ML20214M743
| ML20214M743 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 05/28/1987 |
| From: | Gagliardo J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Andrews R OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20214M745 | List: |
| References | |
| IEB-86-002, IEB-86-003, IEB-86-2, IEB-86-3, NUDOCS 8706010416 | |
| Download: ML20214M743 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000285/1987010
Text
g
MAY 2 81987
v1 #
In Reply Refer To:
Docket: .50-285/87-10
Omaha Public. Power District
ATTN:
R. L.?Andrews, Division Mana'ger-
Nuclear Production
1623 Harney Street ,,
Omaha, Nebraska 68102
Gentlemen:
This refers .to the inspection conducted by Mr. .P. H. Harrell of this office
'during the period April 1-30, 1987, of activities authorized by NRC Operating
License DPR-40 for the Fort Calhoun Station, and to the discussion of our .
findings with Mr. W. G. Gates and other members of your staff at the conclusion
of the inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection included operational safety verification,
maintenance, surveillance, plant tours, safety-related system walkdown,
security observations, radiological protection observations, in-office review
of periodic and special reports, followup on previously identified items,.
followup on IE-Bulletins 86-02 and 86-03, refueling activities, containment
local leak rate testing, licensed operator initial training,-and licensed
operator requalification program. Within these areas, the inspection consisted
of selective examination of procedures and representative records, interviews
with personnel, and observations by the NRC inspector. The Inspection-findings
are documented in the enclosed inspection report.
During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities were in .
violation of NRC requirements. Consequently, you are required to respond to
these violations, in writing, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of.
Federal Regulations. Your response should be based on the specifics' contained-
in the Notice of Violation enclosed with this letter.
During this inspection, it was also found that certain of your activities were
a potential violation of NRC requirements. However, since this potential
violation is related to training, it is not cited herein as a violation but is
considered to be an unresolved item in accordance with the Comission' Policy
Statement on Training and Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel
(50 FR 11147). We are concerned'that the individual SR0 was returned to
normal shift assignment subsequent to failing the annual written-
requalification examination. This matter needs specific management attention
to prevent this type of oversight in the future. No response is required;
^
however, your attention to the unresolved . item which has the potentic,l_ of
becoming a violation in the. future is warranted. !The unresolved item is
discussed in paragraph 15 of the enclosed inspection report.
_
NW
PIgy
h(y
C:R
C:RPB
RIV: SRI
RPMullikin
DRH nter
JEGagi ,a
}fPHHarrell/nc
3/3/87
(/S7
f { /ty/87
f/y/87
f
/
8706010416 870528
~
'
ADOCK 05000285
s~
G
- \\
.
t
,
.i
=
r
Omaha Public Power District
-2-
'Also during this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities
appeared to deviate from a commitment made to the NRC. This item and reference
to the connitment is identified in the enclosed Notice of Deviation. You are
requested-to respond to this deviation in writing. Your response should be
based on the specifics contained in the Notice of Deviation enclosed with this
letter.
In addition to the unresolved item identified in paragraph 15 related to
training, three additional unresolved items are identified in paragraph 7 of
the enclosed inspection report. These three unresolved items regarding the
.
trisodium phosphate dodecahydrate (TSP) requirements need prompt attention.
We have also examined actions you have taken with regard to previously
identified-inspection findings. The status' of these items is identified in
paragraph 2 of the enclosed inspection report.
The responses directed by this letter and-the accompanying Notices are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to
discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
Odginal Signed N
1 E. Gagliardo
J. E. Gagliardo, Chief
Reactor Projects Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A - Notice of Violation
2.
Appendix B - Notice of Deviation
3.
Appendix C - NRC. Inspection Report
50-285/87-10
cc w/ enclosures:
W. G. Gates, Manager
P. O. Box 399
Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023
Harry H. Voigt, Esq.
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae
1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Kansas Radiation Control Program Director
Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director
bcc:
(seenextpage)
.
_
_ _ _ .
_ _ . .
_.
.
_ . _ . .
_.
>
-
.
- .
,
,
j-
Omaha Public Power District
-3-
i
- bectoDMB(IE01)
bec distrib by _ RIV:-
- RPB
- RRI
.
R. D. Martin, RA
- R&SPB
- SectionChief~(RPB/B)-
- MIS. System
-
- RIV File
DRSP
.
- RSTS Operator
'
.*RSB
- Project Inspector
- D. Weiss, RM/ALF
,
- R. Hall
'
~ *w/766
,
4
=
f
,
b
'
i
W
h
!
2
!
4
4
9
i
I
f
i
l
--.
. .
,-
, , - , .
. . . . , - ,_ ..,,,:.,--.:.
_ , - . , . - . , -
- - - - . . - ,
- . - - , , .
.
..
. - . _ -
.