ML20210S840

Forwards Schedules for Review of Plants Using CESSAR NSSS as Ref.Cessar Interface Info Incomplete

ML20210S840
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde, 05000000, Satsop, Perkins, Cherokee
Issue date:	07/25/1975
From:	Deyoung R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Heineman R, Skovholt D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CON-WNP-1689 NUDOCS 8605290442
Download: ML20210S840 (8)

Text

. - , , .

e b

Distribution

- TR AD's WHaass JUL 2 51975 50 TR BC's CMoon PD0'Reilly

~

DSkovholt WHouston DPAllison

' PCollins RCDeYoung RVollmer ODParr Robert E. Heinesan, Director. Division of Technical Review, NRR D. Skovholt, Assistant Director. Quality Assurance & Operations SCHEDULE FOR WPPSS 3 & 5. PALO VERDE 1, 2 & 3 AND DUKE -6 (CHEROKEE 1, 2 & 3 AND PERKINS 1, 2 & 3)

The staff is not ready at this time to conclude that the interface information contained in CESSAR is complete and sufficient.

Ben Rusche, at a meeting on July 14, 1975, directed us to sodify our program for the resolution of this matter without impacting L the licensing schedules for the CP applicants currently referencing these standard NSSS's.

In order to do this we will need to perform certain tasks. These tasks will involve a coordinated effort between the CESSAR and

- utility PSAR reviewers in each branch. They will have to be conducted on a limiting time schedule to avoid delay of these plants.

We have prepared revised schedules for meeting the objective set by Mr. Rusche. The details of the necessary mviews and the times when they must be accomplished are listed in the enclosures.

Original signal by:

U.C= Uc k ag R. C. DeYoung, Assistant Director for Light Water Reactors Group 1 Division of Reactor Licensing

Enclosures:

1. Additional Reviews Required

2. CESSAR Milestones

3. Palo Verde Milestones

4. WPPSS 3 & 5 Milestones

5. Duke Milestones r 8605290442 750725 PDR ADOCK 05000488 *[6',

O;

_ A PDR l

.,,,,,,.  !.M /-3 L ket l ~ 3 _

evensene % k$ W (A k ents > . k .T .Y . -. -.

Form AEC Sla (Rev. 9 5)) AICM 0240 W u. a. eovgneugMT PRIN?tMe OFFICE 8 9974 884-964 I e u -.

ENCLOSURE 1 ADDITIONAL REVIEWS REQUIRED

1. COORDINATED REVIEW OF CESSAR AND tfTILITY PSAR Perfom a coordinated review of the interface and other infonmation contained in the CESSAR and referencing application (CP) dockets to detemine whether or not, taken together, they provide acceptable infomation. This would be done assuming that the interface infonnation contained in CESSAR is not complete (since we are not ready to conclude that it is complete). Additionally, it will be necessary to provide a list of all pmblems, questions, open items and inconsistencies, which would interfere with concluding that the two applications, taken together, are complete and sufficient.

Meet with the applicant to discuss how these itans will be handled.

After this is decided, publish appropriate cossents in the SER's.

2. OPTIONS Proceed on the basis that CESSAR will delete all optional systems in an amendment to be docketed 08/04/75 and that the utility PSAR's will be expanded to include those which they were previously referencing in CESSAR. The utility PSAR's will utilize the same pages as were in CESSAR so the review can be accelerated. These systems were not discussed in the CESSAR Report to ACRS so they must be discussed in the utility application SER's.

Review these optional systems, as presently described in CESSAR, assuming that they will be incorporated verbatim in the utility PSAR. Provide a list of all problems or questions. ~ Meet with the applicant to discuss how these items will be handled. When this is decided, publish appropriate connents in the SER's.

