ML20211L177

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Memo Re Faulty Concrete Pour at Facility.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20211L177
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/1985
From: Weil C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Nash T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20211L126 List:
References
FOIA-85-594 NUDOCS 8702270068
Download: ML20211L177 (8)


Text

..

~_

l

, ** c UNii t D ST All S 5.,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON nt croN ::

f 799 AOO$tyt L T mO AD

)2, (.

j coc~ cuv. iu Ois win May 31, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR: Tom Nash, Allegation Coordinator, Region IV FROM:

Charles H. Weil, Investigation and Compliance Speciali n Region 111

SUBJECT:

ALLEGATION RE:

FAULTY CONCRETE POUR AT WOLF CREEK (50-482)

On May 31, 1985, the following information was obtained from Edward G. Greenman, Deputy Division Director, Division of Reactor Projects, Region III.

A friend, was_gssigned tol prior

,to being transferreLJo y I During his tenure'jn was involved in an '

l

[was described as a comercial/ residential contract 6f.

l 9pTarenfTy held contqcts with various local governments too.

U

' Accordilig to,~~Te.g.,,certifyTng that jobs were completed to specification had been involved in various record falsifications when in fact they were not; using duct tape to wrap pipe joints, when the jgints,s_,hould have bee,n cemenjed; using inferior grade materials).

l tee arEitect/ engineer at tMU' Wolf Creek site and had heard thatwas employed advised that was involved in a faulty concrete pour at Wolf Creek. Allegedly,t I

was involved in a concrete pour in which the concrete was dropped'TFom, a~

height of 25' to avoid tamping the concrete.

On May 31, 1985, this matter was discussed with Eugene T. Pawlik, Director, Office >f Investigations Regign III Field Office.

Pawlik was able to determine information is Torwarded to you for e,v]aluation and whatever that as employed by in their of fidt-action is deemed appropriate by Region IV.

Charles H. Weil Investigation and Compliance Specialist

Enclosure:

AMS Form cc w/ enclosure:

8702270060 B70224 RI!!:RA0 PDR FOIA RII P

N85-594 PDR 01:RIV e~

ED O

o ppa e

Dl

f. h r,.

Fo,- :

i., cnw'.

... Feo,, :

8://

3'o A, s., -

SL Q eel:' Alley a 6:<.-

4 -es 4-i c

( Q 4 -e4-oid e P th e-KGor

..) tkAed is cepy a

reporF e n the;,-

n v e.rt's, a /
e n.

Or 1

Ydis Vo h l' W o, f fo re vie ev I

sn 19 dedermin wAa.f4 es-a ddi L' o ~ l cy u t,e d.

i i s < r k y a /,~ n e Phe+

rs

]~

d a sef ba/te us fAaf anbn-/

e&~ n a dd;+i. n a /

,y<tn
r a#9 anu.

e reya:,sd ir on Al,fe fA,f we.

., dou /el i nfa~

fAe.

l

allege, e f 7%e s u + com e oe ou< re. vies P/eas. lef

,,e An.w iF 0t s :7 <~Jy b

c4 s e f-A i s, o n d,

F < eg a e.r A d T

n;f/ c n Lc/ a //eg e,.

8-cZ/

1 e

I f/ ff# Z m m.es,df'f5 "*

m sesamm -

1

b^ 1 m

(_j

's -

ALLEGATION REVIEW Date: March 12, 1985 CASE NUMBER 4-84-A-015 DATE OPENED 02/07/84

'- m FACILITY NAME Wolf Creek 50-482 SUBJECT Harrassment of QC Inspectors SOURCE OF ALLEGATION Employee NUMBER OF ALLEG.

ASSIGNED TO 01 CROSS REF. NO.

Q4-84-018 ACTION SCHEDULED OI review FIRST/LAST NAME R. Herr DATE ASSIGNED REPORT NUMBER 1st:

2nd:

Lst:

FTS NUMBER 8-728-8100 DUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT SORT CODE C

DATE CLOSED ACTION OFFICE RIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DETAILS:

Mechanical / welding QC inspector was harrassed for writing NCR dealing with improper welding amperage by superintendent.

RIV to contact alleger with

. regard to turning allegation over to licensee for review.

OI has indicated an

'interest.

Report of Inquiry Q4-84-18 issued 4/11/84.

KG&E Report provided for OI review and then returned to Licensee.

Supplemental Q4-84-185 issued and closes all OI interest.

Need to contact alleger.

Supplemental Q issued by 01 on 2/15/85 which closes 01 case.

Need to contact alleger,

,s N

REFERENCE:

OIR4-84-A-0027.

~.

13/

3%.#

LEGATION DATA FORM h/. NUCMAR REGULATCk C instructens on r.vn> i.e.

RECEIVING OFFICE Docket Number (if applicable)

1. Facility (les) Involved:

(Name!

W **'

  • 3 O' N Nbok hNfK 0 $ O 0 0 4- ? 5 genenc. ame GENERIC)

U # 1 l A 1470 A 9

A eJS A S I

2. Functional Area (s) Involved:

[H iChect.ooroon.ta basiesi l operations onsite health and safety 4[od construction offsite health and safety safeguards emergency preparedness other (specify) 3.

