ML20213C815
| ML20213C815 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 11/17/1978 |
| From: | Kreger W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0236, CON-WNP-236 NUDOCS 7811300259 | |
| Download: ML20213C815 (3) | |
Text
-
V n L 7 ?T*;
i i
MEMORANDUM FOR:
S. Varga. Chief, Light Water Reactors Branch 4. DPM FROM:
W. Kreger, Chief, Radiological Assessment Branch, DSE I
SUBJECT:
WPPSS 2 - ROUND ONE QUESTIONS i
PLANT NAME:
WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2 l
LICENSING STAGE:
OL DOCKET HUMBER:
50-397 MILESTONE NUMBER / BRANCH CODE:
05/33 PROJECT MANAGER:
M. Lynch RESPONSIBLE BRMCH:
LWR-4 REQUESTED CO*1PLETION DATE:
11/8/78 DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE:
Round One Questions j
REVIEW STATUS:
Continuing i
The Radiation Protection Section of the Radiological Assessment Branch has completed its round one review of Chapter 12 and related I
sections of the WPPSS #2 FSAR. The attached 10 questions are a result of this review and of the applicant's responses to the acceptance review questions. As discussed with the project manager, this review is submitted late due to other commitments of the reviewer.
j This review was perfomed by C. S. Hinson, RPS/RG.
l Ocnal algunt by W. E. Kneer l
William E. Kreger, Chief gg ga Radiological Assessment Branch i
All e
Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis
Enclosure:
as stated j
l
[
cc:
R. Hartfield (w/o encl.)
D. Crutchfield DISTRIBUTION l
i S. Hanauer J. Collins Central File R. DeYoung R. Boyd RAB Reading D. Muller M. Lynch W. Kreger L. Crocker T. Murphy l
l R. Vollmer C. Hinson
[-]
i l
orne
- ER Acr.
7 nRr/
/ _RAB DSE 5
CHifis D me y M
WEKrege k
.....s, 11/16/78 11/jy/78 11//)/78 i
s.,,,
l l
NRCPGAM 318 (9-76) NRCM 0240 W us s. oovannuswr ensurine ornes. sore-eaus4 l
4 331-1 331.0 RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 12.0 331.15 Indicate whether, and if. so how, the guidance provided by the (12.
following Regulatory Guides has been followed; if not followed, describe the specific alternative methods used:
R.G. 8.14, " Personnel Neutron Dosimeters."
R.G. 8.15, " Acceptable Programs for Respiratory Protection."
331.16 The following design features are intended to complement the (12.1.2.1)
ALARA program. Describe how your plant design reflects consideration of these features:
1.
use of adequate and quick-serv' ice auxiliary lighting in high radiation areas.
2.
clear identification of localized radiation sources.
331.17 Tables 12.2-14 through 12.2-16 give the estimated airborne (12.2.2) radionuclide concentrations for three normally occupied areas at WNP-2. Provide similar tables giving the estimated airborne radionuclide concentrations for these other areas of the plant:
solid radwaste handling areas, and liquid radwaste handling areas.
331.18 Specify the frequency with which you plan to calibrate your (12.3.4.3) area radiation monitors.
331.19 Area monitors located in high noise areas should have visual as (12.3.4-5) well as audible alarms. State how you plan to comply.
331.20 In addition to the' job group exposure breakdown contained in (12/4.1)
Section 12.4, provide a profile of the estimated annual man-rem doses at WNP-2 broken down by major functions such as operations, maintenance, radwaste handling, and inservice inspection.
Using experience from other BWR's, provide estimates of doses resulting from non-routine or special maintenance activities.
Include estimated dose rates, expected required number of workers and occupancy times required for performing such maintenance work. Regulatory Guide 8.19 provides guidance in making such an assessment.
331.21 The annual exposure estimates given for the job group classifi-(12.4.2.3) cations in Section 12.4.2.3 do not agree with the total group exposures listed in Table 12.4-1.
Clarify this apparent dis-crepancy.
r
' O _
,_O' 331-2
~
-331.22 Provide a detailed layout drawing of your change and locker (12.5.2.2) facilities in the Service Building.
a.
Show that you have made provisions for both male and female employees.
b.
Show that your change and locker facilities are sufficient to accomodate and provide services for an expected increased number of maintenance personnel present during major outages.
331.23 Discuss provisions for local exhaust systems to be employed in the (12.5.2.2) hot nachine shop for work on contaminated items.
331.24 Discuss provisions for laundering soiled and contaminated (12.5.2.3) protective clothing at WNP-2.
e e.
4
-