ML20210M733
| ML20210M733 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 04/14/1986 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| ANPP-36090-EEVB, DER-85-38-R1, NUDOCS 8605020353 | |
| Download: ML20210M733 (5) | |
Text
-
o FE avEn NT:C Arizona Nuclear Power,Pfojecy 7 PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85072-F032 b7,D 4
P.o box 52034 e April 14,49,86m/LAS/DRL-92.11 ANPP-36090 N8d,,,
d U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane - Suitt 210 Walnut Creek, CA 9459'-5368 Attention:
Mr. D. F. Ki rsch, Acting Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) -
Units 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50/529/ 530
Subject:
Interim Report - DER 85-38, Revision 1 A 50.55(e) Potent'lally Reportable Deficiency Relating To QA Audit at General Electric File: 86-019-026 ; 86-056-026 ; D.4.33.2
Reference:
(A) Telephone Conversation between A. Hon and T. P. Siegfried on November 8, 1985 (Initial Reportability - DER 85-38)
(B) ANPP-34165, dated December 4, 1985 (Interim Report - DER 85-38)
(C) ANPP-34397, dated January 3, 1986 (Time Extension - DER 85-38)
(D) ANPP-35134, dated February 14, 1986 (Time Extension - DER 85-38)
(E) ANPP-35514, dated March 13, 1986 (Time Extension - DER 85-38)
Dear Sir:
The NRC was notified of a potentially reportable deficiency in Reference (A), an Interim Report by Reference (B), and Time Extensions by References (C); (D), and (E).
Due to the extensive investigation and evaluation required, an Interim Report, Revision 1, is attached.
It is now expected that this information will be finalized by Fay 14, 1986, at which time a complete report will be submitted.
Very truly yours, 8605020353 860414 1M PDR ADOCK 05000529 S
PDR E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
~
Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/DRL/1df 1df/001/ DER 85-38 Attachment (s)
I l cc: See Page Two f
.L' -J 7
a April 14, 1986 ANPP-36090-EEVB/LAS/DRL-92.11 DER 85-38 Interim Report, Rev. 1 Mr. D. F. Kirsch Acting Director Page 2 cc:
J. M. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 A. C. Gehr (4141)
R. P. Zimmerman (6295)
Records Center Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1100 Circle 75 Parkway - Suite 1500 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 1
Idf/001/CrbnCpy
INTERIM REPORT - DER 85-38, REVISION 1 POTENTIAL REPORTABLE DEFICIENCY ARIZONA NUCLEAR POWER PROJECT PVEGS UNITS 2 AND 3 I.
Potential Problem Bechtel Procurement Supplier Quality Department (PSQD) conducted an audit
(#85-218) at the General Electric Company (GE), Philadelphia, PA, plant on October 16-17, 1985. As a result of the audit, sir Audit Finding Reports (AFR) were issued to identify a lack of compliance with the quality program requirements as stated in Bechtel specification 13-EM-009. Purchase Orders not shipped by October,1985, were placed on hold, pending satisfactory resolution of AFR's.
Two of these AFR's required evaluation for safety significance:
AFR 1 Procurement documents to GE Subvendors do not contain any of the necessary quality requirements for equipment supplied to Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS).
AFR 2 Purchase Orders to GE Subvendors did not include the requirements for the qualification of equipment to procurement specification 13-EM-009 and the requirements of ANSI N45.2.2, for equipment supplied to PVNGS.
II.
Approach to and Status of Proposed Resolution A re-audit of GE was performed by Bechtel PSQD, on March 12 through 14, 1986. The results of this re-audit closed AFR No. 6, however, AFR No.1 remains open. GE has initiated corrective action to ensure that future purchase orders to subvendors contain applicable quality requirements.
Therefore, the Hold-On-Shipment restriction has been removed. GE is in the process of evaluating past procurements to determine those purchase orders which require corrective action in order that AFR 1 may be closed.
In addition to the above, materials supplied by GE since the inception of their computer generated purchase order system were evaluated and grouped into the following categories:
Category A All required qualification traceability for safety related application is available.
Category B These items are not qualified. Traceability to qualification reports is not possible.
Category C These items are not qualified. Traceability to qualific.ition reports has not been substantiated.
INTERIM REPORT - DER 85-38 Revision 1 Page Two l
Category D i
These items were not originally qualified for PVNGS, however, they have received qualification testing.
4 Those items in Category "A" have no impact on safety, as proper certification is available.
4 i
Those items listed in Category B require return to GE.
All items in Category B have been placed on hold (quarantine) with the following i
exceptions:
i i
Field purchase order F-176604 - one item has been issued to unit three for installation in equipment tag no. 3E-PBB-S04C.
One item has been issued to unit one for installation under work order No. 124280 in j
location 1E-NAN-502N.
Field purchase order F-175187 - one item has been issued to unit three j
for installation at location 3E-PBB-SO4M.
t Field purchase order F-176190 - one ites has been issued to unit three for installation at location 3J-RMN-B01.
1 The above items have been identified on NCR RX 875. This NCR is presently under evaluation by project engineering.
Those items listed in Categories "C" and "D" will be evaluated by ANPP l
Engineering and GE as applicable, if the items are installed to determine j
safety impact.
If the items are not installed they will be returned to GE.
i III. Projected Completion of Corrective Action and Submittal of the Final Report i
The expected completion of t required engineering evaluations return of unused /uninstalled equipment, and closure of AFR 1 is forecast for May 14, 1986.
I
r-4 INTERIM REPORT - DFR 85-38 Revision 1 Page Three
REFERENCES:
A.
Report of Audit, Bechtel letter from J. Milandin to J. Simpson of GE, dated October 30, 19885.
B.
Corrective Action Reports, GE letter from J. H. Simpson to J. Milandin of Bechtel, dated November 18, 1985.
C.
GE Response, GE letter from C. M. Lombardo to D. Eshleman of Bechtel, dated January 14, 1986.
D.
GE letter from C. M. Lombardo to E. E. Van Brunt, Jr. of ANPP, dated March 14, 1986.
E.
Report of Audit, Bechtel letter from S. I. Heisler to J. H. Simpson of GE, dated March 24, 1986.
F.
Report of Re-audit, Bechtel letter from S. I. Heisler to J. H. Simpson of GE, dated March 24, 1986.
\\
\\
\\