ML20209C601
| ML20209C601 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 11/08/1983 |
| From: | Johnston W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-1469 NUDOCS 8311180053 | |
| Download: ML20209C601 (17) | |
Text
^ ' DISTRIBUTION:
~~*
, 1 gE3tece
~
WJohnston
. NOy 0 81983 WRegan KCampe .
ABrauner 1
Docket No. 50-508 MEMORANDUM FOR: . Thomas H. Novak, Assistant Director l
for Licensing, DL ;
FR04: William V. Johnston, Assistant Director for Materials, Chemical and Environmental Technology, DE
SUBJECT:
WNP-3 DRAFT SER INPlK PLANT HAME: WNP-3 LICENSING STAGE: .OL LICENSING BRANCH: LB-3, ANNETTE VIETTI, LPM SAB REVIEWER: A. BRAUNER REQUESTED COMPLETION DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1983 REVIEW STATUS: SAB SAFETY REVIEW CONTINUING Attached are Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the Washington Muclear Project-3 (! IMP-3) draft SER from the Site Analysis Branch. We have identified several open items. One pertains to the applicant's authority to establish complete control of all activity at the site (i.e., easements for certain land areas, roads, etc.)
which is still being negotiated (Q311.4 response dated 6/12/83). Another is the population discrepancies identified during the site visit (0311.5 response dated 6/2/83). The third is in regard to the applicant's analysis of airplane crashes (Q311.3 response dated 1/17/83). In addition, AEB is investigating the offects of several toxic cases (aqueous amonia and sulfur di' oxide) on control room habitability and is considering this as an open item.
This draft was prepared by Al Brauner of the Site Analysis Branch.
CRIGINAL sramm William V. Johnston, Assistant Of rector for Materials, Chemical and Environmental Technology
Attachment:
Draft Ser Input cc: G --
eameoosa sauce g ADOCK 0500050e )(.8 1 o,==>f ._ q ,iigSAE! Y'TJ .. d g CET
>= a-l Br L, ,
.11 KCam WR
. g. . . fs . . n.F WJohnston
- * * * = .
"** 6 83 /0 /9//,83 , ijj, / p/,83 //,,/ </83
,]. ,
e
~
WNP-3 DRAFT SER 2.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2.1 GE0 GRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY The July 1981 edition of " Standard Review Plan for the review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants," (SRP, NUREG-0800) includes Chapter 2, Site Characteristics. The Washington Nuclear Project 3 (WNP-3) was reviewed in accordance with Section 2.1.1, 2.1. 2, an d 2.1. 3. The results of this review are contained in Section 2.1 of this Safety Evaluation Report.
2.1.1 ' SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site for WNP-3, which was formerly proposed as a two unit site, consists of 2450 acres located in southeastern Grays Harbor-County in the western part of the state of Washington. Figure 2.1 shows the site location including the low population zone '(LPZ), and the surrounding area within 4 miles. The principal plant features in conjunction with the exclusion area and site boundary lines (including land ownership) are shown in Figure 2.2. The area within 50 miles of the site is shown in Figure 2.3. Figure 2.4 shows the site location relative to various transportation routes and transmission lines. These include the Chehalis and Satsop rivers, the Union Pacific and Burlington Northern railroad lines, an eight inch natural gas pipeline, the BPA transmission lines, and U.S.
Highway 12, as well as other local roads. As shown in Figures 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4, WNP-3 is located about 1.25 miles south of the Chehalis Diver near its junction with the Satsop River. The site is situated on a ridae above the Chehalis River in an area that is generally rural in nature and so.arsely populated but extensively
n,
- J 2
used for timber production, with some scattered farmlands in the fertile river bottom lands. The city of Olympia, the capitol of Washington, is about 26 miles east and the cities of Aberdeen-Hoquiam, Washington are approximately 20 miles west of the site. Tacoma, Washington is the largest populated area in the vicinity and is located' 50 miles northeast. The coordinates of WMP-3 are 46* 57' 34" north latitude and 123* 28' 15" west longitude. The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates are 5,200,546 meters north and 464,176 meters east, in zone 10.
