ML20212H878
| ML20212H878 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris, Brunswick, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 10/05/1985 |
| From: | Miriello P AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212H765 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-596 NUDOCS 8703060248 | |
| Download: ML20212H878 (1) | |
Text
-
d P.O. Box 28071 Raleigh, N.C. 27611 October 5,1985 U.S.N.R.C.
Office of Investigations 101 Marietta St.,NW Suite 2900 Atlanta,Ca. 30303
Dear Mr. Robinson:
During the week of October 1,1985; my credibility was attacked by Carolina Power &
Light and the USNRC attornies.
In the local newspapers of that same week it was stated that the USNRC considered my credibility as questionable. Of course I strongly object to this and must now take this whole matter further. It can be also stated that the USNRC has a special interest in keeping this matter quiet that the USNRC aust first keep the commercial nuclear power industry which is:
alive in order to have something to regulate. It must also be. stated that if it is to be kept alive, it must also be kept honest.
In the above paragraph, I am referring to the USNRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board hearing which was called to hear matters concerning contention WB-3 or Carolina Power and Light's Shearon Harris 4
i drug abuse during the construction ofNot only was it stated in the local newspaper th Nuclear Power Plant.
considered my credibility as questionable; but at the hearing I was subjected to remarks made by the USNRC attornies which disgraced the USNRC and disgusted an.
and it was stated that I was a racist.
I was told that I looked like a cat You did ask for my cooperation. Due to the character of the treatment I have I
received and for the good of the nuclear power industry and public safety:
submit to a polygraph test and or P.S.E. and or any other accepted method will concerning anything in the affidavit which was primarily about i
of lie detection In addition to that,any questions in the future that the USNRC or any Conam.
l other law enforcement concern wants an answer to: those questions will be answered This will certainly add to my credibility. I only during a lie detection test.
I hope that employees of Conas NES, and have come forward on my own requesting this.
Carolina Power & Light would be willing to do the same. However, I do doubt that l
would occur.
i The problem with drug abuse within the Conam organization affects nuclear power TMI unit 1 is an example. This matter should be taken seriously, plants nacionally.
As I discussed since it may appear again possibly surfacing after an accident.
with you in September of 1985, there are problems with the inservice inspection of welds, in weld documentaion concerning construction and inservice inspection, and also at the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant concerning radiation control.
I as also going Carolina to raise further concerns with the integrity of supervisory personnel in Power & Light.
8Ince i as finishing a Hasrurr degrww *m mndw c e.;i,i.Cli rip it' r 1=r ; ibl0 f; e
I simply want it anyone to allege that I an out to get the nuclear power industry.
It was claimed that I was out to get Carolina cleaned up to insure its existence.
Power & Light when I raised safety issues due to drug abuse; well now I as stating that it's a national safety issue. Problems should not be covered up; but cleaned up.
D703060248 870304 PDR FOIA MATZ86-596 PDR
W
(
'7 L
4.]jg-m September 23, 1985 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUC1. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-400 OL and NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN
)
MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
)
)
(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power
)
Plant)
APPLICANTS' TESTIMONY OF THOMAS W.
BROMBACH ON CONAM INSPECTION ACTIVITIES (CCNC CONTENTION WB-3)
/
)
['
i L.?
I ID 2 Y e
Q.1 Please state your name.
\\
A.1 Thonas Wa.lter Brombach.
x Q.2 Mr. Brombach, by whom are youtemployed and what is 1
your position?
A.2 I am empicyed by Carolink'Pober & Ligh,t Cc,mpany
.i
("CP&L") at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant as a Project-Specialist / Inservice Inspection.
Inthiscapacity$amrespon-sible for Non-Destructive Examination ("NDE") of Class 1, 2 and 3 components, piping and their supports to ensure applicable requirements of ASME Code Section XI and 10 C.F.R. S 50.55a are met.
t Q.3 Please state your professional cualifications and ex-perience related to your present position.
A.3 I have been actively engaged in NDE and inservice in-specticn programs at nuclear power plants since 1976.
I have i
received extensive NDE training, including ultrason c testing, I
visual inspection and eddy current testing / examination.
