ML20207L607

Forwards FEMA Correspondence Re Evaluation of Remedial Drills Conducted on 860514 & 0806-07.Deficiencies Corrected or Scheduled for Correction.Understands That Problems Re Dedicated Hot Line Telephone Sys Will Soon Be Resolved

ML20207L607
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	01/02/1987
From:	Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Kingsley O MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8701120254
Download: ML20207L607 (2)

Text

a 1

JAN 0 21997 hississippi Power and Light Company 4TTN: Mr. O. D. Kingsley, Jr.

Vice President, Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 23054 Jackson, MS 39205 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

FEMA REGION VI FINAL REPORT FOR REMEDIAL DRILLS CONDUCTED AT THE GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Enclosed are copies of correspondence received from FEMA documenting their evaluation of the remedial drills which were conducted on May 14, 1986, and August 6-7, 1986.

According to FEMA correspondence dated November 24, 1986 (see memo from Richard W. Krimm to Edward L. Jordan), the deficiencies have been either corrected or scheduled for correction.

Based on discussions with Mr. L. Dale of Mississippi Power and Light, we understand that problems involving the dedicated hot line telephone system will soon be resolved or are in the process of being resolved.

We encourage your continued assistance to the States and counties in the development of a scenario for the next full scale exercise that will test as many of the areas as practical in which the previously identified deficiencies were found.

We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely, Original Signed by Luis A. Reyes /for Roger D. Walker, Director Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure:

Memorandum from R. W. Krimm to E. L. Jordan, dated November 24, 1986, with Attachment cc w/ encl:

(See page 2) y

/

\\,

60 B701120254 870102 PDR ADOCK 05000416 F

PDR

{

r.Ed

O g

Mississippi Power and Light Company 2

cc w/ encl:

/ H. Cloninger, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering and Support E. Cross, GGNS Site Director R. Hutchinson, GGNS General Manager

. F. Dale, Director, Nuclear Licensing

[andSafety T. Lally, Manager of Quality Assurance Middle South Services, Inc.

M B. McGehee, Esquire Wise, Carter, Child, Steen and Caraway W S. Reynolds, Esquire Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell

[&Reynolds W. Jackson, Project Engineer bpc w/ encl:

t4RC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk State of Mississippi RII RII RII RI RII RII fn4Gooden ATDec)ker h

VD

<GL$

<f DCollins JPSto HDance DVerrelli

/g7 -

7 (M/)e/8E 11hl/

1/3 /87 1/ v/87 I

f+m: / 4 Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 O

M MaiORANDU4 FOR: Edward L. Jordan Director Division of Dnergency Preparedness and Engineering Pesponse Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Caninission FPCM:

^

Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards

SUBJECT:

Final PeInrt of the May 14, 1986, and August 6 & 7, 1986, Renedial Drills of Offsite Radiological Dnergency Preparedness Plans for the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Attached are t.vo ccpies of the final report on reedial drills resultiry from the December 3,1985, exercise of offsite radiological energency prepared-ness plans for the Grand Gulf !bclear Station. The drills were conducted May 14, 1986, and August 6 & 7, 1986. his report was prepared by the Region VI staff of the Federal Snergency Management Agency.

We outstanding deficiencies that have been corrected or are scheduled for correction ares o limitations of the primary dedicated hot line telephone system in the State Dnergency Operations -Center; This deficiency is expected to be corrected by December 31, 1986.

o unsatisfactory direction and control of the field monitoring teams including connunication problems involving the Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division; This deficiency was corrected by the installation of a new two-way radio base station at the EOF.

o unsatisfactory handling of contaminated individuals by the Madison Parish Hospital and Anbulance Services; This deficiency es corrected by the identification of a different hospital to provide radiological handling of contaminated individuals and the successful remedial drill of the Mahoney Ambulance Service.

The appropriate state plans have been anended to reflect this change.

. Based on the results of the exercise, remedial drills, and scheduled corrective actions, the of fsite radiological energency plans and prepared-ness are adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate masures can be taken to protect the health arxl safety of the public in the event of an accident at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; and, the 44 CFR 350 approval granted in June 1983 will renain in effect.

If you should have any questions, please contact Robert S. Wilkerson, Chief, Technological Hazards Division, at 646-2860.

Attacht:ents 4

1

?

r v

q.

[

a i

a 4

3 x

~c' o

o 97 y

w;a, 3

g+0 3 3 },s d<-

1 3

3 h(

y-i 6

4Xl1 g:1~~ h).

df'?A-m.'Wh

.? ?

• , hk

• kh

.?

• ll b0 h %dw* lN

. A.

h, mR:? Wrny@@mMrW%w#24%+GQ;;q w

_J tM wMm+W"t-e c_

H

]$ w w FINAL e

Ma@

.bw

'~

m' e t wppdm sup&: w n *f,

s-4 Q l wl g& $ &g &o wlON yyO l

n

,m w

mmc M8gR mn REMEDIAL DRILLS

E s> w%gry w;/N,*.Nb %mw#iM?MY$#@mpk.,s%fNinM'$edvY E

WhMW w

mi:r MrsuGw w

<v qwin w;n v. m.n+ ma.w;ny?.~ vwwe:va g g a rg; p cg wv.g m m.ya, nM,N.77EIN.ne; p>+ g m,~rgu.m gom ung a;

. w.u a y,. A g

sa c, wt a w, s

y h4f@

yF i S-Qh ' ^ Qg '

6?hOrMk Q W5 M

s UM T.O RADIO IC EM NC 'PREPpe ED

[

w

't m om op Q

sf y

la'jN.,w b$%%f-:4 5

~ &. g

, > + ifb tFW% W 5*{?,

,$d)y$#h$5$w$$e$;441TW*lNldM.:: nstwe ;M+k@&'h<R.Me:.

^ L&.

u

n

.,a ambw$c.$!h$$ w c $.E

$y m:2m$06

$1#

ii z%. %M,Ru nw amaww mw.

w~

m ~

e ng w; 4. aa gt w p n.,

mx.

feww 9Lyl%s...:MyM%&m,w :qigAiyMA%wwas:g w%;yyw..W4.4in ar.

a.

Af#

MM.7pm 4 hM m.a q x A.

,,nma u:m - --

,5$f.-@M%.%v@, qhn

. n.g,)g % % d e,,,

'1?

a n

-n en n.

.w ^

.Q e 3,5f% y Wx 9.W r a4 7 w<

e v

r s

s we n 91 M. M,%[kY 4

3

. a u

w.nu',g @u NT; 8 x +

c a C *.$Y,@ db 9

'N

{

~ '[

a 4

. sy st-j w e,n w w.%q

~

~- w n+h:l %.ff; ff N h

i

%gDq l#m.x%s.

$ Mg 2.,,e~,ts.A w-,9.Q$

MM- [n+ p h

d b

wu, mat s.

n.Oa;c,~n c+-

,m e

d%m 74;#g$E;d@mt w,.n$e

~w

~

c

pwn

jdQf

$ngj

%%MidMMndMM9t@hM@?fiGEM@&W@@g

$RQ?m 5f M..

tM[WMis$$7#r!.m@$$e

' W%

• bgWFEDERACLEMKRGENCY MANAGEMENT, AGENQTfdfeW6$

k hl MERehniWMi@m@@g?M6NMMMn6 y, W Wry m%

'hmm e4 j%

y gg. x $%R@GgA,%Qp m; gg Ytdtral enterQfW[ML9;@ *l7py pgiN W 3 a

s, C

y.fw&

W c:

As %%Mh4MME200WC6o'p1288MS dis J f h@nfRW#s%w%y%n$D'en65t[idas&sys%

?u ww'g-

.s e 7620i D yM b

• v. 3A

'TF

1. 51 iM54hMb P

~[%ld%

i gwigg M

ingB9n8Wy R

i%w@wummma

>%%uw

.y1 mum m e m.gm e genxm,em.;,7.gm.w e,numayg,eamwn

5

,f, =-

.r d :l=

i r_

g 3

-c=

I E

k y

I p.

U>}

AO pug i

y 3

C m

$,e j

f b..$.

e /2 hv : y ~ < )f J2',

+% Q A

3 tv s,

u!

m p

)

1-A 7 p d ' / *' $

Iw-4 ag 2.-

in Y$f lI O

0

. _Jg

"=

i 42 52 -ur N

k m

-=-

f g

=-

FINAL

~

F

=

4l 1 -

REMEDIAL DRlLLS k

ww

,f -

1

_m-up EREPAREDNENh'kkb n am q::c c c n.bihN j hk bhkNDUMiO RADIObOfelbNik 5$EkdkhC[2

- y$u$f$ffkMNNW$DkMh5@,TEDl3E4 8,6jj$fgQ%;p%gl pp '!

f

(

$mp$Qa# '

% W y +?M "c f % 5A51d W;gs ye$tf7 1

p b

u m A k/W a c g w n; AM.h.

