ML20211F836
| ML20211F836 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 09/22/1997 |
| From: | Raghavan L NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Richard Anderson FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| GL-96-01, GL-96-1, TAC-M94668, NUDOCS 9710010230 | |
| Download: ML20211F836 (4) | |
Text
,56-362 ym%
y
\\
UNITED STATES g
}
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c
o WASHINGTON, D.C. 30eeHo01
%,*,ses/
September 22, 1997 Mr. Roy A. Anderson Senior Vice President.
Nuclear Operations Florida Power Corporation ATTN: Manager. Nuclear Licensing Crystal River Energy Complex (SA2A) 15760 W. Power Line Street Crystal River. Florida 34428-6708
SUBJECT:
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 - COMPLETION OF LICENSING ACTION FOR GENERIC LETTER 96 01. " TESTING OF SAFETY-RELATED LOGIC CIRCUITS." DATED JANUARY 10. 1996 (TAC N0. M94668)
Dear Mr. Anderson:
On January 10. 1996, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Generic Letter (GL) 96-01. " Testing of Safety-Related Logic Circuits." to all holders of operating licenses or construction permits. The NRC issued GL 96-01 for three principal reasons:
1.
Notify addressees about problems with testing of safety-related logic circuits:
2.
Request that all addressees implement the actions described within the generic letter; and 3.
Require that all addressees submit to the NRC a written response g\\
0 regarding implementation of the requested actions.
In GL 96-01, the NRC staff specifically requested that licensees take the-following actions:
g 1.
Compare electrical schematics anc logic diagrams for the reactor protection system, emergency diesel generator load shedding and sequencing, and actuation logic for the engineered safety feature systems against plant surveillance test 3rocedures to ensure that all the logic circuitry, including t1e parallel logic, interlocks, portions of
- bypasses, and inhibit circuits are adequately covered in the surveillance procedures to fulfill the technical specification requirements. This review should also include relay contacts. control switches, and other relevant electrical components within these systems utilized in the logic circuits performing a safety function; and c
- 2.
Modify the surveillance procedures as necessary for complete testing to comply with the technical specifications. Additionally. the licensee may request an amendment to the technical specifications if relief from certain testing requirements can be justified.
hg% M MTB COM'
.p
-4 Roy A. Anderson.
Furthermore, the NRC staff required that addressees prepare and submit the following:
1.
A written response indicating whether or not the licensee would implement the' actions requested above or propose an alternative action:
-- 2.
A schedule for completing the requested actions or proposed alternative:
and
-3.
A response ~ confirming completion of the requested actions.
By. letter dated September 5.1997. you confirmed completion of the requested
- actions of GL_96-01 and provided a list of systems and surveillance
- requirements which have been-verified by you.' You identified and reported testing deficiencies in Licensee Event Reports (LERs) 96-011-00.
96-025-00, and 97-003, revisions 01. 02, 03, 04 and 05.
In LER 97-003-05. you committed to specific actions to prevent recurrence of the cause of the testing deficiencies including revision of training programs, revision:of engineering and procedure development procedures. and training. You also committed to perform testing with the modified procedures to ensure that surveillance requirements are met for system operability at appropriate times during the startup from the current outage, f
These submittals provided both the information recuested and the responses required by GL 96-01 and.therefore. our effort uncer the technical assignment-control (TAC) No. M96448 is completed and the TAC is closed.
Please note this may be subject of our future inspection / audit.
Sincerely, i
A L.Raghava{n.ProjectManager Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Project. - 1/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
. Docket No. 50-302 cc: See next page
1
+
- =
Mr. Roy'A. Anderson CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Florida Power Corporation cc:
-Mr. R. Alexander Glenn Mr. Robert E. Grazio. Director Corporate Counsel-Nuclear Regulatory Affairs (SA2A)
Florida Power Corporation Florida Power Corporation MAC-ASA crystal River Energy Complex P.O. Box 14042 15760 W. Power Line Street St. Petersburg. Florida 33733-4042 Crystal River. Florida 34428 6708 Mr. Charles Pardee. Director Senior Resident Inspector Nuclear Plant Operations (NA2C)
Crystal River Unit 3 Florida Power Corporation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Cr{stal River Energy Complex 6745 N. Tallahassee Road 15 50 W. Power Line Street Crystal River. Florida 34428 Crystal River. Florida 34428-6708 Mr. John P. Cowan Mr. Bruce J. Hickle. Director Vice President. Nuclear Production l:
. Director Restart (NA2C)
(NA2E) l
Crystal River Energy Complex Crystal River Energy Complex l
15760 W. Power Line Street 15760 W. Power Line Street Crystal River. Florida _34428-6708 Crystal River. Florida 34428-6708 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Mr. James S. Baumstark B&W Nuclear Te:hnologies Director. Quality Programs (SA2C) 1700 Rockville Pike. Suite 525 Florida Power Corporation Rockville. Maryland 20852 Crystal River Energy Complex 15760 W. Power Line Street Mr. Bill Passetti Crystal River. Fbrida 34428-6708' Office of Radiation Control De)artment of Health and lehabilitative Services
?.317 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 1
Attorney General
-Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee. Florida 32304 Mr.-Joe Myers. Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Department.of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Chairman Board of-County Commissioners Citrus County
-110 North Apopka Avenue Iverness. Florida 34450-4245
_ _- o
Roy A, Anderson 2-September 22, 1997 Furthermore, the NRC staff required that addressees prepare and submit the following:
1.
A written response indicating whether or not the licensee would implement the actions requested above or propose an alternative action, 2.
A schedule for completing the requested actions or proposed alternative:
and 3.
A response confirming completion of the requested actions.
l
.By letter dated September 5,1997. you confirmed completion of the requested actions of GL 96-01 and arovided a list of systems and surveillance i
requirements which have 3een verified by you.
You identified and reported testing deficiencies in Licensee Event Reports (LERs) 96-011-00, j
96-025-00, and 97-003, revisions 01. 02. 03. 04 and 05.
In LER 97-003-05, you committed to specific actions to prevent recurrence of the cause of the testing deficiencies, including revision of training programs, revision of engineering and procedure d velopment procedures, and training.
You also committed to perform testing with the modified procedures
-to ensure that surveillance requirements are met for system operability at appropriate times during the startup from the current outage.
These submittals provided both the information recuested and the responses required by GL 96-01 and-therefore, our effort uncer the technical assignment control (TAC) No. M96448 is completed and the TAC is closed.
Please note this may be subject of our future inspection / audit.
l Sincerely.
L.k[chavan.ProjectManager Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No 50-302 cc: See next page
- Distribution
-Docket File ~
PUBLIC
- CR-3 r/f B. Boger J Zwolinski ACRS J. Wermiel
-G. Kelly OGC e
DOCUMENT NAME:.G:\\ CRYSTAL \\94668.clo se.,r. ou.
Ta receive e copy of tNe document, indicate in the bos: 'C' = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachmentienclosure
- N* = N,., copy 0FFICE Poll-3/PM l
PDII 3/LA l
HICB
[
PDIl 3/D
,)
l C, l
l liAME LRegavan Lf/
BC t nyton, A,1 A,,
FHebdon N DATS 09/21/97 09/22/97 09/17/97 09/22/97 09/ /97 09/ /97 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
_ - _ _ _ _ _ -