While employed by Virginia Electric & Power Ccmpany ("VIPCO") from 1976 unti'l 1982, I was certified as an 'NDE examiner., Frem 1978 to the present I have been employed in, supervisory positions, overseeing NDE and inservice inspection' activities.
Becinning with my early training and experience in the United States
/
Navy, I have sixteen years of hands-on experience in power plant operations, maintenance and testing.
A complete state-
+
...,
- c1 my_,,g.g., 1 gn.1 4 r 4 r=
- 4 nn._ =_nj3_.,gn.,4.nc... an-pended hereto as Attachment 1.
e '
I I
=-. _.
Q.4 What is the.purpore of this testimony?
A.4 The purpose of this testimony is to respond to cer-tain allegations set forth in an " Affidavit of Patti Miriello,"
dated September 6, 1985, and attached to the "Censervation Council's Response to Applicant's Motion for Summary Disposi-tion of Contencion WB-3," dated September 6, 1985.
In that Af-fidavit Ms. Miriello alleges that certain persons employed by Cenam InspecQien ("Conam") of Richmond, California, who provid-ed contractor services to the Harris Plant, used drugs.
In h
It/cf.l0scaSe SnHerst U 0c9?tbW Affidavit M's. Mirielle accuses the fol1 @ing individuals of ei-
~
ther dealing in, selling or using drugs:
Richard Marlow, Jr.,
Vice President of Conam; John Camburn; John Funanich; a Mr.
Dugas; a Mr. Dobson; Mark Matheson and Mel Matheson.
She implies that_such activities may have impacted on work per-formed by certain of those individuals on the Harris steam gen-erators.
My testimony attests to the quality of the work per-formed by Conam.
Q.5 Did Cona:n provide contractor services to CP&L at the Harrf.s Plant?
f A.5 Conam is a division of Nuclear Energy Services, Inc.
("NES*)..
C?&L contracted with NES to perform baseline preservice eddy current testing / examination of heat exchanger I
tubing, including the Harris steam ganerator tubes.
NES' Conam W
Inspection Division pr,ovided these eddy current testing ser-l VicGG.
i f
_3_
4 e
.n-.-,.......-.s.._,,.--.-.--._...
,_. _,,..,-- - - ----, -.- - n, _ _ --.... - - - - -.. - - -. - -. - -.,, -, - - -, - -,
l
-Q.6 Do you personally know the individuals named in the Miriello Affidavit?
A.6 My resonsibilities at the Karris Plant include everseeing and supervising Conam's testing and examination ac-tivities.on site.
In that capacity I have a professional rela-tionship with each of the individuals named in the Miriello Af-fidavit.
My professional acquaintance and relationship with some of.the individuals began while I was em loyef by CO d
.Atto 4210u.E, V
Nrt{
Conam performed eddy current testing on VE O
Sur Anna nuclear plants.- My personal knowledge of d named indi-67 viduals can be summarized as follows:
Richard Marlow is Senior Vice~ President of Conam.
His office is in Richmond, California.
I have perscnally known Mr. Marlow since 1976 when he first performed eddy current ex-aminations at VEPCO's Surry Nuclear Power Station.
From that time until the present I have engaged Mr. Marlow and Conam to perform numerous eddy current examinations.
Mr. Marlow has only been to the Harris Plant on approximately three occasions, i
l limiting his stay to one day ei less for business purposes.
John Camburn ie t Lv el II Data Analyst for Conam.
I have known Mr. Camburn since cie late 1970's.
He also per-formed eddy current examinations for me as an examiner at VEPCO's Surry and North Anna nuclear plants from approximately 1978 to 1982.
While at the Harris Plant Mr. Camburn was the
=*=== generate edd'j. current bar.eline Ho-n a + = n a = 1 *, = +. r e.-
h.
was directly supervised by me while on the Harris site during
_4_
D
_,_,__,._.-___,y_
the periods August 1 - September 14, 1984; October 8-13, 1984; and November 3.13, 1984.
Michael Dobson is a Level II Data Analyst for Conam.
I have known Mr. Dobson since approximately 1976 when Conam first performed eddy current examinations at VEPCO's Surry and North Anna nuclear plants as an examiner.
