ML20212B202

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Completed Review Re Acceptance for Ref of Licensing Topical Rept EDR-1 (P),Rev 3, Ederer Nuclear Safety Related Extra Safety & Monitoring (X-SAM) Cranes, Submitted by Ederer .Rept Acceptable for Ref
ML20212B202
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/26/1983
From: Thomas C
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Clark C
EDERER, INC.
Shared Package
ML20212B192 List:
References
NUDOCS 9909200011
Download: ML20212B202 (1)


Text

T Se,Stcy?EDERERINC.

2066238583; 08/26/99 13: 13PM;)elfax #904;Page 4/5 t

  • t Mr. C. hjlliam Clark, Jr. January 2,1980 S

i

  1. ~~'

In accordance with established procedure, it is requested that Ederer issue revised Versions of these reports within three months of receipt of this letter to include the NRC acceptance letter and the enclosed evaluation.

The chan$es described in your letter dated October 23, 1579 should also be made.

,such that our :onclusions concerning these reports are invalidated,y'ou will be notified and given an opportunity t6

~'

, should you so desire.

If you hive any questions about our review.of this Ederer topical report, please contact vs.

t Si ncerely, S

  • f, E ']

o i

obert L. Baer, Chief Light Water Reactors Branch No. 2 Division of Project Management

Enclosure:

Q Topical Peport Evaluation

-/

l l

8

?h 9909200011 990909 PDR TOPRP EMVEDER C

pog

1 lSent Dy: EDERER lhC.

2066238583; 08/26/9912:14PM;)elfaz #904;Page 5/5,

.= %

/

'9, UNITED STATES

,.f ' '

. 1 - g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5

wasnowaTow.c. c. aosss

  • 5 AUO 2 61993 C. W1111am' Clark, Jr.

DirectorofEngineering Ederer Incorporated 2925 First Avenue South -

Box 24708 Seattle, Washington 98124

Dear Mr. Clark:

Subject:

Acceptance for Referencing of Licensing Topical Report EDR-1(P), Revision 3, "Ederer Nuclear Safety-Related Extra Safety and Monitoring (X-SAM) Cranes" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by Ederer's October 8,1982 letter. We find this report is acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation which i

is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.

We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license appli-cations except to assure that the material prMented is applicable to the

-specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.

In accorda6ce with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that Ederer publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions should incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract.

The accepted versions shall include an A (designating accepted) following the report ident1fication symbol.

Should' our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, Ederer and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continueo effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.

Sincerely, 0-W Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization & Special Projects Branch

~~

Division of Licensing

{

Enclosure:

As stated j

-