3. REVIEW OF AMENDMENTS Several CESSAR and utility PSAR amendments are due in tha near r

future. These umst be reviewed and the results published quickly to bring the CESSAR and utility application SER's into consistency with each other and to reduce the number of open items to the minimum number practicable.

l l

a '"c '

• _ _

s

[ Sum *eatet b ,

OAII . . . . ,, _,,_

Forms AfC 318 (Rev. 9-53) AECM 0240 W u. e. sovannassar paintime otracts es,4.sas. tee I

s ENCLOSURE 2 CESSAR MILESTONES

1. CESSAR Report to ACRS was published based f on review of CESSAR through Amendment 28 and, in soan cases, 29 07/03/75

2. CESSAR Amendment 33 was received (shutdown coolingsystemredesign) 07/07/75

3. CESSAR to submit Amendment 34 (add:vss cpenitems) 07/21/75

4. TR input to LPM based on review of CESSAR through Amendment 34 07/28/75

5. Publish CESSAR Supplement I based on review of CESSAR through Amendment 34 08/07/75

6. CESSARtosubmitAmendment35(optionsand interfaces and remaining open items to extent practicable) 08/04/75

7. TR input to LPM based on review of CESSAR through Amendment 35 08/18/75

8. Publish CESSAR Supplement 2 based on review of CESSAR through Amendment 35 09/05/75 errec e > ,, . _ . ,

evanaus >

aata > . . . . . .

Soc.a AEC.)ls (Rev. 9 3)) AIO4 0240 W u. e. eevenmusme paintime oprices sere.ese see

. I ENCLOSURE 3 PALO VERDE MILESTONES

1. Palo Verde SER input (except EI&CSB and SAB) based on review of Palo Verde through faendment 8 corresponding to CESSAR

! Amendment 26 07/18/75

2. Palo Verde to submit Amandment 9, corresponding to CESSAR Amendment 33 and resolving open items 07/21/75

3. Palo Verde letter committing to use CESSAR optional systems verbatim 07/30/75

4. Perform special reviews of Palo Verde and provide list of all problems, etc. to LFM.

This consists of: 07/31/75 A. Review to detemine any problems, questions, etc. regarding conpleteness or adequacy of

' Palo Verde taken in combination with CESSAR, assuming that the interface information in 1 CESSAR may not be complete.

B. Review of CESSAR optional systems appropriate to Palo Verde, assuming they will be incor-porated verbatim in Palo Verde. (Theseare containment spray, iodine removal, new fuel storage, spent fuel storage, process sampling and secondary control systems).

5. Meet with applicant to discuss how to handle problems identified in 4 above 08/07/75

6. TR input to LPM revising SER input, as necessary, based on 08/15/75 A. Special review for interfaces in item 4 above, as modified by meeting B. Special review for options in item 4 above, as modified by meeting C. Results of review of Palo Verde Amendnent 9 (CESSARAmendment33)

D. Results of review of Palo Verde letter p.unsu i 6 isun 6 su u w up6 Una vusunbim) eerse . > - . .

.u s se a ns. >

.a.9 > .. .

............y_,.....................

__,.......,7._

- 2-E, Any effect of CESSAR Supplement 1 published on 08/07/75 (NOTE: For SA8 and EI&CSB this is the first SER input instead of a revision).

7. Palo Verde to submit Amendment 10, corresponding to CESSAR Amendment 34 & 35, dealing with options, interface changes, and resolving open items 08/18/75

8. TR input to LPH revising SER input as necessary, based on 09/03/75 A. Review of Palo Verde Amendment 10 (CESSAR Amendment 34&35)

8. Any effect of CESSAR Supplement 2 to be published 09/05/75

9. Pubitsh Palo Verde SER, based on above itses. We currently expect that liquefaction and hydrology will be open items at this time 10/03/7E

10. Applicant submit infonnation on liquefaction and hydrology 10/03/75

11. Complete rr. view of liquefaction and hydmlogy, be propired to address at full ACRS (if resolved) 10/24/75

12. Full ACRS Heeting 11/07/75 l

l l

l l

l e.,. uc.ne eme.. v4n .ucu oJ40 h. .. . . . . = = = . . , p ai n , ... . ,,ie s. i . ,. . .. . ..

i 1

., i

' ENCLOSURE 4 WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJiCTS NO. 3 AND N0. 5 NEW MILESTONES

1. TR input for WPPSS SER basd on review of PSAR

, through Amendment 17 (corresponding to CESSAR Amendment 16) 06!16/75

2. WPPSS submitted Amendment la to PSAR (update of PSAR to incorporate CESSAt'. through Amendment

21) 06,23/75

3. WPPSS submitted Amendment 15 to PSAR (update of information regarding geolagic investigations) 06fi!6/75

4. WPPSS to submit Amendment 20. corresponding to CESSAR Amendment 32 and resolving open items (original comitment was fer 7/1/75 submittal) 07/.15/75

