ML20211J101

Action Plan for Restart, Monthly Rept for Oct 1986

ML20211J101
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	10/30/1986
From:	Julie Ward SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:	Miner S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
JEW-86-738, PROC-861030, NUDOCS 8611100357
Download: ML20211J101 (26)

Text

- _ - . .- .. . - - - - - . - .

% m5 e%,

e .

r%

U suun SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT O 6201 S Street. P.O. Box 15830, Sacramento CA 95852-1830. (916) 452-3211 AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING THE HEART OF CALIFORNIA 4

RANCHO SECO ACTION PLAN FOR RESTART i 4

MONTHLY REPORT -

OCTOBER, 1986 i

l 1

1 .

Prepared by:

J. E. WARD DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, NUCLEAR l

8611100357 861030 f l kDR ADOCK 05000312 00 l PDR __ g l l - - - , . - - , . - - . - . . _ . - .

y hSMUD SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTIUTY DISTRICT C P. O. Box 15830, Sacramento CA 95852-1830,(916) 452-3211 AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING THE HEART OF CALIFORNIA October 30, 1986 JEH 86-738 g ,) i 1 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN: Syd Miner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014 RANCHO SECO MONTHLY REPORT ON STATUS OF ACTION PLAN FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT - OCTOBER, 1986

Dear Mr. Miner:

This monthly report on the status of the Action Plan for Performance Improvement at Rancho Seco covers activities during the month of September, 1986.

As you will see in this report, we are making significant progress in addressing and resolving the wide spectrum of modification, maintenance, inspection, training, procedure development, administrative and management improvement isues.

l The attached report is intended to keep you, as holders of our Action Plan, l current on our progress.

Sincerely, Jo . Ward Deputy General Manager, Nuclear i

Enclosure l cc: Glen Perez -

! go \ , >

\

i l

DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS O 62o1 S Street, Sacramento CA 95817-1899

i 3- .

' ACTION PLAN MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT CONTENTS I. Highlights

.II. Introduction

.1 Purpose

.2 Scope III.' Action Plan Progress

.1 Changes and Revisions to the Action Plan

.2 New Issues

.3 Closure of Issues

.4 Systematic Assessment Program .

.5 Management, Operations, and Administrative Process Improvements

.6 Plant Modifications and Maintenance Improvements

.7 System Review and Testing Program .

.8 Non-Action Plan Related Activities l

.9 Resource Commitments and Utilization

.10 Schedule IV. Appendixes l .1 Closure Status Update

.2 Monthly Report Slides i

l .3 Schedule I

t s

_ _ , . _ - _ _ _ . - - - , . - , _ . _ . _ , , , , - , . . - , . - . . . , , , . . _ , , . , , , _ , , _ _ - . , - _ _ - , _ . . . . . , , , , . . , _ . , ~ . _ . . . . . w

i .

I.. HIGHLIGHTS .

September was a productive month for progress todard restart of Rancho Seco.

The Systematic Assessment Program, which has taken an introspective look at the facility and its operating history, was completed. Approximately 1800 recommendations have been forwarded to either the Systems Engineers, or to the Department Managers for disposition and implementation.

The System Review and Test Program (SRTP) is fully functional and producing the detailed System Status Reports, which address system related problems and netded enhancements. These are being resolved into detailed test programs for each system, the first of which are already underway.

During the month'several NRC Review Teams made extended visits to the site to investigate in detail the technical basis and progress being made with the ICS, NNI, and EFIC systems, the modifications to the Control Room, and the status and content of the SRTP. These' reviews went very well. A good dialogue has been established between the NRC and our technical people which is expected to aid appreciably in insuring the NRC that they receive the information they need to prepare their Safety Evaluation Report (SER).

The TDI Diesel Generators will be installed for restart.- This decision will cause a delay in the return to full power to May 1, 1987, but will insure that adequate supplies of standby power are available during operation. Although

~a dditional costs are associated with this decision, they are primarily due .to acceleration of the installation date from the previous commitment of the 1988 .

refueling.

The detailed costs of the restart effort'are still being developed, particularly the dethils for 1987 expenditures. At this time forcast costs at completion are with.in 2% of the original restart budget estimates, including

~

the costs for the TDI Diesels.

Major project completed during September was the sleeving of 507 Steam Generator. tubes. This major first-of-a-kind effort was completed within three days of its original schedule, and at a cost below budget. This project provides Rancho Seco with Steam Generators whose resistance to leaks should be much improved, leading to measurable improvement in plant reliability..

s

I 4 II. INTRODUCTION This report describes the progress in implementing the " Action Plan for Performance Improvement" at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station. The Action Plan was submitted.to the NRC on July 3 1986, and this monthly report covers activities during the month of September,1986.

III. ACTION PLAN PROGRESS

1. Chances and Revisions to the Action-Plan Amendment 1 to the Action Plan was submitted on September 15, 1986. This Amendment was a result of the decision to install the Emergency Feedwater Initiation and Control (EFIC) system as the appropriate Auxiliary.