Mr. Dobson was di-rectly supervised by me while he was at the Harris Plant during the periods August 20-30, 1984 and January 18-30, 1985.
John Funanich is a Level II Data Analyst for Conam.
I have known Mr. Funanich since 1978 when he was an examiner doing eddy current examinations Tt VIPCO's Surry Nuclear Power Station.
Mr. Funanich was e.t the Harris Site September 27-28, 1983; February 13-25, 1984 and June 10-13, 1984.
Melvin Matheson is a Level II Examiner for Conam.
My first contact with him was in 1983 when he was assigned as Conam's site supervisor for performing the Harris Plant baseline eddy current examinations.
Mr. Fathesen was on site during the following times: December 2-31, 1983; January 2 -
September 21, 1984; October 1-12, 1984; October 30 - November 16, 1984; November 19 - December 21, 1984; January 2 and 18-25, 1985; and March 4 - Apr 5, 1985.
Kenneth Dugas is a Level II eddy current examiner for Conam.
I have known Mr. Dugas about four years.
He performed eddy current work for,me at,VEPCO's Surry Nuclear Power Station nr.d-at thM:erri, T-lurt frcm-Wst 1 -- 04pt c+b+s 7, 1 ^<04.
Y3%0 h bA
'C F Y
g} &
- J pTge.JUdd StA'w. kuno dp
& fe # p 4
Mark Matheson is a laborer and an eddy current Level I trainee for Conam.
Mark is Melvin Matheson's son.
I first met Mark Matheson when he came to Harris during the period of July 30 - October 18, 1984.
Other than seeing him work with his father and occasionally talking to him, I never had much D
[
contact with Mark Matheson.
.4#tM 4VfLM-While I have only established a business relationship with each of the named individuals and, with the exception of an occasional business lunch with Mr. Marlow, have never mixed with them socially, I have no reason to believe that any of them has been involved in drug use.
Q.7 What is the purpose of eddy current examinations of the Harris steam generators?
A.7 The purpose of eddy current examinations of steam generator tubing prior to operation is to establish a baseline ccndition of the tubing for comparisen with the examination re-sults of the first inservice inspection after commencing ecm-
=ercial service of the plant.
This is consistent with NRC Reg-
)
ulatory Guide 1.83 (Revision 1)(1975) at Section C.3.a.
Q.8 Are eddy current examinations required to assure the safe construction of the Harris Plant?
ii A.8 No.
The steam generator tubing was inspected and subject to non-destructive examinations at the point of fabri-cation to detect any defects and flaws.
After installation at the Har.ris. Plant._ the steam q_enerators were subiected to a hy-drostatic test to ensure integrity sufficient to meet ASME Code 4 -
[ f W.4 p.a. m saof & A GAn daO N w D'*y"~ 4" 6 yaucAs -m
- standards.
The eddy current examination performed on site'is to establish baseline information for comparison with later inservice test results.
In fact, the contract involved here is l
an Operations and not a Construction contract.
Further, none of the employees of Conam are quality assurance inspectors as that term is used to describe CP&L QA/QC/CI inspection person-M e/P1dE40452 t[ W M i7L nel or vendor QA/QC inspectors.
7 Qf0 MUs Mfins Q.9 Describe eddy current testing / examination techniques and analyses of eddy-current tapes.
A.9 The. method most commonly u. sed to check for defects or flaws in heat exchanger tubing is eddy current examination.
This method is based upon measuring the changes of an electro-magnetic field induced into the tubing to be tested.
A differ-ential set of electric coils called a probe is drawn at a con-stant rate through the tubing to be tested.
When these coils are energized, an electromagnetic current is induced in the tube in the areas adjacent to the probe.
This induced electro.
magnetic field generates eddy currents.
Changes in tube wall thickness or permeability or the presence of flaws will cause changes to the flux and density of l
the induced current, which in turn causes changes in the imped-ance.of the coil.
From the measurement of these impedance changes the size and orientation of defects can be calculated and determined.