- Nticlear PoweiPlant: frandl Gulf Nuclea_rJ+tati+on,sc#94g4 wwdNff s

- e.

=

,cf5@ga@rg@#$MPSR+OI@WFA[>pitisidFRisiitsuppt Ydifaihiid 1.ight?UMi#8 MEW $7([NM3%MM:

W se iT E

^gkY@h@~% g@$f* ,WWENd%RWWimp#egw&GvfebMN4y$qi?Ddrei@M Md D

{

$I,M,atEn $f PIN,ti,Stktd. ENissiddh0N@M.m$$

iG%WEW%WN0nRW8 N

l TMS$$NN @kf% " Y. l * '

m fAfNOhf

$ dMydskA m y y y.. %@

d,8 j 6

nm% < wha wm u

~

~

~

^ S

?

a ^

..?

iME '

• J "M ' @*

}

%Q%{)j$${IfM[f;OriginalJtxercisesgDecsaib4E3

~ilS45 7 ns C M V 1 i

QW~94Dat6To

. g @. r q y.. w. tides @

. s.1_ a v sy 1.m

=

Ag rn g w w y#n g.,w n...gicm M..

t:C 6 $ g ~ x m = w 9 y : m a,t..-

xq.

p.#,

n m

c w.

v m

q q" 'ng g,w m nh grw w w & [ M1fIhkN M Ih.

. Ih hhI hMfk[ffDNhhh

% $ R g [ey m &p$ h h!h h$ k 6d$h k. h=g;n, W 4$ w N

un m 2fq M b gc %,yg w q,%- % day, bQ -

nnnkm.Qvsp J yTgiWW%

y' &" a#

v a

wwRedw{LJ%jsQState,0N%9}anagg 1W S M 3

{

5ggj g yg adicipid leu,Is C

i

..e AR s% $ hdnYgMd$19 C W M b WY@ f5 W M e#M M'@

sMEN pd iM M W WW!EMM @M@yanN

=%RR@@w %d5 MEG %4#FM4.4@dWQWhWU:

G e#M F

h Tedd$

- f44@?WM w w @n$Tf!6 hhW m 17 &c$ k &

• e h

=

A

- p@M4 6M @yn;Mn N F

=

c.

=1

,; an L-.:%@M&:w.e n lO

- :: k+

r s

.M I'A, O, w w! Wim A W @mW.w/2.M dD.

d W 9 9 N As?

A S

ESm$m E

snAn ww w~. - m~ -

a-m ma., a.

nw M$h(g16[MMPSifM26 h.b MiQFReildriVI

~

u

. w --...

u. m x or$ey.m%puf$aCW-FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT yhM@ 4'W,m x,

v y

g 2M W ff m

4MG

% i 5 hhy NWRW @?M[M@- 1, w%~p 1sMMC;W

..;b

- ?800'N. Loop 288

.,e % E4'f$$#M $

JMFe'deral Center Midd 5'

~

7/k% ' / ' VI G

T Iienton, Texas 76201 M ^

.. f? f f].. m' % m. g

'Ow

\\

t

b

_r - g?*. "

<2gT5QQ y' *.-

-1.

Y T

'W~

,^

l 8

my4~.v%m 1

, _r r: g g w. 9 w,

m Ep q:w e.

4p --

W-r y

r y s4x.y 9

y 'E x

e 17 Ah4 t -a Ju t -

w w_J p;M4 m_;<w a.

q

' glW f h.9fwm s..

i w w w u w usp m..-,

~.e +s-w.. ;,

x

m....

L. _

,c. 4mww w b

-s, I

l l

1 CONTENTS 1 INTROD U CTION A N D SU M M A RY.........................................

I 1.1 R e m edial Drill Background...........................................

1 1.2 F e d e r al E v al u a t o rs..................................................

2 1.3 R e m e dial D rill Obj ectives............................................

3 2 E X E RCIS E EVA L U ATIO N................................................

6 2.1 EO F Field Tea m Coordination.........................................

6 2.2 Fi eld M o n i t o rin g Te a m s..............................................

8 2.3 Mahoney Am bulance Service (E MS)....................................

11 3 TRACKING SCHEDULE FOR STATE / LOCAL ACTIONS TO CORRECT DEFICIENCIES AND AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION.............

13 4 EVA LU ATIO N O F O BJ E CTIVES........................................... 31 4.1 Summary of FEM A Objectives Remaining to be Met...................... 31 4.2 FEMA Objectives Tracking - Grand Gulf Station......................... 31 TABLES 1 Tracking System for Deficiencies and Arcas Requiring Corrective Action.................................................................

14 2 Summary of FEMA Objectives Remaining to be Met as of August 7,1986

- Grand G ulf Nucle ar Station............................................. 32 3 FEMA Objectives Tracking Chart - Grand Gulf Nuclear Station............... 34 E

1

~q_j I INTRODUCTION AND

SUMMARY

+

J 1.1 REMEDIAL DRILL BACEGROUND Following the December 3-4, 1985 full participation exercise, a remedial drill m

I was required. This drill was conducted May 14,1986 to correct deficiencies identified in

~~'

the December,1985 exercise. Evaluation results of the May 1986 remedial drill required q

a second remedial drill in the areas of: 1) field monitoring activities, and 2) medical

~'j support (ambulance only).

Therefore, a second remedial drill was conducted and I

evaluated on August 6 and 7,1986.

This report includes evaluation of the second l

y remedial drill.

i Three deficiencies were identified as a result of the December 3-4, 1985 exercise.

These deficiencies were documented in the March 4, 1986 report.

A

}

description of the defic!encies and their current status follow.

w Primary Dedicated Hotline System: As identified in the March 4,

,_l 1986 report under deficiency #1, this system did not allow the State of Louisiana opportunity to initiate conversations with affacted parties. FEMA has reviewed a letter from Mississippi Power and Light to the State of Louisiana informing them that the operational

~~J hotline (OHL) upgrade has been ordered from AT&T. This system upgrade will give each party the ability to selectively ring any other l

party. The "ringback" system is expected to be in service no later than 12/31/86. Therefore, the defielency has been corrected and FEMA will verify the system's operability.

Madison Parish Hospital and Ambulance Service: A deficiency (#20-March 4,1986 Report) and two areas requiring corrective action (#'s

,]

21 and 22 March 4,1986 Report) were identified as a result of the December 3-4, 1985 exercise, An exemption request regarding

~'

Madison Parish Hospital and two others, of their REP support

_l responsibilities was approved on August 28, 1986 by FEMA. Thus,

, J objective 31 is no longer applicable to Louisiana hospitals and, therefore, the deficiency and ARCAs relating to hospital REP responsibilities in Louisiana have been eliminated.

However, medical support with regard to ambulance service responsibilities still exist and these capabilities were tested during the second remedial drill by the Mahoney Ambulance Service and the Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division.

The results of the demonstration of FEMA objectives #30, #5, and #36 in response to the deficiency and ARCAs are include'd in this exercise report in Section 2.3.

Mahoney Ambulance Service properly demonstrated FEMA objectives #30, #5, #36.

4 2

l Direction and Control of Field Monitoring Teams: As indicated in the March 4,1986 exercise report, the direction and control of field monitoring teams was unsatisfactory during the December 3-4,1985 J

exercise. The conveyance of information, from the LNED staff at l

the EOF, to the field monitoring teams via the field team j

coordinator and dispatcher located at the Tensas Parish EOC, was awkward and inefficient. This arrangement resulted in the field teams not being effectively tracked, and inaccurate information J,

being transferred between the LNED staff at the EOF, the field team coordinator and dispatcher at Tensas Parish, and the field monitoring teams. As a result of these evaluations, deficiencies were identified for FEMA objectives #3, #4, and #36 and the first remedial drill was req'uired.

In response to FEMA recommendation, a new two-way radio base station was installed at the EOF to allow LNED personnel to control field monitoring teams directly from the EOF, thus eliminating the need for cumbersome communication link through Tensas Parish.

The Tensas Parish Courthouse complex continued to be used as' a i

staging area for the field monitoring teams.

During the first remedial drill, direction of field monitoring teams from the EOF proved to be very effective. This demonstration corrected deficiencies #11 and #12 documented in the March 4, 1986 exercise report.

Most Areas Requiring Corrective Action related to field monitoring were also corrected during the first remedial drill.

However, one of the two State field monitoring teams (Team #2) participating in the first remedial drill, failed to adequately demonstrate FEMA Objectives #7 and #8. Therefore, as previously stated, a second remedial drill was required to re-demonstrate FEMA Objections #7 and #8. The second remedial drill was conducted on August 7,1986. Evaluation results in Section 2.2 of this report describe how these two objectives were adequately demonstrated.

