ML20210Q138

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to in Which N Dacek Inquired About Surveys Being Performed at Neutron Products in Dickerson, Maryland
ML20210Q138
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/15/1993
From: Bernero R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Dacek N
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD
Shared Package
ML20210Q135 List:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-URFO NUDOCS 9708280160
Download: ML20210Q138 (6)


Text

..

,counctiwoxan Nancy Dacek Montg:mery County Council DEC 151993 Stella 8. Werner Council Office Building Rockville, MD 20850

Dear Counct1 woman Dacek:

I am responding to your letter dated November 15, 1993, to Chairman Selin in which you inquired about surveys performed at Neutron Products, Inc., in Dickerson, Maryland.

Specifically, you asked about information regarding the aerial background survey conducted and plans for the dissemination of survey results.

The purpose of the aerial survey was to determine the levels of natural background radiation and to detect the presence of man-made radiation surrounding the Neutron Products, Inc., site The aerial survey was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy and will supplement the Maryland Department of the Environment's inspection that was conducted with assistance from the U.S. Nuclear 'legulatory Commission.

-Preliminary results from the aeriki survey indicated that off-site radiation levels were not distinguishable from natural background radiation.

However, ground level surveys, also conducted during the inspection, did detect some isolated areas of low-level contamination immediately adjacent to the facility.

These survey results are consistent with prior surveys conducted by the State and the licensee. No adverse health effects would be expected from these quantities of cobalt-60. The results of the Maryland Department of the Environment inspection will be available to all interested parties in several weeks; however, aerial background survey results will not be available until February. A copy of both survey reports will be provided to you once we receive them.

I trust that this reply responds to your concerns, drhilcigned by Robxt M. Bcmsto Robert M. Bernero, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety cc:

R. Fletcher, Administrator Radiologia1 Health Program, MD DISTRIBUTION: (ED09578)

IM0B r/f NHSS r/f DMorris HLThompson IMNS r/f CPoland JBlaha JSniezek CEstep ED0 r/f EBeckjord RBangart NMSS Dir. Off.

OCA RVojteck, DOE (EG&G)

RNewlin, OPA g'es

  • See previous concurrence OFC
  • 1 MOB C
  • IM0B
  • IM0B
  • NMSS
  • 0SP
  • 0GC
  • 1MNS NAME AJones/aj/1 CJones FCombs CNorelius SSchwartz RFonner EWBrach b

sumeaNb muuas 0FC

NAME CPaperiello GArlotto RBe b '

DATE 12/13/93

/ /93

/dn793

~

C = COVER E = COVlR & ENCLOSURli N = NO COPY OFFICIAL RECORD COPY:

a:dacek.arj c.-o 9 J7 82 g o 931115 9708200156 PDR

'touncilwoman Nancy Dacek Montgomery County Council Stella B. Werner Council Office Building Rockville, MD 20850

Dear Councilwoman Dacek:

I am responding to your lettar dated November 15, 1993, to Chairman Selin where you inquired about surveys performed at Neutron Products, Inc., in Dickerson, Maryland. Specifically, you asked about information regarding the aerial background survey conducted and plans for the dissemination of survey results.

The purpose of the aerial survey wa. to determine the levels of natural background radiation and to detect the presence of man-made radiation surrounding the Neutron Products, Inc., site. The aerial survey was conducted 4

by the U.S. Department of Energy and will supplement the Maryland Department of. Environment's inspection that was conducted with assistance from the U. S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Preliminary results from the aerial survey indicated that off-site radiation levels were not distinguishable from natural background radiation.

However, ground level surveys, also conducted during the inspection did detect some isolated areas of low-level contamination immediately adjacent to the facility.

These survey results are consistent with prior surveys conducted by the State and the licensee.

No adverse health effects would be expected from these quantities of cobalt-60.

The results of the Maryland Department of Environment inspection will be available to all interested parties in several weeks; however, aerial background survey results will not be available until February. A copy of both survey reports will be provided to you once we receive them.

\\

! trust that this reply responds to your, concerns.

s Sincerely,

\\

Robert M.'Bernero, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards cc:

R. Fletcher, Administrator Radiologia1 Health Program, MD DISTRIBUTION: (ED09578)

IM0B r/f NHSS r/f DMorris HLThompson INNS r/f CPoland JBlaha JSniezek CEstep ED0 r/f EBeckjord RBangart NHSS Dir. Off.

OCA RVojteck, DOE (EG&G)

RNewlin, OPA.

  • See previous concurrence OFC
  • 1 MOB C
  • 1 MOB
  • IM0B
  • NMSS
  • 0SP
  • 0GC IMNS NAME AJones/aj/1 CJones FCombs CNorelius SSchwartz RFonner MBrach

.w wm w u.v ma m,y w.l.'w..m a.d n 0FC IMNS_/)

NMSS NMSS NAME CPapkrh110 GArlotto RBernero DATE W/d/93

/ /93

/ /93 C = COVER E = C0VlR & ENCLOSURR N = NO COPY OFFICIAL RECORD COPY:

a:dacek.arj

'.Counciltoman Nancy Dacek Nontgomery County Council Stella B. Wetaer Council Office Building Rockville, MD 20850

Dear Couacilwoman Dacek:

I am respondin to your letter dated November 15, 1993, to Chairman Selin where you ingu red about surveys performed at Neutron Products, Inc., in Dickerson, Maryland.