To assist and enhance this process the eddy current prehs 10 sttsched through 2n. interf ace system C_h e.-
digital computer, which allows a permanent record to be made
~
e
-,w.,
--n-,,-.n
- - - - - - - - -, -,, - -,, - - -, ~., -,, _
mu
,m, - - -, - - -- -, _. - -. - - - -,, -, -
.--,-w
via magnetic tape of the calibration, sequence of testing, and the actual data inspection results.
The eddy current test data acquired and stored is unique for each tube tested.
The mag-netic tapes that are generated during an examination are re-viewed using a similar computer system by a data analyst.
In this manner the validity of the test results can be re-established.
If necessary the magnetic tapes can be re-viewed again by a third party at any time.
Q.10 Who supervised the work of individuals from Conam while performing eddy current testing / examination activities at j
g gg the Harris site?
A.10 While Conam was at the Harris site performing eddy
- ' b5 d current testing they were directly supervised by me and I had an engineering technician work directly with them in the field en a daily basis.
Q.ll Did you ever observe any of the individuals per-forming eddy current testing or analyses of data exhibit behav.
ioral traits of a persen who has used cocaine or other cen-01078LLRAJ LCCkEb uME HE wAS cn=rOJ trolled substances?
gC/nc) d c1e - de M [w ADt-A.ll At no time whiie a @ Conam personnel were en site did they exhibit any aberrant behavioral traits which I wculd asse-ciate with an individual using cocaine or other centrolled sub-stances.
My engineering-technician c*,r, firmed my cwn observa-tion.
O.11 Have vou taken CP&L trainina courses desicned to edu-cate supervisory personnel to be able to detect individuals I
s _.
a..
whose performance may be affected due to use of controlled sub-stances?
A.12 I have received training'both while at VEPCO and CP&L designed to educate supervisors to detect personnel whose per-formance may be affected by using alcohol or controlled sub-stances.
Q.13 Have you checked the work of individuals from Conam to ensure the accuracy of the eddy current testing / examinations and correctness of the analysis of eddy current tapes?
A.13 During most of the analysis work performed by John Camburn I worked directly with him while reading a significant amount of the test data results.
If at any time an anomaly of h
M v'
involvement was to assure the accuracy view.
e o
f of the eddy cu rent examinations and the test results.
During the~ data acquisition phase of actual examinatien of the tubes, I made several trips to the field to overview the work of the Also, during data acquisition CP&L Quality Assur-examiners.
ance Persennel performed surveillance checks.
Because of my personal supervision of the eddy current examinations and data analyses, I have no reason to question the integrity nor cor-results, notwithstanding the allegations rectness of the test in the Miriello Affidavit.
Q.14 As a result of the allegations by Ms. Miriello did Conam?
vou perform an evaluation of the work eerformed by
_9_
0 r
--e
- - - - - -, _., - - - - - - - -,, - -,,,-, - ~,, - - + - -,. -,
n-,,-
g,gg g[f:f s N 1. h
/ #<Ad<vM Y,
G.W AN y
g yy(g g Wo1 c.
3~do,,o(
7 f?"A~:
gg a.a.
str.#A.
A.14 Yes.
Nine of the magnetic tapes acquired by Conam during the baseline examination of Harris steam generator tubes w.ere taken to the Electric Power Research Institute ("EPRI")
ppE Center in Charlotte, N.C.,
and EPRI was requested to per-g.irm an independent third party review, reanalysis and verifi-ation of the data acquired and analyzed by Conam.
c Q.15 Describe the independent review of Conam's analysis and the results.
A.15 The tubes selected for reanalysis by EPRI had either been tested by and/or analyzed by the individuals identified in the Miriello affidavit (with the exception of Richard Marlow who performed no onsite work).
Three reels of data were ran-domly selected from each of the three steam generators, repre-senting five percent of the total number of steam generator tubes examined by Cenam.
Included in the sample were tubes with no quantifiable indications and others that had identified anomalies requiring evaluation.
EPRI used the same procedure, data analysis system and calibration system as these used by Conam personnel.
Based 4
on its review of the data on the tapes, EPRI concluded that the data acquisition had gone very smoothly and validated Conam's use of procedures, selection and application of the defect sizing criteria and interpretation of the eddy current signals.
Thus, EPRI confirmed,Conam's eddy current testing and exa:-ina-tion. roc. cite
_10
,,--.ev
,m.