1.2 FEDERAL EVALUATORS Six Federal evaluators participated in the first remedial drill on May 14, 1986.

These individuals, their agencies, and assigned evaluation responsibilities follow:

Al Lookabaugh FEMA Overall Coordination Oary Kaszynski ANL EOF Tony Rhea ORNL EOF Gary Jones FEMA Field Monitoring Team (I Harry Harrison FEMA Field Monitoring Team 41 Jim Opelka ANL Field Monitoring Team 42

.s

~-,,%

U*

3 l

Six Federal evaluators participated in the second remedial drill on August 6-7, 1986. These individuals, their agencies, and assigned evaluation responsibilities follow:

y

_j Gary Jones FEMA Overall Coordination Mahoney Ambulance Service &

LNED Monitoring Team #3

~7 a

-A Tom Goertz FDA Mahoney Ambulance Service &

~1 LNED Monitoring Team #3 i

Jim Opelka ANL Field Monitoring Team #1 q

C Harry Harrison FEMA Field Monitoring Team #2 Lee Peyton FEMA

_q

_j Gary Kaszynski (observe only)

Gra..d Gulf EOF - Field Team Coordination m

Gary Jones (cbserve only)

Grand Gulf EOF - Field Team Coordination

)

~;

1.3 REMEDIAL DRILL OBJECTIVES

^

The State of Loulslana agreed to retest the following FEMA Objectives (listed by FEMA Objective No.) to correct the associated Deficiencies and/or Areas Requiring Corrective Action.

1st Remedial Drill conducted May 14,1986 EOF Objectives FEMA #3 Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate emergency activities (Deficiency #11 and #12 - 3/4/86 report).

FEMA #4 Demonstr adequacy.of facilities, equipment, maps and displays to support gency operations.

FEMA #5 Demonstra ability to comraunicate with all appropriate locations, anizations and field personnel (equipment)

(Deficiency

, 12, 15 - 3/4/86 report).

FEMA

1. 20 Demonstrate ability to continuously monitor and control emergency worker exposure.

FEMA #36 Demonstrate the adequacy of communications procedures and methods (Deficiency #11,12,15 - 3/4/86 report).

4 Field Monitoring Teams Objectives In addition to the objectives listed above, the following two objectives were tested by the field monitoring teams:

FEMA

1. 7 Demonstrate appropriate equipment and procedures for determining ambient radiation levels (ARCA #13 - 3/4/86 report).

FEMA

1. 8 Demonstrate appropriate equipment and procedures for measurement of airborne radioiodine concentrations as low as 10-7 uCi/cc in the presence of noble gases (ARCA #14 - 3/4/86 report).

2nd Remedial Drill Conducted August 6-7,1986 Field Monitoring Teams Objectives FEMA

1. 7 Demonstrate appropriate equipment and procedures for determining ambient radiation levels (Deficiency #2 from 5/19/86 remedial drill report).

FEMA #8 Demonstrate approximate equipment and procedures for measure-ment of airborne radioiodine concentration as low as 10-7 uCl/cc in the presence of noble gases (Deficiency #2 from 5/19/86 remedial drill report).

In the second remedial drill, The State of Louisiana and Mahoney Ambulance Service agreed to retest the following FEMA Objectives (listed by FEMA Objective No.)

to correct the associated Deficiencies and/or Areas Requiring Corrective Action from the 12/3/86 exercise (EMS only).

Mahoney Ambulance Service (EMS) Objectives FEMA #30 Demonstrate adequacy of EMS transportation, personnel, and procedures for handling contaminated individuals including proper decontamination of vehicle and equipment. (Deficiency #20 and ARCA #21 from the 12/3/86 exercise.

FEMA

1. 5 Demonstrate ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations and field personnel. (ARCA #22 from the 12/3/86 exercise).

FEMA #36 Demonstrate the adequacy, operability and effective use of emergency communications equipment and the adequacy of communications procedures and methods. (ARCA #22 from the 12/3/96 exercise).

. ~.....

x, ~

t In addition to evaluating the Objectiv!s, Deficiencies, and Areas Requiring Corrective Action during the two remedial drills, Federal evaluators observed related Areas Recommended for Improvements identified in the March 4,1986 report. These are addressed, as appropriate, in the narrative summaries in section 2 of this report.

a E

\\B B

E f.tB

.~,

E

6 2 EXERCISE EVALUATION The Emergency Operating Facility and two field monitoring teams participated in the first remedial drill conducted 5tay 14,1986 to demonstrate objectives to correct the identified Defielencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Action based on the December 3-4, 1985 exercise. The following includes a narrative summary of the EOF performances in the afay 14, 1986 drill. The narrative summary for the two field teams is the performance evaluation noted in the sec',nd remedial drill conducted August 7, y

1986. The evaluation is included in section 2.2 of this report.

~

The numbering of defielencies and ARCA's in the narrative sections that follow correlate with the Afarch 4,1986 report that documented the results of the 12/3-4/85 exercise.

However, the numbering of deficiencies and ARCA's in Tables 1-3 of this report reflect their addition to the list of deficiencies and ARCA's identified at the 12/3-4/85 exercise, therefore Tables 1-3 are a combined list of deficiencies and ARCA's identified at the 12/3-4/85 exercise and the first S/14/86 remedial drill. There were no deficiencies or ARCA's in the second August 6-7, 1986 remedial drill. Credit was given for previous deficiencies and ARCA's which were corrected during these drills.

2.1 EOF FIELD TEAM COORDINATION NARRATIVE The EOF was activated only to test the direction and control of field monitoring from this location through the use of the new two-way radio system. The LNED Staff consisted of the field team dispatcher and an administrative assistant.

The field teams were staged at the LNED trailer at the Tensas Parish Courthouse complex. Prior to deployment, both teams were briefed by the LNED Field Stonitoring Team (F31T) coordinator at the EOF based on the initial conditions presented. Field team direction and control during the first and neond remedial drills were greatly improved with the direction from the EOF. The field teams were effectively positioned, tracked and directed to monitor the edge of the plume.

Decision-making sad coordination of the field teams from the EOF by the LNED F31T coordinator demonstrated correction of Deficiencies 411 and 412 as documented as a result of the December 1985 exercise and presented in the Starch 4,1986 report.

Appropriate maps and visual aids were available to track the location of the field monitoring teams. To improve the plotting of previous locations of the field monitoring teams, it was suggested after the 1st remedial drill that adhesive paper be used which provides space for type of sample, reading, time of sample, and any other pertinent information to track the teams. This area recommended for improvement was carried out at the second remedial drill.

Installation of a new radio at the EOF greatly improved the ability to coordinate the field monitoring teams, as comparec. with the December 3-4, 198a exeretse.

d 7

I Communications with Field Team #2 was intermittent for a period of approximately five minutes but was quickly corrected. This problem was likely due to an intermittent connection in the new van, which had a radio installed in it the day before the exercise.

- n Primary communications would be provided by a portable repeater which would be transported from Baton Rouge. Upon failure of the primary communications, field y

teams would contact the FMT coordinator via commercial telephone. Coins for use at a pay telephone were provided to each field monitoring team.

These activities were simulated during the second remedial drill.

y 1

Although communications from the EOF were excellent, minor changes would provide a more workable system. Earphones should be available for the EOF radio to l

facilitate effective communications with the high ambient noise levels such as could be

~'

expected inside the EOF during an actual emergency. The FMT coordinator indicated that another radio " control head," equipped with a combination headphone and boom microphone, is being readied for use at the EOF. Improved radio protocol from the FMT coordinator could help to eliminate delays in the acknowledgment from the field monitoring teams and the simultaneous transmission (" doubling") by the field monitoring teams af ter a FMT coordinator announcement. One possible improvement would be for the FMT coordinator to poll each field monitoring team in sequence after each announcement.

Also, closer attention to proper station identification would help to eliminate confusion in the event of an actual emergency. Although most of the radio protocol Issues were identified during the December 1985 exercise and the 1st remedial drill, improvements were made during the second remedial drill.

Based on these evaluations for communications procedures and equipment, the Deficiencies (#11,12,15) identified in the March 4,1986 report, were corrected.

The field team coordinator / dispatcher was also assisted by a secretary who logged exposures of emergency workers. Dosimeter readings were collected every 30 minutes and exposures were logged at the EOF. Based on this demonstration, FEMA Objective #20 was met.

Overall, all FEMA objectives were met at the EOF and the previously identified deficiencies were satisfactorily addressed.

DEFICIENCIES None.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION None.

8 AREAS RECOMMENDED FOR IMPROVEMENT Descriptior : It is likely that the EOF would be very noisy during an actual event or exercise and it may be difficult to hear radio transmissions.

