ML20214Q388
| ML20214Q388 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/19/1986 |
| From: | Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Selman M CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. |
| References | |
| CON-#486-841 2.206, NUDOCS 8609240338 | |
| Download: ML20214Q388 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.
< 4 ',
t s September 19, 1986
-Docket No. 50-247 '
Consolidated Edison Company < of New York, Inc. N ATTN: Murray Selman Vice President, Nuclear Power Indian Point Station Broadway and 81eakley Avenue Buchanan, New York 10511 Gentlemen: ' The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received the enclosed Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) memorandum dated September 17, 1986 which i refers to the state of. emergency preparedness ar,ound your reactor site at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station. Attached to'the FEMA memorandum is their , report dated September 17, 1986, entitled " Interim Finding - Indian Point," l
- prepared by FEMA Region II. The repdrt'provides FEMA's findir.gs on several
'f l unresolved planning issues zone in the for the four Point Indian counties site.that compr.ise the 10-mile emergency '
I While progress has been made in responding to these issues, FEMA stated that they were " unable to provide reasonable assurance that the public health and safety of school children in the four-County Emergency Planning Zone at Indian Point can be protected." The FEMA report goes on to state that certain addi-tional material has been submitted relative to correcting certain of the deficiencies yet this information has not been considered in the FEMA report. The NRC has not been apprised of the current status of these corrective actions. We are of the view that the unresolved issues identified by FEMA and referred to in their report must be remedied in order for the NRC to conclude that ' appropriate protective actions can and will be taken in the event of a radio-logical emergency at your facility.
~
(f t Accordingly., i 'l's you,are requested to submit a written' statement to this office y ( h within 10 days of the date of thi hlgttep, describing (1)thecurrentstatus
'of the issues identified in FEMA's' Yeport, (2) yoursplans and schedules for '
' correcting the unresolved issues,<and (3) yourt. views: regar~ d irig'the significance s of these findings with respect to the(StateTof thirgency Pr_eparedness,at the ' Indian Point site'. We consider the FEMA findings to apply eq' u ally'to Units 2 I and 3, and suggest you coordinate your reply. This request affects fewer than ten licensees and therefore, is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of / 1980 (PL 96-5111 1 Sincerely, 8609240339 860919 PDR ADOCK 05000247 WigTnal ~sTgnedlig F PDR - Thomas E. Murlegf Thomas E. Murley N Regional Administrator i s
Enclosure:
Memorandum from FEMA dated 9/17/86 w/ Attachment ql[g g f _\ '
Murray Selman 2 cc: w/ Encl. Robert Spring, Manager, Regulatory Affairs Brent L. Brandenburg, Assistant General Counsel P. Kokolakis, Director, Nuclear Licensing Water Stein, Secretary - NFSC Public Document Room (PDR) local Public Document Room (LPDR) Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) NRC Resident Inspector State of New York bcc: w/ Encl. Region I Document Room (w/ concurrence) Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o Encl.). -
" DRP Section Chief Robert J. Bores, DRSS '
t s DRSSM RC EP&RPB/4,',f CCo. 12, . 1Ma,ti a Mu,i.,
$p,,jye,ez 9//9/86 9/pr7/86 9/q'/86 9/13/86 9/[/86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
.b '. , ,g . .
1 301 492 7921 gg 99/18/86 11:22 gm a sr.se ses 13:3e rose ofEH FEB Cm 1 Federal Fmpf Management Agency * , w o m g n , n.oise m E P 11 7 8 06) IWGAsupt Sets Seess4. assemi Disseter, 91staten of teengency pumperedeems and . Engsspesing Seepense et eneessement n a
- "'a 'JEe;= g;;igh .
Offlee.et Isomsrel ens steheelegienk neemmes Prsormer e tDa3acri serppu t.208ipatition on Indian potht nie ia in esepense to your nemeentse et W 5.1905, reasseting a e finding and deteeminetten about ehether, at the pausent time, the offsite plane ear. Indian amist ass adequate te sedtonesiset .sf enheet sedadsen sa the: event.of e.eedialagi . protect the land col sessgencar at the site. Eau ask.spoo&fically abast the signifiaanse of e ' arqr aseeltdng deficiencies trith seseost to the. ability to take adagnata 6%e infeemetio j eseouses to ashool 411 deen. tien in ting.the anal misester's mootsien an the.2.905 i en . 1406) f!&ed by thatuew Wauk public Inteenstausee.(Nrpt 1' these teouse , Attached la the finding prepness ty meWien 22 of the.Psderal assegency fanagement Agency (estn). It la beoodsupon outertal eenLtted 14 the. State of wr York thr.ough August it,19064 Aeaitimal meterial eentinues ebengen.to to the a be autunLttede including, for esses 3s, a list,of Intetchester Ctunty skicklaret Courity plan,:four Estesse of Agreement.' transportaticri guariders, etc. Alas, a sesstial annecise is to be i searh1=9 aster in 1906 eldch may. effect asas teaues cmoormd with the , protectlen el scimot children. In ender to awfnect ery changes or enhorioe-ments incorporated in additional adseittale and to resort on e lthe soeules finding on. of the roundial esercise, as pecpose to endemit a mL this Laeue en recruary 1# 1987. Taking into corsideration plan.edmaittala.end amorcises medan gooursed prior to August 12, 1996# retA is toestde to proeide sessenable ammuronne that>the putdic hedth and asfoty of assion1 eld 16ren in the four-Omanty amarguiner planning sene et 2neientpoiet,een he protooeed. httachment. ~ As stated h ...
.. . ~ . . I I - _ . . . . . .
i -_ _-_ ----m%, _ _
. o ,c.e. i s.. . ,
.f.i, f.5.*
f, s i m yg,ge eig.., g g g ge w -...#. ... !
. 7 .... .
(Septanber 17, Ise6)
) .
. . .: his is in response to the necesher 6,1905 ===a-ides femksqhetemeteur w
. ..- Regulatory Canonission (NBC), requesting a vuld fintisig tin $.'detessainatian '
.',, , about whether, at the present tismo, the e88 site media 8W dusegency response . l
.' plans for Indian Point are adequate to gesbest ther health ett safety:ct - " !
t
< l. . eensel Children in the event of a radiological emesgesyintathe miter Mou J. ' i
, ,. . . ' W edt spoeifically about the significanos of any reunising depielencies with *.
6 - respect to the ability to take adequate measures to protects adiocE chi 1&en.
- t $.i3 . -
);
i
.~1. On April 28,1986, a draft of the Federal Duergency Manageaient A0mney's '- l i .
(FDR) finding and detenmination cm the adequacy of offsite tadiological 1 s energency plans to protect the health and safety of edical childman was provided to New York State. his draf t was provided so that' the State uculd - l j . have the opportunity to respond to any issume which FDR found to be tmtesolse6. - j
; On May 9,1986, a meeting was held at the offices of FDE Region 11 to diecmans 1
; the status of .the issues in the four counties that ocupcios.the 10-suite - l
- f. plume EPZ for the Indian Point site. Attending the seeking 1 sere supresentatives - !
I faces the Federal Dnergency Management Agency Region II, NRC Regitti I, Nos
- l i York state, Westchester, Putnam, Rockland and Orange Counties} the Stew York
- 1
- l
'.. / Pcwor Authority and consolidated Edison. As a meeult of this meeting, now-7 York State agreed to resolve certain issues and to peoride' FIDE ~with informatiori I
. . on the latest status of resolving the remaining concerns. On July 7,1986 4
New York State submitted the following information to PDE: 3
) .l
- m apanse dates foe training of bus drivers l l
' I
- Proposed revisions to the It:ckland, Westchestar and Putnen -
l . [. County plans: and - e f
- Modified letters of agreement with bus providers. ;
e .
)
) his finding and determination incorporates the repulta of 9pm'n'May 9,1906'
.noeting with the state, counties and utilities, the State's written temponse .
, ,g..
i of July 7,1986 regarding the April 28,1986 & aft af this asport. A meeting' . 3 .s was held on August 13, 1986 with the State of New York, leastchester an6 ~ ' 7*. L
- a. Rockland counties. Correspondence autsmitted as corrective action by tho' '
f, Governor's authorized representative to FDE after the August IS Iqeeting has
- i not been reviewed for adequacy and is not reflected in the body of this i report.
)
4 1 f
; 0 i ,; .
$ g .
.: I n
( t g, , .
. 3.. r _ ,
i eufP
- l
;..- .o k . ;. . I l
1 l r' A. Rookland County Special Issue '-~ ~ - - - -- Rockland county 1
+1 s.
. The State has in the past and aga roosntly, said that.there $s as need..' -
s, ,g. fer isttees of agressent in Ro County between the seesty mad gehoe35. ' - i'*.',' ergeisis since the county executi has the right toiuse ashpdO. fheilities 6
.d.
v,. Sa emergency, ; This position me stated in a letgerf ested, {u$y 1,..tg83 to . .t etteh stated in part: - A'~ * . t
~j ?.. :-4e44.ANe533mA,i,c .
