ML20211D959
| ML20211D959 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1986 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Edelman M CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211D963 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8606130187 | |
| Download: ML20211D959 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000440/1986011
Text
-
A m6
.
.
JUN 0 61986
Docket No. 50-440
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating
Company
ATTN: Mr. Murray R. Edelman
Vice President
Nuclear Group
Post Office Box 5000
Cleveland, OH 44101
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. J. A. Grobe,
K. A. Connaughton and J. W. McCormick-Barger of this office on April 9 through
May 12, 1986, of activities at Perry Nuclear Pcwer Plant, Unit 1, authorized
by NRC Facility Operating License No. NPF-45 and to the discussion of our
findings with Mr. C. M. Shuster at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection rcport identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
with hRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written
response is required.
Pursuant to NRC's Enforcement Policy, we have carefully evaluated the
violations identified to determine whether or not escalated enforcement action
was warranted. We have concluded that the safety significance of the
violations was minimal, but note that this was due largely if not solely to
plant conditions at the time of each occurrence.
For this reason escalated
enforcerrent action will not be taken at this time. Notwithstanding, and as we
have emphasized to you during the course of our routine meetings in the past,
this trend merits prompt and aggressive senior licensee management attention to
preclude similar violations in the future.
Your response to the enclosed
notice, which underscores our concerns, should specifically address ycur
program for identification of rcot cause(s) of violations and those steps you
plan or have already taken to assure prompt and ccmprehensive corrective
action is taken to preclude occurrences involving similar personnel errors.
Your response to the enclosed Notice should include consideration of the
possible contribution to these occurrences of the ambitious scheduling of work
activities requiring the cognizance and support of operating personnel.
M
f
G
1l
.-
.
.
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating
2
AUN 0 6 WO6
Company
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
far*Sh,al Stuacd LJ .: . : , t . . . ' . u ?
Charles E. Norelius, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-440/86011(DRP)
cc w/ enclosures:
J. J. Waldron, Manager, Perry
Plant Technical Department
M. D. Lyster, Manager, Perry Plant
Operations Department
L. O. Beck, General Supervising
Engineer, Nuclear Licensing and
Fuel Management Section
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
-
Ter?y J. Lodge, Esq.
Jan.es W. Harris, State of Ohio
Robert H. Quillin, Ohio
Department of Health
6
R I
RIII
RIII
RIII bg-
McCormickfrger/jp
$LL
[&
$3
i
Knop
ick
(./5 /D
__J
_