Recommendattom Obtain earphones or a combination earphone /

boom microphone headset for use with EOF radio.

Descriptiom At one point in the second remedial drill, communications with Field Monitoring Team #2 broke up.

Recommendatiom Investigate and correct intermittent communica-tions from Field Monitoring Team #2 vehicle.

2.2 FIELD MONITORING TEAMS NARRATIVE Two field monitoring teams were activated for the first remedial drill on May 14, 1986. Field Team #1 successfully demonstrated Objectives 5,7,8,20,36, and corrected that Team's deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Action.

Field Team #2 successfully demonstrated Objectives #5 and #36.

However, they only partially demonstrated Objective #20, and deficiencies in their performance of FEMA Objectives

1. 7 and #8 resulted in these objectives not being met, r,d the requirenent for a second remedial drill conducted August 7,1986. Performance evaluation of the second remedial drill is as follows:

FIELD 'IEAM #1 Team #1 made proper and professional measurements of both open and closed readings of ambient radiation, following current procedures.

Ground level measurements were not taken but are not required by the current procedures.

Air samples were taken and measured following current and proper procedures. The air sample was taken using a jig on the front of the van to hold the air sampler at the proper height above the ground. The cartridge and filter holder were covered with a single layer of plastic bag while being carried into the van. This prevented contamination of the vehicle or field team members during bagging and measuring the filter and cartridge inside the vehicle.

A double plastic bag would present an extra barrier of safety in handling the cartridges in the vehicle. Samples were measured after the team moved to an area of background ambient radiation. Samples were properly double bagged and labeled. The cartridges were measured properly using a specially designed jig to assure proper geometry. The filter paper and cartridge

9 were both checked to see if they could be safely stored in the van without excess radiation exposure to those in the van.

Cross-y contamination of samples was properly prevented.

J

(

Objectives #7 and #8 were fully met. The deficiency from the first remedial

~ ')

drill was fully resolved and corrected.

lJ Field Team #1 had the proper equipment for measuring ambient radiation and for L7 taking and measuring air samples. A checklist of equipment and current procedures were d

available. The vehicle was large enough to accommodate equipment, personnel, and

}

workspace; it was suitable for all anticipated terrain. Air sampling equipment was L

calibrated at the proper flow rate (2 cfm) and silver zeolite cartridges were used. A1.

7 j

equipment had been calibrated within the past year.

Field Team #1 practiced good exposure control; all pntective equipment was

~~]

available, KI was on hand; and all appropriate dosimetry equipment was available.

Dosimeter readings were made every 30 minutes and reported to the Field Monitoring Team coordinator at the EOF.

Team #1 knew dose limits.

Team #1 adequately

,,7 1

demonstrated FEMA objectives #7 and #8 during this second remedial drill.

a DEFICIENCIES None.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION None.

AREAS RECOMMENDED FOR IMPROVEMENT

==

Description:==

According to current procedures, ambient measurements were taken at waist level.

Recommendation: It is suggested that measurements be taken at ground level as a check on particle contamination, which could be kicked up by walking and then ingested. This could be reflected in a change in procedures.

7 2

==

Description:==

The air sample cartridge holder was only single bagged when brought into the vehicle.

Recommendation: A second bag would be an inexpensive second line of defense against contamination getting into the vehicle and personnel inside the vehicle.

10 FIELD TEAM #2 The field monitoring teams were mobilized from their work locations in Baton Rouge. This procedure would be follovmd during normal duty-hours.

The field teams have lockers with supplies in place and a checklist is used to inventory equipment. Team #2 inventoried its locker prior to departing from Baton Rouge and found it complete. The field team was comprised of two members, the lead health physicist and an assistant health physicist. Members were also given briefings on plant conditions, weather, etc.

In the field, good procedures were followed in taking an air sample.

The sample was double-bagged and was appropriately labeled. Team #2 is also commended on its use of the Ludlum 14C with 1"x 1" scintillator for early and very sensitive detection of gamma radiation.

There was a communications check between survey teams early on during deployment and it caused Team #2 to note that its transmitter was not operational. The Team 'immediately turned back and traded vehicles (for one with an operational radio).

Field Team #2 practiced good exposure control; all protective equipment was available, KI was on hand; and all appropriate dosimetry equipment was available. Dosimeter readings were made every 30 minutes and reported to the Field Monitoring Team coordinator at the EOF. Team #2 knew dose limits. Team #2 adequately demonstrated FEMA objectives #7 and #8 during this second remedial drill.

DEFICIENCIES None.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION None.

l AREAS RECOMMENDED FOR IMPROVEMENT None.

NiE mil

y 11 2.3 MAHONEY AMBULANCE SERVICE (EMS)

)

NARRATIVE Mahoney Ambulance Service is the designated emergency medical service for transporting injured, contaminated persons during a nuclear emergency in the St. Joseph, LA/Tensas Parish area. Training of EMS personnel in the proper handling of an injured, contaminated individual was conducted by the Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division and Mahoney Ambulance Service.

FEMA objective #30 was adequately demonstrated by Mahoney Ambulance Service.

Ambulances used by the firm are equipped with two sets of anticontamination clothing, two 0-200R dosimeters and a CDV-700 radiation survey meter. The ambulances are also equipped with a two-way radio system capable of communications on the Sheriff's Network, the Louisiana and Mississippi Hospital Network, the Civil Defense Network and a phone patch communication system.

At 1:30 p.m. a telephone call was received at the Tensas Parish Sheriff's office informing them that someone had been shot with a rifle (simulated) at the junction of Highway 604 and 605. According to the caller, the injured person and his companion had heard the siren but were unable to leave the area or take shelter. Mahoney Ambulance Service was contacted at 1:30 p.m. using the Civil Defense Network and was dispatched to the scene.

The ambulance service's ability to use emergency communication equipment to communicate with other organizations was demonstrated satisfactorily by this portion of the exercise. Thus, FEMA objectives 5 and 36 were met.

Due to the expense and the time necessary for replacement, complete dress out by the EMS crew in anticontamination clothing was simulated for this exercise. At 1:35 p.m. the EMS crew arrived at the junction of highway 604 and 605 and was met by the wounded (simulated) person's companion. In order to assess the extent of the injuries, it was necessary to remove the wounded individual's shirt. To prevent the spread of any contamination in the ambulance, the EMS crew bagged the victim's shirt and wrapped him in a blanket prior to loading him for transport. The wounded person's companion was transported in the ambulance and was instructed to wrap herself in a blanket.

In order to demonstrate off loading of the patient and decontamination of the ambulance, a hospital emergency room entrance was simulated at the Tensas Parish Civil Defense office.

In an actual emergency, the wounded individual would have been transported to the nearest hospital (Tensas Parish Hospital for patient stabilization) and T

~

then transferred to the Vicksburg or Port Gibson, MS Hospital for radiation management.

At the simulated hospital, a hotline and radiation control area was established by members of a field monitoring team from the Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division (LNED).

A radiation survey of the transport vehicle, EMS crew and passengers was conducted. The patient's companion was determined to be contaminated and appropriate decontamination procedures were instituted. All contaminated clothing, blankets, etc.

were collected by the field team and double bagged for proper disposal. The LNED

12 Team did an excellent job in monitoring the vehicle, equipment, patients and ambulance crew. They were knowledgeable about proper decontamination procedures.

The adequacy of EMS transportation, personnel and procedures for handling contaminated individuals, including decontamination of vehicle and equipment was demonstrated satisfactorily during this portion of the exercise. Thus, FEMA objective 30 was met. This demonstration also provided corrective action for ARCA #21 from the December 3-4, 1985 exercise.

DEFICIENC12S None.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION None.

AREAS RECOMMENDED FOR IMPROVEMENT None.

l*

4

. ay

13 3 TRACKING SCIIEDULE FOR STATE / LOCAL ACTIONS TO CORRECT DEFICIENCIES AND AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION Section 2 of this exercise report has provided a listing of Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Actions remaining uncorrected with recommendations noted by Federal evaluators following both the exercise conducted on December 3-4, 1985 and the two (2) remedial drills conducted May 14, 1986 and August 6-7, 1986. The deficiencies and ARCAs have been renumbered in Tables 1-3 to reflect tneir current status. The

~

evaluations were based on the applicable planning standards and evaluation criteria set forth in Section 11 of the NUREG-0654, FEMA-1, Rev.1 (November 1980) and exercise objectives.

The FEMA Region VI Director is responsible for certifying to the FEMA Associate Director, State and Local Programs and Support, Washington, D.C., that any Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Actions noted in the exercise and remedial drills will be corrected and such corrections will also be incorporated into the emergency response plans as appropriate.

FEMA Region Vi has requested that the State of Louisiana and local jurisdictions participat:ng in the Grand Gulf exercise submit measures that they will take to correct those problems found by the Federal evaluators. A detailed plan, including dates for scheduling and implementing corrective actions is included in Table 1.

