ML20213H022
| ML20213H022 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1986 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8611190034 | |
| Download: ML20213H022 (3) | |
Text
,
November 13, 1986 Docket No. STN 50-454 DISTRIBUTION 50-455 Docket-File-Local PDR PD#3 Rdg D '
NRC PDR T. Novak C. Rossi NOTE T0:
Harold R. Denton, Director L. 01shan Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation C. Vogan R. Vollmer FROM:
Steven A. Varga, Director Project Directorate #3 Division of PWR Licensing-A
SUBJECT:
NRR SALP REPORT FOR COMMONWEALTH EDIS0N COMPANY FOR BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 A copy of the NRR SALP Report addressing Commonwealth Edison's performance as owner / operator of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, from November 1,1985 to October 31, 1986 is enlosed. The report includes review ratings and summarizes significant licensing actions and activities during the evaluation period. The licensee's performance in the functio.ial area of licensing activities is rated Category 2.
Enclosed for your information is a summary of the NRR and overall ratings for the past two evaluation periods.
We plan to transmit the report to Region I on November 20, 1986.
I am the assigned SES for this SALP.
l(
Steven A. Varga, Director Project Directorate #3 Division of PWR Licensing-A
Enclosures:
As stated PD#3 @
D#3 CVogan Olshan a
11$/86 143/86 11 86 8611190034 861113 PDR ADOCK 0500 4
. =.......
From SALP 4 - January 1, 1983 through April 30, 1984 y
4 III.
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS Overall, the licensee's performance was found to be acceptable and showed an improving trend. Followup and resolution of many identified past problems continues. In most cases the licensee's recent actions on resolution of past problems has been responsive.
Rating Last Rating This Trend Within Functional Areas Period Period the Period A.
Soils and Foundations NR*
NR None B.
Containment and Other Safety-Related Structures 2
2 Same C.
Piping Systems and Supports 2
2 Same 2
Improved D.
Safety-Related Components 3 E.
Support Systems 3
2 Improved F.
Electrical Power Supply and Distribution 3
2 Same G.
Instrumentation and Control Systems NR 2
Sams s
H.
Licensing Activities 1
2*
Same 1.
Quality Assurance 3
2 Improved
/
J.
Preoperational Testing 3
3 Nixed
~~
K.
Radiological Controls 2
2 Same
- ~
L.
Fire Protection NR 3
None g
M.
Same N.
Security and Safeguards NR 2
Improved i
)
4 0.
Reinspection Program NR 1
Mone
- NR = not rated t
?
.}
I i
i 4
~~-~~~~~~'
From SALP 5 - May 1, 1984 through October 31, 1985
]'
III.
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS Byron SALP 5 incompasses activities in 17 functional areas during all, or part, of the 18 month assessment period. The licensee's performance was acceptable in the construction activities which continued from the previous assessment period. However, perfonnance in functional areas involving Unit 1 operations demonstrates significant weaknesses. Although the licensee is considered capable, continued management action is needed in order to assure acceptable performance.
Rating Last Rating This Functional Areas Period Period Trend A.
Plant Operations NR 3
None*
B.
Radiological Controls 2
3 Same i
'C.
Maintenance NR 2
Same 0.
Surveillance NR 3
Declined E.
Initial Fuel Loading NR 1
N/A F.
Preoperational Testing 3
2 Same and Startup Testing G.
Fire Protection 3
2 Improved H.
1 Improved I.
Security 2
3 Decl,ined J.
Quality Programs and 2
2 Same Administrative Controls K.
Licensing Activities 2
2 Same L.
Containment and 2
2 Same Other Safety-Related Structures M.
Piping Systems 2
2 Same and Supports N.
Safety-Related 2
2 Same Components
. O.
Support Systems 2
NR N/A P.
Electrical Power Supply 2
2 Same and Distribution 5
- _.-. - _ _.