Specifically, you asked about information regarding the aerial background survey conducted and plans for the dissemination of survey results.

lhe purpose of the aerial survey was to determine the levels of natural background radiation and to detect the presence of man-made radiation surrounding the Neutron Products, Inc., site.

The aerial survey was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy and will supplement the Maryland Department of Environment's inspection that was conducted with assistance from the V. S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Preliminary results from the aerial survey indicated that off-site radiation levels were not distinguishable from natural background radiation.

However, ground level surveys, also conducted during the inspection did detect some isolated areas of low-leve1' contamination immediately adjacent to the facility. No adverse health' effects would be expected from these quantities of cobalt-60.

The results of'the Maryland Department of Environment inspection will be available to all interested parties in several weeks; however, aerial backgrr a survey results will not be available until February. A copy of bo, survey reports will be provided to you once we receive them.

I trust that this reply responds to your concerns.

Sincerely,

\\

RoberOM.Bernero, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety cc:

R. Fletcher, Administrator Radiologia1 Health Program, MD DISTRIB41[QH: (ED09578)

\\

IM0B r/f NMSS r/f DMorris HLThompson IMNS r/f CPoland JBlaha JSniezek CEstep ED0 r/f EBeckjord RBangart NMSS Dir. Off.

OCA RVojteck, DOE (EG&G)

  • See previous concurrence d

OFC

  • 1 MOB C
  • 1 MOB

- 1 MOB NHSS

_OSP, g

  • 0GC IMNS NAME AJones/aj/1 CJones FCombs C@obus [c$b RFonner EWBrach DATE 12/09/93 12/09/93-12/10/93 it / G/93 kO/93 12/10/93

/

/93 0FC IMHS NMSS NMSS NAME CPaperiello GArlotto RBernero DATE

/ :/93

/ /93

/ /93 C = COVER E = COVlR & ENCLOSDRE N = WO COPY OFFICIAL RECORD COPY:

a:dacek.arj

'Councilwo an Nancy Dacek Montgomery Ccunty Council Stella B. Werner Council Office Building Rockville, MD 20850

Dear Councilwoman Dacek:

I am responding to your letter dated November 15, 1993, to Chairm:n Selin where you inquired about surveys performed at Neutron Products, Inc., in Dickerson, Maryland.

Specifically, you asked about information regarding the aerial background survey conducted and plans for the dissemination of survey results.

The purpose of the aerial survey was to determine the levels of natural backgrounri radiation and to detect the presence of man-made radiation surrounding the Neutron Products, Inc., site. The aerial survey was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy and will supplement the Maryland Department of Environment's inspection that was conducted with assistance from the U. S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Preliminary results from the aerial survey indicated that off-site radiation levels were not distinguishable from natural background radiation.

The results of the Maryland Department of Environment inspection will be available to all interested parties in several weeks; however, aerial background survey results will not be available until February.

A copy of both survey reports will be provided to you once we receive them.

I trust that this reply responds to your concerns.

Sincerely, t

Robert M. Bernero, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards cc:

R. fletcher, Administrator Radiologia1 Health Program, MD DISTRIBUTI0B: (ED09578)

IM0B r/f NHSS r/f DMorris HLThompson IMNS r/f CPoland JBlaha JSniezek CEstep EDO r/f EBeckjord RBangart NMSS Dir. Off.

OCA RVojteck, DOE (EG&G)

RNewlin, OPA

  • See previous concurrence OFC
  • 1 MOB C
  • 1 MOB INo{l NMSS OSP Of&i, _ d IMNSl NAME AJones/aj/1 CJones 70hs CNorelius SSchwartz d EWBrach mumm muum useum num man-0FC IMNS NHSS NMSS NAME CPaperiello GArlotto RBernero DATE

/ -/93

/- /93

/ /93 C = COVER E = COVLR & ENCLOSURB N = NO COPY OFFICIAL RECORD COPY:

a:dacek.arj

.- ' 'Councilmember Nancy Dacek Montgomery County Council Stella B. Werner Council Office Building Rockville, MD 20B50

Dear Councilmember Dacek:

l I am writing-in response to your letter dated November 15, 1993, to l

Chairman Selin.wherein you inquired about surveys performed at Neutron Products,Inc.\\inDickerson, Maryland.

Specifically, you asked about F

information re rding the aerial background survey conducted and plans for the disseminat o of survey results.

