ML20209B407
| ML20209B407 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1982 |
| From: | Poulos S GEI CONSULTANTS, INC. (FORMERLY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER |
| To: | Kane J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20150F172 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-96 81907-7, NUDOCS 8206100343 | |
| Download: ML20209B407 (4) | |
Text
'
_4 ki i
4 i
N
\\
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS INC.
1037 MalN STAEET WINCHESTER
- MaSSACMUSETTS 0:490
'617)729 1625
=..
- ?Ji'#5;'
7jyj!T,*i;]jjf May 12, 19e2 droject 81907 File 2.0 Ref: 81907-7 Mr. Joseph Kane Project Officer U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Engineering, M/S P-214 Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Review of Letter dated April 22, 1982 frosa J. W. Cook to H. R. Denton on Respnse to NRO request for additional information on Borated Water Storage Tank and Service Water Pump Structure Dear Mr. Kanet i
In accordance with your request we have prepared Enclosure (1).
For each geotechnical issue relating to the Service Water Pxnp Structure in the subject letter, we F ave indicated whether or not the issue is resolved and, if not the additional information that is needed.
I Sincerely yours, L
GECTfECHNICAL ENGINEERS INO.
Steve J. Poulos Principal SJPims Encl.
ces Mr. Reuben Samuels Mr. Mark Singh i
b
/
B206100343 820512
!h
/
CF ADOCK 05000327 C F-
/
IR d
~
-_u o
8 Max rebar stress at El 620 By others 9
Hax rebar stress at critical elaments By others 10 out of plane shear By others 11 Critical elements By others t
12 Interaction with CWPS, EDB, and Retaining Wall By others 13 Bearing stratum acceptance Remove the word " solely" in 5th line (p. 10).
Remove the word " generally" from the 2nd line of 2nd paragraph on p.
Add that 11.
the correlation between the pier or plate results and the penetration sosts done on the soil atload test of the pter or plate the base load test will be usad to correct the correlation chart and to judge suitability of bearing stratum.
The zone of influence shall be defined by lines extending at 1H to IV slope in enbestve soil.
If soil a
braced excavation shall be used if the excavation mustis cohesionless, a more than 6 in.
below ad acent pier.
proceed 3
pier shall be monitored as the excavation to la in. or less11ovements of adjacen made.
altered (use braced excavation) Excavation shall be stopped and construct is than expected.
if movetaents are larger 14 Pile load test procedures Use a maximum stress of 1.3 times maximum design stress on pior base.
dure to ensure that skin friction is negligible.Use plywood covered Plate load test on 10-in.-dia. or larger plate at pier would be acceptable bottom of in lieu of pier load test.
This approach would allow higher test load on bearing stratum.
If dense sandy alluvium is used as bearing stratun, make pier or plate load test on it also.
Carry out 5 to 10 cone penetration tests on bear: 1g stratun that is teated with pior oc plate load test.
Mesau. *ent of in situ density is also desirable.
Carlson cells es located do not appear to give enough infor-mation to calculate stress on the beartng stratum.
Thus, skin fetetion should be made negitgible, as no.ed above.
Design load should be held until settlement is 0.003 in./hr or less, 15 and 16 Strain monitoring criteria, matrix.
Satisfactory except as noted under Confirmatory Issue 3.
17 Critical stages of construction Use benchmark readings (vertical differential settlement) as control rather than strain gages.
Ensure feedback between measurements and construction so that work is stopped immedtately l
when movements reach limit set.
10 Contingency Plans Comments below are on each item as numbered:
1.
How can one determine if one specific well is fatling?
2.
Item (L) is not clear.
What level vill be equalized?
Ilow much time will be required f or response.
Is action dependent on settler.ent measurements being nade?
3.
Have all equipment on hand for carrying out techn3 ques (a) and (b) so that time delay is only hours.
4.
State limits of depth of excavation below adjacent pier.
Une braced excavation tf necessary.
Bearing area should be increased only atter consultation and approval by I E Branch.
5.
If the pier settles excessively, a review by ?!RC (I
& El should be required.
Based on boring data, excessive pier movement would be caused by excess pter load or mtstn-terpreted bearing stratum.
Thus, a re-evaluation would be needed before proceeding.
I 6.
Use wadges as a routine method to stop movement fails.
if Jack 7.
If one of the northerly benchmarks is knocked out, stop work until it is functioning again.
[
~*i
7 o
?
-4 3.
Stop work first, support' excavation f aces carefully, then carry out the.tems listed.
D 19 Checking and ad]usting jacking loads Monitor the jacks at least at the start of overy shift while piers 1, 2, and 3 ace being constructed.
Re-lack piers more fro-quently until rate of decrease of load is low envagh to allow checking every shift.
Use wedges to prevent movement if jacks fail, both during pier construction and during application of final Jacking loads.
Control Jacks by doop-benchmark settlement readtngL (i.e.,
limit the sottlement to tolerance not in advance).
20 Application of final Jacking load See. tem 19 above.
In addition, control the Jacking by the vertical differential settlements as measured at the deep bench-marks.
Monitor more frequently if necessary.
What is the
" predetermined" rate that is etferred to?
21 Tunnel location Resolved.
22 Crack repair By others 23 Limit analysis By others 24 Monitoring of fines If greater than 10 ppm is retained on the 0.005 mm filter, the character of the matertal will be analyied to judge whether fines are being removed that might affect the structure or the bearing capacity of the bearing stratum.
The observation wells should be chtnged to sensitive piezome-ters.
If the natural soil used as a bearing stratum is stratified with pervious layers, the bottom of the pter will blow unless the phreatte surface is below the bottom of excavat ton.
This soil is s t ra t t f '.ed, theref ore care util be needed, particularly for the first pters excavated.
i
(
" ~~
_. _ _...... _ _... _. _...... _, C 1.
~
4 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS INC.
1
)
soir main stacct winewcarca unssacauscits oiseo em rae seas U
'b W*.:lb."'.*
7:50' i
May 17, 1902 Project 81907 l
Pile 2.0 i
Ref: 41907-8 7
Mr. Joseph Kane Project Of ficer U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Engineering, M/S P-214 Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Revisions to Review of Letter dated April 22, 1982 from J. W. Cook to H. R. Denton on Response to NRC request for additional information on Borated Water Storage Tank and Service Water Pump Structure
Dear :
fr. Kanes Enclosure (1; was pre.,ously transmitted by letter on May 12, 1981.
It has been changed where sh awn by bars in the margin.
Sincerely yours, GEOTECHNICAL DIGINEERS INC.
2
'f D Steve J. Poulos Principal SJP:ms Encl.
cc Mr. Reuben Samuels Mr. Hart Singh
/
J
' /
n
/./'
6jy l
g9 M C.. k
- -- q a
Response to Letter, Dated April 22, 1982 J.
W. Cook (Consumers) to H.
R.
Denton (NRC) on Geotechnical-Related Issues for Underpinning _the Service Water Pum Structure Headed Information Geotechnical Engineers.
Project 81907 Inc. _ _
May 17 1982 t
Items are listed by Confirmatory Issue No. in letter of April 22, 1962.
1 Basta for stresses By others 2
Justify 4000 kcf In our opinion, it is not appropriate to use a k-value of 4000 xcf to compute stresses due to jacking load.
Jacking will cause change in curvature of the lower mat.
The structural group should review this ates.
3 Acceptance criteria 5/16-in. extension in a gage length of 20 ft implies a very high stress in 'he stee' and cracking during underpinning.
Control should L= on vertical differential settlement.
The cri-tarkon should be consistent with that u ed for the Control Tower.
The criterion thould be small enough so that corrective action can be taken in_ advance of severe stressing of the structure.
4 Tendon anchor By others 5
Dowelsfrock bolts By others 6
Sliding calculations Provide calculations and assumptions used for soil properties and interface friction.
7 Empty forebay By others
2 8
Max reber stress at El 620 By others
- ' 9 Max rebar stress at critical elements By others 10 Out of plane shear By others 11 Critical elements By others 12 Interaction with CWPS, EDB, and Retaining Wall By othere 13 Bearing stratum acceptance Remove the word " solely" in 5th line (p. 10).
Remove the word " generally" from the 2nd line of 2nd paragraph on p.
11.
Add that the correlation between the pier or pAate load test results and e ie penetration teste done on the soil at the base of the pier r plate load test will be use' to correct the correlation : hart un d to judge suitability of bearing stratum.
The zone c influence shall be defined by lines extending at a 1H to IV saope in cohesive soil.
If soil is cchesionless, a braced excavation shall be used if the excavation must proceed more than 6 in. below adjacent pier.
Movements of adjacent pier shall be monitored as the excavation to 18 in. or less is made.
Excavation shall be stopped and construction procedure
~
altered (use braced excavation) it movements are larger than expected.
14 Pier load test procedures Use a maximum stress of 13 times maximum design stress on pier bata.
Use plywood covered with asphalt or similar proco-dure to ensure that skin friction is negligible.
Plate load test on 18-in.-dia. or larger plate at bottom of pier would be acceptable in lieu of pier load test.
This approach would allow higher test load on bearing stratum.
If dense sandy alluvium is used as ing stratum, make pter or plate load test on it also.
t h
n-3 Carry out 5 to 10 cone penetration tests on 4 earing stratum that is tested with pier or plate load test.
Measurement of an situ density is also desirable.
Carlson cells as located do not appear to give enough infor-nation to calcula.e stress on the bearing stratum.
Thus, skin frictaan should be made neglig6ble, as noted above.
Design load should be held unt) settlement is 0.003 in./hr or less.
15 and 16 Strain monitoring criterie, matrix.
Satisfactory except as noted under Confirmatory Issue 3.
17 Critical stages of construction Use benchmark readings (vertical differential settlementi as control rather than strain gages.
- ..sure feedback between measurements and construction so that wor is stoppeo Ass e d t a te ly when movements reach limit set.
- 8 Contingency Plans Comments below are on each item as numbered:
1.
How can one determine if one specific well to f a ilin g ?
2.
Item (b) is not clear.
What level will be equattre37 How much time will be required for response.
Is action
)
dependent on settlement ceasurements being made?
3.
Have all equipment on hand for carrying out t*chniques (a) and (b) so that time delay is only hours.
4.
State limits of depth of excavation below adjacent pter.
Use braced excavation if necessary.
Bearing area e4ould be increased only after consultation and approval by I &
E Branch.
5.
If the pier settles excesolvely, a review by ARC (I & El should be required.
Based on boring data, excessive pter movenent would be caused by excess pier load or utstn-torpreted bearing stratum.
Thus, a re-evaluation would be needed before proceeding.
6.
Use wedges and plates as a routine method to stop move-ment if Jack fails.
7.
If one of the northerly benchmarks is knocked out, stop work until it is functioning again.
f
(r
=
_-__m=-_
l a
- +
. j _..
6 t
Itk 4.
Stop work first, support er.cerettoA faces carefalif. t h e *.
earty est the atees I t s t e 3.
kr il Cheelting and e $jestin g 3eckta9 loads i
F j
i Benf.ter the Jacks at Ieest at the st art of every satts
.s...
{
p&ea t - 1
.t. Sa4 3 are be tag const r ac te 3.
Re-jaca p6ers more fre-(
geently sm41% rate of decrease of toed as low es s e gt to e t ; ;.
l eteetLog esety abtit.
I l
{
o.. woe,e.. 4 et.to. to,ree..t e4 e.*t it
- .r..
f.t..
.>t:
dertog p&er co4straetten ea4 Sertsq appiteatsot of fase; Joces g
[i 1ee4..
centrat 24*te by **er-**memoar* *ets; ee-t reesiss=
(&.e.,
laast t%e settlement to tolerasee set a-4tras:wi.
s
[
.p.,,t.t o..,
f,..,
,...ta, e.,
i'
[
Dee'steo 19 shoes.
In alltteen. c2*tr21 ts. Jare.S, ty is.
[
eettteet 4&fferentsat se t t ie n en t s sa... s a r e a e t tse 4
.p
- t.. - :. -
PM morts.
Ros&ta. =ere fre44 st;r af ser sears.
4.et to tse
- pte4etere& sed" ret. that to refert 4 tar a
${
4t feseet neeettes
}
l s.
see. teed.
T
{
32 Cseen repa&r L
Dr othere Ct an usett so.a,.t.
l C.
l or esmer.
)
1 l
s4 me.st.rse,.e ft...
l t
tf geoeter them te pre is reteksea as t*e
.::S==
f.;e.,
t he eteveeter e t the set e r L e i ett; e,
essaiset tt 2.re.
.m.-
.e f asee save beta g seeeeed that eggst 4f rec t the st r. : t. s. $a beerta$ espoetty of the tetrang st ra t 4a.
l N eteervatten wette oeoelt te es==ies se ces
.t.r.
e.,
u
%e Se 18 the ester 1 sett seet es a be.ri e sa e t
.4
.*r.-
with pere &oes layer s.
the bottom of sne eter...
r.
phreette perface as hetoe ts.
>>ttwa af
..e...t.-s.
Stratified, therefore care w6ll te s+ e s e s, ;ar.
.;ar fAret ptere earasated.
l Y
_,~ ~
1.,
y
. t; e
F
[
GEOTisCIINICAL ENGINICEItS INC.
t;
.w,.. t n e. :.u e.
.u. :. u u. <
m n, l '-
l:
s.4. a w.
s:.
m. n :..
l:
y ; ~ g=~l Tssessty ).
1H:
z
- w~=
i
~
sin 7 s n
.-t rtle 2.3 i
Def: $tt37-)
P y..
r-
?
I.
Ett.' W Some Ptsjeet Offnast n
.. m % -..m.
b DEenehea et SeghtmortAg. %/S P=214 t
f.
h t= pan. b C. St%%%
f.
>.et, wt, u m u. i r
Este T.att est Jamit 21-!*,
'NJ f.
.3. J. Fw*os mg a. Asmael.
f/
fh 4 at 4 M ast. IPs emep tma.4s t
~
gre.*t &m. 5ASC-41**J+73 7
Seer 4r. Genes y
, ~r u.,
- -. c... t -,
u,,,
{
thue 56)eet, ete Meat $r W. Sw ows asesei o e.
t4 ae 24t at ee t..
3 F
p-luh e m e t se e aA t v is as m e t s e : ve t.%
rvu. nser O
mareetese, see fenomenee tselmse volve pste. ce.: -trt ze: :=w r e -
F seen w,ene==
w ra s
.==4 te c u.,
we a r.<m.e > -
I seleted tw seer ceeame far mac of te., prepoe c as hep. mis y for tee w
[
seemeterma. The Tt&P Sege. Le 44 et Set Lau oe f n w.
- s W=
..s, e o e
t 1
Wf 2
Ber.5 C;ey noetta g stret se h Ftti matee.41 t
4.
Cemenet.4 m Oneserptets: a yAL1 S.
Foo4pesar !anLattet Vaire FA- -Fra 4.
Eleet t t :.. Po urtsa u a s. r = 4 s Lia '
?.
C.atru
- u. tr O,
e 8.
ferttce w er Famy Str >9 : e v
..tt,
1.
eta f
,r 5
s
,/ e -
- I b-
.s m*
Lt :
\\
DNt 4Jjlc, '
y a
.=_
w.
_,w
- - - - - - ~
---w---
h (C &; {
a t
Trip Report 5o. t
}:I SITE V1 SIT J
RT 3 -79, 1942 missm mer courraect sac-23-e2-Q2,
~
mammannes mas-we sw.
r.*ea r1 i, in; h sugert aseteuse sheerwette.'s mees by 3r. 3Este J. Psaios es t er. Apese Summets tr64g a vtaat se tJee assend m.::eer Plast e t. =
aamung to ese 3D. 19e2. Ar poetnalmery 4tseussaoc. oe t.w osarveu ma b
g,, y p f
.es.eese enneed at see est* Dr nr. Jeems motseeetaer w 1
emmesmuse esser eieqpeer. nr. chersee se-c w neest.: w eet.s 6 1 dine she& t.
tocanet porsem6me; tnaaitat etth es. cat itee v.a 5 + e t
- Ree geene es, as mesmesary.
k t.
p t-b
,,e
,.,e x s,e
.t 1.,y a u t,..
thueW $ etsty M e, *ees S&ent &c&tf. Ite ereten me;1Settoss eyterogt*y wes
[
emesed by GD settiet et a saa.rser, ><t tame sie:ter 464 saut ta et w e tse stret6fbandee m tAus engtes steeewes.
rl' 1mm au assernet as e enter der er e terir *** r wres.s..:t r I.
emne, amen d esen mett an enttaw ouwette e en w
....e I
bette. meesemy w me seset. WL.4e to we rega:artt y as v. an.e.
eenbee eseaume satty a6er ena som atur es=2 tau.
l~
t a act, enen esse a.ver erse.2,.eut..
w w a c. u h*
N 88. W M% 5% ed Wee esiic4Fy tm&& L EL% p.
N o emotetLe;
[
4 ease asMso% Anskap Qtag astew weseee.
Speonettog en p6es ene see3y 4ervn4 e*Jetyam v an.e4
- =
[
enestessee. see at mean pass.see:S sa4een ta. e r.,
s.r.
, - e r -
g n ee e, e
e,e
.e. ~
,s., <,..
I m,*,ee w ta, me,,e w t s
.,. 4:. - +... ;..,,
[
endetaett. P at the ewetAthseemt em t et t~.
erwe* s.+ '. ;
+f tre
- m.
4 i
stemesee 1metases t:me pqp
=$4 v.we earuu 5.i' ne, m.. u s.
L to.
e, n,4 e.,e.se. - to.. m
,, u... o m i
~. u e.<.e:
.t a, m..e...
.,;.ee.,.
m._....
9tfW Dee ate fel&#wSt.
+,
_....