ML20210A265

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-289/86-01.Insp on 870323-26 Examined Corrective & Preventive Actions Taken. Actions Acceptable
ML20210A265
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/23/1987
From: Johnston W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Hukill H
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8705050050
Download: ML20210A265 (3)


See also: IR 05000289/1986001

Text

.

s

p-

.-

APR 2 3 1987

Docket No. 50-289

GPU Nuclear Corporation

ATTN: Mr. H. D. Hukill

Vice President and Director of TMI-1

P. O. Box 480

2

Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection 50-289/86-01

This refers to your letter dated May 2,1986, in response to our letter dated

April 1, 1986.

In your response, you disagreed with our finding as being a

violation and you reiterated your disagreement in a follow-up letter dated

'

September 17, 1986.

)

Following a management meeting held at the NRC Region I office to resolve this

issue, you committed to require the use of respiratory protection gear and

]

protective clothing by at least two drill participants. An inspection of your

program on March 23-26, 1987 examined the corrective and preventive actions you

j

have taken in this area and found them acceptable,

a

j

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

.Oricinal sima p.r:

!

William V. Johnston, Acting Director

i

Division of Reactor Safety

Region I

i

i

cc w/ enc 1:

R. J. Toole, Operations and Maintenance Director, TMI-1

1

C. W. Smyth, Manager, TMI-1 Licensing

i

R. J. McGoey, Manager, PWR Licensing

E. L. Blake, Jr., Esquire

I

TMI-1 Hearing Service List

!

Public Document Room (PDR)

[

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

i

NRC Resident Inspector

Commor.vealth of Pennsylvania

}

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL TMIl 86-01 - 0001.0.0

04/16/87

0705050050 870423

'

PDR

ADOCK 05000289

G

PM

. .

__

.

.

__

-

.

.

_ _ _ . _ _

..

__

_ _ _

_

.

.

o

9

GPU Nuclear Corporation

2

bcc w/ enc 1:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

W. D. Travers, Director, TMI-2 Cleanup Project Directorate

J. Goldberg, OELD: HQ

DRP Section Chief

John Thoma, PM, NRR

K. Abraham, PA0

Robert J. Bores, DRSS

SEE PREVIOUS WHITE

-

RI:DRS

RI:DRS

RI:DRS

{r o culos

Ander on

Durr

,

4/9/87

4/20/87

4//6/87

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL TMIl 86-01 - 0002.0.0

01/16/87

.

-

-

-

..

.

.

/

Operations

18

'

50-289

TMI-1 Hearing Service List

Sheldon J. Wolfe, Chairman

Bruce W. Churchill, Esquire

Administrative Judge

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge

Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel

2300 N Street, N.W.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C.

20037

Washington, D.C.

20555

Dr. Oscar H. Paris

Atomic Safety & Licensing Board

'

Administrative Judge

Panel

Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C.

20555

Washington, D.C.

20555

Frederick J. Shon

Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal

Administrative Judge

Board Panel

Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C.

20555

Washington, D.C.

20555

,

Joanne Doroshow, Esquire

Docketing & Service Section

l

Three Mile Island Alert, Inc.

Office of the Secretary

i

315 Peffer Street

U.S. Nuclear Re ;1atory Commission

Harrrisburg, PA 17102

Washington, D.C.

20555

Louise Bradford

Mary E. Wagner, Esquire

1011 Green Street

Office of Executive Legal Director

Harrisburg, PA 17102

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

!

Thomas Y. Au

USNRC

Assistant Counsel Commonwealth

Resident Inspector

of Pennsylvania

Box 311

Dept. of Environmental Resources

Middletown, PA 17057

Bureau of Environmental Resources

Room 505, Executive House

,

P. O. Box 2357

4

Harrisburg, PA 17120

\\

!

!

i

-

-

- -

-

-

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I

.

.

.

,

=

. .

GPU Nuclear Corporation

NQgIgf

Post Office Box 480

Route 441 South

Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057-0191

717 944 7621

TELEX 84 2386

Writer's Direct Dial Number:

Pay 2,1986

5211-86-2078

Dr. Thomas E. Murley

Region I, Regional Adninistrator

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

631 Park Avenue

King of Prussia, PA 19406

Dear Dr. Murley:

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1 (TMI-1)

Operating License No. DPR-50

Docket No. 50-289

Notice of Violation - Inspection Report 86-01

Enclosed is the GPUN response to the Notice of Violation in Appendix A of

Inspection Report 50-289/86-01.

Sincerely,

)

. D.

utill

Director, TMI-1

HDH/SM0/spb:0574A

cc:

R. Conte

Enclosure

Sworn and subscribegto

before me this y

day

0*

U

d[

'

ueOA t. MTTit, no1Aff PUSUC

moeuTown sce000H, DAUPHIN COUNTY

_ 7[

m As o iIt n e No

hfhi([

s_

p.

e ennsy

es

Notary Puvl1C

<

'

GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Public Utilities Corporation

.

.

.

. .

.

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

During an NRC inspection conducted between January 10, 1986, and February 7,

1986, violations of NRC requirements were identified.

In accordance with the

" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Action,"

10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is set forth below.

Technical Specification 6.4.2 requires that a training

program for the fire brigade shall meet or exceed the

requirements of NFPA Standard 10. 27, 1976 edition.

One

NFPA 27 training requirement is that fire brigade members

responding to a drill wear respiratory protection apparatus.

Contrary to the above, on February 6,1986, it was observed

that fire brigade members responded to a fire drill without

the required respiratory protection apparatus.

4

-1 -

-

-

.

.-

.

. - - . _

.