2.1.2 EXCLUSION AREA AUTHORITY AND CONTROL The exclusion area for the WNP-3 site is defined as a circular area with a 4300 foot (1310 meter) radius measured from the center of the reactor .contiin-ment building. The applicant owns 1120 acres of the site in which the exclusion area is located. The rest of the site area is owned by private corporations or individuals, but under the control of the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) by agreement with the owners. These agreements provide easements to the land. All of the mineral rights within the designated exclusion area will be either owned or leased by the appifcant. Activities that occur within the exclusion area that are unrelated to plant operations are those associated with tree farming, and transmission line maintenance. Approximately 30 persons and associated temporary structures and facilities may be located within the exclusion area from time to time in order to conduct tinber farning activities.
These activities are subject to prior planning and approval by the applicant.
In addition, by agreement with WPPSS, personnel from the Bonneville Power
j .
3 Administration (BPA) will be conducting maintenance in the BPA transmission corridor falling within the exclusion area boundary. There are no residents living within the exclusion area and there are no major highways, railways, or waterways traversing the area. However, there is some vehicular traffic on the access roads leading to the plant and on portions of the BPA corridor. Easements for these portions of'the exclusion area are being negotiated with Grays Harbor County and the BPA. The applicant does not anticipate any problems in obtaining the necessary authorization for . controlling this area. Keyes Road will be aban-doned and the applicant expects to provide the county with an appropriate right-of-way to run another road through the site. The applicant is making arrangements to control and, if necessary, evacuate the exclusion area in the event of an emer-gency. Section 13.3 of this report will provide more details on these arrangements when they are finalized.
We conclude that when the negotiations to acquire the approorf ate easements, and subsequently obtain full control are completed, the applicant will have the authority and will be able to control all activity unrelated to plant operations within the exclusion area as required by 10 CFR Part 100. We also conclude that the activities unrelated to plant operation within the exclusion area will not interfere with nonnal plant operation.
2.1.3 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION The resident population in the vicinity of the WNP-3 site is shown as a function
'of distance in ths table below. The year 2030 is the nearest census year to 6
^
9a 4
TABLE 2.1 RESIDENT POPULATION VS DISTANCE YEAR 0-1 0-2 0-3 0-4 0-5 0-10 Miles Miles Miles Miles Miles Miles 1 980 15 109 906 3061 5867 15165 1990 16 119 1000 3363 6519 16915 2030 20 163 1506 4989 10130 27103 The closest resident lives about one mile (1609 meters) f' rom the site. The nearest communities in the vicinity of the site with a population of more than 1000 persons are the cities of Elma, located about four miles northeast with a population of 2720 in 1980, and Montesano, which is about six miles west-northwest with a 1980 population of 3247. The closest large communities nearby are the cities of Aberdeep'Hoquiam, located approximately 20 miles west of the site. This combined area had a population of 35,170 in 1980. The population within five miles of the site in 1980 was 5867, and within ten miles it was 15,165.
As indicated in Table 2.1, the population within five miles of the site is expected to increase by about 3600 persons during the life of the plant. The applicant re-ported that there were 514,954 people living within 50 miles of the site in 1980, and this number is expected to increase to 646,145 by 1990. By the year 2030 the population within 50 miles of WHP-3 is expected to reach 1,012,502. Olympia, the capitol of Washington, is about 26 miles east of the site and had a population of 27,447 in 1980. The largest city near the site is Tacoma, Washington, located i
j - about 50 miles northeast, with a 1980 population of 158,501. The applicant pre- I
! dicts a population growth rate of about 1.36% per year for the area within 50 miles of the site during the life of the plant as compared to a growth rate of i
I about 0.87% per year predicted by the U.S. Sureau of Economic Analysis (PEA) for ,
! 'this area. The staff made an, independent assessment of the population within
[ . _
1 5
~
50 miles of the plant for the year 2030, based on Bureau of the Census data, and estimated a growth rate of about 0.807, per year. Comparing the staff's estimate and the BEA predictions indicates that the applicant's projections are conservative. .
