ML20210G549

Notice of Deviation from Insp on 861102-870102

ML20210G549
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	02/06/1987
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20210G542	List: IR 05000498/1986033 ML20210G537 ML20210G549
References
50-498-86-33, NUDOCS 8702110294
Download: ML20210G549 (1)

Text

V .

t.f APPENDIX A NOTICE OF DEVIATION Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P) Docket: 50-498 South Texas Project, Unit 1 Permit: CPPR-128 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted Hovember 2,1986, through January 2,1987, a deviation from your commitments was identified. The deviation consisted of failure to make available preoperational test procedures for NRC review within approximately 60 days of scheduled testing. In accordance with the " General Statement.of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

10 CFR Part 2, Appendix.C (1986), the deviation is listed below: ,

HL&P Final Safety Analysis Report, Section 14.2.11.5, Amendment 53, states, in part, "It is planned to have preoperational and initial startup test procedures available for examination by interested parties approximately 60 days prior to their scheduled use in the field, and not less than 60 days prior to fuel load."

In deviation from the above, Preoperational Test Procedure 1-RC-P-02, " Hot Functional Test (HFT)," Revision 0 was issued to the NRC on November 19,

• 1986, and scheduled for performance to coninence on January 15,1987,(57 days later) without the 86 modified operating procedures and 5 support preoperational test procedures necessary to perform the HFT. These supporting documents had not been made available to the NRC staff on January 2,1987. The HFT was scheduled to begin in January 1987.

(498/8633-01)

Houston Light & Power Company is hereby requested to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter trammitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for the deviation: (1) the reason for the deviation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid

further deviations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be acheived.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

l l

Dated at Arlington, Texas this(ce day of jfd ua 1987 1

gaigggy 730$ e G

I