Description:

151 Eld sl f irl i1vlEl l I I I I l l l l l l l l l l 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II III II III II IIIIII IIIII I lI II I I I I I III l&l VI-19 ly l-10lyl2 l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

/

4. Source of Allegation:

(Check.coropnete bons contractor employee security guard licensee employee news media

~

Ivnu emproyee private citizen organization tspecity)

.g, other tspecityl

,Qr--

A -=/-f A

[

ke MM Do YY

5. Date Allegation Received:

6 9 I

I 2 4 TD Dk$

L l

S. Name of Individual meet tw initi.i..nd :..t n.m.:

Receiving Allegation:

7. Office:

g ACTION OFFICE Mf

8. Action Office

Contact:

meet two inirteie and i.: nemes S. FTS Telephone Number:

7 /

/ O 7 2 8

10. Status:

gc3.ca on.,

Open,if followup actions are pending or in progress Closed,if followup actions are completed l

Mu ao vy j

11. Date Closed:

l

12. R. marks:

lAlcirir ldyl-InWl-!al412J l l l l l l 1 ii! l i itmi ia so ca.r.ci.r.i IIIIIIIIII!Il_lIilI;iiiiiiI l

13. Allegation Number:

,,..,;, i

,i

0 ' ^*.~

L f.

s

. d g(f l

Qt ALLEGATION REVIEW f..

.-(

1 CASE NUMBER 4-84-A-094 DATE OPENE0 09/11/84 FACILITY NAME Wolf Creek S0-482 SUBJECT (Sensitive)

,;~

SOURCE OF ALLEGATION Former contractor employee

-s; NUMBER OF ALLEG.

1 ASSIGNED TO 01 CROSS REF. NO.

Q4-84-042 ACTION SCHEDULE 0 Initial inquiry FIRST/LAST NAME R. Herr 0 ATE ASSIGNED 09/11/84 REPORT NUMBER 1st:

2nd:

Lst:

FTS NUMBER 8-492-8110 OUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT SORT CODE O

DATE CLOSED ACTION OFFICE OIRIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DETAILS:

(Sensitive) Ref:

Q4-84-042. - y-rY A

  • M sa m, as s

e

-c

.v i

/ ^

(G P * -

.-[

~

O O

e%

jm QN',

I r/

L

\\

'y - g y ' g 9y

'J D 4-zY-ova

- i.s s~d dsAs CI FM<mo GLt@ /u,,

+o wayGJ-s n

p /,y/gg 0nfae/

oC o/4 e To As 7

Ao-/4d 6, A%/wn bm?- ><

,/

k N/7/g i

=

l

),

I i

y l

{

O vI

t

's Y#'

O u

( \\,

I DOCUNENT LIST

.&. w y ;.

y

.M? 'E ' '

ALLEGATION No, A l - V y -g -Sy.

DC'c0 MENT NAME RECElptf"0."')A RETURN m-g //,,(

  • h ~ s e so e K,.,

}

e-w 4'I*g 64 A. ra

,c;, n j

c 4

eV O

9 f

s

~

e

'(

h 5

h L

9

se a ; s - 3' Alli G M ID?s '.

i!...

'e' i

e o

FilClIVit.L De..; t Docke: N umis s e (if a p; i.:,: i,-

1. F e cliityties) involved:

the=*1li3mIh

(< e e M O

5~ O O n 4 6 L enme u n.

n p.wic.

iie cthtmo

}l.

2. Functional Arests) Involved:

. 'L ',

tw app,%i, t,..t.el l operations onsite health and safety

_d construction offsite health and safety W.

safeguards emergency prepar'edness 5-other (speelfr) h

3. oescription:

16lE.lvlt.161 AIL.I I AIL,ltid6h lt ilolAils l IRinlalA-le ft?

m a '* *'*'*"

l ol i l Ailcl I RI Gl tlEl 14 lalo l lolol A lt,l i I TI vi I Fi t 14 4q.c lflTI I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIl l l l v

4 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

[inI

4. Source of Allegation:

t :'j',

sw.pp,,p,;,ie t,..

contractor employee security guard

[.'

licensee employee news rnedia f.,

NRC employee private citizen

. ).

I organization tspecifri 3

i'.Y..h

[

other tspostfr)

M r ei e v' E v/eueo J

MM DD YV

'e$:

5. Date Allegation Received:

4.

/ 11/ -d f (/

A.

A r e c [4 s l

6. Name of Individual trust two initials and un rarn.)

N,i ',,

Receiving Allegation:

E g:,.;,'7. Office:

4 g

g g

%e'..,.

ACTION OFFICE t

,f, e

T* [' b I b N M I

8. Action Office

Contact:

triesi two inti;.is no i.ii n.m.i th',-

$(FTS Telephone Number:

7 p p,

g, g

,3.f g

?

10.

u,s

_) Open,if fo!Iowup actions are pending or in progress

){ft,

[fh'.