(p.- ad County soboel diair
~
. ;. . base premised their $14ps !: 't i- d. #' iole 2-8 of $45 SaeetAi v and the abl164F of the . .
',...l*.
$ iefir Executive i
to use the faoi . ties during an emergency.; - plan, therefore, is be the Chief Esecutive's t
. J. ettler to open these schools as option oesters."
$ In*4 Febryary 20, 1986, letter to FE g , New York State'again said that no e '.
* . 1stpra of agreement are necessary, however, in this case varigua sostions
,. of the Rockland County Charter are (%ed as the basis of this positica.
a ., k d the 36seletion or the issue is not easily acoasplished teoaues of two other.' #
. . j . Sew teFk StS%e letters to FEMA. In?e response to FDIA's June 11,:1gM. -
s ., .
! 1stter regas61ng the NYPIRO Petition of'Epril 6,19M the State respopoedt.4 : t-
. P) - to the question:
- d. 'To what extent are school districts required by New York .
y State Ereoutive Law 2-B to participate in radiological .
.. -'. assegency planning a redness exercises and e. ills, ant actual emergency ponse activities?' ,
t 4 j .,. A. i' Executive Law Artiene 2-B does pot requirg sobeel . . j distriots, or any other of local government, to- .
-7 * . participate in radiologica rgency matters.* - '.-
r
. 6 In 4 diew forir 9 tate letter to FEMA ded February 13, 1966 ; the state said. T . . l.<. i ' ; , sn o.rt, . .
a)j "We have and will continue to include local school offiotals 'n in our planning process bet as 3.eviously stated there is non r. c e., .
.. s.
Pastpe that the school officials have to abide by a FEMA - 0 .. . .
- Sanos Memorandum".
1 i
- Fu @ , the same letter states. -
s. ,gi . . - . 'Altheggh I w guidance addresses the local povgessmat - -
'u.=. . :
responsibiaity fbr coordlaating. th school eff141413.- , . i S
} .. *-
- there is no h2JGrance th8% Soboo efficials wiS adept. . .
, ; .,i recommended cessrgency progedureaj' , .p J.,,. , d U . .
,1 , .
fp , gj . . . h. .% '
*bh .
M
W T t . i e
._ .?
3 *)= .'%
$he 3000e quotes from various State letters to FEMA @eist ite h'Sasta. e '
g 'ooies. The four ecunt,y plans thry greatly with reepset 46 heu-this d' '-
. ii $s appromohed. Some o les lutve signed Lettere et agreseset,1dtish- -'-
~
to give the local aut ties the . ability to.aake mes .ef> galsed e..
's4y as is necessary. -
*e K .A. ,.E W -
.' Na' result of FEMA Aegion II's @ $, M M gM Akehts,:eaunties' C
. j- ..e ame utilities, FEMA's Reglesal CeW4eriaumd W 8eust,y:Suseuhage 4..- -
esed the need for .htterb ' i
.. i has D M (19m) tas me. 7 (198$7; No then s 3 ( pat as tiety relate to various cohool lities la ammaname genoty o r i , i gitti C. Roger Lunder, Esq. , to the Divi on of Militarp.& Savell ': . . ;
Affhire for the State of New Yos4r. John Lamberskis Esq. of the New Tork e i
- ; Pouer Authority. PEM4's Regional 1 ocasias6cated his eeneerus'te 'the: r .
State in a letter dated July 23,194 (oopy attached) . The StSte hae. + t . requested a legal opdaion from the State Attorpey Genarsi on tip adequmoy- . ?
.of the Rookland Comty stdttute..
j ,
',' It has been and contirnpa to be position that lettere of agreedent **' "
are required to assure the availability of necessary resources 'see.a$*-
> ~ - .
receptdan centers and transportattoa+eguipadak.
- l; 1 1 g
- I
; y 3. Protep Actions e.
i
, ;' Beakland County ,
8 i 1he ashool population will be protytod by either early disminnel es* ; , . . j
. evacuation. \
/. . . D .Bockland County Plan (page IV499) states that tigere are tws pote:Adat * *
' settoms to be taken with regard to the school populationst <
1 ! i : 5 A Close schools 'and have st@s Dt home with families pr$or i . i to an evacuation estdar; fj , 6 ; j 1 ,
- I ( .
~
", If the 'Go Name Policy
- J U t affected schools, oh 6% the
*wi34 safest oemrse 4 e evacuated to predesigente8,hs or optacq.for*.g.J. - .
2 School Reception Centers. .g - - i. ? - A l ? 7t should be noted that the Plan (Drooedure SCM.1, sectioni5 3 2) 'e a , j that at an Alert Emerstoy Clas46fiention Level (BCL) or 'Orgater gency* l ! 9 i 'j . the Assistant Superintendent of BuMness and Finages of $0C58 wil)i.dareet
- 4 4 - i
- g. ths Administrators of schools with15 mookland Comty to -teins " ems Wr.maveralm4 e . .- !
(* ' Te steps which are means of implement 1% the *00 home policy.# . hs.3deWeb - e
- l 5J4, the provision is mads por settsal evaeuntions to to diroghed,9 i 4.e . i i !;
.h. ... unuld upe ofseem reasonable this option at highertoECLs limit the has 8%o goes greater Policyfer* to potential met the enflagAlget. .$ g.Asr : 1i r4 l
.. t oespleted the 'Go Bees PolioF"' Prior to an evacuation assier. s n- . : .' s -
)
fL. iI y 4
, ]
4 P,
. f< .
- m. .. . ..
l i l
) ..
&. m...-> . .
j l . : . \.
, c .... .
/ .. . e. -
,3 *l -
. 'l!bD.$ h
. e
- ,i = - -
i . . .
~
w% v.'. a.n s e - -
.; s.. -N,
- . . Die 404% responded on July 7, .1984t to this plannias.ignes etutagittat thet . " - i-
- Med' h 4 t' **
,. v
*eo' replalesWitpolicya has been with " Site Area olarified or Geogsti by deleting *er greater M6detho4 that 4 Wy.8, FWlathas'th e-
? . , .: this is not responsive to -
eas4&est. 4 gene's : an .-
,.. ding is not a so $$ 4
'M . . > V .-
- u'ue-
., .that Beelenaed *1a4 to -
peMeys z
.SQ,a M Sure @otesE1a4 eta any1"5** "
1
-$ teipnl returned to the ore the dhi)datesatesstaa n I ..g..g.- p eesties action recomenade ,onAugushth. 4heJStabe t en e "
- i -
. </ eitted additional proposed y es to narrest the/ SteF tt .Wult(veP ' -
{ . W86, propaeed abanges, i.e., the steigene8 prosedWre sa44se SCE4, .) - finds these proposed. Man' ehanges i 1
...., 4 delettag all words after *A1 to ty aoeaptable. FDIA will eunit the ~ fos %eal submissian of thake plan changte =-
in 1967 h order to verify that the eorrections have toen ande... ZA the Boveeber 28,1984 fn11-mos reise, an area requiring corrective ~ * - > ; setion was identified which inve1Ves .the unsuccessful training.gf ambool 3 * * - offiaLald in response options (so- t Eseroise Assessment (FRA);' February 27,4 '*
.i 4965, page 63). Additional tr .must be provided to assure. Shat a11.scho61 -
, . . offieists understand the various genee options and arm, avert' of their-
.. ., responsibility in the event of an rgency. During the M A 9946 - ' *i . gfull aoale eneroise, it uns detesinited that plans and proepdurest base 30t - -
i been developed for at least two tionpahlic sch6ols. Althatd $he e60ety -
- l provided evideeos of written othrs tar assist schools in the roeiew of
{ enesgeper preparedness plane which were sent to schools la a letter ested j s. .Getener 7,1985, the school off&oials interviewed could not recall having a- ' 4 <hess oftsted this assistance. This issue has Ateen 03Sssified asi a deficiency *
't -and'FWA. has recommended that State and Cyanty offietals should.Tollowup '!
;.* dth the acepublic schools in Rockland by to insgre that pla'as and the agespeary resources to protect nonpub 1 students are in, place.
,. .. h - according to sehool 4aformation ha4 act been provided principaleg'.pblic schools for three (,3) years.
.i -
;,,. S e of students at two (t) noge .-
f,. : . to these school principals, 4ty last inforuption.prer$ded %e 1 was in a 1983 letter wit $ instructions to , and ad
, *d-e
, pagh $3)2 - P
;g .edmorgeasy infeeustion brochure, fpBA dated September, f n' N ' Bid State responded to these unresolveW exercise issues rotating that seisool - .
i f grtiaials will be provided training iar asptember 1986. FEMA intends to-attend a sample of these training seestons for sobool'offieials to verify i .*l. the adequacy of the training. .
.3. 9.
;. } *
. ~ ~ me emt, y,
.%he wo (2) esaditions fer whether aeh6els * .