,,m.4___,-m._,.
_,._______._._--.-,_-m
~
Q.16 Is the sample size of the number of tapes reanalyzed sufficient to assure a high confidence level of the validity of the original work?
x mb'^ M A_ j ceat u than A.16 Yes.
The five percent sample &of data is k1
.A.C -:,cr 4L/
the sampling requirements of NRC Regulatory Guide
.83, which requires a three percent sample of the total number of tubes to be inspected during inservice inspections.
The five percent sample provides greater than a 95 percent confidence level that the sample results are representative of the data from which the sample was taken.
Q.17 Have you any reason to believe that the work per-formed by personnel frem Conam was of a quality that suggests their perfcrmance was influenced by use of controlled sub-stances?
A.17 I have personally supervised the Conam personnel per-the ferming eddy current examinations and analysis of data at Harris Plant and can attest to the high quality of their work.,
The independent review of a representative, statistically sig-nificant sample of the Conam analyses of eddy current tapes the work _,
provides additional confirmation of the quality of y a n,AmeC t/str.d M d.U / N performed by Cena Conam has an. excellent reputatio i
t.
Shit.,Kk g r y m W f ut b~
& Mgj J
r the professionalfsm(land quality of its empicyees lFU/tt A'cLe j
industr
. Alfa and th quality of its testing and evaluations.
My experience with the individuals. employed by Conam, who performed'examina-the narris Piant, tions and provided anaIytrear evaruatrons at has been entirely satisfactory.
I have found them to be highly
~, - -
,,m
.-.._,.-w,
- ~. - -..
trained, competent and professional in a unique field of non-destructiveexamination.(AtnotimehaveIhadcauseto question the physical or mental condition of a Conam employee performingexaminationsoranalyticalworkattheHarrisPlant.)
ud b -BunetwA % An-onw 4 e
9 0
6 e
6 i
Resume THOMAS W.' BROMBACH EDUCATION MILITARY
- Basic Propulsion and Engineering School
- Machinist Mate "A" School
- Water Treatment School
- Power Plant Maintenance School
- Damage Control School
- Fire Fighting School
- Submarine School
- Nuclear. Power School (25 weeks)
- Hydraulic and Pneumatic School
- AC & R* School
- Magnetic and Liquid Penetrant School
- 3M Records Manacement School
- Radiological Control School CIVILIAN
- High School Graduate
- 5 Semesters of Collece
- Continuing Education Units Awarded for:
/bo, 2 J s*^.
-Magnetic Particle Insoection
,j,,gj gg tgf
-Liquid Penetrant Inspection f
-Ultrasonic Weld Inspection
/'
I
-ASME Section XI Short Courses 9 /d p^r s:L b Formal 5 1/2 Year Journeyman Power Plant l
ct. fnt 4. et./Jt.ga o
Mechanic Apprenticeship
- Company Sponsored Schools:
-Dresser Valve School
-Radiation and Radiological Centrol School f 4
-Grinnel Valve School S F W d0eubi'i
-Milton Roy Pump School
-Non-destructive Testing Schools for MT, PT, VT and Eddy Current Tube Inspection
-Multifrequency Eddy Current Examinatien
-Personnel Management
-Aberrant Behavior PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS i
American Society of Mechanical Engineers i
i 5
e*+r--,
-+- e
.-----.,,,..-_.,..,,-.,-.___.-______.__._,,__,,,,._,.7,
.o e
EMPLOYMENT September 1982 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT to Project Specialist / Inservice Inscoction Present 1
Scope of Responsibility Responsible for developing and maintaining the Harris Plant's inservice inspection ("ISI") program in accordance with, and as required by, ASME Code Section XI to assist in meeting NRC, plant Technical Specification, operating license, and other related plant and regulatory requirements.
The ISI program is developed based on the latest regulatory require-The ISI program provides direction and support of ments.
inservice inspection related tests such as hydrostatic testing, weld inspections, and eddy current testing.
Maior Functions 1.
Developing and maintaining an inservice inspection program for welds by working with Operations and Mainte-nance.
2.
Coordinating inservice inspection activities and schedules.
i 3.
