ML20211N984
| ML20211N984 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/30/1986 |
| From: | Lasky R, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211N979 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900912 NUDOCS 8607110170 | |
| Download: ML20211N984 (7) | |
Text
.'
ORGANIZATION: NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS ACTON, MASSACHUSETTS REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION N0.:99900912/86-01 DATE: 3/31-4/3/86 ON-SITE HOURS: 42 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: National Technical Systems ATTN: Mr. G. Dowd General Manager 533 Main Street Acton, Massachusetts 01720 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: Mr. A. A. Dorr, Quality Assurance Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(617) 263-2933 NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: National Technical Services (NTS) provides qualifi-cation testing services for the military and both the conventional and nuclear power industry. Approximately 25 percent of the services are for the commer-cial nuclear power industry.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
[
4, tp p qb/ts R. H.'Lasky, Equ,if. Qual. Inspec. Section (EQIS)
Date OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
M. Jacobus, Sandia National Laboratories I
APPROVED BY:
LI_kt,bb h) ( d.- ra s l M b ~30M 1
U. Potapovs,' Chief, EQIS) Veridor Program Branch Da te INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES: Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE: This inspection consisted of:
(1) a technical evaluation of Equipment Qualification (EQ) test activities for safety related equip-ment, (21 verification of implementation of the quality assurance program (OAP), and (3) observation of EQ testing of Bussman Fuse Blocks for Public Service Company of Colorado (Ft. St. Vrain).
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Ft. St. Vrain, (50-267); Nine Mile Point, Unit 1, (50-220); and Enrico Fermi, Unit 2,(50-341).
0607110170 060700 j
PDR GA999 EECNATTS 999009912 PDR
ORGANIZATION:
NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS ACTON, MASSACHUSETTS REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900912/86-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 4 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None.
B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
Non,e.
D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1)
Corrective Action Implementation Follow-up - Implementation of corrective action for the nonconformances of Inspection Report
- 99900912/85-01 was verified, a.
(Closed) Nonconformance (Item B.2) concerning approval signature by person not authorized by standard Operating Procecure, S0P 10/83.
S0P 10/83 and selected test reports were reviewed. All test reports were signed by only individuals authori:ed by S0P 10/83.
Implementation of corrective action was verified.
b.
(Closed) Nonconformance (Item B.1) concerning m r iisting test equipment with required accuracies when te..'. m; to IliE standard 323-1974 requic+nents. All test procedures revie,ed whien were required to conform with IEEE standard 323-1974 requirements, were verified to have a list of test eouipment including tb?
required accuracies.
Implementation of corrective action was verif ai.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR cfr,4MENTS:
Five test pre ;".
- era examined during this inspection. These programs were examiceL :'or tha following:
a)
Required teu e s trumentation with accuracies described, met the requirerer.t
- c. F.EE-STD-323/1974.
b)
Equipment intcrfaces were addressed.
c)
Test accee w.ce c-iteria was established a'. A c"tc:ad in the test specific 6 tion; i~ the design engineer:%
a vs to meet the requirements
, stEE-STD-323/1974
l ORGANIZATION: NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS ACTON, MASSACHUSETTS REPORT INSPECTION N0.-
99900912/86-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 4 d)
The same equipment was used for all phases of testing and represented a standard production item, e)
Environmental conditions were described (e.g., pressure and tempera-ture profiles, and thermal aging factors consistent with those out-lined in the test specifications or test plan).
f)
The test results were adequately reduced and evaluated against accep-tance criteria described in the test specifications or purchase order.
g)
All prerequisites for the given test as outlined in the test speci-
- fications were met, h)
The test equipment included a description of all materials, parts and subcomponents.
4)
Notice of anomaly reports properly documented condition and reports were properly dispositioned.
j)
Appropriate margins were applied as required by test specifications.
1.