L The applicant has designated a low population zone (LPZ) for the site which is i a circular area with a three mile (4827 meter) radius measured from the midpoint of the centerline between unit 3 and the previously planned unit 5. Except for the Chehalis and Satsop Rivers, the LPZ consists mostly of wooded areas and some agricultural land, much the same as the rest of' the area in the general vicinity >
around the WNP-3 site.
- There is very little transient population within the LPZ. There is some linited recreational activity on the rivers, including hunting and fishing, and there ;
are several tree fanning companies scattered throughout the area. According to
~
the applicant, about 906 residents were living within the LPZ in 1980, and the population within the LPZ is expected to increase to about 1500 during the life of the plant. Except for the travelers using U.S. Highway 12, which is three miles north of the plant, going from the Puget Sound area to the Pacific Coast region, there is no significant amount of transient population within the ten miles surrounding the site. There are essentially no migrant workers within the ten mile radius around the plant. Logging operations vary from time to time i
throughout this area employing about ten persons per operation. On the average, 120 persons per year are employed in logging activities at twelve different locations. Also within the ten mile radius, there are four ccapanies, generally d
^
. C\"'
s .
6 associated with lumber products, that employ about 130 persons. During peak periods this total may rise to about 185. The applicant estimates that as many as 128 fishermen may be seen in the area on a good day, and during the hunting season a total of 2700 may utilize the woods and river tributaries arcund WHP-3.
There are six schools within ten miles of the site. One is located in Satsop, i
two in Elma, and three in Montesano. Approximately 3550 students and staff occupy these facilities durir.g the school year. Four nursing homes, the Elma youth home, and the county jail, all within ten miles of the plant, averaged about 356 persons in 1981.- Although most of these people (risharmen, hunters, students, loggers and other employees) are transitory, some of them reside within the ten mile radius and a're included in the population statistics given above.
~
Section 13.3 of this report provides a discussion of the Emergency Preparedness plans for protecting the public in this area. The nearest densely populated center, of about 25,000 or more persons, as defined by 10 CFR Part 100, is the combined area of Aberdeen-Hoquiam. The applicant has indicated that the center's nearest boundary is approximately 16 miles west of the site. This distance is at least one and one-third times the distance to the LPZ outer radius, as required by 10 CFR Part 100.
e 4
~
g -
. 7 -
2.
1.4 CONCLUSION
Pending the applicant's completion of all ownership and easement transactions, ,
we conclude that the exclusion area, low population zone and population center distance meets the criteria of 10 CFR Part 100 and will be acceptable. This finding is based on the 10 CFR Part 100 definitions of the exclusion area, the how population zone and the population center distance, our analysis of the onsite meteorological data from which the relative concentration factors (X/0) were calculated (see Section 2.3 of this report), and the calculated potential radiological dose consequences of design basis accidents (see Section 15.0 of this report). .
2.2 -
2.2.1 TRANSPORTATION ROUTES There are no major highways, railroads, or waterways traversing the WNP-3 exclusion area. A transmission corridor owned by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) penetrates the exclusion area but is limited to 8PA maintenance vehicles only. Public access to the exclusion area may be j attained by means of Keyes Road and Workman Creek Road. These roads are used primarily for local traffic, including tree faming activities. The only major highway nearby is U.S.12, a divided four.-lane highway running in an east-west direction approximately three miles north of the olant. This highway is classified as a " scenic and recreational highway" used princf oally by motorists traveling between U.S. I which runs in a north-south direction along the Pacific
- ')
8 Ocean, and I-5 which also runs north-south in the Puget Sound area. Because of the separation distance involved and the topography of the area, accidents occurring on U.S.12 that may present a hazardous materials problem do not pose a threat to the safe operation of the plant.
