ML20207P997
| ML20207P997 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 01/13/1987 |
| From: | Mcdonald J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | Harold Denton NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207P998 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8701210031 | |
| Download: ML20207P997 (10) | |
Text
I t
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Watts Bar Nuclear Plant P. O. Boy 800 Spring City, Tenlessee 37381 January 13, 1987 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Mr. Harold Denton, Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation In the Matter of the Application of
)
Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority
)
50-328 EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK GROUP (ECTG) provides a listing of the report numbers, the related employee concerns, and the previous submittal dates if applicable. To assist you in your review of these reports, Enclosure 2 provides a comparison between the ECTG Writer's Guide recosraended report format and the transmitted reports. The reports from the quality assurance category comply fully with the Writer's Guide. transmits the final element reports for four elements addressing Sequoyah Nuclear Plant employee concerns in the following categories:
i i
Engineering
- 1 report Operations
- 2 reports Quality Assurance
- 1 report As indicated by the report cover sh.eets, these reports have completed final review by the Senior Review Panel and the Employee Concern Task Group V,ement. With these final reports, all employee concerns related to Sequoyah
.have been addressed for Engineering Subcategory 31100, Health Physics; and l
l Engineering Subcategory 31300, Niscellaneous.
Please telephone Martha Nartin at (615) 365-3587 (Watts Bar) if you have any questions.
Very truly yours.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY fee
. A. Mcdonald Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Site Licensing Manager
]got cc (See page 2.):
i 8701210031 870113 ~
DR ADOCK 0500 7
An Equal Opportunity Errployer
]
F:
\\
t-J*.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ec (Rnclosures):
Mr. James N. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Rnforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Attn: Mr. Gary Zech 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Nr. B. J. Youngblood, Project Director PWR Project Directorate #4 Division of PWR Licensing - A U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avanue Room 440, 5 Story Phillips Bethesda, Maryland 20814 3223T C
i 1
-,,,--,,.,-,.,,,,m,.
o j
p.I '
e e
ENCLOSURE I SEQUOYAH EMPLOYEE ELEMENT REPORT CONCERN NUMBER ISSUE Engineering 22908 IN-85-772-006 Chilled Water System, (Final)
Level Switches NOTE: An initial report was not necessary. This will be the only submittal for 22908.
Operation 31102
- 00-85-005-011 Radioactive Material Control (Final)
JAN-86-001 II-85-101-003 NRS-85-003 K1-85-005-001
- Concern 00-85-005-011 added after 9/26/86.
NOTE: Initial report transmitted 9/9/86.
Operation 31306 IN-86-221-002 Questionable Concrete (Final)
IN-86-221-003 Repair (Grout)
NOTE: Initial report transmitted 9/9/86.
Quality Assurance IN-86-087-002 Quality Assurance 80102 WBN-86-004-001 Independence and Authority PH-85-056-X02 WI-85-090-001 WI-85-086-001 WI-85-086-004 II-85-118-001 XI-85-119-001 II-85-113-001
- WI-85-090-002
- WI-85-086-003 11-85-116-011
- IN-85-767-005
- Concerns contained in 80101 in September 2 986 printout.
- Concern IN-85-767-005 contained in 80000 i
'26/86 printout.
NOTE: QA 80102 was submitted final 1/2/87. It is being revised to address
-concern IN-85-767-005.
3223T
r y
j
(
l r
3 4
l l
l l
ENGINEERING CATEGORY Enclesure 2 Page 1 of 2 ELEMENT REPORT FORMAT ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE 1.0 Issue 1.
Characterization of Issue (s)
Characterization 2.0 Summary 9.
Discussion, Findings and Conclusions 3.0 Evaluators Cover Sheet Information 4.0 Evaluation 8.
Evaluation Process Process
5.0 Findings
9.
Discussion, Findings, and Conclusions 6.0 Root Cause (Collective Significance)M*
M*
Overall Root Cauco will not be considered at this report level.
7.0 Attachments /
Attachments as required List of Concerns Other items included 2.
Have issue (s) been identified in Engineering Element in another systematic Reports analysis?
3.
Document nos., tag nos.,
locations or other specific descriptive identifications stated in element.
4.
Interview files reviewed 5.
Documents reviewed related to the element 1992T i
l
.o ENGINEERING CATEGORY Page 2 of 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE ELEMENT REPORT FORMAT Other items included in Engineering Element 6.
What regulations, licensing Reports connitments, design require-(cont'd) ments, or other apply or control in this area?
7.
List requests for information, meetings, telephone calls, and other discussions related to element.
I i
OPERATIONS CATEGORY ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE OPERATIONS (OP) ELEMENT REPORTS NOTES /CONNENTS 1.0 Issue I.
Title The brief introduction Characterization Very brief introduction touches on the source of the concerns.
2.0 Summary I.
Title
- 1. The Conclusions are Very brief introduction towards the end of the findings.
III. Finding (Conclusions)
- 2. The Conclusions services as a summary of the findings.
3.0 Evaluators Cover Sheet
- 1. The printed name of the original evaluator (s) appears on the cover sheet.
- 2. The peer reviewer.and CEG-H approval signa-tures are also on the cover sheet.
4.0 Evaluation II. Specific Evaluation Process Nethodology
5.0 Findings
III. Findings s
1880T
E;cles:ca 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE OPERATIONS (OP) ELNENT REPORTS NOTES / COMMENTS 4
6.0 Root Cause IV. Root Cause
- 1. At the element level 4
(Collective Significance) the Rcot. Cause is often rest identifible.
- 2. Collective significance is not addressed at the element report level.
7.0 Attachments /
II. Specific Evaluation
- 1. A list of the concerns List of Coccerns Nethodology with text are included within this section.
)
i
- 2. Other reports are sometimes attached.
j i
1 D
e h
e
/
b i
.