ML20214A363
| ML20214A363 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 04/29/1987 |
| From: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | James O'Reilly GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8705190419 | |
| Download: ML20214A363 (24) | |
Text
.__ _ __
/
f APR 2 9 IM7 GeorgiafowerCompany ATTN:g/Nr. James P. O'Reilly Senior Vice President-Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- V0GTLE FACILITY, DOCKET NOS. 50-424 AND 425 This refers to the management meeting conducted at your request in the. NRC Region II Office on March 24, 1987. This meeting was held to discuss with the NRC the Vogtle Readiness Review Program (VRRP) for Unit 2, using the lessons learned from Unit 1.
It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial and has provided a comprehensive overview of the Vogtle Unit 2 VRRP and, specifically, the proposed Unit 2 methodology.
This in-depth presentation will better enable the NRC to understand this program.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be pleased to discuss them.
Sincerely,
},/ c/WW J. Nelson Grace egional Administrator
Enclosures:
1.
Attendance List 2.
Plant Vogtle - Unit 2 Readiness Review Program cc w/ encl:
(See page 2)
%[
N
[
G TEyf
z I
Georgia Power Crmpany 2
APR 2 3 tgg7 pc w/ enc 1:
. E. Cdnway, Senior Vice President &
p/C. Whitney,GeneralManagerProject Project Director Support
[/ Engineering P. D. Rice, Vice President, Project V. H. Pinson, Vice President, Project Construction Cy W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality i
/ Assuronce Manager
/. B. Bockhold, General Manager, G
Nuclear Operations
/L. Gucwa, Manager, Nuclear Safety d.andLicensing A. Bailey, Project Licensing t Manager B. W. Churchill, Esq., Shaw, y
Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge
/J.E. Joiner,Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman and Ashmore
[J.G.Ledbetter, Commissioner,
/ Department of Human Resources VC. H. Badger, Office of Planning
/ and Budget V D. Kirkland, III, Counsel, Office of the Consumer's Utility
, j Council V D. Feig, Georgians Against d.NuclearEnergy B. Margulies, Esq., Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
/ Panel 4 Dr. O. H. Paris, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
/G. A. Linenberger, Jr., Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel bec w/ encl: (See page 3)
j Georgia 'wer Company bec w/ encl:
JE.Reis,OGC
/W. M. Hill, IE
/M. Miller, NRR
/W.Brach,ED0 M. Sinkule, RII J.Christnot,RII gNRCResidentInspector Docunent Control Desk State of Georgia RII RII RI g,
[Ig EChristnot:cc Sinkule VBrownlee LR6yes Ernst 4/3r187 4/3 2/87 4/g3/87 4/d/87 4/ /87 l
i ENCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES MARCH 24, 1987 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Region II (RII)
M. L. Ernst, Deputy Regional Administrator, RII A. F. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)
L. A. Reyes, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII V. L. Brownlee, Acting Deputy Director, DRP D. Collins, Chief, Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards (DRSS)
M. V. Sinkule, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2C, DRP H. H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector (Construction), Vogtle J. F. Rogge, Senior Resident Inspector (0perations), Vogtle E. F. Christnot, Project Engineer, Reactor Projects Section 2C, DRP A. Tillman, Physical Security Inspector, Physical Security Section (DRSS)
S. Vias, Project Engineer, Reactor Projects Section 1A (DRP)
Inspection and Enforcement (IE)
F. C. Hawkins, Chief, Policy and Development Section, QAVT W. M. Hill, Jr., Senior Inspection Specialist, QAVT Office of Executive Director for Operations (ED0)
E. W. Brach, Executive Coordinator for Regional Operations, (ED0)
Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
T. M. Novak, Acting Director, Division of Pressurized Water Reactor Licensing-A (PAD)
M. A. Miller, Licensing Project Manager, PAD-4 Georgia Power Company P. D. Rice, Vice President, Project Director C. Whitney, General Manager, Vogtle Project C. W. Hayes, Quality Assurance Manager, Vogtle J. Edwards, Senior Nuclear Specialist, Licensing
-q 1
PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PRESENTATION OUTLINE INTRODUCTORY REMARKS P. D. RICE N
[!
