ML20211M979
| ML20211M979 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 02/19/1987 |
| From: | Stefano J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Sylvia B DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8702270408 | |
| Download: ML20211M979 (2) | |
Text
-
he:
February 19, 1987
\\'
DISTRIBUTION:
56 NRC PDR DockelNo.50-341 Local PDR BGrimes BWD-3 r/f
. Atty, OGC Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia' EAdensam ACRS(10)
Group Vice President - Nuclear Operations EHylton Glainas Detroit Edison Company JStefano EMarinos 6400 Porth Dixie Highway RBernero BMarcus Newport, Michigan 48166 RHouston CNorelius JPartlow EGreenman
Dear Mr. Sylvia:
EJordan WRogers S
Subject:
Proposed Revision of Fermi-2 Technical Specification 3/4.8.4.3, Motor Operated Valve Themal Overload Protection Surveillance Requirement By letter dated September 30, 1986, DECO submitted a proposed license amend-ment which was intended to clarify the surveillance test requirement for the protection of motor operated valves. This requirement is stated in the subject Technical Specification as follows.
"The thermal overload protection for the above required valves shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least once per 18 months and following maintenance on the motor starter by the performance of a CHANNEL CALI-BRATION of a representative sample of at least 25 percent of all thennal overloads for the above required valves."
During development of the Fermi-2 Technical Specifications this requirement was interpreted by DECO and the NRC staff to mean that 25 percent of the thermal over-load protection devices would be tested by performance of a CHANNEL CALIBRATION test once per 18 months, and if maintenance was required on a motor starter, only that motor starter would be tested by the performance of a CHANNEL CALIBRATION test.
DECO's proposed Technical Specification change, as delineated in the September 30, 1986 letter, reaffirms the intent of the above related surveillance test require-ment. Therefore, the administrative change proposed is not considered to be neces-sary, and no further action on LECo's request is planned by the NRC.
This' finding has been communicated with your staff in advance of this letter and they agree that a license amendment incorporating a change to Technical Specifi-cetions 3/4.8.4.3 will not be necessary.
C Sincerely,
(,.,
/S/
1 h 2 g CK 0500o342 os D70219 John J. Stefano, Senior Project Manager BWR Project Directorate No. 3
'P PDR Division of BWR Licensing cc: S next page 63-3: DBL L6
- DBL D.
- DBL Stefano/vag ES on E e am 2/F'/87 02
/87 02/g/87 g
l s
N %.
O j
~.
Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia Detroit Edison Company Fenni-2 Facility cc:
Fr. Harry H. Voigt, Esq.
Ronald C. Callen LeBoeuf Lamb, Leiby & MacRae Adv. Planning Review Section 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N. W.
Michigan Public Service Commission Washington, D. C. 20036 6545 Mercantile Way P. O. Box 30221 John Flynn, Esq.
Lansing, Michigan 48909 Senior Attorney Detroit Edison Company Regional Administrator, Region III 2000 Second Avenue U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coneission Detroit, Michigan 48226 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. Dennis R. Hahn, Chief Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office Division of Radiological Health l
P. O. Box 30035 Lansing, Michigan 48909 I
Mr. Steve Frost Supervisor-Licensing l
Detroit Edison Company Fenni Unit ?
6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 Mr. Thomas Randazzo Director, Regulatory Affairs Detroit Edison Cosenny Fermi Unit 2 6400 North Dixie. Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 Mr. Walt Rogers U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident inspector's Office 6450 W. Dixie Highway Newport, MiQ.gan 48166 Monroe County Office of Civil Preparedness 963 South Raisinville Monroe, Michigan 48161
_ ____ _ ____-_____________ -_____.