W k

n

~__

TAllt.E I Tracking System for Deficiencies and Aress Requiring Corrective Action (Includes both exercise conducted Decsasber 34,1985 and Heanedial Drills conducted May 14,1986 and August 6-7, 1988)

FD(A Evaluation of Nticier.cies and Areas State and Local kcquiritad Currective Actions Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMA /HAC Recommendations State (S) and local (L)

Completion and Determination of Compl et ion tur Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date

!*FICIENCIES:

St at e Emergency Operations Center (TOC) 1.

==

Description:==

1he primary dedi-The State of Louisiana HP&L letter FEMA accepts that this No later cared hotline telephone system received a

letter dated indicates deficiency has been than does not allow the State of 9/15/86 f rors MP&L stating that 12/31/86 corrected.

FEMA will 12/31/86.

I Loui siana opportunit y to initiate the hotline upgrade has been completion.

monitor the situation to conversation with the State of ordered f rom AT&T and will be ensure the hotline upgrade ur uther allected in service by 12/31/86.

is in serWICe by 12/31/86.

Mimsissippi parties.

(NUHLC-0654, II, F.I.b) l kecommmendation Hedesign deds-cated phone system to allow for two way or multi-contact cap-g abilit y.

(11/3-4/85 Esercise) e St ate Field Monitoring Teana 1.

N ec r i pt ion:

Team #2 did not This activity was adequately C/7/86 FEMA evaluated this defi-8/7/86 accurately measure radiciodine demonstrated and corrected in ciency as adequate during l

tevelm.

Several procedures were the 8/7/80 remedial drill.

the 8/7/86 remedial drill.

s apr ope r l y performed which would lead to ina(c ur at e readings. The team did not accurately determine their locatiun in or out of the l

l l

l l

i

-~

TABIE I (Cont'd)

FEMA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Actions Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMA /RAC Recommendations State (S) and local (L),

Completion and Determination of Compl et ion for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date

{

State Field Monitoring Teams (Cont'd) 2.

Descriptions (Cont'd) plume by open window (beta and gasina ) readings compared with closed window (gansna only) read-ings.

Only an open window reac-ing was taken.

Contributing to the possibility that the reading could be too large were the following factorst (1) the air sample cartridge was measured while still in the plume; and (2) the probe was not protected by plastic and the sample was single begged instead of double-bagged.

p Despite the use of a discrimi-V nator, the iodine and noble gases e

in the plume would cause en in-crease in readings on the Na!

detector from direct radiation.

With the detector probe in con-tact with the single plastic bag containing the sample cross-cont ami nat inn of the probe and l

increased readings were possible.

(NUREC-0654, II, I.9).

I i

TAlllE I (Cont'd)

FEMA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas kegat riseg Cur rect ive Act ions Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with Ft MA/MAC Recumunendations State (S) and I.ocal (L)

Compl et ion and Determination of Completion for Currection Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date St at e Field Monit oring Teams (Cont 'd )

kecommendation:

The team should receive turther training and should redemonstrate required IEMA object ives in a ren.edi al drill (5/14/80 Memedial) l 1.

De sc ri pt ion:

Direction and con-This activity was

• adequately 5/86 FEMA has determined that 5/86 f

t' is corrective action is

(

trol ut the three t ield muni tor-demonstrated in the first n

I eng teams was unsatisfactory.

remedial drill conducted on now complete and evaluated 1he u,n v e y a nc e ut information, May 14, 19861 a radio base as adequate as of 5/86.

trum the LN t.D dose assessawnt station was installed in the st at t at the t.0F, by telephane to EOF at Crand Culf to provide j

t t.e tield team coordinator and for direction of field teams.

l l

dispatcher at the team staging area, t he n by radio to the field g

team (s), was awkward and ineffi-G cient.

This arrangement resulted in the tield teams not being ettectively Eracked, and inac-curate inturaation benng trans-itrred be t we en all three loca-Enunn.

't h i s resulted in Objec-tavem 3,

4 and h not being set.

(NUMEC-Otd4, !!, A.2.a. F.1.d)

TAlllE I (Cont'd)

.~

FEMA Evaluation of State end Local Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Actions Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMA /RAC Recommendations State (5) and local (L)

Complet ion and Determination of Com pl et ion for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or inadequacy Date State Field Monitoring Teams (Cont'd)

Recommendation:

Provide direct contact with the field teams, by two-way radio, f rom the LNED dose assessment staff at the EOF.

(12/3-4/86 Exercise) e State Field Team staging Area and Field Monitoring Control 4.

De sc ri pt ion The field team This activity was adequately 5/86 FEMA evaluated this defi-5/86 control communications problem, demonstrated in the first ciency as adequate during the 5/14/86 remedial drill.

described in 3 above, resulted in remedial drill conducted on the relay of inaccurate informa-May 14, 19863 a radio base tion and unsatisfactory control station was installed in the of the field team (s) from the EOF at Crand Cul f to provide staging area.

for direction of field teams.

g w

Recommendation:

Same as in 3 above.

IJED Dose Assessment Staff at the EDF 5.

Description As described in 3 1his activity was adequately 5/EA FEMA evaluated this defi-5/86 above, no direct comenunic at ions demonstrated in the first ci ncy as adequat e during the 5/14/86 remedial drill, esist between the field teams and remedial drill conducted on the EOF dose assessment stafl.

Hay 14, 19863 a radio base The result was unsatisfactory station was installed in the g

t.'

T TAitLE I (Coral'd)

FEMA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas Proposed Corrective Actions Actual kequiring Currective Actions wat h itMA/NAC Recommendat ions State (S) and local (L)

Complet ion and Determination of Cumpletion for Currection Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date IJEB Dome Assesamont Staff at the EOF

( Comt ' d )

i S.

De sc ri pt ion: (Cont'd) l

)

l auntrul of the field team (s) and EOF at Crand Culf to provide I

inaccurate information being for direction of field teams.

passed.

.tecosamendat i on s Same as in 3 a tsu ve.

nadison Parish llospital and Ambulance Services r.

De sc ri pt ion:

bot h Eswrgency An exemption request for 8/86 FEMA approved (8/28/86) a 8/86

• dical Services (EMS) and hospi-Madison Parish Hospital (and hospital exemption request tal persinnel need necessary

.other hospitals in the vici-outasitted by the State of g

radiological training in the nity) was sent August 8, 1986.

La.

Therefore, FEMA 00 Objective 31 is, exempt from proper handling ut an injured, c c...t ami nat ed individual, includ-A remedial drill for EMS demonstration for the Crand ing des.unstration of procedures (ambulance) was conducted Culf site.

State / Local on huu to de cont aminat e an in-August 6,

1986, and succes-plans had been amended jured contaminated patient and afully corrected this accordingly.

The previous how to p ro pe r l y set up a radio-deficiency as it relates to deficiency and ARCA's for the Hadison Parish Hospital, logical s.a na geme nt roor (includ-FMS staff, during the 12/3/85 esercise, demonstration ut "1 tot-eng proper are eliminated.

However, line" and "Esit" procedures) the deficiency and ARCA's etc.

(NUREC-0654, II, 0)

TAllLE 1 (Cont'd)

FEMA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Actione Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMA /RAC Recommendations State (S) and local (I.)

Complet ion and Determinction of Compl et ion for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or inadequacy Date Madison Parish Hospital and hbulence Services (Cont'd)

Recoassendations in6ure that for the DIS (ambulance) proper training is received prior during the 12/J/85 esercise to remedial drill.

(12/3-4/85 were corrected during the I

8/6/86 remedial drill.

The exercise) tahoney embulance service.

adequately demonstrated FEMA I

objectives 30, 5 and 36 as described in this final exercise report.

AREAS REQuihlWC (X)RRECTIVE ACTION:

State Emergency Operations Center w

(EOC) e 1.

Desc ri pt ion:

Due to lack of

%ose state agencies having a 12/87 FEMA accepts that this ARCA pa rt ic ip at ion (except for the lA response role will participate will be corrected, but will De pa rt ment of Agriculture) of in the next full scale emer-reevaluate during the 1981 agencies having a response as-cine scheduled for late 1987 Crand Culf esercise, signment at the St ate EOC, capa-at Crand Culf.

Peili t y for activation and staf-fing could not be determined adequate (NUREC-0654, II, E.1, E.2).

I I

g l

t s'

TA11121 (Cont'd)

FEMA Evaluation of

)

!=tacaencies and Areas State and I.ocal htquit a ng Currect s ve Ac t ions Proposed Corrective Actions Actual wath itMA/kAC Recommendations State (S) and Local (L)

Complet ion and Determination of Completion for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date St ate Emergency Operations Center (LOC) (Cont 'd )

Necommendatioss:

Those agencies and personnel having a response role at the State EOC should be requircJ to participate during the nest esercise no that deter-manation ut c a pa bi l i t y to mobi-lize and staff can be e s t a b-i l

lished. (12/3-4/85 Esercise) l J.