5. WPPSS Amendment 21 comittint to use CESSAR optional systems verbatim 08/M/75

6. Pefom special reviews of WPP:S application and provide list of all problems to LPH 08/Ct;/75 Reviews consist of:

A. Review to determine any pa lems, questions, etc., regarding completenssi. of WPPSS i application takan in combincion with CESSAR assuming that t% interface information in

, CESSAR may not be complete.

i fl. Review of CESSAR optional syr,etts appropriate j to WPPSS, assumir.g tt.at they All be i incorporated vertatim into WT', (These are r.ew and spen'; fuel storag ). 'S1 PSAR.

I 1 7. hwt with WPPSS to discuss how tc treat probleet j identifled in 6 above 08/13/.'5 1 \

8. W)PSS to submit AmeMment 22, coriesponding to CESSAR Amendments 13 & 34 and re tolving open ite;ts 08/21/7!.

9. TF input to LPH revitIng SEF input, as necessary, i

tesed oi 08/29/71.

l l .,,... _ _

. ..... i, r .ucnein...*m um no * ............ - ... . . . ,, .......... ...

4 .

A, Special review for interfaces in item 6 above, as modified by meeting pecial myiew for options in item 6 above, as modified by meeting C. Results of review of WPPSS Amendments 18 through 20(CESSARAmendment32)

D. Results of review of WPPSS Amendment 21 (cosmitment to use options verbatim)

E. Any effect of CESSAR Supplement scheduled for issuance on 8/7/75 (TR revision of SER input was formerly scheduled for 7/29/75 based on WPPSS connitment to complete CESSAR update and furnish information on open items by7/1/75) i 10. WPPSS to submit Amendment 23, corresponding to CESSAR A wndment 35, dealing with options, interface changes, and resolving open items. (WPPSScannot turn CESSAR Amendment around in 2 weeks, as Palo Verde can, because of method of referencing CESSAR physical incorporation. WPPSS will provide statenant on 8/18/75 that they have reviewed Amendment 35 and either take no exceptions or identify problem areas) 09/04/75

11. Publish WPPSS SER based on Items I through 9 (SER i can report status of WPPSS position with regard to CESSAR Amendment 35 as stated in WPPSS letter i to be submitted 8/18/75 and state that, following docusentation in the PSAR we will I review the information and report results in the Supplement) 09/29/75

12. WPPSS Full ACRS Meeting 11/07/75 l

l

.. . .e . o. _ _

I

...m.m.

1 es,. o. .-

r.. ac.n. ir. . ,-9 8) AK.M 0243 W w. e. esvammusm? paintine opriese tote.ese lee l

1

4 s

ENCLOSURE 5 CHEROKEE /PERKINS(DUKE-6) MILESTONES

1. Duke-6 SER input (Input from SA8 AAB. EB not completed by 7/18/75. Input from other branches includes too many non-CESSAR unresolved issues for SERissuance) 06/16/75

2. Duke-6 Amendment No.17 incorporating same description of some systems described in CESSAR as optional systems and removing all connitments to CESSAR options 07/21/75

3. Complete outstanding input to SER (based on application through Amendment 16) under item 1 07/25/75

4. Complete special review of Duke-6 considering CESSAR as part of Duke-6 application and considering the removal of CESSAR options 08/08/75

5. Complete meetings on outstanding issues (items 1 and 4) with applicant 08/15/75

6. Additional TR input for Duke-6 SER to LPH (basedonitem5) 08/25/75

9. Duke-6 PSAR revisions incorporating changes in response to item 5 09/05/75

10. TR inputs on Duke-6 ECCS 09/15/75

11. Publish Duke 6 SER 11/04/75

12. Duke-6 ACRS Meeting 12/05/75 i

l l e... e _

e...... _ _

! ea'* * . _ _ _ - .....

e.,. 4rc.u. i n . , 9 8 i APO4 OM b. s. eevennesset painstesse arriees tora.eastee l

_ . . . _ - . . -. _. --- - . - - - - . _ . . - . . _ . - _ . . . _ _ _