A single railroad track maintained and used by the Union Pacific Railroad, and a rail line owned by the Burlington Northern Railroad are located about 1.25 miles and three miles north of the plant, respectively. Both rail lines run parallel to the Chehalis River and U.S.12 in a valley at an elevation about 350 feet below and separated from WNP-3 by dense forest which is prevalent in the area.
, Rail traffic along the clesest rail'line averages about two trains daily, involv-ing mostly shipments of lumber and related products and infrequently shipments of caustic soda, chlorine and propane. The applicant has identified several types of potential accidents involving hazardous material shipments on the closest railroad line (7000 feet) to the plant. The accidents include: (a) the deton-ation of a box car loaded with 132,000 lbs of TNT, (b) the rupture, spill, and ignition of a tank car filled with 85 tons of propane, and (c) the rupture and spill of a tank car loaded with 90 tons of liquid chlorine. The above events were assumed to occur on the railroad at a point nearest to the plant.
With respect to TNT, the applicant's analysis indicates that the overpressure from detonating 132,000 lbs of TNT at 7000 feet from the plant will not exceed the criteria in Regulatory Guide 1.'91. Our review supports this finding and we concur with the applicant that TNT explosions on the railroad do not pose a significant hazard to the plant.
q -
~
9 /
The applicant's analysis of la 85 ton propane tank car spill indicates that
, ,. flammable concentrations would not reach the plant area. Since the railroad is about 350 feet below plant grade elevat.fon, the heavier than air propane cloud would not tend to flow toward the plant. Detonation of 85 tons of propane at
. the railroad would produce a peak reflected overpressure of less than 1.0 psi at ,
the plant. Hence we find that the potential propane tank car accident does not pose a significant hazard to the plant.
Potential chlorine spills on the railroad have led the applicant to provide chlorine detectors for the control room. A more detailed discussion of chlorine protection is given in Section 6.4 of this report.
In view of the above,'the staff concludes that the potential risks associated with the postulated accidents on the railroad line near the WHP-3 site are sufficiently low and do not exceed the criteria specified in Regulatory . Guides 1.91 and 1.78.
In addition to the above, the applicant also has identified a number of hazardous gas sources on site. Two of these have some potential for control room operator incapacitation. Specifically, there is a 15000 gallon tank of aqueous ammonia, and four 1 ton tanks of liquid sulfur dioxide. The staff is currently reviewing the control room habitability system with respect to these gases, and is currently considering this to be an open item.
The Chehalis River, located about 1.25 miles from the plant, and just north of the Union Pacific track, is used principally by small pleasure and fishing boats.
__-_a
,.q 10 Because the river is not commercially navigable in this area (river mile 21),
making barge traffic impractical, hazards to the plant from accidents on the river are non-existent. River traffic does not pose a hazard to the intake structure, because make-up water is supplied by a Ranney well collection system (which obtains water from about 80 feet below the surface of the river), and there is no potential for highway or railroad chemical spills flowing into the river and entering the make-up water system.
2.2.2 NEAR8Y FACILITIES There is no extensive indy,ttrial activity around the WNP-3 site. The Thiokol Corporation, located about five miles east-northeast of the plant, stores materials such as methanol, metallic sodium, and nitrogen,,which are used in the production of a bleaching agent for the pulp and paper industry. The Western Washington Paper Co. supplies gases for industrial and medical applications. The pases, stored five miles northeast of the site, include ocetylene, hydrogen, propane, argon, helium and nitrogen. There are also several gasoline and diesel fuel distributors that have storage facilities about five miles from the site. Tree farming is the main industry in this area and there is no significant amount of hazardous material involved in this type of operation. Because of the quantities and distances involved, the materials stored at these locations do not pose a hazard to the plant. There are no large industrial expansion programs planned for this area in the foreseeable future.
q .-
I 11 There are no military bases, bombing ranges, munitions plants, missile ,
installations, or major airports within the general vicinity of the WNP-3 site.