The purpose of the'saerial survey was to determine the levels of natural background radiatio'n and to detect the presence of man-made radiation surrounding the Neutr,on Products, Inc., site. The aerial survey was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy and will supplement the Maryland Department of Environment's inspehtion that was conducted with assistance from the V. S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Preliminary results indicated that radiation levels were not distinguishable from natural background radiation outside of an approximate 1000 foot hadius of the plant. Within that radius, the external levels of radittion from the plant combined witn the high sensitivity of the equipment made it im'possible to distinguish the presence of low levels of radioactive contamination \\ However, ground surveys around the facility did 4

detect some 1:/ lated areas orglow level radioactive contamination.

No adverse health effects would be expected from these levels of radiation.

\\

The Maryland Department of Environment ins)ection report will be issued in a few weeks, and will be available to the pu)11r the aerial background survey report will be available in late february. A copy of both survey reports will be provided to you upon their completion and receipt by the NRC.

I hope that this information is resp \\o(isive to your letter.

\\

Sincerely.

Robert M. E,ernero, Director Office.of Nuclear Material Safety and safeguards cc:

R. Fletcher Administrator Radiologia1 llealth Program, MD Dhl? Jell 03: (ED09578)

IM0B '/f NMSS r/f DMorris f(Thompson IMNS r/

CPoland JBlaha JShiezek CEstep E00 r/f EBeckjord RBah art NMSS Dir. Off.

OCA RVojteck, DOE (EG&G)

RNewlin, OPA s

0FC IM0B h IM0Bn Ol IMDB NMSS OhP OGC IMNS NAME AJod/h/1 CN FCombs CNorelius SSchhartz RFonner EWBrt 5 s

r.d>

u.id>

ur m2 u.s. un

. un 0FC IM E e NMSS NMSS NAME CPapd11o GArlotto RBernero DATE

'IF/ t1/93

/ /93

/ /93 C = C0VER E = COViR & ENCLOSURR N = NO COPY

~

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY:

a:dacek.arj

._--,,n.-.

, -., -.,,- -.~..~.,,

c

,.nn

ROUT!".3 AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE: December 10, 1993

                                                                                                                                • r*************

j INITIAL DAl[

l

/b 1

I

1. AJones "h
2. CJones

)

Pfl0

3. FCombs
4. CNorelius h4 I.b.

L. Schwartz

6. Monner M4

'b

7. [WBrach'

___O _

/P4Jd/

k N

8. CPaperiello

/y,-

8.-GArlotto

9. RBernoro ACTION:

CIRCULATED: FOR YOUR INFO:

APPROVAL:

COMMENT:

SEE ME:

4 i

AS REQUESTED:

NOTE AND RE1 URN:

PREPARE REPLY:

COORDINATION:

PER CONVERSATION:

TICKET NUMBER:! LOO 9878-REMARKS DUE TO DIVISION:

12/17/93

/o/2./.6*#r# # # #

DUE TO NMSS:

12/17/93:

DUE TO EDO:

12/21/93

,A al-o MO95%h

            • w.******************************

MEMOPANDUM/ LETTER FOR: Councilmember Nancy Dacek FROM:

Robert.M. Bernero.-NMSS.;

SUBJECT:

RESPONDING LETTER 11/15/93, TD (.dAIRMAN SELIN RE:

SURVEYS PERFORMED AT NEUTRON PRODUCTS, INC.

ORIGINATOR / SECRETARY: AJONES/ Phone: C04-2624 ROOM NO./ BLDG.:

i kf; W" b 1$ $4t*O 44W YY e

f,1p g *Ls ISO &

me

~. --

,-.a.

i*p uau,I\\

UNITED STATES

  • y'*

.j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION wasHisctoN. D C. 20006 0001 j

DEC 151993

%,, * *. * * /

Councilwoman Nancy Dacek Montgomery County Council Stella B. Werner Council Office Building Rockville, :10 20850

Dear Councilwoman Dacek:

I am respondin to your letter dated November 15, 1993, to Chairman Selin in whichyouinqu$redaboutsurveysperformedatNeutronProducts,Inc.,in Specifically, you asked about information regarding the Dickerson, Maryland.

aerial background survey conducted and plans for the dissemination of survey results.

The purpose of the aerial survey was to determine the levels of natural background radiation and to detect the presence of man-made radiation surrounding the Neutron Products, Inc., site. The aerial survey was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy and will supplement the Maryland Department of the Environment's inspection that was conducted with assistance from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission.

Preliminary results from the aerial survey indicated that off-site radiation levels were not distinguishable from natural background radiation. However, ground level surveys, also aonducted during the inspection, did detect some isolated areas of low-level aontamination d amediately adjacent to the facility. These surve/ results are consistent with prior surveys conducted by the State and the licensee. No adverse health effects would be expected from these quantities of cobalt-60. The results of the Maryland Department of the Environment inspection will be available to all interested parties in several weeks; however, aerial background survey results will not be available until February. A copy of both survey reports will be provided to you once we receive them.

I trust that this reply responds to your concerns.

Sincerely,

,' j./

Robert M. Bernero, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safegt.ards cci R. Fletcher, Administrator Radiologia1 Health Program, MO

_