Feedwater.(AFW) control scheme that is independent of the Integrated Control System (ICS). The second major area of change involved additional detail regarding the expanded System Review and Test Program (SRTP), which l

is now functioning with assigned Systems Engineers. The SRTP consolidates F

' the input f rom the Plant Performance- and Management Improvement Program (PP&MIP) and develops a systems approach to the resolution of issues i leading to the demonstration of the plant material condition.

The NRC asked that NUREG-0560, " Staff Report on the Generic Assessment of Feedwater. Transients in' Pressurized Water Reactors Designed by B&W", be included in the Systematic Assessment Program as an element of the Action Plan. A check' of the documentation developed in the Precursor Review program confirmed that this had already been done. Subsequently it.will l

be called out as a commitment within the Action Plan.

2. New Issues Affectina Restart '

The following items, which could affect restart, became known during September. Each is being investigate'd to determine its impact in terms of new requirements, costs, schedule changes, and appropriate disposition.

a. Testing of the. "A" Diesel Generator, following overhaul, indicated high vibration on the unit. The manufacture was called out and a i

balancing program begun, in addition to seeking out the cause of the

! vibrations. It is not expected to impact restart.

b. It has been determined that the TDI Diesel Generators will be required for restart. In addition, it has been confirmed that some

' loads will have to be shifted from the Bruce-GM Diesel Generators to resolve a potential overloading situation. This has lead to a restart delay of approximately 60 days.

c. The NRC is processing a request by the Mayor of Los Angeles, that

public hearings be held regarding his request that Rancho Seco be s

permanently closed. The Petition is being treated pursuant to 10CFR 2.206. The NRC is promising appropriate action within a reasonable time. -

i .

III. 3. Closure of Icsues Attachment 1 provides the current status of NRC identified items required for restart. These items are listed in Appendix C of the Action Plan, which cross references the item to specific paragraphs or Appendix B items, (NUREG 1195 Findings) or to related commitments within' the Action Plan. This report shows that, to date, thirteen closures have been documented in NRC Inspection Reports against their list of 54 items. Note that the term " closure" is being reserved for indicating that an item or issue is " closed with NRC concurrence." The term " complete"-is being used to indicate an item which is " work complete " that is, the activity committed in the Action Plan has been done, yet paperwork and/or NRC concurrence for " closure" remains.

A comprehensive effort to define the specifics of commitments made in the Action Plan (particularly the Management Improvement Items within Section 4B) is being initiated. This will provide the commitment closeout program with the specifics necessary to substantiate completion and closure of commitments.

4. Systematic Assessment Program This program provides the input to the QCI-12 " Plant Performance and Management Improvement Program" (PP&MIP). For all practical purposes the program is complete, as shown in the following status of each input area.

a. December 26, 1985 Event Analysis A total of 150 analyses, studies, repairs, and modifications were initiated to investigate and recover from the overcooling event.

These resulted in approximately 495 recommendations, which have been submitted.to the RRRB for review and processing. This entire effort is >95% complete, with final completion dates established for all

! remaining open items. -

b. B&W Owners Group SPIP The program inputs remain at 37 recommendations of an expected 140, the balance of which may not be available until the first quarter of 1987. Six of these recommendations have been prioritized for~

restart, by the PP&MIP. Ron Colombo has been assigned as the l

l District SPIP Coordinator and representative and reports that the i next batch of recommendations is due in October.

ca

c. ' Precursor Document Review Approximately 1396 documents, applicable to Rancho Seco, have been i

reviewed to determine the appropriateness of previous reviews and implementing actions. This review was completed on August 20the and 457 recommendations were submitted to the RRRB in accordance with the QCI-12 process. Over 3,000 secondary documents were reviewed in support of the primary reviews, and nearly 10,000 manhours expended l

' on the project. A comprehensive, four volume, closure report has been produced which details the project and how it was accomplished.

(

B i . .

- III. 4. d. Deterministic Failure Consequence Analysis This completed project produced 1,232 recommendations to the RRRB and

- QCI-12 process. These recommendations have been processed and delivered to the System Engineers for incorporation into their System Status Reports.

e. Recommendations Review and Resolution Board (RRRB)

The RRRB completed the processing of all submitted recommendations dur_ing September. Future meetings b~y the RRRB will be called whenever new items are delivered. .such as receipt of recommendations from the BWOG SPIP. To date'thC RRRB has received in excess of 4400 recommendations with approximately 3000 being tracked as valid.

Approximately 1782 unique recommendations have been assigned to Department Managers and System Engineers for disposition.

5. ' Management. Operations and Administrative

a. Changes in Organizational Structure On September 3,1986 Nuclear Directive ND-86-10-A was issued. It established the office of the Deputy General Manager to provide administrative and technical support directly to the Deputy General Manager, Nuclear. This action was taken to support Action Plan commitments is sections 4B.1, 48.8, and 4B.10.

On September 29,-1986 the Restart Implementation Organization (RIO) was established with each major department managers position identified to contain the names of an interim manager and deputy manager. The purpose of this dual assignment being the support / training of the interim District Manager. At the same time,

- efforts were -initiated to develop lists of eligible applicants for

- permanent assignment by the District to each function. It will be

. late in the year before any of these positions could be permanently filled. The organizational chart in Attachment 2 details the interim l '

l assignments and the organizational structure.

f

! b. Changes in Supervisory and Management Staff On September 8, 1986 the following assignments were announced:

Restart Implementation Manager (RIM) Ken Perkins (MAC)

Deputy Restart Implementation Manager George Coward (SMUD)

Plant Manager (Acting) Dan Poole (MAC)

Deputy Plant Manager Bob Croley (SMUD)

. Implementation Manager Ted Lutkehaus (MAC)

Deputy Implementation Manager Jim Shetler (SMUD)

Concurrent with the September 29, 1986 Organizational Structural changes, the following were assigned into the new organizations reporting to the Restart Implementation Manager (RIM):

I I

. , , . _ _ r. ._

-III. 5. b. (Continued)

-Nuclear SuDDort Services Headed by Roger Huebner, this new department will be comprised of Materials Management,'Information Services, Budget, Contracts, and .

purchasing coordination with Headquarters. ,

Plant Modifications Management Headed by Tom Robertson of Bechtel, this department will coordinate all construction ~and modification activities.

c. The Systems Review and Test Program (SRTP):

~

d Reassessment of the staffing requirements for the SRTP has concluded that 90 people will be required vice the 110 reported previously.

l During the month another twenty system /startup engineers were brought into the program. The program is now staffed at the 82% level. It is expected that full staffing will be accomplished next month.

6' . Plant Modifications and Maintenance ImDrovements .

Section 4C of the Action Plan details the modifications and maintenance -

required for restart. Actual work is underway on each of the identified L

projects, but none have yet reached the p'oint of closure. Completion-of work tasks is occurring, although item closeout is pending full operation -

L of the QCI-12 Tracking System (QTS) which incorporates the closeout documentation process.

Efforts are underway to provide a cross reference for QCI-12 items to the various Section 4C commitments. This effort is showing that some of the'

~

areas in Section 4C were not substantiated by the Systematic' Assessment Program as requiring resolution prior to restart.- Since all issues presently contained in Section 4C were developed by the " Top Down" process, prior to the QCI-12 Systematic Assessment for recommendations, .it is becoming apparent that these commitments need to be reviewed for appropriateness and priority. The Action Plan makes provisions for a programmatic review of this nature.

' During the month of September two NRC Technical Review Teams visited the site to review elements of the modifications program identified in Section 4C. The first team addressed the ICS/EFIC items, while the second addressed Control Room Modifications; specifically, CRDR, SPDS, and Reg Guide 1.97. The two teams looked into overlapping areas and provided much useful critique to the designers and systems engineers. The overall assessment by the team leaders was that no major problems were uncovered, though they did provide requests for a number of specific documents determined to be necessary for development of their Safety Evaluation Report (SER).

Plans are being developed to support the NRC's announced Review of the Maintenance Program, scheduled for early November. This will be a l

comprehensive review targeting those issues and commitments identified in the Action Plan.

~

. III. 6.

(Continued)

A significant accomplishment during the month was completion of the OTSG tube sleeving operation. The project, the first of its kind, was completed three and one-half days over schedule, but under budget. Significantly, 507 tubes l

were successfully sleeved which should significantly enhance the reliability of the steam generators, and thereby, the plant.

7. Systems Review and Test Program This program is described in Section 40 of the Action Plan and is rapidly becoming the comprehensive effort envisioned in the plan. As noted above, the program is now about 82% staffed. The detailed system review F

documents are being developed and input to the review and test development

' process. aome testing is underway, while progress is being made in defining the prerequisite modifications and changes necessary to support -

'the testing of individual systems.

During preparations for the NRC Review Team audit of Control Room i

Modifications, it became apparent that the Control Room would benefit from treatment as a " System". This resolves the developing concern that ~

"everyone" was fixing process system problems in a manner which affected i' the Control Room, and the matrix of previous commitments and studies which support it. The Performance Analysis Group (PAG) agreed to this treatment, which was subsequently accepted by the NRC. This effort will assure that the Control Room, as defined by the Control Room Design Review-

• (CRDR), will n'ot be invalidated by modifications coming from subsequent programs.

A large number of system problems were identified this month from the final stages of RRRB activity and the systems engineers. This prompted a delay in the identification of the comprehensive test program,while these problems were evaluated to identify restart items. This effort will

• continue into early October.

Engineering initiated a series of reviews of system status reports by the System Design Engineers. Although it has resulted in changes to the

priority and resolution of some problems, and has impacted the work load and schedule for_ report completion, the effort has improved the quality of i

the SRTP and has_ cemented an important interface between the System Engineer and the System Design Engineer.

The first five " selected" systems have reached the point in the program to identify prestart testing requirements. This resulted in the refinement of the process and the product expected for all remaining systems. It also helped clarify the role of the Test Review Group and its relationship to the PRC and PAG. The NRC reviewed the process and product, of these 4

five systems, and indicated that the program and the level of detail in the reports displayed no significant problems although the list of

~

7

" Selected Systems" may require some further revision.

The Auxiliary Steam and Radiation Monitoring Systems were presented to PAG and upgraded from " Additional"'to " Selected" Status.

l 4

w.,, -

-,-r- - - - - - - , - -

III. 8. Non-Action Plan Related Activities

a. Foothill Fault Study The NRC request for additional information regarding the Foothill Fault Seismic System is based on a March 1981 SMUD report titled

" Review of Recent Geologic and Seismologic Information Pertinent to Seismic Safety" and a follow-up field trip by the NRC project manager and staff geologist in May 1985. Per telecon on July 9, 1986, it was indicated that the NRC request'was not an urgent matter and a

" normal" schedule to answer.it would be satisfactory. Geologists from Bechtel were given the task to perform a field reconnaissance (July 11 & 12) and to develop a detailed plan and schedule to respond to the NRC request. We expect to have this plan by the end of August. It was the geologist's initial assessment that a review of any new information developed since SMUD's 1981 report would be necessary and, if needed, some geologic exploration for the purpose of mapping could be done. This schedule indicates that the NRC does

< not consider this to be a " restart issue."

A letter has been sent to the NRC which documents our agreement to complete the additional studies and field work so that the final report can be submitted by July 1, 1987. .

Neither the NRC, nor Cole McClure of Bechtel, expect that this study will impact the plant design bases.

9. Resource Commitments and Utilization As a part of the expansion of programs necessary to support the Action Plan, programs have been strengthened or put in place to provide management information and control of activities and resources. These

- efforts allow'for the budgeting and allocation of resources to accomplish

the commitments of the Action Plan. . Status of the major elements are:

a. Budget Final approval of the Restart Budget was given by the SMUD Board of Directors on September 4,1986. That budget was based on a February 15, 1986 restart date, and excluded the incorporation of the installation of the TDI diesels prior-to plant restart. However, a dollar contingency and schedule slip were associated with the potential of having to install the diesels prior to plant restart.

Based on additional analysis by Nuclear Engineering, it was determined by mid-September that the TDI diesels would have to be installed before plant restart. On September 23, 1986, the SMUD Board of Directors approved the installation of the TDI diesels prior to. plant restart, the associated dollar increase in the budget, and schedule slip.

_g-

III. 9 -a. (Continued)-

The current Restart Budget includes costs for all identified Restart and Plant Performance Improvement activities through May 31, 1987, approximately one month after the schedule return to full power date. Expenditures which had previously been planned for April and E May of 1987 as Plant Performance Improvement activities have now been added to the Restart Budget, and will be tracked in the Restart cost system.

l Through the end of September 1986, several significant budget f

variances have been identified. As of the end of September, the tota 1' forecasted. budget varia~nce through the end of 1986 is -$400,000 and through the end of the Restart program - $2,400,000.

As of the end of September, only two major scope changes have been

. approved and their costs have been incorporated into the Restart Budget. Both are as a result of the requirement to have the TDI diesels installed and operational prior to Plant Restart. They are as follows:

1. TDI Diesel Installation - A total of $4,000,000 ($3,000,000 in 1986 and $1,000,000 in 1987) was added to the budget to account-for the physical work associated with the installation and startup of the TDI diesels and related modifications. This money had been previously held by the SMUD Board of Directors as-contingency for this activity.

[

2. Schedule Extension Due to TDI Diesel Installation - A total of l- $17,600,000 (all in 1987) was added to the budget because of the two month delay in the plant restart date. The majority of the increased budget is to account for improvements that will now be

~

accomplished during the restart time period, and thdrefore will i

be tracked as Restart rather than_ as subsequent Plant Performance improvements. Less than $1,000,000 is as a result of added management costs associated with the time delay.

' A management reserve of $500,000 for.1986- and $4,000,000 through the end of May 1987 has been established as a part of the overall Restart Budget. This money is controlled by the Deputy General Manager, Nuclear and can only be allocated with his approval. As of the end-of September 1986, no management reserve has been allocated to other accounts. A determination will be made during October, whether or not to use the reserve to offset the forecasted negative variance.

b. Personnel and Staffing During the month of September, the total number of staff assigned to the Nuclear Organization increased by approximately 200 people as efforts to ,

staff up to accomplish Action Plan commitments continued.

f

L .

III. 9. b. (Continued)

As of the end of the month, there were 83'6 SMUD employees (includes 57 temporary SMUD employees), 224 craft labor, and 802 consultant /other contractors assigned to the nuclear organization, with a small number of SMUD and consultant personnel assigned to various lccations other than Rancho Seco. A total of 1862 people are now on'the project.