RESULTS OF UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW C. W. WHITNEY 5
UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW R. W. MCMANUS QUESTIONS I
I 0462R/079-7/1
2 READINESS REVIEW PILOT PROGRAM PURPOSE AN IN-DEPTH SELF-ASSESSMENT BY GPC 0F THE PLANT V0GTLE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATIONAL READINESS UNDERTAKEN T0:
o PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE THAT THE V0GTLE PROJECTS' QUALITY PROGRAMS HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS) o ADDRESS RECOMMENDATIONS IN NRC REPORT TO CONGRESS (NUREG 1055, MAY 1984),
' IMPROVING QUALITY AND THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY IN THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS";
o PROVIDE FOR A PHASED INDEPENDENT NRC REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE V0GTLE QUALITY PROGRAM AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION; o
PROVIDE PREDICTABILITY AND STABILITY TO THE V0GTLE WORK AND LICENSING PROCESS AND TO THE NRC REGULATORY PROCESS.
0%7B/079-7/7
N C/)
2 E
W aC es:
LD W
2 C
C E
LAJ L&J C3 M
~
3 LAJ C
A C
LLJ 3
LAJ M
LaJ LaJ
-a H
E J
C C
W CL.
W H
E M
L&J CL.
=
E LD E
eC
.-=
y C/)
e M
M C/)
2
- 3 L'J Z
H C
LLJ TJ C3 L&J E
C y
Q E
W C
g H
H E
l2:
~
La.J E
- 2 E
M
=
LAJ E*
O C
C C:3 E
C E
M E
C C
C/)
M W
W C
3 LLJ
&3 CL.
O C
E LJ L&J C
C C
~
U C
C C
C C
E C
C aC M
=
C C
LaJ C1.
LA LA m
M M
i M
C M
M M
M 7
L&J LAJ L&J C
eC 3
E C
C C
O O
O O
O J
4 i
l l
l
- - -- --. -, - - ~. + - - - - - - -
-p 4
READINESS REVIEW PILOT PROGRAM EXAMPLES OF FINDINGS I
o NEED FOR IMPROVED QUALITY VERIFICATION DOCUMENTATION o
NEED TO UPGRADE INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION / CERTIFICATION RECORDS 3
o CERTAIN LATE ENGINEERING CHANGES NOT INCORPORATED IN COMPLETED WORK o
UNDERTORQUED CABLE TRAY HOLD DOWN BOLTS o
WEAKNESSES IN NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING RECORDS o
INCORRECT TURBINE BUILDING SEISMIC ANALYSIS 1
o INADEQUATE SHIELDING OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER FILTERS o
FAILURE TO APPROPRIATELY QUALIFY CERTAIN FIELD VENDORS o
CALCULATION DISCREPANCIES I
1 e
'f A
q 5
READINESS REVIEW PILOT PROGRAM LESSONS LEARNED o
EARLY IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION OF PROBLEMS o
EARLY RESOLUTION OF COMMITMENT INTERPRETATION DIFFERENCES COORDINATED MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR MANY GPC AND NRC REVIEW ACTIVITIES o
o ENHANCED PREDICTABILITY AND STABILITY OF V0GTLE LICENSING PROCESS o
POTENTIAL APPLICATION TO FUTURE NUCLEAR PROJECTS aa 5
4
6 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM BASES o
BOTH UNITS ARE PART OF A COMMON PLANTS COMMON LICENSING COMMITMENTS, DESIGN CRITERIA, CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES, OPERATIONS STAFF, o
UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW PROVIDES A SUBSTANTIAL BASELINE FOR A UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEWS o
UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW DEMONSTRATES THAT PROJECT CONTINUES TO COMPLY; o
ANY CHANGES / ADDITIONS TO COMMITMENTS TO BE TREATED LIKE UNIT is o
DEGREE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND FORMALITY DEPENDENT ON LEVEL OF NRC PARTICIPATION.
