak Testing Iodine-125 11/14/86 All NRC licensees Sealed Sources In Lixi, Inc.
authorized to use Imaging Devices and Bone Lixi, Inc. imaging Mineral Analyzers devices 86-94 Hilti Contrett Expansion 11/6/86 All power reactor
~i Anchor Bolts facilities holding an OL or CP 86-93 IES 85-03 Evaluation of 11/3/86 All power reactor l
Motor-Operators Identifies facilities holding Improper Torque Switch an OL or CP Settings 86-82 Failures Of Scram Discharge 11/4/86 All power reactor 4
Rev. 1 Volume Vent And Drain Valves facilities holding an OL or CP 86-92 Pressurizer Safety Valve 11/4/86 All PWR facilities Reliability holding an OL or CP 86-91 Limiting Acces's 11/3/86 All power reactor Authorizations facilities holding an OL or CP; fuel fabrication and processing facilities 86-90 Requests To Dispose of Very 11/3/86 All power reactor Low-level Radioactive Waste facilities holding Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.302 an OL or CP e
l OL = Operating License CP = Construction Permit
)
.;c - W t DISTRIBUTION,
< Docket Q NRC PDR Local PDR PRC System PD#II-3 Reading MDuncan HMiller BJYoungblood Reading FHiraglia RStarostecki JThoraa SVarga/Glainas OGC-Bethesda ACRS (10)
JPartlow EJordan
- - - -