There are two grass airstrips and a small airport within five miles of WNP-3.
One of the airstrips, which hasn't baen used in years, is loc /ted 1.2 miles i north-northwest. The other is about 4.2 miles east-northeast of the site and is used very infrequently. The airstrips are intended fe, orivate use, ,
usually crop dusting. Elma airport, the closest active airport in the area, is located three miles northeast of the site. It has a 2100 foot paved runway and can accommodate light single and twin-engine fixed wing aircraft and helf-copters that weigh under 12,500 pounds. The airport was fomerly unattended, so no records were kept on the usage it had. It was estimated that there were between 4000 and 12000 take-off and landing operations in 1980. A minor i expansion program has been proposed for the Elmr airport. The largest airport near the plant is Doweman Field and it is located about 22 miles west. Al though l
there were no scheduled commercial flights prior to 1980,'comuter service is
! proposed and it is projected that there will be about 125,000 operations at this i
airport by the year 2000, i
Two low-level Federal Airways (V-204 and V-27) are located in the airspace around WNP-3. There are about five commercial flights per day on route V-204 which pass over the site at a mini. mum altitude of 4500 feet MSL. Approximately seven commer- r cial flights per day use route V-27 which passes within eleven miles of the plant at a minimum altitude of 3200 feet MSL. Ft. Lewis Army Base and McChord Air Force l
Base are located 42 and 48 miles east-northeast of the site, respectively. There are one or two military helicopter flights per month that use the V-204 route.
,--. .n
. J 12 Af rcraft from McChord AFB (about 280 flights per year) use a predetemined route which passes within four miles of the plant. No ordinance is carried on the military aircraft flying in this area. The applicant is analyzing the effects -
on plant structures assuming an aircraft crashes into WNP-3. The staff will review the analysis when it is submitted and evaluate the potenti$1 risks to the safe operation of the plant.
No LPG or LNG lines are located within five miles of the plant, but there is one natural gas pipeline nearby. It is an eight inch line that is buried at a minimum depth of 30 inches and has a maximum operating pressure of 305 psig.
This line runs in an east-west direction about five miles north of the site.
Two lines, four inches in diameter, are tapped off of the main eight inch gas line and serve the towns of Elma and Montesano. - There are no plans to transport other products in these pipelines or to up-grade the system. Because of the
, distance involved these gas lines do not present a hazard to the tlNP-3 facilities.
2.
2.3 CONCLUSION
On the basis of the infomation provided by the applicant, and our review based upon criteria in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, GDC 4, and in Standard Review Plan Section 2.2.3, we have detemined, subject to a satisfactory conclusion pending our evaluation of the applicant's aircraft analysis, that the WNP-3 site will be adequately protected and can be operated with an acceptable degree of safety considering the activities at nearby transportation, industi f al, and military i facilities.
. + 7. a ' : % .-g ,.,,,s-
^
W:
'- g -, .... ..<.*1' .... -.%'- . L.M,;.~-
.. e. .:.V.g\% gR:-gga m.gpdf
' 'Ir .ird /;;
.,., , ,J . . : . :. '
e .J i n.. // ': ' - . l @j::./ z.. L ) s
) :o., ~ p @j((Qc;
~
h,h fg I "- E. 't / v'. :: . ,-(,, I 'l '+
t!i J e-y;' - :.; s
- i . ~iit; t;; .' ,I-
',.,,'.J).,>s yR
' G ,s.- ' %) /,%. .
y .,- ~~ '
~* ~ %,. .. , l
' q.
- /
t g =.) q// ,j wi ~ w .
(W;;.%,// _cg. Y -y(~.: .