De sc ri pt ion:

Message handling Procedures are being revised 9/86 FEMA accepts that this ARCA were not success-to show that a written record will be c o r re c t,ed, but will capabilitirs f ull y desionst rat ed due t o failure of decisions and other signi-reevaluate during the next to actually send messages or at ficant actions are to be main-scheduled esercise, least to fully d oc umen t their tained.

s i s.ul a t ed d i s pa t c h and receipt y

O methods (NUREC-0654, II, E.).

Recommendationt All incoming and outgoing sessage handling pro-cedures should be fully deson-atrated ur documentation care-tully pes t orswd to verify the St at e's (a pa bi li t y.

(12/3-4/8$ Esercise)

~

s c.;

e zM:

s 1?] (.. D ' '. 4l1i y.

7 1__2

, a.,3

2. m.,;, _-

T T M N i-REEs3 TAflLE I (Cont'd)

FEMA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Actions Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMA /RAC Recommendations State (S) and local (L)

Completion and Determination of Cumpl et i on for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or inadequac; Date State *.nergency oberations Center (EOC) (Cont'd) 3.

Descriptions A satisfactory LDEF maintains a radio system 3/86 FEMA ac cept s that IEEP 3/86 back-up cosusunic at ions link be-with the capability of cover-maintains back-up c osusun i-tween the State EOC end Tensas ing Tensas Parish in the event cation.

Parish has not been established of an emergency. A field unit on this radio system can be (NUREC-0654 II, F.1).

deployed to Tensne Parish at Recosssendations Ca pabilit y the time of an energency.

should be established for initia-tion of calls by State EOC on the dedicated line, or establishment of a twu-way radio system.

(12/3-4/85 Esercise) 4.

riscriptions capability to suc-The nest full scale exercise 12/87 FEMA accepts that this ARCA ce ssfully perform State EOC f unc-at Crand Culf will include will be corrected in the ta H

tions relating to Ingestion Path-ingestion pathway activities.

next full scale exercise at Crand Culf.

This will also way was not successfully or f ully allow the State / Local demonstrated (NUREC-0654, II, authorities to demonstrate I.10. I.11. J.9, J.II, M.1).

adequately all FEMA Rec oassenda tion s State EOC mu st objectives within the sin-redemonstrate ingestion Pathway year cycle.

re sponse activities within the six year c ycle for accomplishing ali FEMA objectives.

(12/3-4/85 Exercise) i

...-v

TAlllE I (Cont'd)

FEMA Evaluation of~

State and Local Deticiencies and Areas Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMAluAC Hecommendations State (S) and Local (L)

Completion and Determination of Gampletion 6tequiring Correct ive Actions tur Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or inadequa y Date l

st at e Emergenc y Operat ions Center (EOC) (Cunt'd)

S.

==

Description:==

Decisions made by The chief of operations is re-12/87 FEMA accepts that this ARCA eaccutive staff were not provided sponsible for briefing EOC will be corrected, but will reevaluate at the nest an briefing form to the Opera-staff on decisions made by the

}

esecutive group. This will be scheduled esercise.

tsuna statt.

emphasized in the annual secosamendati on s StafI members training provided.

shuuld be kept knuwled eable d

l through brieting on all activ-ities at the LNED Headquarters.

l (12/3-4/85 Esercise) t.

St at e IJiED Headquarters De sc ri pt ion s The authorization Procedures are being revised 9/86 FEMA accepts that tiii s ARCA will be corrected, but will to administer El was unwarranted to reflect current policy o.

on reevaluate at the nest based on the pro jected and sample issuance of K!.

scheduled exercise.

Mw i

data.

The De pa r t ment of Health pulicy and I.NED Headquarter's Training will be conducted on SOPS differ as to the threshold the revised procedures in the for administering Ki (NUMEC-0654, annual training provided to emergency personnel.

I I, J.10.e.t ).

kecomumendation A clear policy statement should be f ormulat ed regardihg exposure levels war-ranting the authorization to l

nM1B

-~

x-

+ - -

TNDIE I (Cont'd) i I

FEMA Evaluatioc. of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas Proposed Corrective Actions Act ual Re3uiring Corrective Actions with FEMA /RAC Recommenor' 8cne State (5) and local (L)

Completion and Determination of Cumplet ion y

for Correction, Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date State IJED Headquarters (Cont'd) 6.

Recosmnendations (Cont 'd )

j administer KI.

SOPS and the plan i

should then be revised to reflect l

the polic y statement.

Decision-makers should be trained in these resultant policy changes.

(12/3-4/85 Exercise) 7.

Descriptions Different maps were All old maps have been re-3/86 FEMA accepts that this ARCA 3/86 used by State and Local agencies placed with current maps that is corrected, but will re-than those used by ut il it y to are consistent in their means evaluate at next scheduled identify protective action zones of identifying Protective exercise.

(NUREC-0654, II, J.10.a).

Action Sections.

N y

Rec osamendat ion s All response organizations and Utility should assure consistency in identifi-cation of protective action areas by using identical zone desig-nation maps.

(12/3-4/35 Exercise) 8.

De sc ri pt ient Capability to suc-The nest full scale exercise 12/87 FEMA accepts that this ARCA cessfully perform all required at Crand Culf will include will be corrected in the fusctions relating to Ingestion ingestion pathway activities.

next full scale exercise at Pa t hwa y was not fully demon-Crand Culf.

This will allow st:sted (NUREC-0654 Ill I.10, I.11, J.9, J.ll, M.1).

8 f

TAllt.K I (Cont'd)

FEMA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas keguiring Corrective Actions Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMA /kAC Recommendations State (S) and Local (L)

Completion and Determination of Compl et ion for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or inadequacy Date st ate IJ4ED Headquarters (Cont'd) the State /facal to demon-Mecommendation LNED must re-strate adec,ua t ely the inges-demonstrate Ingestion Pathway tion pathway and other FEMA emeegency activities within the min year cycle for accompl i shing objectives within the six-year cycle.

all FEMA object ive s.

(1213-4/85 Exercise) 9.

tw s.:ri pt ion Hedia releases Press releases which are made 5/86 FEMA accepts that this ARCA whn.ch were verbally passed to the will be prepared in print ed will be corrected, but will t o F., Tensas Parish and the Media

. form prior to release.

Also, reevaluate at next scheduled Cenner were not always prepared a log of telephone messages exercise.

in hard copy form and transmitted will be kept as described in tur verification of the verbal correcting ARCA #2 under State decision (NUMEC-0654, II., E).

EOC.

kecosamenda t ion: For future emer-Training conducted for emer-12/86 ye c i n,e s, messages should actually gency personnel will emphasize t,e dretted and d i s t r i but e J, and the need for these actions.

nimalat ion of siedia releases from St at e 1.NED Headquarters kept to a r i r. i nium.

Addit ionally, t elephone 4

nie n sage logs should be maintained as record of communications in t ree e xec ut ive room.

(12/3-4/55 Exercise)

prier =w amrTru e a-ar a a a a a a ar ar /

,[.

TABLE I (ContM)

T J

d FEMA Evaluation of y

State and Local

'l Proposed Corrective Actic Ac t ual

)

Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Actions with FEMA /RAC Recommendations State (S) and local (L)

Completion and Determination of Com pl et ion

]

for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date l

l State Field Monitoring Teams 10.

Descriptions Team #3 had survey

• All equi pment needed for 5/86 FEMA evaluated this ARCA as 5/86 meters and the air sampling pump emergency response use has adequate during the 5/14/86 remedial drill.

which were not calibrated within since been calibrated; an the past year.

(NUREC-0654, II, annual frequency of calibra-I P.10, I.9 )

El 1 is specified in the plar.

Becommendation Team #3 should ensure that t he i r equipment is calibrated and calibration dates rated on the inst rument s.

(22/3-4/85 exercise) 11.

Bescription Team #3 did not 1his activity was adequately 8/86 FEHA evaluated this ARCA as 8/86 l

teve the capability to measure demonstrated in the August 7, adequate during the 8/7/86 endioiodine levels in the air.

1986 remedial drill.

It remedial drill.

FEMA also y

should be noted that conver-agrees that conversion from u

l Mcommendation Instrument sion from cpm to uCi i s to be cpm to uCi is to be pe r-snlibration curves should be performed at the EOF, not by formed at the EOF, not by field team members.

a<allable with the field team field team members.

aad at LNED Base for converting sm to uCi for the determination sof radioiodine concentration in sme air.

Additional training in emis area is needed by field team #3.