I 1- / .are spea or ter County closed andplan ocasiders speetti foup @(4).pr$eetive otico poocessadattes.'(FAR):! - '
- h. 4 ., .. - * . ,optionsjfer the Alert, Site ener and , Bessgenoy SIX,s. .e ;Y.t h.M
.Steae49e as follows: : ,' .i-g y.I ' e )
- Early Dismissal inclut&ng keeping soboels elosed. (&1ertl5Q.) -
,J.4 +
3 y.- . lE I s.
.E tp - h,3 .
I { ' .( , ;g gh .ad % ,j _
i- . J .
,e
,,g,, ; ....
' Shelter in place. .
! ' Move students to school recepties senters. .- y-3 ,
' Eeep studente in school, ustia morum1 diasisaal time.Jac . Jr .- . .
". <4, .. .-46 M
- arte m esseney med
' egnametica af S Q the M a1'se.provides e sa 12 years W. egey-seogunat#usemea. =. : *. .-
.. e .
y
,g 't og a teu tonsenese to q ism. t' . a.
'V.- I + Thde,efe statestnutg.In the gha that Mrs the desta$en makere te eemeider1 s
.- 2 . 4...the sprio cirodmatanees ef e given dungency betere selasting the PAR that t.;
,' , y to to implemented. fbr schools.
the plan statek (Section C of Attdebeest 3 toeAppendia A) that/if .tM supply !
.i of buses is limited, the buses will ber ased to evseunte sehool schildres !
'.! 'e before the evacuation of the general M11st. )
l
- In addition, Westchester County has informally provided. FEM 4$aespied of - ' l
. A school plane that.are in place Tor use in the event .at s*r9dtalegiemi -
. j
. teorgency a$ Indien Point. FBea has act, roeiewed these schoot 3Qash t && met - e.' : I
; r they are inste to the County plaar ishis4 desepibee in SeteL1 the meaner -
-)r s $a Which pr ative action recommendations 1611 be developed aptd taplemented
, , .' for schools,in Westonetter Opunty.
- i. Goumeer, during the . June (,1986 full-seale exereios, it isas. observed that
- the eeoced-snitt school oowdinator at the Westchester Oeenty 50C was not
-J treined and u'eed a long-o to 1961 version o{the school procedure portion ?
. W the Goody , plan (Proc ,
- 4) .. FBeiJhas reo - -^;M that.estfielent
. s., $mpees gf,bpogup achool ecordinators shop 1d be trained sad* * 'ppp11pt with YJW* ,
} '
l! i f;.1(b h tipump Flan states that school fasibities, &1sele 814 einigery ,
- I4- o j- estes$e. mad Way.aerees (Atwk-a%oesters 5 to tare esati$esed Appendis A M)*aseL1Pf6regme1114&ta by 553 540654.Ae'-mtian i . .
pr Action Rooemmendations for the sotp1 pbpulaties would De selseted .o 1
) fret't fullbwing 4ptions which are speciftelPsin the School Procedure. -
j
. t E 45e. 44eit he
~
t-
}
4 Esep sobools oleeed if act tar'peasien -+
* -}
) ', . -
'r S ter in place l
n
.;tl.
1 J la / I
- 1,.
c- t ' s' .m e - .
, o w .
4 ". At the Site Area RG.,
~
~'
any of the above -
.( .. . ,5
.3dpot16e evacuation of stadsats under 12 yters F '# * -
,, . puhgeant emmen, med.others with a low.4plestans 40 ,stice.* .
I,3- , [ $4 b Genasst higesoF % - g ,, gg, . - syv;4M . sr.
~ '
se m students to a ashool ten p ater - i At the May!9,1986 meeting FBIA point out that.(1) the early%@ -
.~-- '
. eption was not included in the Putaan by g&an and Wy
) the', gt .y ', - I i
evaeunte students to a school recept @eh center leded i. at either the Alert or Site Area heademog SQ.s. i- i J the Putnam Comity plan is being reviadd to inolgde thaWe ooast
- 9 -
J l When these modifications are.ocuplete. Putaan County plan' fb11owing FAR options fer schools at the 1ert, Site Area e h '- ') e' Genossi Energeney ECLs. j.2 l 4 ,
- Esop soboels closed if not in ogston ^s .
j '
-; ' Early dianissai (Alert ECL)
' Shsitor in place 9 ,
, ' Nepe students to a sobool roeptses center -
i
- W 1 asses related to radiological shergenor pmaparedeces. fine sch th Putaan Geissty were identified during the June 4.1986 hi11.soale esero(K.
These asesse fall into two peups as fellows: C 3 f
- the availability and Qs of emergeney @ ~"* '?. - *~ '"
taitnsation for schools; mas, .. 6 o ' l *
! 1 Y ' the, areas alloontian ofAetion riguiring corredtive busteoluetd:
resources to achoo
- P.' IL den had. anon'ecorteed ta stude$ s or either the noen g as & .- -
( 1 or t rummaa galle sessied use a6hool-cesardias e # t e noe er hints te zaalan Potat.1 FEft *.igeemme b d- 1 ' " .
./ huss4 in publi ,.
the procedures tI tel ad nursery .aohools ehante hen . . f is the evnak at a emaioleginal .* -..- !:.,g,py eme%67 at Inaian Poi 46 (PEA, a g glep 136) .' ' *-
'"- ' 't
- ,4 .
l6 i .
! t. i - . '
iii t Y - h 6
,9 t .
4 g ,. ~.-
4 . .
-t- . ..
t 1
- 3) the primotpal of the putaan Talley' Jgdoe M Behe51.N F;'*.' W ** '-
.. .- easht (8) buses would be ree for avesuntaan. .mased'enr eakte::s .. -?
.i Astgebsent 1 to Procedure 5, hools. of the Pg Countr*plaaradri .
- SB134 dgmidge Q , - .s esvek (7) buses have been alloosted to the 1 .*/: 1, - e 1. i PENA recamuneaded that the al ima of tag ege0@ets $34Ah000$' ** **
. JDr a - .
- County should to per14tged to are that tho sugMy Of tegege re , e at A . unto to meet the demand ta.the of a fts11:sq4ee (psA; :4 .
e i.. ,,. 1966, pese 136). .. I
.ieg%stessee.u. . ti
- , .e '
Apensa menne'
.' N fte creage- Osunty Plan sM W echoeb facil1$$mdp imaladiah enmeery a-l.' taheels and day care esattes, are some&dered 6' feat 11him See) .
i paesetton planning purposes -(AttW. 5 s'A); ttte possib s . protectius Actione for the sehool unat de sels d od frth th)y . . . . la tas School Proendret
- I h1&owies options ultich are specifi -
i
' At the: Alert 5%, .
feep schools olosed if not in sesaign . e . a s & shelter in piece [ Early Dismissal 3
- At the Site Area R E ,
Esep schools closed if not in possica
) # ,
Shelter in place
'. 4t the G,eneral. smerse,n9F ECQ
= .
l v [ 4eep school olosed if not is asetton .
. 9.
s I' . Sielter in piace a ! . ., ( Nove studenta to scheoi reeerthen oestere
- 4. T : .fte estly dismissal option ps , listed 13 W Aaplemmating procedure under. r.
. ' . k the site Area and General Bee y response antions. t Since this
.s Sea.is specified only fee Sits A E 4 , At das ausgested-that .
r '.w *.'- Aefs to teleted from thesag-two h ,
's to ave &d possible- meias. . -
\ q ~. ; o As'heig. deleted ite Sitet
,i d'; . .s' b State Peoponded stating that erby. u s. ,
,t + H.* . '. h med Osneral tmerusesy BCM. This _ deep ist aaeopt, ebb.. 2.
I kl.E " . Seghi en tae penulta of the *J
%,.1$$$ hall-sealg esadeise,+.a .... . . . . ,
g"l' .- aded4(ied titet inonaded t the siit sinistrators et sano . .r ,
.aperb of radiological eger y r$spense precedurts 4 PEA, a %
p4p i % p pap 103). d . V 3 3 ,, ,
. r .
% ,. E '
l l
.' .k s a Q
W '_.
l 3
>D . 1 l
- =8= 5
~
f F9m roommended that training '14' radio 14sisar energes rm;r.~r .- ta i . abeeld to provided to school effisiele (PgA, Septembee , 130 3 $$$)4. . . t.-
- c. Rooepties centere
.' ampopedcounte ,
raan 1 sets four N reesantes as senseave.ep., , ,
....j
# u i mMg e ogestees n ess (precedw se m aane ge . - Q $ ,6 % jg: j , a WJ .
; k.6
- 9 l '
Don Bosco R.S. , Samage W.J. . ! .se . a.
)
Ramapo camsmity Colh, Nalde4/idl.J. .. . i Sergen Community Collage, . Fargeus, N.J. ', .