Test Pronram N6538 - Environmental and Seimic Qualification testing of Bussman Fuse Blocks for Public Service Company of Colorado (Ft. St. Vrain)
Test Procedure, Purchase Orders and other associated records were reviewed prior to observing High Energy Line Break (HELB) test on Bussman Fuse Blocks. No nonconformances were found, i
HELB test on Bussman Fuse Blocks was terminated due to failure of test setup. Test will be rescheduled upon correction of problems with the test equipment.
Final test report and test data on Bussman Fuse blocks will be reviewed during a future Inspection.
2.
Test Program 18990 - Environmental Qualification of Model 8005N i
Electropneumatic Transducers, Model 74N109 Airset and 77N-4 Airset per IEEE standards 323-1974, 344-1975 and 382-1980.
Test procedure, purchase orders, test data and final test report were reviewed. No nonconformances were found.
O'RGANIZATION: NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS ACTON, MASSACHUSETTS REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900912/86-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 4 3.
Test Program 18227-81N Test per Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Specification E-89, Qualification Testing of Class 1E Electrical Equipment'used at Nine Mile Point Unit #1 Nuclear Station per IEEE standards 323-1974, 323-1975 and 344-1975.
i Final Test Report and associated documents were examined. No nonconformances were found.
4.
Test Program 17297-1-82N - Class 1E Qualification testing of Osborne and Brown-Boveri Corporation current transformers per IEEE standards 323-1974 and 344-1975 for the Detroit Edison Company (Enrico Fermi, Unit 2 Nuclear Generating Station).
Final Test Report and associated documents were examined.
No nonconformances were found, r
5.
Test Program 20897 - Qualification Testing of Class IE Electrical Equipment in accordance with IEEE standards 323-1974/1983 for static "0" Ring (SOR), Inc.
This testing is part of a generic qualification program for SOR pressure switches (differential pressurer & vacuum), level switches and temperature switches. This test program will be conducted in the future.
The test procedure and purchase orders from SOR were examined.
No nonconformances were found.
l
4 a.
i
_1 h.
>u 9
_ A
]F,. N 5
l t
~%
i n
f l
T S' dn t
1 & &c u
'v 1
O w
9 I
o g
w b)
/
e Y
n V-a a Q )w O[
L.
s.
Y Y
O s
3 f'.
l
~
~
6 u
U.
N
,, M.}s a.
J d
Q. b l
T 1
r
]
2
~
b O
he X'-
O Y
i 0'
4 jl f
o
? A 4.
i l
1 e e/
ga f
s
/
l h
c t
~.
a J
'7(~l mY/
7 g
l T. T r
e R
a y
,D mRE h
+s k U. ! d &CU
?.
c W
F O
cP G b
'J a
/
e F1 oEM s
W n
k ab E
a O
Y n
DR 3
7 E
x A
'J.
s 8
J, el D
kW_ lM l
r c &
- G x,,
a A4 R
o r
w E
7 a M Yl W
U.
rr NAY @?w&r Wj f
d h J a
r bT
[
i w
J M.
v A W
u 6 M
h hN Y
~
h dy $. W.k M1 f
e c
a
- w. u G
b h
- c. teS.
T nr e
n t
i c
- Ie t6 w, k~
~
W u
h
'Y D
s 1
!.k lW 5 l
Yk E
E- /
c o
a t
1 ka 3
E.
J 9
1 l
i M
4M n
c 4
a e
c 4
ls t
N i
A T
f 3
l r
e k 6 %. % h 5
d i
m Y
I
?
G i
~
R 7
hY 0
'^ b o
7 T
(
h LT M
h s
d
)
S N
_r 0
l l
a
~
l T
a h
}
(
1 GV
&_ h Y
,h
- - &.3
)]
A A, $ $_L h L
N
~.
e7 r
1 u
E d
A h
t 2^fg
. k h d
-b 0
D pA C
C e
n o
O r
K te S fa&
N R
D I
fl[f[?
3 f
's
_ lt E
c s
Y c
l1 T
k T
y y
v y$_
b a
k f,
E.
p h
$t y
I r
t.
U.
L m
'l E
v.
- ~
5 R
~
r1 T
s t
~
$~
a L
l(
/
b x
1-h u
O r
B Y M 7
w N
/'
0
?
l o
6 d
C 3
s y
9 4
Y_ N t
U d
-n-o T
t
- g 8
9 1
TEL.N s
C 0l g
1 A'
Lo 1
AZ A s 1
4 E
GCOOn 0
u I
C NFDMc 5
m Y
O tEAo I
RS g
o O
D Wc ciD t
AEo O 'C r
f 0 R o
0 F RPrAc TI g' P 9
O DSPQq T
.f r-C l
6 EP P E
Gc tD Ot S o P
E
}
Y T__.
Y Y WP R A. c
(*
l 4
I b
7 T DSP4q sI S jh
,l,
i h
i D 4 I
w g
\\
14 N
Y s
e
<k
.h
=
+
(k h
^
\\
'I h
1 g
2 i
Q C
~
Q t
2 t
9 o
i A
N O
0 f
4 r.'
g k
g s
m Q
n M O y
,g
.+
.n Q
s v.
4 A
3 s
d 8
.b b\\
0 l('f 4
G s
2 4 Q
7 3
o "I '-
4 T
(
h y
e o
5 hw J
d 0*
f d
b o
s N
nw I
e w
o 20 h
4 4
d S
I
~
3 u
(g' 3
e
.~
.n we c,
si r
s Q CK 4 D
d j
q g
b I
I lu D
S s.
e 9
5 tu w
e i
u 4
~
k N
6 h
e S
y y
i 3
C ti.
s
?
to 4
- W I
- W 9
k 4
/
i E
[
d t
x 4
s o
x e
a 3
q p
e
-q r,
s a
s o
a e g
,j b;
1
-=
4 e
3 e
1
'4 t
8.
ul N
j of j
m p
y y
E s
~
- Z 4
e-q v
L t
k
\\'h
~~$.
^
x y
t.
T
.c 4
t-S N
A ke f
4o s
Q m
c
=
rn Qt 0
4 tt R
5 i
s h
5
'z 1
1 N
N 1
e v
w g
9 Q
4-C k
s Q
w 2
e k
u Y
i 7
7 A
E
.s td d
h 4
K q
W i
y 1
t
+
2 s
I i,
t x
t
,s y
~
o e
k Q
ol u
-c s
A.
O 3,
~4:
u gp Wd W
4 s
e~ s y
s s
sm
~
~
~
~
,,,,iii I
')
h D
h v
t D'
5
',7 v.
OE a
s 4
g 6
Ig
~
N d
1
'2 Ois In g,P y,
pg.J '2 o c
N g_
o l-a g D
t tN 9
t
S g
R y
w 2
N 9
o S
q cucW J c
g a
0 0
D C
@ Ug > {y i
oO C2eg 2 u.w g o z W e
2 h 4
0 7u ogoW 1
W e
Cw o W W 2
4 g4wddo2 3
0 4-k k
D
'N O Q W Q,1@ N k,
d-k
%g A
J w a
s ii,gi I,8 A
u s d C og
.h U
y3
,gi 3 *E
~
u.
t, u
n,
~
a l
l PERSONS CONTACTED Dates 7/ Mar -
4,,,., / pg Company A>TS, A doa Inspector A s ) v */' K w J,a g Docket / Report No. 999x7/2-8C-6 /
Page g of
/
NAME(Please Print)
TIT 1.E(Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
_h hv Fredlia J r.
U E.Q. Ma aper A)TS A>Ts A.Aulu Doer a A Maaayer 4o Ho Swans.w cs,- x n,e 9<
9a
- Lucun
- c. w n r a ne fb A. %Amom
- c. ~,. u.~T ta4
,y.
Wa,llalibr frni Cs N7~5 L Aopr '
cub /rrl on Jack Cox ki Eiw DTS GA Pep
/J T.C Cl as Coulier S 4.pi). r. c. /+
Li ~ 5 k ve Zun ehe y -
-1..
L-t i
- _ -.