(12/3-4/85 Exercise) i l

l l

l l

J e

TAIRE I (Coot'd)

I FEMA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas Proposed Corrective Actions Actual Requiring Corrective Actions wit h FEMA /W AC keconnendations State (S) and Local (L)

Completion and Determination of Complet ion for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date 4

Tensas Parish tDC 12.

Descriptioni Capability to suc-The nest full scale esercise 12/87 FEMA accepts that this ARCA cessfully perform Parish func-at Crand Culf will include will be corrected in the tiene relating to Ingestion ingestion pathway activities.

next full scale exercise at Crand Culf.

This will allow Pathway could not be desen-the State / Local to demon-i I

strated since they must imple-strate adequately the inges-l m.e n t decisions or r ec omine nd a-tion pathway and other FEMA tions made bw State of Louisiana objectives within the sin-(NUREC-0654, I.10, i.!!,

year cycle.

J.9, J.ll, M.1).

Recommendation:

Tensas Parish must sedeawnstrate Ingestion activities Pathway response i

wit hin the six year cycle for j

a cc ompl i shi ng all FEMA Ob jec-g tives. (12/3-4/85 Emercise) ch i Medse Center l

13.

==

Description:==

Facility used for At present, a f acilit y ade-Unknown FEMA will continue to work the operation of Media activi-quate to conduct media center with State / Local officials ties is not adequate to allow activities has not been tu resolve this ARCA before l

the nest scheduled exercise.

succesmlut conduct of Hedia located.

Center.

2 t

0 1

4 i

l

. -- Y YY Y

W Y

"~

~

II TABli I (ContM) ri I

4 I

FEMA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMA /RAC Recomunendations State (S) and Local (L)

Complet ion and Determination of Cumplet ion j

Sequiring Corrective Actions for Correction Proposed Correctivs Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date Media Center (Cont'd)

Recommendation: Efforts must be made to establish, and demon-strate use of a facility ade-suate for the successful conduct of media activities by State and Parish media officials.

l (12/3-4/85 Exercise) 14.

Descriptions Advance coordi-Advance coordination was not Unknown FEMA will continue to work mation between all PIO's was not possible in the facility with State / Local officials to resolve this ARCA before utilised, due to space limita-obtained prior to all news briefings, although some limited tions.

When an adequate the next scheduled esercise.

coordination was obtained at facility is l oc a t ed, thir situation will be remedied.

times, ra l

Recomunendat ion s To avoid con-tradictory or confusing releases of information by the media, coordination should be obtained l

orior to all issuances of all

aress releases.

(12/3-4/85 Esercise)

O f

is c Tall!l 1 (Cont'd)

FEMA Evaluation of State and Local i

Proposed Correctivg Actions Ac t ual

]

tJeticiencies and Areas kequiring Currective Actions with FEMA /MAC Recommendations State (S) and Local (L)

Compl et ion and Determination of Completion i

tur Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date l

1 Media Certer (Cont'd) 15.

==

Description:==

There was no co-Advance coordination was not Unknown FEMA will ensure that the ordinated rumor control efforts possible in the facility appropriate objective is re-a l t houg h this was a stated ob-utilized, due to space limita-demonstrated to correct this j

jective t ur t he exercise.

tions.

When an adequate ARCA during the nest facility is

located, this scheduled Crand Culf exer-uecommendation:

Established situation will be remedied.

cise.

procedures for Rumor Control should t,e reviewed, and deter-mination made as to their ade-l quacy.

(12/3-4/d's Exerci se)

Madison Parish tiospital and Amtmalance i

se rvice 16.

Descriptiun:

Pro pe r desuanst r a-This was adequately demon-8/86 FEMA approved (8/28/86) a 8/86 N i

1. l l

i tion ut surveying the ambulance s' rated an the August 6, 1986 hospital esemption request from the State of La.

remedial medical drill.

vehicle (including patient com-Thetefore, FEMA Objective 31 1

partment) and EMS personnt!

is esempt from demonstration tullouing the removal of the for the Crand Culf site.

c on t ami na t ed patient.

Proper State / local plans have been security ut the EMS vehicle changed accordingly.

The should also t,e demonstrated previous dpficiency and along with proper dispumal and ARCA's for the Madison Parish Hospital during the l

secur it y ut the contaminated waste.

(NUllEC-0654, II, 0) 12/3/85 esercise are elimi-l nated.

1;owever, the 1

E N3 5

M Y K R _

N aHs-a-a-a-a-mu s, ara.

TABLs I (ContM)

FD1A Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas

' Proposed Corrective Actions Act ual Requiries Corrective Actions with FEMA /RAC Recomumendations State (S) and IAcal (L)

Completion and Determination of Completion for Correction Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or inadequacy Date Madison Parish Hospital and Ambulance Service (Cont 'd )

1 1

deficiency and ARCA's for Recommendations:

Insure that the EMS (Ambulance) during the above training and tech-the 12/3/85 exercise were aiques are demonstrated at the corrected during the 8/o/86

(

remedial drill.

second remedial drill.

The i

(12/3/86 Exercise)

Mahoney Ambulance service adequately demonstrated FEMA ob ject ives 30, 5 and 36 as desc ri bed in this final I

esercise report.

l 17.

==

Description:==

There was inade-This was adequately demon-8/86 FEMA approved (8/28/86) a 8/86 j

quate cossmunications capabili-strated in the August 6, 1986 hospital esemption request ties and coordination demon-remedial medical drill, from the State of La.

y strated between the Madison Therefore, FEMA Objective 31 i

is esempt from demonstration Civil Defense Director, EMS and for the Crand Culf site.

hospital. (NUREC-0654, II, F)

State / local plans have been changed ac c o a'd in gl y.

The Recommendation:

Proper com-previous deficiency and munication between all three ARCA's for the Madison parties should be e st abli shed Parish Hospital during the and coordinated before the re-12/3/85 czercise are elimi-medial drill is conducted.

nated.

H owever,

the (12/3/86 Esercise)

I l

l

s TAlla.E I (Cont'd) 4 FDtA Evaluation of State and Local Deficiencies and Areas kequiriod corrective Actions Proposed Corrective Actions Actual with FEMA /MAC Recosumendations State (S) and 1.ocal (L)

Complet ion and Determination of Completion tur Currection Proposed Corrective Actions Date Adequacy or Inadequacy Date Madison Parish liospital and Ambulance service ( Cont 'd )

deficiency and ARCA's for 17.

(Cont'd) the EMS (Ambulance) during the 12/3/85 exercise were corrected during the 2/6/86 remedial drill. The Mahoney Ambulance service adequately demonstrated FEMA objectives 30, 5 and 36 as described in this final exercise report.

l ta 0

l uREERREEE

__-;=

31 4 EVALUATION OF OBJECTIVES 4.1

SUMMARY

OF FEMA OBJECTIVES REMAINING TO BE MET Table 2 on the follcwing pages provides listing of those FEMA objectives which, according to the FEMA RAC Chairman, have not been satisfactorily met or tested and which should be incorporated into the exercise objectives on or by the sixth year of the six-year period in which all the objectives must be tested. These should be considered in j

the development of future exercise objectives; as well as those FEMA objectives which,

,r although previously tested and satisfactorily demonstrated, must be tested and evaluated during any full-participation exercise of offsite state and local response capabilities.

~

4.2 FEMA OBJECTIVES TRACKING - GRAND GULF STATION Table 3 provides comprehensive tracking system of FEMA Objectives, NUREG-t 0654 Reference Elements, Exercise Objectives, Jurisdictional Responsibility, Exercise Dates, Identified Deficiencies and Required Corrective Actions, and the Date Specific FEMA Objectives Were Met by state and local agencies. This system will track the progress and status of this data through the six-year exercise cycle in which all FEMA objectives must be tested.

NOTE: FEMA Objective No. 31 is shown as not applicable to Tensas Parish regarding the Grand Gulf Station offsite plans. This is based on a special exemption request (Hospitals only) submitted by the State of Loulslana and approved by FEMA on August 28, 1986. Loulslana offsite REP plans have been amended to clarify that any injured, contaminated patient would be transported to one of the two desig-nated contract hospitals in Mississippi. If a patient needed immediate life saving emergency care and stabilization, the patient would be first transported and treated at the nearest Louisiana hospital and then transferred for radiological treatment and care at one of the two Mississippi hospitals as per the amended plans.

O O

i TABLE 2 Summary of FEMA Objectives Remaining to be Met As of August 7,1986 -

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station jW FEMA Objectives Jurisdiction i

1.

Demonstrate ability to mobilize staff and State (not met) ARCA #1 l

activate facilities promptly.

State EOC (12/3-4/85 exercise) 3.

Demonstrate ability to make decisions and State (not met) ARCA #5

~

to coordinate emergency activities.