- 3
- cranse county community conegg, middapoun, .
s.t. , . .. Since these Taoilities are not within paklae8 Cousy,y,.and regardamos of 'tist - ive Saw/ it se squasemahls se semples .-- .- resolation these.four facilities which age loange dgWJersey, sad Oras)e taunt'yg., of Rookland Comty's quadg$'d -
}
4 Wes York would not be sovered Dy*ths W 'Cently @ es6tes 2 alt. ftere. i
.e i
. ! pere, ietters of agreement are eti}1 poquired witk thope fWue 44bSpe11141,s - l b Is the November 28, 1984 full-soale epocoise, as ares poquirins'.es M otive a
action was identif&ed wh&ah found cWications betwee6 the SqcIttsdad [ Comty 20C and the Beroen County 30C d$fficult' to semplete, repeettag a , .
*
- deficiency observed at the 1983.ederesp er the State 0egenostias @ . .
,' Flan fbr Rockland County. Arrangements b Wa fleesty to toad as eperatione liaison to the Recklaat 300 hace set been beepleted.M ; . :
}
; w dated February 17, 1985, ). recommended thdt repeescuest(tys -
$$rgen County and New J representatives of Bow Wes4tand
! )* krimmat County to establish the it$4ities a Bergen Seqdgy 4 . v
.11aises and ensure that this function 1 %s a d in the Ap'.es. .i
,l
$ted February 27,1985, page $3}. ,
' 9eries the June 4,1986 fu14. coal reise an agua requiring correstive 4 k line.pterlikking Bergen Comty -
.h setten included the dedicated to '
not' eperatieaal and was report,ed
'. and 30ekland County. The tel -
s ' s,- e to have been inoperable fee the pis southp. FBIA veesomended all ' ecomunication equipment abould be opeptional opdateeted in ecoordance with i I plano (PEA, September.1986, page 18% between Rocklead?and Stegen Goetiaan One result of the e$mmunicatioon ters loested la New Jerway ds .. - -
.,*. to that the opening of the room
. diffiosit to ooordinate with the aties of protective est$se seesh e e: ,
t . . amadations that would invatte of popenatacea-(e.g4. 1 r _x L . ear 11e en) from noekland comty, New grt/ . this diff$ meaty saa && . - f. .. -
;, oises. -
p both the 1984 and 1986 fu113.soals i'. 6I ' g l , [ j . 2 . i bbh ___ - (hh'. -- _
j
.'e. ,
I
+ .'
\: t The State responded to these unctgestved plaa and esiereiseTlmtp.gM D ~ M Ii'f i . July 7,1986 letter by stating tbs 4: . $1.GW ptters of asroement usWsetool reception osaaeve 14intet"-t- ' '-
, op open issue; and, -
e
, g .,. . _
- A MA#ted telephsas gebeuf hendeen BereG)*$atstW andi. /t -
, hp.y.tand County is la eerftse' -
.FBE Finds the issue of settere of & $4 4-@
[] . . he ufresolved until all dediepted telephone systes to re of agreemeht ske o Coquity dagettanF r* '3 s a.
).
have to be verified during t$ met observed e$mreise, i:.',#p :s. .i: . <
. ?, Maatabastar Cmanty .. .. e j
, , The curamat plan in Tah191 et At'est 1 to pineessure4.idestI185ts'hial- -
- theretable This has toen lists the a recogdition.Af sobools withisthe plepains0.e11eneeds of plaam$as St., the thetgebodl e$tta .pe$dta$'1 mueber, ass. ', "
the enrollment, the school recepti r, the aseostated gegurei WeDelallina 1 j reception center, the number of Tshie l , the eveaustion vehiales. A summmation of theiind@v& deal, thei$thyltatafahower ? '
$4 schools with 23,264 enrollment
. } 45 nursery schools and day care centers with 1824 enrollamat , :'
. 430 evacuation buses
-; 80 evacuation vans
- ,i 29 school reception contare , , .
Bousver, an inooneistenay une .- 4, Atha .4 = t; utaan St thele 4hott i Aasentis A, Attaohnent 5, with in d to Proesth. the "'-
. . eentest. Attachment i to Pr e 4.(Seet 3.13) 4%stes thdh tele:'thserbs t*" -
.l not eenleeted by parents or others vi e semable taas will as.bbted ne * . t -
, .) the associated general public recept esser. Attaoboost 5 to eppendts A :- l f
- states that the school receptian contep wetl reania in eperaties 30411 all 4
[
~
ebildren have been reunited with their Boeilles. 1
- 2. J Dese seotione should be reviewed and amended sooerdingly. Attadeipt te.the ' . . . .e -
i ! 4* doty carpet7,1986 this inconsistency. letter from New Test State were proposeil,. pies
- 'l' %y%ltthtte F '
m.' I.* 'I 2n addition, the issue of the assured Ava116b111ty of 4her fea144$11sted * -
, 5', . ee'eebool reception senters io1s$ ophetely resolygd. ~50say' ifMbk beheet ' C' t *
- i . recep(1on'oentera are also listed og gemarm1. pat 11e poegkleed # 4 A k hii,H t 4 . I L
fi asseussed la the January 31 1986 59t6 Statum Updaterter all of the fuellities are oberet b gtable lettere agreensimh * ' feetF,is jf;;. .e r . r r 11,0 5 s i i4- 0 t; : .y
. w% ,
4 r
-10 , - .
'( ,1 c '
..; b s. i -
---- n - *: the State responded tra their.4917 7,1946 letter. theba -
i?
, u+y -y n -. ._
' The operation of satool baption sentere pie toes .seetenes.Y .k. r, . e i
. and revisions have ,been made; sad,
.p .4.g . , ,. f: ,
* % transmittal lettee ented June.85,1946 smaa am q: / 's. .. s.
alt of the school reception es er agreemente St ence sg.t.t .- v.. .
.-' . Weetabester County. Epweser, scheel resep .v. 6 . .
- etah are 1eented la stW1 e ; ] [l . .a see a e oie se em 3 7.b . ,
.*.)4 '9
.ii t ,
1 * -
'N' n
i, W sepshitendag list has tese emained JWee 4tp _ I"'"T ,W; . .qP 43 '4 pov Yerk state: Seool Reception Center less of agreestmab :' tc .. - g ( White F1sina I.S., White Plains, N.Y. X -' c *:..;.. i j Oep(sa Sobsol of White Plaine,J.Y. k5'
.,t,4 1
. Nemaroceek. Ave. School, White Plains, N.Y. X . k e'Y., .: . .ylF ,,
. . R$ age Street school, Port Chester, N.Y. I . .i r . . ..'i..N ', .s'.T 't. .
F$shkill Plaine N,3,, Fishk.111 Plaipe, 8.T. "- '
- i.
Seybee4 8.S. , Repovell Junction, N.Y, - a Corner Rd. Wappinger Falls, N,Y. -
,8 E.S. , Beacon, N.Y.
Briaborboff E.S. , nahkill, N.Y. .
- p Ridgeway School, White Plaine, N.Y. I -
. John Joy S.H.S., Cross Riv'e r', N.Y. I- ..- .
-' Do. Sales .R.S./M.S. , No. Salen, N.Y. I -
Solamen Schooter, White Plains,
- Ng Y. X
' - a .
Ardeley E.5 Ardsley, N.Y. 2 :~. ..
!, 9mpt ave , Nrt Chester, N.Y. I # -
- Fos 1.aog US. , Bedford , N.Y. 2 -- .
St. Patrick'a, Bedford, N.Y. 1 .y., W.: . . , . , i
~
John Jay J.N.S. , Croesp River, N.Y. I . . . .".. .
; , Herase Gree 4py N.S. ;Chappaqua, N.Y. I ; . .- 6. .; . . ; e, c . .
$ lied Dock R.S. , Port Chester, N.Y. I .
c'
., Elas Street School, Port Chester, N.Y. I ..
I t- BetteFerryM.s.,DobbsFerry,p.Y. X ' l , 3 Peteenakenek Elementary Sobool I
' herinen Rip sobool I . .
i '; Sert thastae hiddle Sobool 1 - i
- i g, ftssnd most letters of agroceegt he $e la plaan;ame sI11 beam 44Mpie.Seenet),'L.. s 3..
' ? *. i :- selon~ of revised plane le ves%fy .I1
,- :$this the procedures have been mado. $t correebietstdler. 4astashtenedes.fu ..4
.. . i..t, , i.e p _. .,e i
{
, I a -
. .. z -
, t,. .
- m. ... .
.y ' - ,- .. .
. v, ,
.I %. . p ,. g-
., -( t .:
p
. M', ,
,.r. v, .
.11- ,
. , g g.g . ..
Nanady *
*~~r *:* ***-
Ths current plan in Tabla 1 er At$ashment 1 to tSe Seheels
' are'shous t has been a recognittaa of the lastieg nee d of *pgulat .
le lists the schools within S pi W E,the sunbee, - 1 ment, the schoo) rees$ 1on se , the asee M Depelattes'
. . tien conter, the ouder W dttpunt les.gmedge,*had.4he heures*
. the untaan webiaise, e WW & fee 1&ity datar. g .
