ML20214G397
| ML20214G397 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point, Vogtle, Washington State University, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 05/08/1986 |
| From: | Rossi C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Slosson M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20213E629 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, GL-85-09, GL-85-9, TAC-53176, TAC-55358, NUDOCS 8605190305 | |
| Download: ML20214G397 (2) | |
Text
._
\\.....[
MY 0 o 1936
.)
MEMORANDUM FOR:
M. Slosson, Project Manager, PWR Project Directorate f3 Division of PWR Licensing-A FROM:
C. E. Rossi, Assistant D'irector Division of PWR Licensing-A ~
SUBJECT:
INDIAN POINT 2 - SUPPLEMENT TO SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT ON REVIEW 0F DESIGN FOR AUTOMAl'IC SHUNT TRIP FOR REACTOR TRIP BREAKERS i
Plant Name:
Indian Point Unit 2 Utility:
Consolidated Edison Co.,,
Docket No.:
50~247 TAC Nos.:
53176 (4.3); 55358 (MPA B-90)
Licensing Status:
OR Resp. Pro,i. Dir. :
PO #3/DPA Project ifanager:
M. Slosson Review Branch:
E1CSB Review Status:
Incomplete By letters dated November 4,1983 March 16,1984 April 2,1984 and June 22, 1984, the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. provided responses to Generic Letter 83-28 including Item 4.3, Reactor Trip System Reliability (automatic actuation of the Shunt Trip Attachment for W Evaluation Report (SERI by the NRC staff dated June 22 plantsl. A Safety 1984, found that the design modifications proposed by the licensee were acceptable, thus completing the preimplementation review requirements of Item 4.3 of the generic letter.
The SER noted however that the seismic qualification of the shunt trip attach-ment was being conducted by the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) and that the licensee should confirm that the shunt trip is seismically qualified when the results of the WOG qualifications are completed. The SER also noted that following implementation of the shunt trip modifications, the licensee should submit proposed technical specifications which are responsive to the staff requirements noted in the SER. Subsequently, Generic Letter 85-09 was issued providing guidance for the Technical Specifications associated with the shunt coil trip attachments.
The licensee responded by letter dated Feb'ruary 14, 1986 to the seismic quali-k<
' fication and Technical Specification issues.
Fc,r the seismic qualification issue, we find the licensee's response acceptable. For the Technical 9
Specification issue, we do not find the licensee's response acceptable....
N
.q i
D
\\h
%$5I I$30b y
hh h M b Nh5SN!Nb N!NSMAk?$NdMkNbbh
-2 will require the licensee to submit Technical Specification changes that are responsive to the Generic Letter 85-09 requirements within 60 days.
not forthcoming we recommend the issuance of a show cause order.
If this is are evaluated and discussed further i'n the enclosed Safety Evaluation Report.
These issues Enclosed also is the SALP input for the additional review of Generic Letter 83-28, items 4.3 and 4.3 (T.S. ).
Enclosure:
As stated Charles E. Rossi, Assistant Director Division of PWR Licensing-A cc:
T. Novak B. J. Youngblood Distribution:
Document Control 016 C. E. Rossi
Contact:
EICSB Rdg.
IP-2 S/F A. Toalston, EICSB/DPA A. Toalston (PF)(2)
X27243 D. Lasher J. E. Knight F. Rosa
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE EICSB/DPA EICSB/DPA SL/EICSB/DPA BC/EICSB/DPA AD/DPA AToalston:ct* DLasher*
JEKnight*
FRosa*
CERossi 3/
/86 3/
/86 3/
/86 3/
/86 3/
/86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY e