ML20211G364
| ML20211G364 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/1986 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211G356 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8611030429 | |
| Download: ML20211G364 (2) | |
Text
_
~
d o
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
n g
-a WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 y.....)
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT N0.49T0 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE DPR-77 AND AMENDMENT NO.41TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE DPR-79 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY I.
INTRODUCTION By letter dated January 25, 1984, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) requested various changes to Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications. This evalua-tion only addresses the deletion of Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2.d.6 from the specification.
II.
EVALUATION TVA has proposed the deletion of diesel generator Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2.d.6 from the Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications. The sur-veillance requirement verified that on a simulated loss of the diesel generator, with offsite power not available, the loads are shed from the shutdown boards and that subsequent loading of the diesel generator is in accordance with design j
requirements. The deletion of this surveillance is consistent with the staff re-quest in Generic Letter 83-30 dated July 21, 1983. The proposed change is, therefore, acceptable.
III.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION These amendments involve changes in surveillance requirements. The staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that these amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
IV. CONCLUSION The Connission made a proposed determination that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration which was published in the Federal Register on September 28,1984 (49 FR 38410) and consulted with the state of Tennessee.
No public connents were received, and the state of Tennessee did not have any connents.
8611030429 861028 PDR ADOCK 05000327 p
,~ -
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributors: Carl R. Stable, PWR#4, DPWR-A doe Holonich, PWR#4, DPWR-A Dated: October 28, 1986 9