4 The following is.the approximate overtime utilization of the Nuclear Organization as percentage of straight time hours worked for September and the prior month of August; AUGUST SEPTEMBER 22% 34%

SMUD 15% 11%

Craft Labor 18% 28%

' Consultants /Other Contractors (located at Rancho Seco and submitting site timesheets)

c. Contracts Action by the SMUD Board of Directors on August 26, 1986, gave the.

' Deputy General Manager, Nuclear broad power to award service contracts, in support'of the Rancho Seco Restart effort, without-going through the normal contract approval cycle. The control of i

these contracts is in the budget dollar limits established by the

' Board of Directors for the award of work through individual tasks.

i As of September 30, 1986, nine contracts have been awarded, including l

i four during the month of September. Thirteen additional contracts l

~

are in various stages of approval. The following contracts were

! awarded during September: -

I l

Contractor Start Date Services to Be Provided 09/05/86 Software and Program Support Southern Electric Staff Augmentation BCP Technical Services 09/09/86 09/30/86 Staff Augmentation Volt Information Sciences Engineering Services Quadrex Energy Services 09/30/86 During the month of September, a total of 21 tasks with a committed value of approximately $5.9 million were issued against the nine

~ active contracts in effect under the August 26, 1986 Board action.

The majority of the takes extend into the second and third quarter of 1987. .

l

.III . 10. Schedule A new schedule showing the impact of the TDI-Diesel Generator installation, was developed at the end of the month. A copy is provided 4

as Attachment 3. This is a preliminary effort which does not show the impact of-scheduling and planning activity to accelerate the critical path tasks. Management of the critical path tasks.will allow them to be shortened to achieve the desired May 1,1987 date for-full. power operation.

IV. Appendices ~

1. Closure Status Update

2. Monthly Report Slides

3. Schedule J

9 6

E l

l t

e

.. ATTACHMENT 1 SzptCmb2r 30 '1986 -

RESTART ACTION PLAN ,

CLOSURE STATUS UPDATE APPENDIX "B" APPENDIX APPENDIX "C" ACTION PLAN FINDING "B" TITLE STATUS ISSUE -

REFERENCE NO.

BJ FEEDPUMP THIP CRITERIA B.5 REVIEW PROCEDURES TO PREVENT WATER -CLOSED- A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR 48.3.2 IN MIN STEAM LINES (NUREG 1154) NRC (86-07), 0-2 PERFORMNCE B.6 PRIORITY OF PTS OR B.6 CONDUCT TRAINING ON OVERC00 LING -CLOSED- A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR PRESSURIZER LEVEL EVENT NRC (86-07), 0-9 PERFORMNCE  :

NRC (86-07), 0-10 '

lr ,

B.7 TRAINING Oil LOSS / B.7 CONOUCT EVENT AWARENESS 1 RAINING -CLOSED- A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR 4C.1, AC.3 R3 TORATION OF ICS POWER FOR 12-26 EVENT NRC (06-07), 0-9 PERFORMNCE c ,

B.8 RECOGNITION OF ICS B.O CONDUCT EVENT AWARENESS TRAINING -CLOSED- A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR AC.1, 4C.3 POWER CONDITION FOR 12-26 EVENT NRC (86-07), 0-9 PERFORMNCE j r.'.

. . <t'

c, B.9 DAMAGED llAND OPERATOR

~

B.9 CONDUCT TRAINING ON PROPER VALVE -CLOSED- - A.8 TRAINING'AND' OPERATOR 48.3.2.1.C OTtAfW VALVE OPERATION METHODS INCLUDING Tile NRC (86-07), 0-14 PERFORMNCE  ;-

OVERRIDE OF AIR-OPERATED VALVES ,' .

'I B.12 REACTOR VESSEL TIIERML B.12 CONDUCT TRAINING ON OVERC00 LING -CLOSED- A.4 OVERC00 LING EFFECTS ON Sil0CK EVENTS, ETC. ,

NRC (86-07), 0-9 REACTOR VESSEL & STEAM GENERATORS B.13 REACTOR VESSEL B.13 CONOUCT TRAINING ON OVERCOOLING -CLOSED- A.4 OVERC00 LING EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY EVENTS, ETC. NRC (86-07), 0-9 REACTOR VESSEL & STEAM GENERATORS CMAnc 'N r B.14 USE OF ICS IN FSAR B.14 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CREDIT MY NOT BE - CLOSED - '" ALL RETROSPECTIVE ISSUES B.14 DESIGN BASIS EVENT ANALYSIS TAKEN FOR ICS/NNI MITIGATION ASitLEY TO KNIGli K '

MEMO OF 10-2-86 B.16 TIMELY ID OF LOSS OF B.16 CONDUCT EVENT AWARENESS TRAINING -CLOSED- A.8 TRAINING AND OPERATOR . 4C.), 4C.3 ICS POWER CONDITION FOR 12-26 EVENT NRC (06-07) 0-9 PERFORMNCE B.24 SYSTEMTIC TROUBLE- B.24 LICENSEE TO PERFORM TROUBLE- -CLOSED '

