ML20214F130

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Schedule for Implementation of Requirements of USI A-46, Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants No Later than 871201,per Encl Granting 870410 Request for Schedular Relief.W/O Encl
ML20214F130
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/14/1987
From: Capra R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Brons J
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
References
REF-GTECI-A-46, REF-GTECI-SC, TASK-A-46, TASK-OR GL-87-02, GL-87-2, NUDOCS 8705220422
Download: ML20214F130 (3)


Text

_

J May 14,-1987 Docket No. 50-333 DISTRIBUTION lEcEETITd7 B. Boger NRCPDR ~

C. Vogan Local PDR H. Abelson PDI-1 Rdg.

E. Jordan-OGC J. Partlow Mr. John C. Brons S. Varga ACRS(10)

Senior Vice President, Nuclear ~

J. Johnson Generation Power Authority of the State of New York

-e 173 Main Street White Plains, New York 10601

Dear Mr. Brons:

SUBJECT:

RELIEF FROM 60 DAY REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF GENERIC LETTER 87-02 Re: James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power: Plant

~

Generic Letter 87-02, dated February 19, 1987, was issued to all licensees subject to implement the requirements of USI-46, " Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants.".The generic letter. requested that each affected licensee provide an-implementation schedule for seismic adequacy verification within 60 days.

By letter to the NRC, dated April 10, 1987, the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) stated that its member utilities would be unable to provide the -

required response within the specified time because generic implementation procedures, were still under development. The SQUG thereby requested that an

-extension be granted.

The staff reviewed this extension request and, by letter to the Chairman of SQUG dated April 28, 1987 (Enclosure 1), granted schedular relief to SQUG member utilities. Therefore, in accordance with Enclosure 1, you are requested to provide a schedule for implementation of the requirements of USI-46 for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, no later than December 1, 1987.

Sincerely, 8705220422 870514 PDR ADOCK 05000333 p

PDR a

Robert A. Capra, Acting Director Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects, I/II Enclosure As stated

-cc: See next page

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE PDI r PDI CVogan*

D son J

ra 5/11/87 y /l3/87 5 /g/87

g Docket 1No. 50-333-DISTRIBUTION Docket File

- B. Boger-NRCPDR C._Vogan Local PDR H. Abelson PDI-1 Rdg.

E. Jordan OGC.

J. Partlow Mr.' John C. Brons' S. Varga- ~

ACRS(10)

Senior Vice President, Nuclear J. Johnson

~

Generation Power Authority of the State

of New York 123. Main, Street-n White P1ains. New York 10601

Dear Mr.' Brons:

SUBJECT:

RELIEF FROM 60 DAY REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF GENERIC LETTER 87-02 Re:f ' James A. _ FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Generic Letter-87-02, dated February 19, 1987, was issued to all licensees subject to implement the requirements of USI-46, " Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants". The generic letter-requested that each

-affected licensee provide an implementation schedule for seismic adequacy verification within 60 days.

-By. letter to the NRC, dated' April 10, 1987, the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) stated that its member utilities would be unable to provide the

required response within the specified time.because generic implementation procedures were still under development. The SQUG~ thereby requested.that an extension be granted.

l The staff reviewed this extension request and, by letter to the Chairman of l

SQUG_ dated April 28, 1987.(Enclosure 1), granted schedular relief to SQUG l

member utilities. Therefore, in accordance with Enclosure 1,-you are i

requested to provide a schedule for implementation of the requirements of USI-46 for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, no later than December 1,.1987.

I Sincerely, I

L Robert A. Capra, Acting Director Project Directorate I-l' Division of Reactor Projects I/II l

l

~ Enclosure As stated cc: See next page PDI-1h PDI-1 CVogan e son RCapra b/%/87 5

l/87

/ /87 l

n

+

!'r. John C. Brons

~ James A. FitzPatrick Uuclear Fower Authority of the State of New York.

Power Plant cc:

Mr. Charles M. Pratt Mr. Jay Dunkleberger Assistant General Counsel Division of Policy-Analysis Power Authority of the State and Planning of New York New York State Energy Office 10 Columbus Circle Agency Building 2 New York, New York 10019 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 kesident Inspector's Office Regional Administrator, Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 136 Lycoming, New York 13093 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. A. Klausman fir. Radford J. Converse Vice President - Quality Assurance

-Resident Manager Power Authority of the State James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear of New York Power Plant 10 Columbus Circle Post Office Box 41 New York, New York 10019 Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. J. A. Gray, Jr.

Mr. George Wilverding, Cnairman Director - Nuclear Licensing - BWR Safety Review Committee Power Authority of the State Power Authority of the State of New York of New York

~

123 Main Street 123 Main Street White Plains, New Ycrk 10601 White Plains, New York 10601 Mr. Robert.P. Jones, Supervisor Town of Scriba R. D. #4 Oswego, New York 13126 Mr. Leroy W. Sinclair Power Authority of the State of New York i

l 10 Columbus Circle l

New York, New York 10019 Mr. M. C. Cosgrove l

Quality Assurance Superintendent James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear l

Power Plant Post Office Box 41 l

Lycoming, New York 13093 l

l l

1 l

8 o

UNITED STATES g

8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

E-WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

%,**"*/

APR 2 81987 i

.i e

Mr. Neil P. Smith Chairsan Seismic Qualification Utility Group 801 18th Street,-N.W.

Suite 300-Washington, D.C.

20006,

Dear Mr. Smith:

I have received your letter dated April 10, 1987 requesting clarification of the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02.

In Generic Letter 87-02, the staff requested that each licensee subject to the USI A-46 equipment seismic adequacy verification requirements provide a schedule for implementation of the seismic verificatio'n within 60 days of receipt of the Generic Letter.

In your letter you stated that licensees who belong to the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) will be unable to provide a schedule for implementation at this time because the generic implementation procedures are still under development by the SQUG and will not be finalized until the completion of.s.eyeral trial plant reviews.,

y The staff hasfreviewed your request and concluded that it is appropriate to

~

extend the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02 for SQUG licensees until the generic implementation procedures are better defined and the trial plant reviews are completed. It is my understanding that the SQUG generic implementation procedures should be essentially complete before October 1, 1987. By that date at least two trial plant reviews will have been completed and the generic implementation procedures sufficiently defined and reviewed by NRC staff so that licensees can plan and schedule their plant specific reviews.

All licensees participating in the USI A-46 SQUG implementation program should

"[

provide the schedule for plant specific implementation no later than December 1, 1987. The NRC staff will review and evaluate the generic p

procedures by October 1, to allow each utility 60 days to prepare their replies to the generic letter.

Sincerely.

l Thomas E. Murley, u..uwr Office,of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Ah A

^

g, / U J L/G ' f/ VV b y

.