Developing, updating, and maintaining ASME Code Sec-tion XI inspection programs.
4.
Maintaining interface responsibilities among the Plant's organizations to ensure the ISI program is imple-mented effectively.
5.
Analyz'ing and providing resolution to Plant problems resulting frem ISI.
6.
Preparing and monitoring budget items pertaining to ISI.
7.
Staying updated on chances to, and latest recui re-ments of, the ASME Code.
8.
Responsible for ensuring the proper maintenance of inservice. inspection records, deficiencies and resolu-tions.
4 k
... _. _. - -...... - _. _ _ _ _ _ -.. -.. - ~,..,. _.... _,
_.m._,
m_,__
,,m_,.
.r_ _, -,--,-- -.,_--
,.,c,.
..r o
March 1976 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY to SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION August 1982 Engineering Supervisor of Non-destructive Testine and Evaluation Scope of Responsibility Performed unit and component testing in the field of non-destructive exa'mination and provided evaluation of test re-sults to insure component and vessel integrity.
Maior Functions k 6tjC O
N L&J W.
C u tL 4 itfC L Y
1.
C$Nduct inservice and preservice inspections to assure comoliance with ASME Code Section XI and plant technical specifications.
2.
Provide non-destructive testing services for the station, i.e.: PT, MT, RT, VT, UT and ET, in accordance with ASME Code Sections III, IV, IX and XI and other designated applicable codes as required.
3.
Coordinate inspection services with the desic-nated ANSI to ssure full compliance with the ASME Code in effect.
4.
Provide eddy current examination services to meet the recuirements of USNRC Reculatory Guide 1.83 and ASME Code Section XI for steam cenera-tors.
5.
Provide eddy current examination services in ex-amination of condenser and other various heat exchanger tubing.
6.
Prepare and submit inservice, creservice and eddy current reports.
7.
Assist Engineering in identifying generic prob-I lems and working toward solutions.
8.
Support and implement additional training pro-grams for NDT technicians to keep personnel abreast and trained in new field developments.
9.
Establish and maintain appropriate records man-acement of all work conducted.
10.
Prepare and submit budgets for procurement of equipment, supplies and arrange for contractor and vendor services.
I
-.. ~.,.. - -.. -..,-. - -.----,.. - _. ------.,.,--.-_ - -
a g.
jA4 11.
Provide schedules and commitment dates during plant outages for inspection services.
i 12.
Reylew and implement non-destructive examination procedures.
13.
Certified in accordance to ASNT-TC-1A as a LEVEL II in Visual, Liquid Penetrant, Magnetic Parti-cle and fdddy Current examinations, apd LEVEL I i Ulttasonic maag. Ae.y da e,wy' AM swhn Also prior to being promoted to a supervisory position, I was a journeyman mechanic providing round-the-clock maintenance and repair to all station eeuipment, i.e.: oumps, valves, hy-draulic and pneumatic systems, EVAC, steam turbines and auxil-iary systems on both the primary and secondary sides of the plant.
A collateral duty was to travel to various fossil fuel plants within the VEPCO system and conduct maintenance and re-pair on high pressure power boilers, coal systems and other plant systems.
September 1975 NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRYDOCK, CO.
to Newport News, VA March 1976 Power Plant Ooerator, Utilities Department Assigned to the oceration of the main Dower plant and all substations -- maintaining and operating 600 lb. boilers, air ecmpressors and related eculpment supplying power steam and compressed air to the shipyard.
September 1974 COLLEGE OF DUPAGE to Glen Ellyn, Illinois September 1975 Assistant Chief of Plant Coeratiens Responsible for the operation of the steam generating and air conditioning plant, in addition to which, performed all re-
- pairs as necessary to its plumbing, hydraulic, oneumatic and electrical systems.
Collaterally responsible for the mainte-nance of the buildings and all service support systems.
April 1974 FACTORY MUTUAL ENGINEERING CO.
to Chicago, Illinois September 1974 Boiler & Machinerv Insoector Conducted on-site physical inspections of steam generating power plants and machinery for compliance with ASME, state and local codes.
January 1969 UNITED STATES NAVY to E-4 Machinist Mate December 1973 O