.-

- . . . - .

_ . - - _ -

-.

l

. *

!'

!

RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION

l

t

!

i

GPUN disagrees with the violation in Inspection Report 86-01.

TNI-1 TS 6.4.2 states a training program for the Fire Brigade shall meet or

i

j

exceed the requirements of Section 27 of the NFPA Code-1976

NFPA-27, Part 52

!

j

states:

"In drills, equipment should be operated whenever possible. For

i

example, portable extinguishers should be actually discharged, respiratory

l

protective equipment should be operated and water should be turned into hose

li nes . "

I

On February 6,1986, an inspector observed a fire drill where brigade members

j

responded without respiratory protection apparatus.

This was viewed as a

j

violation of TS 6.4.2.

-

The purpose of the Fire Brigade, as stated in the TMI-1 Fire Protection Plan,

is to:

!

!

1.

protect the health and safety of the public and employees,

l

!

2.

maintain the plant in a safe, stable condition,

i

3.

limit damage from the fire, and

i

4.

contain and eliminate the fire.

l

To fulfill this purpose, we feel drills should reflect the type of fire

i

problems which the brigade may face. Further, the NFPA Code does not require

all drills to include the use of all equipment. The drill scenario

establishes the type of equipment required.

During the drill observed by the

.

i

inspector, the initial action taken by the first responders of the brigade

!

,

i

extinguished the fire prior to the situation developing into one which would

i

require respiratory protection. Two Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)

j

were required to be brought to the scene by brigade members per Procedure

EP 1202-31, " Fire. " One. brigade member passed the equipment locker on the way

j

to the scene and responded in turn-out gear, one SCBA was at the scene.

The

j

second SCBA was not at the scene since the man assigned to bring the SCBA did

i

not respond due to a page system problem.

The brigade, based on the fire

i

conditions given by the scenario and controlled by the observers, extinguished

'

{

the fire properly and promptly, and therefore, the particular situation did

not require respiratory protection.

i

,

j

It should be noted that the brigade did not receive credit for the observed

drill because there was not a full brigade response.

,

t

k

,

--

,

l

i

l

!

l

4

.-

., . . - . . - - . , , - - , , _

-,-- - -,- - -- - . . . _ , - - , - - , - , . - , . - _ _ , , - - . . , , - . , - , , - . - . - - - - . _ . . . , - _ ~

-

,

-

.

.' .

.'

.

Typically, fire brigack drills involve the use of respiratory equipment.

There are drills, though, such as the drill observed by the inspector, that do

not.

This is in support of the conclusion that small, localized electrical

fires are the most typical type, as documented in fire reports. Also,

NPFA-27, Part 51 states:

" Practice drills should be held to check the ability

of members to perform the operations they are expected to carry out with the

fire equipment provided."

In conclusion, we feel our fire brigade training program does meet NFPA-27 and

provides the experience necessary to fulfill the purpose of the Fire Brigade

at TMI-1.

i

-3-

_. -_ _-

..

.

JAN 14 '87 09:47

HRC TLR TMI UNIT 1

P02

6;QY

"

.

.

,

.

.

NU$I%f

GPU Nuoleet Corporation

Post Office Box 4so

Route 441 South

Midd

. Pennsylvante 17o57 0191

TELEX 84 23aa

Writer's Direct Oial Number:

Sestamber 17. 1986

52'1-86-2155

l'

Dr Thomas E. Murley .

Region i Regional' Attninistrator

U.$; Nuclear Regulatory' Commtssion

631 Park Avenue

King of Prussia PA 19406

Dear Dr. Murleyt

Three Mile 11an.d Nuclea/ Station, Unit I, (TMI-1)

4

Opertflag"1.icense No. DPR-50

' Doc cet No. 50-289

Meet 1{ o~ri Fire Brigade Training Program

Ort Au ust 12, 1986, GPUWepersonnel met with Region 1 personnel to discuss the

TMt F re BrigadoxTraffli*hg Probram and5the contested violation in Inspection

.)

Report 86-01; Aspects of the training program discussed were:

,

training at the trurn building

,

role of support personnel at drills

documentation of drills

determining credit for drills

  • complexity of drill scenarios

i

The contested violation in Inspection Report 86-01 concerned an alleged

violation of a section of NFPA-27

The issue was the use of respiratory

protection apparatus during drills. A A' frill was observed by an inspector

where two brigade members did not arrfys with respiratory protection

apparatus. A violation was issued by the inspector although credit had not

been given for the drill. GPUN still contends this was not a valid violation.

A review of drill data for January 1 through August 12, 1986 showed that for

all drills except the one observed by the inspector, at Icast two brigade

members arrived.in turnout gear and at least two respiratory protection

apparatus were brought. This information was provided to the NRC at the

1,LO40917

gDR

ADOCK 050

9

fu o s i\\e

/

OPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Pubile Utilities Corporation

W6-4 8 4

,

!

INA U a

_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. _ . . _ - . - - - - _ _ - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - -

-

--

- - - - ~ ~

JbH14'870'9:48

HRC TLR TMI UNIT 1

P03

.-

,

.

.

.

.

5211-86-2155

-2-

September 17, 1986

,,

,

V

August 12th meeting. .Sinci'this has been routinely accomplished GPlM has

agreed to include the requirveent for two fire brigade members to obtain, don

'and utilize full turn.:ut gear and res01ratory protection apparatus during a

drill as one of the ob.fectives of 44C1 drill.

.

5incerely,

h11

Vice President 4 Of ttetor, TMI-1

HDH/900/sp6'

,

cc:

R. Conte

oCIA

.

k

.

.

8

..

O