. . . , . ( echools dth WW . -
i .0 * $ sumery sobeels med 9e enrolleont (ao enrolament sanous fof* 1- "'- I
- two schools) -
45 evsoustica buses l 3 school reception eentem i
't.
; - South Avsaue Schooli 59aed, 5.Y. '
, , - Sargent School, Beso g , 5 7
; e : - Roebout School, Seaget, N.Y. - -
, 9 ,
. Bowever, in reviewing the current p1pa.. SMA found an ineensistency ta Sable 1 k -
of the 8ebool Procedure and Table 8 pf the Tmnsportation Procedure. According to the data in the Transportgnon Pu,ssedure, four of the five nursery seboels . i listed do not need transportation espistanoe. However, la the teksoi peeoede . ' g the table indicates each of the fios nursery sobools required 1'. ban. 'This
, information should be reviewed and scended socordingly. . -
.s l .
. The issue of the assured availability.ef facilities listed as seheM'reebptish "
r, eastere is not oospletely resolved. At this time FEMA does act have 'a sepy -
, of a letter of agreement betareen thg y and the gebool. district apersting '
t the 3 schools in the town of Spoosa- 9eh are listed as school teseptegg - easters. The State respopd la % Jdy 7,1986 letter by letatidt.thats- t School reception oop fee futnam Comity scheel chileian . o , are located in DuteNWas Cously (Beeson School 36etriot);' As .' ' l of this time, the school board hos not ocevened to diaoues -
. $his issue and grant approval. The Datahees County Smergency.
- I honagement Director is di 11y werking to ensure that these ' -
8 Letters of Agreement are . The Director has indicated
- that the Letters of Agreese d 5e available by --
, . 4, August 1, 1986.
. ,Wege yeoestly, it was indiosted the lettom of agreemost W111 set ,be *1 a
- , 1,, p ilable until October 1, 1986.- 4tys comain unresolved umtit the -
t . i P. n'has been oorrected for &neenstpteneles and Mtterp of agreeeestesith
- 5- e t
, ! r reception centers are entaigge,
, , d, i
) . .
Q -
.. . e- ~t-j .
Y J:s + At <
. ; %" 'tr
[ l '. l j l l 13 ., '[-
- J....
l I l Grapma_Dyanir '- I
. :. Ths.eurpub plan in Table 1 et Freendpre 4 shows that.there been h- . . .
eenguMibo.of the planning asede of the school papelastees,w. Jyah&e % +- -
. 11st>4be eehools within the W 34 M3, the pleastag OrgF r .4 1 a
. 3*
espelament., the nobool reception spor,theesseeigt Sea .'Ju.' i - t
.. poesplien sentar,.the aumber er. -*ie ve gan h heseneres ( 4. 1 .
, s. 3 et.thg evacuation tablelas. A eigla4Me of Sadigi JaeElity esta': -fni :- etsses
.. q:.
5 4 epheets utth the espet M y 1442 -
- -.
- 1 aureery edbool ut%h enrollmed th' 15 ,'
' 38 evacuation buses
{
- 1 evacuation van
! ; ' I school reception center .
- - South J.M.8. . .
There district isfbran existing use of theirletter er agreeagnt facilities in the evoetytth of antheggh Cittischool emergency which
":- e esaures the availability of the schoek reception centers. .
, , D. Transportatism tesouroes
- t nankland counts .
~
; Appendix 4.of WMG.0654 (section II saa 21.=) states that the ushecipeps. . .
f latima shall De evaluated in the aps " t eetdaating. .:
". the number of people to De evapted Fao111ty.af-the s--j Mper%eties 4hal'i. hs *.. .
. described. In the surrent vastaan of land eeungy y4.a tattlaties :/ . .
.f* et.the appulation could not be tupstdf. A lose verties er tas $1ami ' 't- - '
listed the sobool population att app %1r 22,000. 'The eersient vessian of r
.. the plan lists (Procedure DFT@ Athhohmenev i) 218 tuses se haies available C i 8 flem primary sources and an astutichal 366. buses as teias availabas ft. ins s' *.
t ascendary souroes. In the eventi the 800 Bone Policy' has not been - '
' deplemented or the decision is'4m a,t this option is not,the safest course i
; .. er action the school evaouatihe' opt.ito sup, be Laplemented. - .
. h Ammains that the mobsol evaeundios epi $p na he.requiredseths puwease er .r. o i 6 e uma d he assignet hetueen.4he eeav i . .I pr;erity Idnereby. the semilable i .
. 4. "4 seheel dad general pub 1h egne M eeuld mot.he located ta ttes planP .
- r. . In gat,hering informatten ft4s $es e 5 the EfPIRO petitions in May 1985i - ' +
. .. a the State indiosted to FEMA the 346 would be saeqqsired for %e teraounties a'u. !,,..<: I et toekland County. In add &t the indicated that there were 333;.t6.:..Lv e- ! .- .A r. huses available,. 333 buses contregit ,.and e st there were.141 tm ines m,* .-
jj - j drivers.
,' 1 1 6
,! ( f .
. . 1 u- .
e.
,( ii a ,' ; "
5'...., - i i
?.
_i> I i .,:1 . ;
. r - . .
1 T. .; r, deta taken frem Procedure $PT.2. Attachment 3 eligio V
~
,.4 tty i that there are 7954.peop14 poquiring has traaepetts5mW ge6' '
.. 2 are required thich is in agreement with.the.$4eter ,, .. -
. . These figures indicate t the averest papesty.pesar .
figure is used tm estima the bus reasuroes needed Lir 4.. i sa t D r.
, . *$. . i.
- e-
, ggeg1Mtaly T19 tue$ Would be aiogdred -2f ice
,evastmitiae plas fur scheel eDildres. .W M-
. 3 . s +.
ar ir t
'.~ .
4-
, t.
W eurrent plan ateo states that if q ' " .U .. J g
;. , . tially esfest sourse of astian, based 11e pin 4 y
# peerdinater, the sobool emergency coordt $reet"the - -
J. . y3
, . ngeons to evacuate to a Seheel Rooepsian stdr. Therefers, ' at W's. evacuation plan easseds ( pne-wave Weaestion. - ,. '- , . .
.. . Intgrai$ don supplied by the State A .May 1985 stated that ther9e vers' 333 .
[ hu$me under contract while the plan lis8h 564 buses .sve$.'this . Q.af ths; a . , 33rger value may not be sofficients.' 4epending on the average'W' Middplure
. ,e W ees, Letters of agreement are regu4 red with the bus groFIM","" =
the availability of the seeded resouroes. The following ini-
,,t i
egspiled fece the current plan dated May 1,1986 and data' IBM 4..<.4 Den New York State on July 7,1984e t."M . . .... . : , .
~ . (,
@ ' - i.
~
! Trtasportation Companies Vehiclear Yehicles Required per Available (5')' tes ?
Plan Per IAA f 1' Ih0 ' g ; - .- Amt II. 'Breesportation Inc. ? 53b. 32v So . E-
'. good. s idlaw.,Trkasit Iso, 56 48b, 42v M,,, by ..
.. It marrea)
. Samstawn Central Sch. (primary) $ Not Identified *:-; :. .
.c
, Bevaqqtepw (primary) 73 69b. 65v ' X _I Daniped - "
j P 3rgsa (primary) 50 5%, 4v X, Iby coenty - 14ad and City'T.R.I ,F.S. [.:- ( ry) T Not Identified . - 160 " ' ' l ; ' san t-Line. *
- 3 90 . ,
apo Central Sohool Distriot 22 * * - 1 E F falley Rapid Transit 40 ' * - , I. t4alen Free Soh. 15 l Se Orangetown Sch, 12 * * - i Edeentional Trsnsport 40 " " - .
.I Additions 1 County Bus Operatere 112 8 * =
j; } jaes p as Dpt.2) ' i .e .. s ',' l .
'i i l jy 6, . % ..,,
h
- p i l
g. W l(. ,
~
,. W
- f. ,3
..:.niar s..
"?- -
. .tT!v C l
. 1
~.. . ,
r 14 i s._ , n . .o. ,, E fe4* As~ stated in # FEMA's . Analysis and Responsg Ter supplauset 'e l M WWEW .4 8 i et . Petition For Suspension of Operaties of the W 9445 9 taatw j ze. .. tes may 9,1985, in-depth bus.trandportatidp Apes spei . g@ c i r . o,. age i
)., finalized by the Transyion, study Planning Group ..
,; 1985. J 5
%. M. ,, '
t ' t 1,M ; .;. En a p a$est s%88us report er the penstido Plaa fte ben 4at.$p9y v/- 1.s .r , 4 tes september 17, 1984 513 (6)
-L were gfdressedg S oy
{. . gr o.t, . nd .ee ent .. 7 m es t
- Resource Analysis r...< . .
3 : ' pendumy Network Ch M eriet J - . h .- *
- Service Design Ic."
