ML20211L122

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Sixth Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documentation Re Region IV Allegation Data Forms from 830101-850820.App K Document Partially Withheld & App L Documents Completely Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemptions 6 & 7)
ML20211L122
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek 
Issue date: 02/24/1987
From: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Stephens S
NUCLEAR AWARENESS NETWORK
Shared Package
ML20211L126 List:
References
FOIA-85-594 NUDOCS 8702270059
Download: ML20211L122 (4)


Text

o.

._. ~_.

    • O'&k UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3

[

wAssencrow, o.c. aossa

%,**.../

Docket ho. 50-482 FEB s 4 mr Ms. Stevi Stephens Nuclear Awareness Network 13476 Massachusetts IN RESPONSE REFER Lawrence, KS 66044 TO FOIA-85-594

Dear Ms. Stephens:

This is the sixth partial response to your letter dated August 20, 1985, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (F0IA), copies of all documentation pertaining to all cases regarding the Wolf Creek plant.

In a telephone conversation with Ms. Pappas, Ms. Reed, and yourself on October 15, 1985, you narrowed the scope of your request to copies of all the Region IV Allegation Data Forms ano the background records pertaining to these forms. You also clarified that your request covers the time frame between January 1, 1983, through August 20, 1985.

The released portion of the record identified on the enclosed Appendix K is being placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) in Washington, DC, and the i

NRC Local Public Document Rooms in Emporia and Topeka, Kansas.

The denied portion of the record identifed on Appendix K and all of the denied records ioentifieo on the enclosed Appendix L are being withheld pursuant to the FOIA exemptions noted on the appendixes.

l Infomation withheld pursuant to Exemption (6) of the F0IA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6))

and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(6) of the Commission's regulations consists of a name and personal identifiers the disclosure of which would cause a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

Infomation withheld pursuant to Exemption (7)(A) consists of investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably be expected to interfere with an ongoing enforcement proceeding.

Thisinformationisbeingwithheldp(ursuanttoExemption(7)(A)oftheF0IA(5 i

U.S.C. 552(b)(7)(A)) and 10 CFR 9.5 a)(7)(1) of the Commission's regulations.

InformationwithheldpursuanttoExemption(7)(D)consistsofthenameofan i

individual and personal identifiers. Because this information consists of the identity of a confidential source, it is being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Exemption (7)(D) of the F0IA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7)(D))

and'10 CFR 9.5(a)(7)(i., of the Commission's regulations.

B702270059 870224 PDR FOIA l

STEPHEN 05-594 PDR

Ms. Stephens f*

'InformationwithheldpursuanttoExemption(7)(E)consistsofinvestigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which would disclose investigative techniques and This information is being withheld pursuant to Exemption (7)(E) procedures.of the F0IA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7)(E)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(7)(v) of the Comission's regulations.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Consission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withhelo is exempt from production or disclosure and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator, Region III.

This denial may be appealed to the NRC's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an

" Appeal from an Initial F0IA Decision."

We will communicate with you further with regard to any additional records which are subject to your F0IA request.

Sincerely, 4W k.

Donnie H. Grimsley, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration

Enclosures:

As stated

~

Re: F01A-85-594 (SixthPartial)

APPENDIX K Portion Deleted Exemptions 6and7(D) 1.

5/31/85 Memo to Nash from Charles Weil Re: Allegation:

Faulty ConcretePouratWolfCreek(50-482)(1page) i i

1 l

i i

i

{

I

Re: F01A-85-594 (Sixth Partial)

Appendix L Allegation Number 4-84-A-19 Exemptions 1.

3/2/84 Allegation Review Form w/ attachments 7A (15 pages)

Allegation Number 4-84-A-195 2.

2/26/85 Memo to R. Herr from Robert Martin re: 01 7A &E Report of Inquiry Q4-85-001 (1 page)

Allegation Number 4-85-A-57 3.

9/15/85 Allegation Data Input Form w/ attachments 7A (4pages)

Allegation Number 4-85-A-62 4.

6/12/85 Allegation Review Form w/ attachments (2 pages) 7A Allegation Number 4-85-A-58 5.

6/5/86 Allegation Review Form w/ attachments (4 pages) 7A Miscellaneous 6.

2/3/84 Memo to T. Westerman from C. Weil Re:

7A Allegations Concerning Wolf Creek w/ attachments (3 pages)

.