7 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PURPOSE TO PROVIDE A SYSTEMATIC AND DISCIPLINED REVIEW 0F GPC'S IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND INITIAL TEST PROGRAM PROCESSES f0 INCREASE THE ASSURANCE THAT QUALITY PROGRAM ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.
a u,
u-a PLANT V0 GILE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PROGRAM OVERVIEW o
THE UNIT 2 PROGRAM WILL BE A CONTINUATION OF THE UNIT 1 EFFORT MODIFIED FOR LESSONS LEARNED AND FOCUSING ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN UNITS.
o THE COMMITMENTS DATA BASE ESTABLISHED FOR UNIT 1 WILL BE MAINTAINED FOR UNIT 2 AND UPDATED FOR SUBSEQUENT COMMITMENT CHANGES.
o THE ITEMS CHOSEN FOR ASSESSMENT AND THEIR ATTRIBUTES WILL BE BASED ON THE STATUS OF UNIT 2 WORK DURING UNIT 1 ASSESSMENTS, PROGRAM OR ORGANIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES FROM THAT ASSESSED IN UNIT 1, AND UNIT I FINDINGS.
o IMPLEMENTATION OF ASSESSMENT PLANS WILL BE JOINTLY IMPLEMENTED BY THE READINESS REVIEW ORGANIZATION AND THE QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATION.
o A READINESS REVIEW BOARD WILL CONTINUE TO OVERSEE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM.
e
T 9
PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM SCOPE i
THE SCOPE OF THE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM WILL INCLUDE ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION, AND INITIAL TEST PROGRAM ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH UNIT 2 SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS AND CATEGORY I STRUCTURES.
9 9
10 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PROGRAM ELEMENTS 1
o LICENSING COMMITMENT MATRIXs o
PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS o
ESTABLISHMENT OF A LIST OF LESSONS LEARNED AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS RESULTING FROM UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEWS o
ASSESSMENT OF UNIT 2 ACTIVITIESs o
UNIT 2 MODULES AND APPENDICES.
e
11 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PROGRAM ELEMENTS LICENSING COMMITMENT MATRIX o
FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS; MAINTENANCE OF IDENTIFIED UNIT I DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS, UPDATING 0F MATRIX FOR ADDITIONS AND REVISIONS OF COMMITMENTS, RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATRIX ASSUMED BY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS AT UNIT 2 FUEL LOAD.
o OPERATING PLANT COMMITMENTS ARE MAINTAINED AND UPDATED BY ESTABLISHED OPERATIONS PROGRAMS.
12 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS L
UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW WILL EVALUATE THE PROJECT PROGRAMS FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND INITIAL TEST PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND, WHERE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES EXIST, WILL PROVIDE UPDATES FOR THE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION.
i j
I
?
n
u-
~
l s
13 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PROGRAM ELEMENTS LESSONS LEARNED AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROGRAM ELEMENT IS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION GAINED FROM UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW TO ENSURE AGAINST RECURRENCE OF THE SAME PROBLEM IN UNIT 2.
o ASSEMBLED FROM UNIT I MODULE FINDINGS, NRC INSPECTION OF UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW, AND THE IDRs 1
o UTILIZED AS A SOURCE FOR DEVELOPING UNIT 2 ASSESSMENTS; o
EXAMINATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION EFFECTIVENESS BY BOTH RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT AND READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM.
, -A-n o
i 14 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PROGRAM ELEMENTS UNIT 2 ASSESSMENTS PURPOSE:
TO EVALUATE THE CONFORMANCE OF UNIT 2 ACTIVITIES TO LICENSING COMMITMENTS o
THE DECISION AS TO WHETHER A UNIT 2 ASSESSMENT IS NECESSARY WILL DEPEND ON THE FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTES:
- SIGNIFICANCE OF UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW AND NRC FINDINGS AS A RESULT OF UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW,
- STATUS OF COMPLETION OF UNIT 2 ACTIVITIES DURING UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW,
- CHANGES IN ORGANIZATION OR PROGRAM DETAILS FROM THAT EVALUATED IN UNIT 1.
o READINESS REVIEW WILL USE THE FOLLOWING SOURCES IN ESTABLISHMENT OF ASSESSMENT PLANSs
- UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW AND NRC FINDINGS,
- RESULTS OF AUDITS,
- INDUSTRY ISSUES, o
ASSESSMENTS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED BY QUALITY ASSURANCE AND THE READINESS REVIEW TASK FORCE.
h E
h 1
15 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM PROGRAM ELEMENTS i
UNIT 2 MODULES AND APPENDICES o
EACH UNIT 2 MODULE SUPPLEMENT WILL INCLUDE; UPDATED COMMITMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX, SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO PROGRAM DESCRIPTION, UPDATED AUDIT AND NRC INSPECTION MATRIX, UNIT 2 ASSESSMENT PLAN AND RESULTS, 1
PLANT v04TLE UNIT 2 NRelSION NEADINSSS BRvikW PNO4 NAM 03/83/87 AESBSnMNNT PLAN IPSSLIMENANY)
..........................ans...s se...
....s......................
.a.as.....:..
.aasessses..... mas..asesseses.sses.asessasaasess ne...
COMPLETION STATUS DWWING UNIT I FINDINGS TYPE OF UNIT 2 MODULE UNIT I ASSESSMENT READINESS REVIEW NBC SIGNIFICANT: PROGRAM. ASSESSMSNT 9478 UNIT It UNIT 24 I
II III I IFI URI VIOL FINDINGS : CHANGES
- I-II Ill s.....
.a s a....... e... a s s a s s a : s.. s a. a.s.. e s.... a s s a. s. o. a !. s a..a.. a s s e...
- s. ;. s s.e s s s a s..s e a. = : s e s s e s.a s e s ;.a... e. s s : 3.sseessee.sessa.
Civil
..........s.as..............:.
Modele 01 01-85 95 66 3
20 43 3
5 0
yee se a
telaterced Concrete Structurce Module 88 05-85 98 66 3
17 42 12 5
0 yee ne a
Structural Steel Module 13A 07-85 98 98 0
5 12 0
0 0
no me a
Foundetten Meterial and Beckfill Module 13e 07 85 84 4
0 10 6
0 0
0 yee yee a
a a
Castlege Modele 13C 10-85 30 0
0 3
5 3
0 0
no me a
Post Tenelened Centalmeent Mechanical
.................s...aaa.asas.
Medele 04 02-85 90 15 14 41 26 4
7 4
yes yes a
a a
Meckentce! Squipment and Piping Module Il 08-85 TO 4
6 46 23 I
I 3
yes yes a
a a
P6pe Stress and Supporte Medele 16 06-85 85 23 5
5 3
0 0
2 yee me a
ns$5 Module ISA Il R5 83 13 I
18 13 2
2 3
ne me a
a a
MVAC Medute 20 08 85 60 0
3 7
4 3
0 0
yes yee a
a a
Instrementet6ee and Centrete Electrical
............u..
Module 06 04 85 60 0
N I6 46 2
0 0
yee ao a
a m
Electrical Equipeemt Module 12 09 85 50 0
7 28 I5 o
I 0
yee yes a
a a
Cable end forstaattene Module 17 07-85 69 7
3 IS 7
3 0
2 yee ne a
w a
Receweye Module 19 12-85 60 le 4
14 3
2 0
0 rea yes a
a a
Electrical Supporte M
PLANT WOwfLE UNIT 2 NEv35 ION suABINEss BEvlse rNOGNAM 01/19/n?
ASSESSMENT PLAN (PRELIMINART)
......smanas.......ssas.2 sssssassas......as.....
4......s.s......es.ssa.
{
....as.......ssa..asss3 3...
m.,s.......
ssa. ass asses..
32 COMPLETION STAT 73 DURING UNIT I FibOINGS TTFE OF UNIT 2 MODULE UNIT I A$$ES$ MENT READINESS REVIEN NF2 SIGNIFICANT: PROGRAM AS$E$$ MENT DATE UNIT lt UNIT 24 I
II III IFI URI vl0L FINDINGS CEANGES I
il til
........s..ssa.s..m s.s==ss.es 3.sa...as.s
....assa.sa m
=;s.6as..sas s.ss.as:s.4 4.s.s..sessses sassamasses:sess sa..:.assssass.
ss...s INITIAL TEST PeocaAM
...........a
==..............s Module 034 04-85 to 0
K 12 II 5
0 0
no yee a
a a
RADIAff0N PROTECTION
..................s...........
Modulo 09A IO 85 800 100 1
0 2
1 0
0 yee me n
(Deatge espects saly)
Fire Protecties
.....s2.
Module ISS 02-86 10 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
se me DLeeel Oesereter es..........sa.
.........s====
Module 18C 11-85 100 50 0
1 0
0 0
0 se me Appendices
............a...........
3.
Appendia C 05-85 758 458 0
2 1
0 0
0 yee se a
Precurement Appendem 0 05-85 758 450 0
1 7
0 0
I se se a
Decament Centre!
Appendte E 05-85 75e 458 0
0 4
1 0
2 se no a
Meter &ol Centrol Appendia F 11-85 900 548 0
4 0
2 0
0 yee no a
Inspector Ovaltftcettee Appeadle G 05-85 T5e 45e 0
3 IS 0
I I
yee no a
M&TE Appendte I 04-85 TSe 4Se 0
0 3
2 1
0 no me l
Quality Assurance Orgentsatten l
Apperdam J 10-85 90s 54e 0
2 0
I I
O no me a
Equipment Queltftcetten eseeed en plant t.eplete et stee of eseessment
18 PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 READINESS REV;EW PROGRAM MODULES WITH COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND UNIT I FINDING FOLLOWUP IPRELIMINARY1 l
MODULE 1 REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES APPENDIX C PROCUREMENT MODULE 8 STRUCTURAL STEEL APPENDIX D DOCUMENT CONTROL A
MODULE 9A RADIATION PROTECTION (DESIGN)
APPENDIX E MATERIAL CONTROL MODULE 13A FOUNDATION MATERIAL AND BACKFILL APPENDIX F INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION MODULE 13C POST TENSIONED CONTAINMENT APPENDIX G MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT MODULE 16 NSSS APPENDIX I QUALITY ASSURANCE MODULE 18B FIRE PROTECTION APPENDIX J EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION MODULE 18C DIESEL GENERATOR e
PLANT V0GTLE - UNIT 2 19 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM UNIT 2 MODULES WITH FULL ASSESSMENTS IPRELIMINARY1 MODULE 3A INITIAL TEST PROGRAM MODULE 4 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND PIPING MODULE 6 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT MODULE 11 PIPE STRESS AND SUPPORTS MODULE 12 ELECTRICAL CABLES AND TERMINATIONS MODULE 13B C0ATINGS MODULE 17 ELECTRICAL RACEWAYS MODULE 18A HVAC MODULE 19 ELECTRICAL SUPPORTS MODULE 20 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS u
W W
5 A
2 E4 y
n b
k 3
3 4
n 5
A S
~
E4
~ w 5$
y
,wa MW A
w -g h
>ggx
-m A
hN du 3
A 5
n -
l l
5 -
l h -
l' R4 -
I y
B N
5
=
6 e
es n
2 g
m i
5 y
s i
Eh n
B O
6 8
E g
0 m
m e
a N
h eB a=g g" H;; S as d =$
e 25 ne a
l a
eas
$eb E
E 6
5 5
5
(
a' Q* D' S D
9 2
9 9
g E5 2 5
_------_,----,m__,-,__
._,aa,,,
, ~ - - -
.,__,_,,,-,--r,-wwww.,