. ( 4 -
# ..
- Transportation RepouPee egent ,
. . . i.* '
l .
- Training Prograa . .
; ..~.
i i s p conclusions and roccamentatleap of the Mportatima StuRy-5401u4e4 in the current plan. r, the shbuld to restened F un v . W' -
. ( emended to clarify the current tp by ide ify a.eparately ,the. ' .{' . ?.
, ) 4 population transportation recoupset and the spo al faci 3,ity.)gpW1st , tD - - i j ,;
.(1aaluding school children) tot png resources. . This !afengstids' -
l
. {:4 -
4
., to assure that sufficient trans rtation resources esist to edgenstety.
preteet the school children in Rock 1ded 00anty. , . .
. 418e the. information supplied by the, State la May 1965 indiented thp%hhers ). .
were then 161 trained bus drivers available in Ro**1==i County, . No 4ed tsta.: o .- I has been provided to FEMA to indiosto that e$ditional drivers hva ' *- . ' l-I trained. In the November 24,$964 thy e 4,1986 fun-tga14- ama A veral issues were oited M tod t thW testains of Ahe. vorm. u l ..: set been'enepletely suooessful. One issue conoermed Anna $equa$b'. W a. l 8 (< the school evacuation tus drivera in that they did met know ther speedfAo - w. '
!: tien of the school recepti4n omater (PEA, February 5,195,, page,$y). . . ty/- 0 1 .
the June 4,1986 exercise,. the be d4spatcher for savantpow Tmesit ameppsyu . i . 4 tad that only 6 of the 95 has d rs expected had resolvet trainias et 3-
, I,: a using dosimetry (PEA, September be page 83). '
.. "C
' , :s i FEMA recensended that maps should developed shovieg the leastice(s) af * . 8.i l t sebool reception centers to whiah. Is are assigned. These anpa ensu14 bh .9. l -l esistained at the bus garages Apr vibution to drivere in the event a. . sebool evceustion becomes neoeseary (P54, February M,1955,> pase 67), ,6. . During the June 4,1986 full soale esfareise it was meted that/ thern were at 13: -
. . . >.. Jg . .apga available at the Haverstraw Tru it Campany.to direct drivern frea ttlethD.t . , s-
{ 7,1 : ' ~ . 4aaigned sobools to the Reception r (PEA, September 1986, passAR)q{hpi A 4s . 1 .
.q t . 3 4e . W.L.
; y .
?:
, e. u . , ,- .
- (L l }' .
i . t, 3 [ i ;gg
l
'W- *E
. . ?
e t .
', "'k : .$
n d.ee.
- a. .-
.15- 3 .*
4 r . ' .," .
.i, Bow tert St,ete reopended to the issue of bus providerg ty ethgg si 2. .,4.r. T . .p , -
. .5 Im $ ers.of Agreement with bue providers have been attaimet. 0* if .. . ./
ej aed indioste the nuaker af buses tenish IWould be neds ava$3st&se:ht ' 4. t e. l W2 - ,,$$4 that C3arteteun Sobeel Distriot is a bee peerseer but ibdi~i "- . 1 jy . Sa'the esatentian of the esasty that no I.et.ter gr apeement % .t. ti st. 4.*. ; se retuired as clastatout as a municipalty.. er @$ 4 c.
'+
sJ . hus (rivers will be 1 "gparte5berp, .' .i , ?,i > ~. i-enh1 pre 9
+r i- FEN & finds these issues to te >
(f .
.- the acessaary trunsportation pformatiat, letters iar en .et n
[ r... areobtainedandabusdriver/k dbr training sabedele is sed $st g~ > i e . i
- fer review. " I .
1 Maatahaakar County The issue of assured availabili4r ef toteel transportation Pts'ourass tsa et : F i ~~ eospletely. resolved. The plan ltats % sammeroimi soapanies.andtthree ' .r . P. - -: . school districts as being bus ers. One of the sphool disteistW has. si - 4e
, i been essigs.id to the transport nee 4s of their aus schoolev En ig rn .....:. . .. . .n
- 4. . . -l July 12, 1985. letter to FEMA, t $ tate provided endes of.nt-gtng ...,;p %
the same companies listed as suppilers of buses for the pub W , 73 *e.. 'J4 evacuation needs. FEMA found thal thspp 1stters were . YJ I asseptph)4FPer 6 .. several reasons including not bei8e signed by the County, not beigg.$tedy . ' , - a t v' .t i,' t not thowing effhotive dotes of being provided, etc. In a January $9, the agreement, not showiss the 6 letteri to FEMA, %se.4 4te, quW[gnes.. . = e e o n.'.
; assurance that Westchester Coustg yms"p uses the signing of.16 el' ,. .t.a 't ti; 's ,
. agreement with the bus onapanies. -
i t." . .! - ananuse the current letters of aspent whiah are available - to' WE' NAM met ' . , .- e atuays list the number of huses tog gasunitted, ret een not verdy thetheirr b . 9 -
! i sufficient buses are available,- ornation supplied by the State te WW E.1.!- .
in May 1985 indicated that in test 4, ster County 432 buses vois1d be coquirge- ., 1011 buses were available. T80 busdp were unaer eentreet, aad that 4p36 , - < m i E
- i tralmed drivers were availabla. . Casa de the mueber of bushp 1tukse as . 1"r-
i
) teing needed for school sweeustion ). 1, the siegle wave eveaustdem i er;....j i option is desired, the auster of bup pequered abou1d be reevaluated end- ' . 1." 1 letters of agreement must be obtained to assure the availability of the - * .8-
.- I
( necessary resources. The ft110 wing informatio4 was compiled'from the ' * - O * .M ,: ) ourrent plan dated September,1985 and ante submitted to FEN 1.from New4crk . 5: ,, - , 1
;.' . ,. , k
- l l { .'.
y.. f . . *: ,, :
.!.]j,/l w
' ! s. ;*
,. , .Q.
1,sS
. y -
L
} l 1 .5 . ,
lt.i 1 n.-ih. .r$. , A l
,.. . .( '.' . n -. \,
I k d' ,
- ,- s - .
.- & A::t 1
31.g [,. ... ..
~ - ~ ' ~ ~ ' - ~
qh l
..r -
-14= .
, ps.. -
3
, . L
. State on July 7,1986: a: ' -
, orsa. .t. tan Co. au. .. ,en a . ., ,t Requityd per Available .
.- 4 .
- > = = _ mee m -
t! ;. , , ., ,
- halalaw (tbrweriy
- " . T "I
- it, .
; ) 175b, 479 -
.M .;. E 9 A a '." ;
- 449, D 47 Set: % a; ..
8,D, W e.'4 L Q J gmb . .2 . 4 F i qin Not Ideetitiep. ' 't.h 1. .t .. , tradriek Budson 8.D. Not ide u,ified. 4 y.J M <t s eso latters of agreement are requited Dr Crotorb.hnson 8.D., bland , esPry their own childrea. .h ' . . ' i h , All 3etters of agreement were unstged by the-Sounty. 41eo,is14;:hdIdr 1 -s .
. of agreement must identify the nest $se and typha of vdh6eleet aski196)al, 3 . !. .- Se 8 tate responded all thir Jaly 75 1966 latter as folloues. ,j. ;#, ,a i r. . . l .
2 Proposed Letters of Agreement are enolosed for 4 of the (inds t's * ' "\ - . i providers. The one remaining L'etter of Agreement it wits .- 4 Imkeland. Lakeland will sign e Letter of 43reement ones sentreet 1
., language is completed. .
( All the Letters of Agressent .are only pro)s6 eels. These agree-
- e- .7 seats have to 30 through a j9tep process before the County -
Attorney will sign them, The steps are: t
. 1) Presentation of behere of Agreement to the Conalty Semed . . es -
.g i of Acquisition and Contemot (public Aceting, possib&y 1. 9 public heariass) . .
.) 1) Signature of Approral hr Commisaloner et Transportst$seg am4. .9 3
- y. 3) Signature of County Attorgey. .-
1 i
. The time involved in this q ss would indicate that September, 4986 4 would be the earliest official debe letters of agreement would4e -
.g available. 1 W
( ,n.
-.J- Asse 'trpining teeses hung eye 6. En the 1986 ausresas, tha bumMb mz t .- > -
. !: . , > . 40 tbe Laidlaw Bus Garase da Od n$g.did met demonstrate.an !adequ$e p.t.r'14i.'%i 't . t. !
1 u 4-{
' heinsledge of her espons litt , apparently beoesse she tras new 4b7 $gM. W. P. . a . ! . This eeuld:have impeded protestSea of the publis'besasse At 't .. t'r e . Pr) ' ' .
l c. 4 e.- s - have reonited in the impr9pr 4Hpaigg.of evsoantiontueee.: esa e6Stese$rr 8,yi r I , 6 ?. g -', 3.- .} j > (' f, . .
., g, .? ,
. . . i. -
$
- d. *? - 3'
. i
?
-* . T ,g
. 7. .