Sil00!ING Sil00 TING OF ICS NRC (06-07), E-5 -

PERFORM ANALYSIS OF STEAM LINES -CLOSED- A.6 FLOODING OF MIN STEAM 4C.3.d.).3 TO INCLUDE STRESS CALCS & NRC (06-07), E-8 IIEADERS - EVALUATE STEAM

, WALKDOWN INSPECIION LEADER SUPPORTS 8

6

,, ATTACHMENT 1 S*pttmber:3b,1986

• Pago'2 of!.2 RESTART ACTION P!AN - ,

CLO5tmE 5TATUS UPQ4TE APPENDIX "8" APPENDIX APPENDIX "C" '. ACTION PLAN I

FINDING "B" TITLE STATUS ISSUE A REFERENCE NO.

a OETERMINE CAUSE OF MAKEUP (MU) -CLOSED- ~ A.3 MAKEUP M I PtmP *.' . 4C.12 P-236 PUMP FAILURE NRC (86-07), E-15 FAILURE .ipf it. ~

4C.13.1.3

,,...,. r

. B8W ANALYZE POTENTIAL FOR CORE -CLOSED- A.4 OVERQ)0 LING EFFECTS ON I

LIFT DURING 12-26 TRANSIENT NRC (86 ,01), E-19 REACTOR VESSEL AND STEAM GENERATORS '_i. .. '. : .g s ..

~

PERFORM REPAIRS TO ICS AND VALVES -CLOSED- A.7 PLANT MAINTENANCE AND 4C.13.1.10 j letIO{ WERE DAMAGED DURING THE NRC (86-07), MA-5 TESTING j; 12-26 TRANSIENT < , ,

P .

se f

4 t ',

f f

e e

'h .

• 4 J g

'F . t j I .'

.j ' .

c~

l  ;

,I  !.

, .o

ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 1 0F 9 l*

1 OCTOBER ^1986 MONTHL Y REPO'RT -

t.

RANCHO SECO ACTION PLAN l

~

l FOR RESTART ^

e Action Plan Progress During . Sept. ember.1986 l

• Major Projects Underway' I

!

• Updated Schedule

• Project Staffing .;

i

e Budget '

I

ATTACHMENT 2 -

Fage 2'of 9 -

l -

OCTOBER MONTHLY REPORT

, e i

ll' ACTION PLAN PROGRESS o NRC Interaction ,

-Submitted Amendment 1 to Action Plan 0

(included Response to Sept. 5 Request for Additional Info)

-NRC Site Visits for Review of .

l- . e Control Room Design Review,' SPDS, Reg. Guide 1.97 i e

• System Review and Test Program

' o System Review and Test Program (SRTP)

-27 Selected Systems, Expect to " Select" 4 more,

-SRTP Requires 90 People, 74 On-Board, . Staffing increased from 52% to 82%

- during September.~ Will be completely staffed by November 1.

-System Status Reports, , Making Significant Progress

-NRC On-Site Review Meet:ing, Pleased with Progress

-Work on 50 "Additio'nal" Sy tems Underway

o Submittal of Action Plan Amendment 1 '

-As of September 16,1986 , ,

-Includes Details of EFIC

-Includes Responses to NRC/NRR from Sept 6mber 5' letter

-Includes Details of SRTP

-Expands Detail in Schedule  :

-issued over 300 copies 9

'ATACilMENT 2 .

~Page 3 of 9 ObTOBER MONTHLY REPORT .

t

-' ACTION PLAN PROGRESS (con't)

Major Project Status:_'

-Systematic Assessment per PP&MIP (OCI-12) * .

e 12/26 Event Analysis, 99% Complete, 495 Recommendations Submitted e B&W Owners Group, 30% Complete,140 Recommendation's Expected e Precursor Document Review,100% ' Complete, 457. Recommendations Submitted e Plant Staff Interviews,100%. Complete,1,631 Recommendations Submitted.

e Deterministic Failure' Consequences,100% Complete, 1,232 Recommendations Submitted .

-Recommendations, Review and Resolution Board (RRRB) e 2,987 Recommendations Being Tracked l

• 1,782 Valid Recommendations Being Resolved o RRRB Completed its Phase 1 Work 9/22/88 -

j i -Performance Analysis Group (PAG)

-

• Met 11 times to Review System Stntus Repotts, etc.

