ML20214D616
| ML20214D616 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 11/19/1986 |
| From: | Hood D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8611240170 | |
| Download: ML20214D616 (14) | |
Text
r-November 19, 1986 Docket Nos.: 50-369 and 50-370
!!EMORANDUM FOR:
B. J. Youngblood, Director PWR Project Directorate #4 Division of PWR Licensing-A,fiRR FR0f4:
Darl Hood, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #4 Division of PWR Licensing-A, NRR
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF MEETING REGARDING OPERATIONAL EVENTS RESULTING FR0f4 PROCEDURES - MCGU1RE NUCLEAR SYATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 DATE & TIME:
December 4 and 5,1986 9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
LOCATION:
ficGuire Site Cornelius, North Carolina PURPOSE:
To discuss events resulting from procedures PARTICIPANTS:
NRC DUKE POWER COMPANY Drager T. McConnell D. Hood, et.al.
N. McCraw, et.al.
\\s Darl Hood, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #4 Division of PWR Licensing-A, NRR cc: See next page 8611240170 861119 PDR ADOCK 05000369 P
PDR 35(t PWR#4/DPWR-A PW PWR-A DHocd/mac BJYo it ilood 11/gg/86 11/[/86 1
I Mr. H. B. Tucker Duke Power Company McGuire Nuclear Station cc:
Mr. A.V. Carr, Esq.
Dr. John M. Barry Duke Power Company Department of Environmental Health P. O. Box 33189 Mecklenburg County 422 South Church Street 1200 Blythe Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 26242 Charlotte, North Carolir.e 28203 County Manager of Mecklenburg County 720 East Fourth Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 Chainnan, North Carolina Utilities Comission Mr. Robert Gill Dobbs Building Duke Power Company 430 North Salisbury Street Nuclear Production Department Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 P. O. Box 33189 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Mr. Dayne H. Brown, Chief Radiation Protection Branch J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Division of Facility Services Bishop, Libennan, Cook, Purcell Department of Human Resources and Reynolds 701 Barbour Drive 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2008 Washington, D. C.
20036 Senior Resident Inspector c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Route 4, Box 529 Hunterville, North Carolina 28078 Regional Adninistrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 L. L. Williams Area Manager, Mid-South Area ESSD Projects Westinghouse Electric Corporation MNC West Tower - Bay 239 P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230
~
J
I Enclosure AGEf!DA (APPROXIMATELY 1-1/2 DAYS)
Introductory remarks by tlRC.
Brief description of the event (s)* by plant supervisor familiar with the event (s) (i.e., what cccurred, actions leading up to the event, personnel involved, conclusions reached regardina why the event occurred, acticns taken after the event to preclude recurrence).
View areas in the plant where the event occurred.
Discuss the event (s) in detail with plant supervisors using the protocol as a guide.
Discuss the event (s) with plant personnel who were directly involved in the event (s).
Closing discussion with plant supervisor on any remaining items.
- LERs Describire Events it is Planned to Discuss.
Plant LER #
Event Date FkGuire 1 369-84-018 06/04/84 PkGuire 1 369-84-025 06/27/84 McGuire 1 369-84-030 11/01/84 McGuire 2 370-84-001 01/09/84 McGuire 2 370-84-002 01/15/84 McGuire 2 370-84-028 11/13/84 McGuire 2 370-85-017 06/01/85 I
s n a t hiin /
4
/ q is
/- '
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS V
1.
a.
The purpose of this review is to gather information regarding contributing factors to significant events that involved procedures.
b.
The purpose is not to assess blame.
2.
Questions refer to all types of work and all people who may have been involved in the events (e.g., operations, maintenance, I&C, etc.).
a m
,-,____..-_v
__.__.,7 y
II ENTRANCE QUESTIONS 1.
Describe the sequence of events involved in the event.
a.
What organizations (operations, maintenance, test, etc.)
b.
Work order / procedures in effect c.
Communications 2.
Describe any significant features of the area where the event occurred (e.g., contaminated, accessibility, temperature, humidity, ventilation, noise, lighting, etc.) and indicate whether these may have influenced the event.
3.
Was there a sense of urgency to get the work done?
2 l
a r,- 7 6--
III PROCEDURES e
1.
Was a procedure being used for this event?
a.
Obtain copy of procedure that was involved.
b.
Obtain copy of revised procedure if procedure was changed to prevent recurrence.
2.
Are written procedures, instructions, or orders available to operations, maintenance, and surveillance and testing personnel performing work in the plant? If yes, explain how plant personnel use them. Are procedures other than written used?
3.
Who controls the quality and technical content of the procedures?
i 3
m sv---
4.
Describe the plant procedures for sign-off, verification, initiation, etc., of work performed out in the plant.
a.
Establishing plant conditions prior to initiating work.
b.
Post maintenance / modification testing c.
Administrative procedures governing the verification of work (independent versus double verification).
N A
s 5.
Is there a procedure upgrade program? If so, how was it recognized that procedures needed improvement? When was program initiated?
What have been the results?
j 6.
When a procedure is changed to prevent recurrence of an event, is a myiew made to detennine whether there are other procedures that inay have the same problem? If so, how~ is the corrective action-(problem identification and procedure revision) tracked?
D 4
l
,,n
-m
-.,,_.,n-.
,-,.,,-.g.,m.-
a g
.. ~
p~--
7 e,
--n.,
S y /o 7.
Do maintenance and modification procedures include instructions for system restoration?
e 3.
What plant procedure (s) governs connunications? What steps have been taken to help ensure oral connunications are not misunderstood?
9 5
)
[
' 7 '
IV PERSONNEL AND INTERACTIONS 1.
Personnel Involved a.
Number of people and discipline b.
Overtime worked during or prior to event; maximum amount permitted c.
Contract people l
l 2.
Shift Information l
a.
Shift on which event occurred and approximate tir.e on shift.
b.
Shift change (recent change relative to event) how is on-coming shift not?fied of work l
completed by previous shift, on-going work, and work to be performed establishing plant conditions to allow work to be performed.
0 6
'l if / u V
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS 1.
Training l
l a.
Any received by personnel involved in the event l
equipment location relative safety significance of equipment b.
Who receives training and when?
l c.
Are personnel retrained after plant events, unnecessary l
rework, plant modifications, plant procedural changes or industry operating experience?
d.
Status of accreditation programs with IN'PO.
Is there an interface between procedures and the INPO accreditation process?
2.
Qualifications of personnel including length of time at plant, nuclear vs. non-ruclear experience, etc.
O 7
W 't i a 3.
How are procedures and procedure changes factored into the training program? When a procedure is changed to prevent recurrence, how is this reflected in the training?
a.
For licensed operator training, how are the procedures used at simulators kept up to date? When changes are made, are they first verified at simulators?
l b.
How are procedures used in the training of NL0s? Are revised procedures checked out through training?
i
\\
l 8
j
9 7 /o VI MISCELLANEOUS d
1.
Organizational structure and interfaces.
2.
How are events investigated? When correction action is reconsnended, who determines whether it will be taken? Who ensures completion and on what schedule?
3.
What steps in the planning and control of work are taken to help prevent occurrence of this type of event (e.g., group discussions prior to critical jobs)?
i 9
1 J
7 o' O
/c
SUMMARY
QUESTIONS 1.
In your opinion, what were the most significant contributing factors in the event (s)?
I 2.
Was the problem looked at generically? In general, how is this decision inade?
e l
10
i MEETING NOTICE DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC Participants NRC PDR E. Tracer L PDR D. Hood, et.al.
NSIC PRC System PWR#4 Reading File i
M. Duncan Project Manager D. Hood l
CRFS H. Centon l
J. Lyons l
H. Thompson E. Rossi, AD/PWR-A R. Ballard, EB C. Berlinger, RSB J. Milhoan, PSB F. Rosa, EICSB V. Benaroya, F0B OGC/Bethesda J. Partlow B. Grimes E. Jordan l
ACRS (10)
OPA Receptionist (Building where mtg is being held) bcc: Licensee / Applicant A Service List
_