F3E F4eds that letters of agreemen4 with treasportatism providerie.gNY l '. k
. KM4eniaing Newever, the training gyllabus and 6f tee drivers abst he verified ty- Jg sai to attend a sample of these tr sehegates fram See Indt stater mg sessions.
jFv
.r .t> l' y .y.. M .
f ', . kf. 1 g . . She asema er the assured ses of tee fetam w e hae ele nas one vue e==psar ese setest easteset,es.eums n.e~ e
. I'$-
they are as rollows: ' -
. ,, . +.,e,,,, ,. .... . ,....e lat Tehse14s Lea-
.- - 4-4 i
, N 4
17 ;
' . :i-] : she did not demonstrate an adessaata knowledge of her responsibilities sor -
energency worker radio 14gical expgeure control. Finally, she. had no knoe. q
,. leep6 of KI and did not distritaats. it either of the'2 tass-driwes dis . w- 4
. ,s .
patched _ fran that garage. 'the . .af allithe rMme gua piapetdugs ... - i-j ai shas1d be reviewed end s ided to all those edio have *. 4 l i been trained (or whose trainirig ) on the esorgency'werker rullot dit : - e j esposure control iwo C ares ned the County Plan and the: Plan in eN ? I Mi genwral (PEA, Septaber 1984, 59- ). In addition, one of the-tus r-- -
.@* drivers from the Laidlas aus did het read her dosimeters et the stepeT>
. . intervals and did not the pecper use of the mid-range'sulp. It.4sd . s recommended that all 1 pus drivers be trained on the use oCall the-0 ,i e doelmeters tenich would be hated es$ them iniogee of a rp61clG31cht :- a u 4.g -; ermorgency at Indian point (FRA, pop.tweer 1964, page 80).
3 . . .
~. 3 FEMA finds these issues to be. Iveg until 1) all Isttets of A0remient are ~ -
, obtained and the number of tm allaple can be serified as aiutflcient to ' -
i 8 transport the transit dependent stion (including school children) in Westchester County and 2) a taas ver/ provider training schedule is aut> : : r mitted to FEMA for review. '
.\
crance County -
- 7. ,
'I ' -
1
,, 'the issue the plan listsof the two assured consercial busarabl31ty ccypanies asofheifl0 busbus rumources provideiro and has one' been t h reso 4-si l achool district bus providees f. ) -
gehicle vehicles- - - J ' transportation ocnpanies , acquirsd per Available Ftt)hs i . _ Plan .Pe r'I m - ,
,~.. .
.-l.M c )as .
that Point Riurs 31 O N ed e eAll hva11athlFQ .s-
,. . .. i m 9 a sam a tg Honree - Miry School Dietrict */
. g ,, ,, x .*
e e
~. :
,s W,$ the proposed chastges. e f ..h
*~
E. Pue14p Inferention. -
.- .' . . . ]. .- .
S
,e
;.~ .g s . . sha.neeklaea county plan presogthes that it.ym mehool evampa4es- La a: ..
4
,- .e.- Tpm.estes, an Ess mesense auss. ne pewsas sehroat e .c .i
. . 4 c' (Weesswei scu-1, sostion 5.a.6). een o g, -
af na 41ert or greater aa., prior _Spetsasetat et s>
- 4.?ong .ie !
A* , PAR, sebool adniaistrators will he ed to fe einenlag8 t n ., J s- t At the Alert or grouter 38b's, Se 4. . es er information involving the anfety soordinator 11dren will be w&11. esses , M he forwardediai' ).agyt.'4<....*
.M; Publie Internation Officer for EBS 4nstru too (Procedure S G -1, Se The hoekland County plan adequately pueri for parents to be met 1544.)..' :t . .
. . school slosias/ ear 1F dismissal (i.e,yr4ge Name' policy) diek'.ge tr. .
. the preferred response option at the Alert pr greater ECL's. * .in * .
reopease to F2MA commente, the 90- Alert . ,. SCL, asoording to proposind charges edtattted/see~ aplicy is on Augugt 14,to1986.(See be 11416ed p tM49 - . above). .. maataapater county .,
. The Westehoster County Plan statea (, hat parents will be act10ied by the local i media (radio station) of the situation for response actions at .the..jite Area I-l
. i and General georgency ECL's (Procedyre 4. Sections 5 5.13 and 6.H13.). The > .
- rs
', plan should be revised to include tate 4ame net.ifiestien at the Altet. 8CL :'- - t ti.e., in Procedure 4, Sootion 4).t.3). , a . W mananty ,. .,
the Putnam county Plan states thht p&rente will be .aotified by'an N.'hange. . j .e. .. idnieh is appropriate to the respo etica at the Site Area and Steerani a s.: , c' - - Stergenty ECLis (School P , ions 5 5 1 3 and 6.5.t& .. tab;paan o . .. f deuid be revised to innlede notifiestion at the Alart 3G.((t e., . . -
'I 4 I .
. la Beheel Procedure, Seetian 5.1 3 4 s
. Branee County to statements could be loested in the Orgnge County Plan with respeak.to lyw the parents of the school Wulatita would be actified as to tbs.respomme .-
t r -( . esties takta for the protectidh of. e group. The plan should he 9% Time 6 .. S: t'.4 t J L i l to imelude, in the School Proced , s. requirdesat that the parpend ugu'Id ee .s :- g6kw Igebified of the response action. .
. e. , , -
.f Seu ,fod Stste responded.to tense tashea eqi July 7,1966 by statisN h..;. . r . - -
{),t' - i ' a ;,a t '; s Parental notifientAass en the gtes et protective actio.sadh[.a *, .A .,tc, .
, . - e ,,
w ,. - l .
!, } ,f.: w .g 3
1 :.4 .
%.ik,.Aw . -
-__p_ __
i: i
.s Q ' . i.
\l . f. h%.
-tb 5
.i.t. . '.
?. .t i 4.'
E- ehildr'en who are in schoela loested is the WE util esosP aF hCp4 '"t* k'd#q 6 3
..... .. ABest ECL. there appropriate, thia 34vinica hamsheen Sam 1 esety school procedures as a point of infeeuntsam. '
.=
1af%fip
...n...
f!t
.,4 .c h publi'a informtion is an overail.ooordiastadtrea$ppge g n't(et.M 3
- 2. e. emes 4rithin the Itkeine W1. eagt plaA abould be. s.el e.M ' s k' ic ;, . S W 937 are esteletem with eaah othere en . 1 4
1' 4 ; c'. .6 , M utal await theas plan Q,ame restyy them ,. [ . ,.* j h$12k Infamatian armahnresq
. f.. ' +
.t . + . ... .I poe6ew of the eurtent publie tafertistion.kroeliures, datedeighty' .*E . ,1
- the ocordinated response of all fourbouages. The tassemation .r W
, ;< .ta one of.the four brochia os AmeQqfe& instructions for the pree .) A r. .
t e anebool children with the fo1}owing SPbteetive notion desponse ,3 -.
. i ,
. .C *>
. 'Early dismis $ c.; % -
' Sheltering a ..
,
- EvaouAios +,.,Ffy . n gader the evacuation, response optha, t.be text eh, seek of the L _ '- 1.): '
.I referomets the airmountion route amps contained id the troebuNe' - .: - '
! l Adentifies the school and the associated school receptiba echter,
- d .
~
f44da these brochures to be adeqkte; the 1966 brochudes Are to 81444 .
)sted in late September er parly Octobpr 4f this year. FEMA will hegskij h arrOa1 and review thee accordingly.
, t,. 4 : ^l . i pt Mawa Cantar Preaadurea * ..' ; ! .* d
. . ..' s o .- All counties have agreed to e'goerdinated approach to publ44. 1
# and message release. To sett t % h anordinated role, publio 91 . .
preetsares have been ocopiled ib a siingle Joint neve. cent.or PE -T'attp R t' - r a.. . r c .; Ptab34e Infes9mation/Eduontion . The 1986 version of this i,s4 *p . t. .'S - Aostates prescripted 335 as with appropriate arena fler 4 G. - i .......the deseription er geogr areas where respenge eetiens as's to be Met. .-. - - . b prescripted messages ve been pp to SSegre that timely 4 l 3 util to available for roles to the to caos a FAR has heel 114414he$ Wyr.d' - l j
.the appropriate decision makerg.- Bowever, there are aestral DPablabt with r rT y the sureent messages with regard to the school populatioes. Q ..
' - . She surrent. prescripted messages de 1314, appear to preFide inftmust & s. >
' ,f ; i :: J. .' Se asserd tdth FEMA's undere$andlag 4f t$ seneepA et speett.4 eggs W6 .
,y y , go reopense actions ftpr the cohool popu144 ton. 34 14 FBIt's . .%t4**
,.% + . J4h4% the Early Dismissel (Oe Rose Petidyl .As the prefhrrad reakthet j .# . . ..
.P...