• Covered 349 Items '

• Developing Revision 2 to 001-12 j -Priority Review Taskforce (PRT] a .;

• Two week effort to Review "30'0 items ,

i e Review'all Priority 1 Tasks which Requite

• Engineering e^< ssure' that 0C1-12 Criteria Properly Applied

• Results to RIM / PAG ,

b r /

~ '

7- -

' ATTACitMENT 2 '

Page 4 of 9 g

OCTOBER ONTHL Y REPORT s

• e-

'. ACTION PLAN PROGRESS Major Project Status '

-S_ystems Review *

• 22 of 27 Rev 0 System Status. Reports (Functions & Problems), increase of 7 e 5 of 27 Rev 1 System ' Status Reports (Test Requirement),' increase' of 5

. e 0 of 27 Rev 2 System Status Reports (Results & Acceptanco)

• 6 of'50 Rev 0 System Investigation Reports (Functions & Problems), increa,se' of 6 e 0 of 50 Rev 1 System Investigation Reports (Results & Acceptance) '

l

• Staffing of SRTP, 74 On-Board of 90 Required

-Test Program

<

• Developing Test Specifications s Developing Test Procedures ,

• Beginning Field Testing .

-NRC SRTP Review -

• Site' visit by NRC Team Webk of.9/29/86, pleased with progress

• Full Time On-Site, NRC Team to Monitor SRTP, due October G

4 e

• 1 l

. - ATTACHMENT 2 .

~ "

" Page 5 of 9 rTwin OCTOBER MONTHLY REPORT' ACTION PLAN PROGRESS

e. Major Project Status

-0TSG Tube Sleeving ,

.- e Completed Sleeving 507 Tubes .

'~ '

e Completed Project Under Budget ..

• Completion Required 3 Days Beyond Original Estimate

-Motor Operated Valve Program .

• All 163 Limitorque Valves at Rancho Seco in Program e Uses MOVATS. Equipment .

e Program Expanded to include Motor Overhaul; ..

~

• Project On Schedule  ? -

. ~

9 e e

-  ;- ~

e

~. _m

,:_. ., :s s .

ATACHMENT 2 CH5D

- Page 6 of 9 ,

OCTOBER MONTHL.Y REPORT

! , . . ' A CTION PLAN PROGRESS .

Major Project Status _.

-Emergency Feedwater Initlation and Control'(EFIC) System I

+

o Obtained PRC & MSRC Approval of EFI'C Design Basis

• Purchased EFIC Control Panel- Delivery 12/1/86

• Developed Engineering, Construction, and Test Plans e Estimated Craft Labor Required for EFIC, -82,000 MH's i .

l t i .

, s 1

?

.e

• h e

9 e

m

ATTACHMENT 2 Page 7 of 9 M, OCTOBER MONTHLY REPORT ACTION PLAN PROGRESS .

Major Project Status .

-TDI Diesel / Generator Installation s

• Initiated TDI Diesel Project Organization e Developing Procedures for Otartup and Functional Test Programs e First Licensing Submittal, To Allow' Operation, . Completed e ' Initial Engine Runs Scheduled for October '

s

-Transition Programs -

o Established Nuclear Organization fot Restart implementation e .Over 90% of Organization is^ Staffed and Operating

• Developing' Details of Program to Transition to All'SMUD Organization O

e 9

O

' ATTACHMENT 2 .

. Page 8 of 9 NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION RESTART IMPLEMENTATION bRGANIZATION GBD DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER,

REY.3 9/29/86

.* * . NUCLEAR

• John Ward t

, I I I I I ,

MANAGEMENT EMERGENCY PUBLIC QUALITY EXECUTIVE

• ONsE A SSIS TA NT' $Aggg INFORMATION - ASSURANCE- ^ ASSISTANT

. Dick Weber + Den Martin ++

• Brad Thomas e Stu Knight + ' John Wnoutst *

++ Kerry Shearer DEPUTY . pae ,

OA MANAGER . mo,,, p,,g . ,

, + LVacant] '

~

RES TART IMPLEMENTA TION

{

l +SMUD "A"A*

ORGANIZA TIONAL e ht A C PRACTICES &

• Ken Perkins STAFF EFFECTIVENE.tS ASSISTANTS OlNPO PROCEDURES DEPUTY , .

COORDINATION , e Bob Crosby RES TAR T

+ Don Elliott IMPLEMENTA TION

• o CECH TEL LeIne McDaniel -

• Vic Johnson e A.J. Tuduty NANAGER 3 Geer Roy x C ON TR A C TOR, 4

.M,rR,xED + Geor e Co, ard . . . .,,s h i,,

! FROM HO, t l

t . t l i I I I I I I PLANT iMPLEMENTA TION TRAINING #

PL A NT L'ICENSING ENG N ERING 3ER VICES

ifANA GER MODIFICA TIONS MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER yyygggy ygygggy l Dan Poole o Tom Robertson e Ted Luthehaus + Paul Turner e ' Ray Ashlev

• Den GilNaple + Roger Nuebner DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTY DEPUTY #U PL A NT PLANT IMPLEMENTA TION TRAINING LICENSING ENGINEERING sgn'y'gh R ItANAGER MODIFICA TIONS MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER

+ Cob Croley + (Vacant) + Jim Shetler x Don Oulgley +

(Vacant) + Greg Cranston n (Vacant]

. . . . , , . . . . . .a,n. . ,,. . . .a...e.....,,..- .