5
".yb( ~ ' p(b. p y_.r! ,h g!o?, . :
},$.ht!.t.' -Q fQhi$%f Q { [. - ' l,} & , Y };
~? !.1:: Qi-?.
Q.
.- --o>. . ...
.. y/k,% ,_p g.uA y ,. _ - s
..m 7 37
\- ,.
] g p, f >(j,
~ '
O 'ja. . [. ,
c.c. ~ .:... ..
l.7 t ,y _ . . u -
y<. m .
A ,g
!m< f'.
)9 e , -'(.. ' f gh_ ;,
vj d .. c- a M'
.a g h. g .
i'
.j - gI
.F i yy .t .., W.p W h (g., J-..
- s. , - . - , 3j ygQs :". ., e.y x.
s.*.--r't
.y N:. F 'i , /q ~
% 5 : % ,' k ,. 2 J
. .g%@ O
- n. r .- V.. ; s: *. . : k \, ' -
.z. .. ,. .? ,$Q.,
n.; j g g psh- Q'*Q)9G
. j(ig, 4,\,;;
,-'y . r c . 1-. -.,y _'- Qg 5
. y n Q : f..f. - Q --..,
i
- l.. ,
y ,
[ '
h 7- e y n -- e .
Y0; ,Yph
- h. 'T' hc.. . . . .
.; j_.[ _." *l . @
,~w..
hhgg 4 .h.
4 e
a t. g . ., .
r * :y .l .
s . .l . .:
)p, r : ;, 7 7 l-g.
,.!4..] i..,g .-
. Qd,.iar.+,;cfi[ c- i. .I 1 G
...Q.M.~.. ,Qj Iw
..W. . (, ~. .
- -. .J -! . . . n-g) : .
.g..'k , .: ' [7.-- ..
..... ,.l, ?. :.,
&, .';;c' L [, s1. N t .
.\
pa y:, . ... . a i;g,i. ,. ... ...t.... ': . ?
+p '.- .
x,
,g W.
b < A L, .. . Y.
~.. l Il - E a$_ / ..
.=
6 " - s. h, s-M. ;. ' . ,
\ '
2 0 .: ' c f '%
,N3 :;
e.- - J;w,) : q z o .g - n( , t .
- =- ~
me ., L. - .e.
.~
, i r
. . - %. e..
l
~ --
.. $ . h N .y...:;..;[,W.I.j...;._,p
. ~.: .. .
x
'...h..-.[f9[ja g q T p ?; :. .y, , . J{ . .:w j . . e ,,,. , &b.j';:,:3.gi ;,it;f Q. .
,. . , _e . .- ,....
I, . ,,p
.. n g .. .
!N [.
~
h)3 . sTD1.h.!.l. : -, ;. k I N=. D M ~"..:..:.: N N,. I- g~ , y Q.1 f y
) p '. .. -
' ,,l .
;3 .jfMv.. f; .p :.Y p."E - K ;} . .
.w :
- 2 '1, w IC c.
7 f _f
.s
.g .
.e, rz i.u.s:,n ;
; h .
s l
.-. - Q-;s: a :-rF- g.,v. 1- .% ..:.
- --..., - n s a m- ,, , -3 l ,
I , As sa$10P Stv4R . sans asan g ,) l FEE GWNED PRGPERTY _ a
,,s, ,,
,p ,
/ - !
[g ses mit
,,, ,,,,, EXCLUSION 20NE
,f f , Tj EASEMENT
/
4xy , 7 eso.oems ties y / 'y.,- Ns,N s s, smicama N \ /g
,s
,, __ ,x .
s - s. . x... x - l,\ ' l
\ l
~ ' .ist 54555 ,, -
N , i qt
.ninewaun a ' ' \'s .
,,, 3 . ; . ,, .s s Firttitt ' \
s' , u t U$t## .. , Df Lis M .
.\, ,
stactos atos L's's'Nj y x ' s\ , i Figure 2.2 ' , t, s x ,,,,,,,,,,,-
,s \\x '\ \l' ,'
Principal Plant Features h N N.'s . N- .\ ' x ' in Relation to Exclusion '{.' '. Area and Property Lines '-i /g/' , cN s' xs
'x
,s s N Nhs 'y -
N xxx,-. , p ' _,(,, p+g
. ... .... .... .. .... .s. ,s . .
g -- ,na .g r- - --- -i L. s '
,s s
- - scatt am itti - {g . .
\ 's N s N '. ' ,\
s
.s
- t. ~
,, sv \' exs o x.
' ,' ' %r,N]
b _b _\[ O'
g. N ) a t ] 4, . KITSAP COUNTY ,
)\
N JEFFERSON COUNTY
-,M
' ~
x. [M T1 C'
- NE l'*'
o aa.a. ,
,/
,,,,)
* s" h'\ i
. h
,y# <>
N ' *,,,
/ 4.;P; MASON COUNTY ,g NE
"*~'
WNW sb.ii \ ]
' \,~'yn,::~\\
C
\f f. p[ "
, . T r \/l )s 3 o. ,
PIERCE COUNTY s GRAYS HARB R COUNTY Y28$ g i h j 6 ...., ,& ,y ,,,.. ..
,,\
" ' , ~' i.rr,r m A , 3"
.L -.. ,
..,... a:l11.-
E [
.frrv!. ~ . /.
W r .,. u.<hm ,
...us...J. - ,, . , _.2 ..
. . . ,,.. j _.
g s.cw. THURSION COUNIY
}-lo , s ca.. , - , _S i t / / ^-
- t',[\[c..i. 6.
% 'b\g wa.,. s ,
n'.',','.d fg, 2e T cm.m
'".6. ESE
^
I 8 WSW
- - ' ss.in..s w %.e **['\ u.[- t g si LEWIS COUNIV I N w .cn PACIFIC COUNIY .a. SE
\ 4, .- Eq
/ \" COWilTZ COUNTY Figure 2.3 HKlAKUM COUNIV Area Within 50 Miles of Site
~gMjr.
^' '
w.. .
e [ . 6
?) ( ,... - -- ,m - .
l
, % . y .....- ~ .. **
,s' .
s ,# 0 g seas tias portisest
- ,8
\
,- , s
, *N l l,
,. s i
. ,~. ,,- m,-------.. ~ . , .
,s f, f.
- * + I 8 a# % taua
* - t 84 9 G A5 tasst I s is.
* 'A
*
- BuftaINGIOss e esO.Al.HE RNeeeeeee..<
ee eeeee...e. NM
, \ 9 ,
f~ _
's ... SAISOP y 8 --
g s- , 9 u...e,..... #,# a i ,, , ntibOss Plant 7 ,..;
- i. ,,,,4 1
e #s . . . . a
~ ,
~
_ _ .... e....$p..
......,* / **,'.,
~......
ee
/
......' un.e.s'.saesn Wens g*, e o ,,,,.. L .. . ..
..ss pe.
a ggR .y,
........-p...- g o
I pra enassueu.o=
..~..
s *.
....e ..
......... _ . . * . . . p * .
~
.- ....~.............-.......
g r
- y. .,.
...... EID Weep i .
,. 5, 5,
y ....~,. , a
.f s.
s, r ,
'g**,,
7N 8 **,
/ , u,,, ..nsos
,o ,
h ,. + k,s.,
.s, '
kh p%* -l 1 4 E GE 940 _ eseessee.ee m aat e.OAD POWE R TR AN5us&SeN iseef (Jevent p toets.fW AT St LONDARY ROAD Alvt R *
. .. GAS PlPE LANE
, --h-- BSOL AllON WatWES O 8 2 3 SCast of usass .
Figure 2.4 Transportation sRoutes and Pipeline Within .5 Miles bf Site}}