CloscJ. If followup actions are completed

,.3,1 Mu oo yy

11. Date Closed:

I l

1

'n

n. nemark.:

l l ll l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l [ [ l l l m. so c, ww

.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII omo o, Offece Yea e E.m b e.

%g UNITED STATES

'fg t,' g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,i-OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS FIELD OFFICE. REGloN IV

%,',[. **'

'" "Ntin"$$. 7Ex"I' SI! "

S DATE:

June 29, 1984 REPORT OF INVESTIGATION 3

TITLE:

WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR P0k'ER STATION:

' s.

ALLEGED INTIMIDATION OF QUALITY C0tiTROL INSPECTOR SUPPLEMENTAL NO.

DN 50-482 CASE NUMBER:

4-84-003 C0f;TRCL OFFICE:

01 FIELD OFFICE: REGION IV STATUS:

CLOSED PERIOD OF INVESTIGATION:

Janua ry 10,1903 - March 9,1984

[/

A REPORTING INVESTIGATOR:

Verdel E. Fr'ost; Investiyator Office of Investigations Field Office, Region IV ARTICIPATING PERSONNEL:

H. Brooks Griffin, Investigator Office of Investigations Field Office, Region IV REVIEWED BY:

M4

~Ri cT18 rd~ T(, Her~r, Director Office of Investigatier.s Field Office, Region IV l

RogerVo tuna,' Deputy Diract Office Investigations

/

M[/

APPROVED BY:

l erl. Hayes, Diredtpf/

OfficeofInvestigaticfis

\\,

$$@3110aNx!!00

$2 G

N s

l

SUMMARY

An allegation was received by the Office of Investigations Field Office, Region IV, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC), that a Daniel International Corporation

. (DI) Quality Control (QC) inspector at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

Burlington, Kansas, had been intimidated by a DI senior QC supervisor. The alleged intimidation caused the DI QC inspector to terminate his employment becaus'e his freedom to report nonconforming conditions had been eliminated.

The DI QC inspector was interviewed and stated that he had been the subject of a meeting wherein a DI senior QC supervisor made intimidating statements to him, including the statement, " Cooperate with construction." The DI QC inspector stated that he performed all his inspection duties in a proper manner; however, he voluntarily terminated his employment 23 days after the date the alleged intimidation occurred because he believed that his freedom to report nonconfoming conditions had been eliminated.

A DI QC lead hanger inspector who was a witness to the alleged act of intimi-dation and who kept a diary of the incident was interviewed. This QC lead hanger inspector provided the diary to the reporting investigator. The diary reflects the date the meeting took place and the quotes and connents that were made by the DI senior QC supervisor to the DI QC inspector. The quoted wording contained in the diary is, "Everyone in this seg, will cooperate, g

including craft" (the word " including" was written using a shorthand symbol) and "These welds will not be held up over nitpick problems."

The DI senior QC supervisor who allegedly made the intimidating statements was interviewed and denied making any intimidating statements to the DI QC inspector in question. The DI senior QC supervisor stated that statements like, " Cooperate with construction" or any other statements of that type would, if stated by a supervisor in his position, be intimidating to QC personnel.

Subsequently, this same DI senior QC supervisor was reinterviewed at his own request the next day and admitted making the following statement to the DI QC inspector in question, "There is no room in this organization for people who L

y a

cannot work together;" however, he denied making the statement. " Cooperate with construction." The DI senior QC supervisor denied attempting to intimidate the DI QC inspector, even though he acknowledged that a statement like " cooperate with construction" is an intimidating statement.

rj b.

The DI project QC inspection manager who is the DI senior QC supervisor'5 imediate supervisor was interviewed and stated he was aware that a meeting occurred between a QC inspector and the senior QC supervisor; however, he g-

denied having any other knowledge concerning the meeting.

W

?.

O

.6 e

O it 1

August 20, 1985 nuceor oworeness networc 1347% rrossachusetts. laurence, kansas 66044.(913)749-1640

atalie Brown Office of Administration L'S NRC Washington, D.C.

20555 Zear Natalie, I am directing this to you since you dealt with the original FOIA-85-161.

. art of the documents I received included some Allegation Data Forms, Allegation Review Forms and Document Lists.

However, they seemed to be rather piece-meal.

If possible, as an extention of the request relating to 85-161 I am requesting the supporting documents for the cases (from 161) and the supporting documents for the closure of some of those cases listed in 161:

1) Q4-84-018 (attached)
2) 04-84-042 (attached) %
3) 84-A-85 (attached) w//
4) 84-A-0195 (attached)
5) 4-84-003 (attached)

As you see, they are incomplete, and seemingly random.

I would like any other documents pertaining to them other than the ones attached.

I am also sending another FOIA to your attention today because I am expanding on this request to include all cases.

l As I said, if it can be an extension of 85-161 to send further documents please do send the other information that was not included in 161.

If that is not possible, then the FOIA I sent to your attention today will cover this request as well.

Thanks.

Sincerely, O

' 47LLvo-Stevi Stephens jfd 00k ~

\\ lf