. 2nr the soboel population if that
.Jther publib FAR's. There are ao
' peat $ estion saa be sempleM bor14ted aesongen ub$ok giW .. . ? E a
) . i. : .o D
,t n gd.e.-8 . Anformation regarding aabool responsp eations for situations ',4 i. eg Eu..t. i . 4?* P,..; . ) ., d
' b ?, e, .
i a a : ~- i g.. g , .*.i: g. N /
- N 1 *
.: .! i
- l *. _, . .
s ,
' N&N.m
l .
- l. '
- s. !T.' .
21 T. . t - . .' ,f -
- l geb11e Pars are being implemeaged. . s. nl. '
I tur test Rate responded to this assue by stattagt "* r the need for an BS tesanaissiewee ladiente states of getest D.. .o. . . i
. ebildrho will be deoided. by 5 individual Geesty Bassative'st ...'s,- ,' . . -
.- the time a sehool protective aq,ien'as $aplacested.. thereSpepl. . t - 'y** e* ' -
the appropriate ERS assesse wilt he @ggite$ed at thgt *A
. Wr a.' s .
Nr. h Nade the State feptase 90 daggesepteMe he tese russedset
^
0.U- l h,6.ta .etifmesa. speetfied in the county p em p a t .ith e,s Ja some oeuhties, parestai * - u .. W '.4 - '-
- c. ,
. l notifiestion via MS MF o r. 4 the Alert. Site Ares est < / l l
General Emersoney. ' . It would be helpftal RF ett fear eeunties agree on a means a e# . .I of notifying the publie on protective actions for school - s ehildren. Exe se esperieepe has shown that even with 2 . 3 e
- prenoripted mes es, the fu tpen-einute requirement is ; i r ..a .
! .tuet barely est. Therefore, IERA P4 quires that prescripted i.4' ' - -
messasse be prepared for all foms df protective actions ? ' ' 8 l . i for school children.
. . A formal submission of proposed changes to the ples will be requLMd .~. t rd :
by FINA. . c h
~
. Ensed on the informaties provided by the gate of New Eark en Juiy 7, 9984 '* * > .6 and FEMA'eirevik of the ourecat Weqtgbester, Sockland, Orsage, and .
i putaan County's Plans; FEMA Spued 6,he followingt - - I i h _Cennty -
. Drntentive Antiana!
Proposed plan changes to alarify the Alest, SCL as the only BCL : in which the "Go Nome Policy" (1412 impleensted must be - forinally submitted to FEMA in Spa nest annual submissies. . l <f v Arete requirits eerreetive setteh 1 ifted during the i . ..- , , J 3* . 2 Novembe'r 26,'1984 and a deffeteoy $6 June 4,1986 is ...- ie. . .e c i
. ,; - full-soais enereises meet De_retanyed. This usu14 ' . r- -
* :t <
l . .. . . . . y . isolace the traintes of sobson eff1biais in teth publie r - I .
- e, j 'e p.-
mad non-public sectore to immare tapt plans and ,.x Ms are la place. r
.y g
i.
- t. ..
.L
- n. ,
b
.4 ,
+
9 S s.. s
.e ta i M 1kt. -
~\ ,
43=
.
- communication problems identified between Boektmed and . . J :. . -
Bergen County identified durig both the November.W 1984 - ..= s and June 4,1966 full-asale emeraises are still.maremotgedc.i r.: A 4 Banantign Cantara:.
; m- .
.-
- Setters of agremyset are still dutstandias fer18te amegLv.)i;;e i. : . . 4. .
fWeptten emeters loested Anq Jereer and estage Geset96 A'D'- 'i ' * ' , M. -d .rr - 61 h tama ammoureast
- The Plan elear4y idehtify the transportation resouroes c ,
totals for school childrwe, thlbspecial Smollity population ... . (including seheel ch11W) 46 assure sufficient transports- . tien' renouroes' esipt. -
- Adequate training of schooA, esacuation bus drivers must, be i
- Training schedules must be slutettled to FEMA.
.
- Letters of Agreement with T>ttaportation oespanies have .
been submitted to FEMA 3 howdger, they are unsigned by the . ." ... t. . County whieb negates thsae (patrdots. l l paatahantar Qaunty Protect.ive Antions:
?.
- An area requiring oorspoti etion was identified durins &be : *
- Jme 4,1986 full-soals ens with rosard to the Sasurtipseet ..
sunber of beekup schoot ooordiestors. i, . l ' Training syllabus and adledeleo suet be forwardedito FWe'.:fbr 2.- 4 verification. i
- - Raaentian Cantarai 4
- All Letters of 43reesset gre in place fer esbool reception . . .
esoters loasted in Was ter ty.. Five letters er' - u: i, agreement are still ug freut s Countr the111 ties- - Wiich best students .Wegl44bester and Putamp Countles' ..r - . . i. .. . s , ' I . l - -
- 7.--;-rM pian abanges pre sukuitted te delett assegueisteentes e n. . 4
=r,
.. found in the plan in 4 and Appendiz 4. .Nowevertt.i...w ,
?- .!. , these changes must be led l'orimally to FEMA la ths' asst e . >..- : >
* /t
! ; b aual submission. .. t i j [ ... l t !e - M.Y'. -
,,,, j
- w. w.. .
8 ,
- a 9" D .'l
*l
- y. 4'e '. #
~t Sc' :e *d l Tramanartation Emmaureeni Nj , ,
- The issue concerning Letters af agreement with Tremspostatica , i I .. .
l Companies is stf.11 pending. agreemente have W sehmittedyr... c :"s . . . < however. *, hey are unsigned by a11 per6&G W megates . thane < - *( < esotesets.
? W et W semilable sust he laeleded in the Letters.of v r.* a . .Wy . . ,
. at to verify there is d.soffiniset master to transport ' 4 * *ef..s- .1 .
Aneit-(e'peedent populatagr. 4
, . . ai l Prataative Anudpla t Proposed plan chanses to alar 4/y the Alert ECL as the .anly. . A .
E g in which the 50o Eose policy' will be implemented must he Ye i formally subeitted to FEMA in the neat assual submiesten to . 'i a
, avoie inconsistency.
A deficiency found dur$ag. the JWne 4, -1986 full seale 'esereias' r.: 4, i
- ino1 pled that the Administ(sters at some sehools were act- '<
aware of radiq1ogical emergency resposee precedures. Training - - in these procedures should 'be #rtvided to school officials.
)
5 Banantianf.sittars: , All Imttere of agreemoet, with School Neooption Centers are &n 9 .t i s plane.
' Oltrrent plan procedures p ad6guste.
, Trananartertian Resoureest ,
- Imtters of Agreement are in, place with transportationi . .
. providere. ,
- Current plan procedures are adegate. .
*
- Training syllabus and schedules must se fonsarded to pBNA for -
1 i
, ver$,f4sgtion.
I 2pakantive Antiona; '. 3 2
' propoeod plas changes to imeless the *co game
- sytiam st tee .r ,. .. .
Alert EQ. and the optim W eveg stedente to a emhesRa '. . .. : ,
.e i
I t ' .
%W t
I i o
. ._. . . _ g reception center at either the Alert er Site Area hersemey C
- b BCLs aust be formally autimitted to PBS in theaaush amenal ti* -
w* plaairevision salmission.
*P.
areas r. quiring creative a ties womairiad darias the (g June 4,1986 full-seale eneroise must he reaalted. These - p# include the availability.and. awareness of emoegeasy - '. ' 'h plannina infomation for schools and the alleontion of bus i r- - ' ..'. t i resources to sobools. '*4 Ennenkien .Centerar !' .
- The issue concoming Letters of Ag$eement for Beh@el *~ '
Reception Contare is still pending, these Reception i Centers are located in Detelepes Sounty sad; therefore, -
?
are being obtained by the OBf of Dateless County. -
' Plan abanges avat he ande to eslap intenoies found '
in the eurrent plan between the . Procedure and -
. Transportation Precedure. These re4&sions abould be -
submitted to FDEA in the next femal salisission. !' Trananortation Cannmaias! s
> ' Lettere of Agreement are,in panoe with transportation *
. Providers.
,
- Proposed changes of the plan suSt to enheitted during the * - ':
forma.1 sunniasion to alarity M4gs of bus requiremente. . ** - 7^^4A TskPmt.{ net far 'all I~ F ^^4--- 4 1 l ' Baeh eeusty . plan should be ooerdinate and ammaded for ; -' - i soneistency with each other. PDIt Will avait those plan I revistens in the mest femal seqiuliaales. 8 g 4 l
. N ia Fiqdinet . i Saeed en F5MA's g ures and the eriberia : 'e :. ( -
h montaf = d Aq' pup @gview.cf plano,det. P$ meet at this taas to provide - bes1th and safety of the
- L
. s a w
's*..<
1ltatthe reneonable'W'en ep . . W
^ - !
- . ,. ocho41 shi&di , W' e . Qf c T > WE et Sadiaa Point een hs .
4 pretooted. ., f. J
.i i e
. I. e .j i}}