..u...., . .l. . , s . . . ..u., .....,.. c

..........s Ic,;;;',, ',',,,, ..,,... .c. ..... g . . s ,.. ... o. .. .c...,....

'" ""'n

.s... u., .,,, * *~ ~~* ........

. r.. . ... ., s .. .u . .

,,,,,,,,,, ...n..n.,,,...... ,,,,,,,,,,,,

• ,-=""-*

. c .. .

i . roa .,.lue.

j * **"** Ph r* *n

. Q. Currently studying the melhed e c ,nu n @ ler combining svilh Licensing.

.i 4

' ATTACHMENT 2 Page 9 of 9 I...

. [ t708 ) ,

t .

!' . OCTOBER MONTHL Y REPORT

, . RESTART . .

• Baseline Budget

-Total 1986 Cost ~

$170 Million, Approved 1986 Rancho Seco Budget, September 4,1986 .

~

-September 23, Board Approved Installation of TDI Diesels .

e Personnel, As of' 9/30/86

-Permanent SMUD Nuclear Staffing 779 of 974 Authorized

-Temporary SMUD Nuclear Staffing 57

-Contractor Support: NPS (Latior) 2,24'

. Other 802 (includes At-Home 0ffices) ,

Total 186@

-Increase of 158 from 8/29/86 Report e Schedule "

l -Heatup: Early March 1987

-Unrestricteel Operation: May 1,198 7 ,.

-Refueling for Cycle 8 Scheduled For Fall 1988

-Detailed Schedule Prepared 9/30/86 9

9 4 k r

+

6 e

t -

t E $

~~

$5 g zE E2 Et ~5

.u f Eo e

2 M E

~~ e4 0 wM p W z

w %o !Ef a - ee i 55 b" 5=.

G S I *b aC q 5

C

-i g*

E g

H b H e E g hnI *

- y -

A *

$ 7r g $eb $ I-@hk 7 r '3 g

• c 5 s gt - 4 G -

g E -E f. ke 2

- B 2 -

I fg4o l~ 4l .!1.

h- K b -

_ e -

f a e g 5. I , Ol$ k 2 r E

v r f W E 3 3; O 6 5 Ig h, -g@ $'!'

E E-ts- m ef '

t -

1a *p -

1a

( w g {g ~5 3a,l e ~

3 a

o J

is O tv &OE 3

-E 4*r :

1

~

@ -E ki ,

m

-1 ' -

- a - Ig I  : [~

3 3 1a 11 a g

b op5 1 -

i k} ;3 +1 -

Zi .5 m ' o ti m _

= y- n -

n s g 8 5 m g ._ w

• w- w - -

d W e mM - -_

• M 7 ( =

f E 4 5I

-k, k - E '!

5! . s k

!a = 51 -

.i _

! -c y -

!sW R d -

R 5

!;f

~

E 2 @

87 91-

=8 2 3 E8 n 5 W e s TW - >z 3D R fW3 0 QC 20 ]R a w s i s ss a

3 8 ~ $2  : 7 3

g 3

7 h! ME 2 mm o o do E-! -

E 58 g

.3 R -

SE 7 8 28 7 5=

g{65 j ~I 2Q

=a - E

• m -

e- g a

'n~

8 g; '"

l

, .B , ,-

• Gc a

- 8 s.

0 0

0 /'

D E!9 h

32 -

=

t u

E

% do 2 U

S mm 5 f

o 55 z

w a I E ,  ;.g .

~ h J*.g U p s  ; -

i i i. nIi E! =

- 'e 4

g a

7-8 3c+*

m 1 2

,3 -

.. *I -

4 o R n a ~!g p O m 5 9

S

-E $ $ E ,

h a as1-95 2 e= r I o e is

_t_a-eg

, m y -

M '

I L a ( +-

i l=

a .

11 e

_ e la ! 5 e [

e

.g ..

W

' N s'

s -

w 2

E

2. R v f kg $ k Er s

W-""

= .

1

~

I f

1

= '

R . 5

.h.

• 3 ~s:A

!D w

m e

e as 55 v - -

e l

- O h4 0

! l il= i*

3l =

a g E R E-9

-I R .

gg g

y'-

g o f_

a 3

s

• a @

5 d i ~ 7 8 Gh T

420 8 l -

5 5

a 3

$j a i >z IQ

-I

-a n E E E i

EE 80 zs- ' L

~ e a 3  ::: a P.

E

7 OS E -

1 ll$ 2 15 I';

G !i '.

d

• h e8 g f 1 5

5"f" 6

I?

z -

h5 $ I $h

!g w s

a y-i A,.Q SR

.h.vs 17 t e b ~ .- g n

gg m

+E sE s5 si z=

$pfUI *i " 2 75 k! 25 s ! "2 b- 8

• -A _

bi CE Ji

~

_ E P'-

[i :" f _k Tg u E ;' =>y n, i .K W EF On NEY