ML20210L075
| ML20210L075 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 04/24/1986 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210L080 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8604290169 | |
| Download: ML20210L075 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000373/1986001
Text
,
-
1
w.
.
.
--
APR 2 41986
.. Docket No. 50-373
Docket No; 50-374
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
Vice President
. Post ~0ffice Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. T. Ploski and
others of this office on April 7-10, 1986, of activities at the LaSalle County
Station, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Operating Licenses No. NPF-11 and
No. NPF-18, and to the discussion of our Tindings with Messrs. G. Diederich
_
and D. Scott and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
inspection. However, several weaknesses were identified which will require
corrective action by your staff.
These weaknesses are summarized in the
appendix to this letter.
As required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix E(IV.F), any
-weaknesses.that are identified must be corrected.
Accordingly, please advise
us within-45 days of the date of this letter of the corrective actions you
have.taken or plan to take regarding these weaknesses, including the estimated
~
dates of completion.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC
Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance
procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
8604290169 860424"
/
g\\'Cg'.~)
ADOCK 05000373
r
G
0
g\\
'li
-
..
_
.
.-
,
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
gg4
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
.
"Jriginal ct;r.cd ty S,0. Shaf#
W. D. Shafer, Chief
Radiological Protection Branch
Enclosures:
-1.
Appendix - Exercise Weaknesses
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-373/86001(DRSS);
No. 50-374/86001(DRSS)-
cc w/ enclosures:
D. L. Farrar, Director
of Nuclear Licensing
G. J. Diederich, Plant
Manager
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
General's Office, Environmental
Control Division
D. Matthews, EPB, OIE
D. Perrotti, EPB, OIE
W. Weaver, FEMA, Region V
.
RIII
III
RIII
RIII
RIII
RII
R(
LAEN
\\t4A
LN
lJGY
I
Ploski'mj
en
Savith
Williamsen
Snell
[ right
/
/
- (Y
lh *
?
, 'S
fe'
yes
'
s/n
- -
- -
- - -
---
-
.
-
- -
- -
.
- - -
- .
-
- - -
- -
-
-
-
-
.. .
'
.
APPENDIX
EXERCISE WEAKNESSES
1.
The licensee failed to adequately inform the State and the NRC
Operations Center of both changes in plant conditions that warranted
Alert declarations.
(50-373/86001-01; 50-374/86001-01) (Sections 5a
+
and Sb)
<
2.
The post-accident sampling team failed to follow procedural guidance
in LZP 1330-24 regarding specified time periods to perform procedure
steps, and to adequately demonstrate good Health Physics practices when
collecting, handling, and transporting samples.
(50-373/86001-02;
50-374/86001-02) (Section 5d)
3.
Certain EOF staff failed to follow adequate procedure guidance when
formulatinp the initial offsite protective action recommendation
following the General Emergency declaration.
(50-373/86001-03;
50-374/86001-03) (Section Se)
4 .-
The licensee's EOF and JPIC staffs failed to adequately coordinate
the timing of messages to State officials via the NARS with press
briefings regarding the initiation and termination of the release.
(50-373/86001-04; 50-374/86001-04) (Section Sg)
4
e