State EOC (12/3-4/85 exercise) 4.

Demonstrate adequacy of facilities and Local (not met) displays to support emergency operations.

ARCA #13, Media Center (12/3-4/85 exercise) 11.

Demonstrate ability to project dosage to State (not met) ARCA #4 the public via ingestion pathway exposure, (12/3-4/85 exercise) based on field data; and to determine State EOC; ARCA #8 appropriate protective measures based on State LNED PACS and other relevant factors.

(12/3-4/85 exercise) i 12.

Demonstrate ability to implement protective State (not met) ARCA #4 actions for ingestion pathway hazards.

State EOC; ARCA #8 State LNED Local (Partially met) ARCA #11 Tensas Parish (12/3-4/85 exercise) 21.

Demonstrate ability to make the decision, State (not met) ARCA #6 based on predetermined criteria, whether (12/3-4/85 exercise) to issue KI to emergency workers and/or the general population.

22.

Demonstrate ability to supply and admin-Local (not tested) ister KI, once the decision has been made i

to do so.

24 Demonstrate ability to brief the media in a State / Local (not met)

J clear, accurate and timely manner.

ARCA #14 Media Center (12/3-4/85 exercise) 25.

Demonstrate ability to provide advance State / Local (not met)

~

coordination of information released.

ARCA #9, State LNED ARCA #14, Media Center (12/3-4/85 exercise)

]W l

si

l 33 TABLE 2 (cont'd)

.I C

g; FEMA Objectives Jurisdiction i

26.

Demonstrate ability to establish and State / Local (not met) operate rumor control in a coordinated ARCA #15 Media Center fashion.

(12/3-4/85 exercise)

~}~~

32.

Demonstrate ability to identify need for, State (not tested) request, and obtain Federal assistance.

34.

Demonstrate ability to determine and State (not met) ARCA #4, #8 l

implement appropriate measures for con-Local (partially tested) trolled recovery and reentry.

ARCA #11 (12/3-4/85 exercise) 38.

Demonstrate capability to effectively State (not met) process all incoming messages in a ARCA #2 State EOC timely manner.

ARCA #9 State LNED (12/3-4/85 exercise)

O

/

9

4 TA!!!E 3 FFCA Objectives Tracking Chart - Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Exercise Objective h risdictional Date FEMA NUMEC-0654 12/3/85 and Remedial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /ARCA Objective Met FIMA Object ives Reference 5/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State Local Esercise Date, location State Local 1.

Demus.=trate abilit y to mobilire E.1, E.2 Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85-ARCA #1 7 17/85 2/27/85 st at and activate facilitics (S&L) mobilize staff and acti-State EOL promptly.

vate facilities promptly (1).

(Ot,putive for whic h ca pa bili t y Not Het should be demonstrated during 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 each full participat ion esercise)

State EDC 2.

Dr a.itrate abilit y to fi.!!y A.2.a.

X X

4-11-84 4-11-84 statt tacilities and maintain A.4 st at s ing around the clock.

(S&L) 3.

be

..t rate abilit y to make deci-A.I.d Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85-ARCA #5 Not Het sion. and to coordinate emergency A.I.e make decisions and to co-State EOC 12/3-4/85 acts.aties.

A.2.a ordinate emergency activi-State EOC (S&L) ties (2).

(ot,pttsve for whic h ca pa bi li t y 2/27/85 shuuld t,e demonstrated during g

each tuli participation exercise) 12/3-4/85 e 4.

Des.un s t r at e adequacy of facili-J.10.a.b.

Demonstrate adequacy of X

I 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 ARCA #7 1/26/85 2-27-85

ties, eq ui pmen t, maps and dis-C.3.a facilities and displays to DIED Corrected Not Het plays to support emergency H.2 support emergency opera-12/3-4/85 ARCA #13 3/86 12/3-4/85 oper at auns.

H.3 tions (3).

Media Ctr.

ARCA f7 ARCA #13 (S&L)

(LNED)

(Media)

(ut, p c t i ve for whic h c a pa bi l i t y shoulJ t,e denunstrated during each toll participation caercise) 1h in 3 m 3 W3444.mam m m y

er ur er

TAal2 3 (CoaliG Date FEMA Esercise Objective Jurisdictional NUREC-0654 12/3/85 and Remedial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /ArcA object ive Met F.!MA Objectives Reference 5/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State Local Esercise Dat e, loca t ime St at e Local S.

Demonstrate ability to consnuni-F Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 care with all appropriate loca-(S&L) cosasurgic a t e with all Deficienc y #1 ARCA #3 State EOC State EOC tions, organizations and field appropriate locations, personnel equipment.

organisations, and field 12/3-4/85 AkcA #3 State EOC personnel (4).

I (Objective for which capability i

should be demonstrated during each full participation esercise) 6.

Demonstrate ability to mobilise 1.8 Demonstrate ability to X

N/A 12/3-4/85 1/26/83 N/A 12/3-4/83 and deploy field monitoring teams (S&L) mobilise and deploy field teses in a timely fashion in a timely fashion.

(S-5).

(Objective for which capability chould be demonstrated during each full participation esercise) 7.

Demonstrate appropriate equipment 1.8, 1.11 Demonstrate appropriate X

N/A 5/14/836 5/14/86 Deficiency 8/7/86 N/A cnd procedures for determining (1.8-S61.)

equipment and procedures

1. 2, State Fieid u

ambient radiation levels.

(1.11-5) for determining ambient Mon it or in g radiation levels (S-6).

. iObjective for which capability should be demonstrated during Redemonstrated 8/7/86 8/7/86 each full participation esercise) l l

l l

l l

i i

.m_

x e

TAllLE 3 (Cont'd)

Esercise Objective Jurisdictional Date FEMA NUWEC-0654 12/3/85 and Remedial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /AMCA Objective Met FDIA Object ives Reference

$/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State

, Local Esercise Date, location State 1.oc al s.

bra.unst rat e appropriat e equipment I.9 Demonstrate appropriate X

N/A 5/14/86 5/14/86, Deficiency 8/7/66 N/A and procedures iur measurement of (S) equipment and procedures f2, State Field s i s t,u r ne radiciodine concentra-for measurement of air-Monitoring lu'I pCi/cc in borne radiciodine concen-t a ua..

as low an 10'I s t.c pr esence ut nuble g ses.

trations as low as pCi/cc in the presence of (ub uctive for which ca pabilit y noble gases (S-7).

st.uund t,e demonstrated during

e. t. t ull part icipat ion esercise)

Redemonstrated 8/7/86 8/7/86 l

l 9.

t w umtrate appro,.riate equipment 1.8 Demonstrate appropriate X

N/A 12/3-4/85 8/7/86 N/A i

...a procedures for collection, (S&L) equipoent and procedures l

t r....por t, analysis of samples of for collection, transport.

l suit.

vegetation.

s..o w,

water, and analysis of samples of l

4.,4 ilk.

soil, vegetation, snow.

water and milk (S-8).

(ob jec t i ve fur wh ic h c a pa bi l i t y ar.

i d t,e denunstrated during r. c t.

t ull part icipat ion exercise) l

10. b.

unstrate ability to pro ject 1.10 Demonstrate ability to X

do :. se to the public via plume J.10 project dosage to the plant and (1.10-S) public via plume exposure, N/A 12/3-4/85 N/A ca w >ure, t,a sed un plant and field 1/26/83 t a la

data, and to determine (J.10-based on appe priate proteu ive measures S&L) data and to determine a p-12/3-4/85 t 4 :.c 4 un PACS, available shelter, propriate protective X

X e m tsun time est imat es and all measures based on PACS, ut t.

appropriate 1 44:Lurs.

available shelter, evacu-arion time estimates and (ot.jec t i ve for wl. i c h ta pa bi l i t y all other appropriate it..6d be demonstrated during factors (S-9).

tull participation exercise) e..

h

d T8523 M l

't E

Esercise Objective Jurisdictional Date FENA

[

ImaEC-0654 12/3/85 and Benedial Drille Responsibility Date of Deficiency /ARCA Objective Met FEMA Objectives Reference 5/14/86 and e/6-7/86 state Local Esercise Date, tocation State f.oc al

!!. Demonstrate ability to project 1.10 Demonstrate ability to X

N/A 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85, ARCA #4 Not Het N/A dosage to the public via inges-1.11 protect dosage to the State EOC 12/3-4/85 tion pathway exposure, based on J.11 public via ingestion path-ARCA #8 5

IJiED field data; and to determine (5) way esposure based on appropriate protective measures field detal and to deter-based on PACS and other relevant eine a ppropriate protec-

factors, tive measures based on PACS and other relevant factors'(S-10).

12.

Demonstrate ability to implement J.9, J.Il Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85, ARCA #4 Not Met Pa rt iall y protective actions for ingestion (J.9, S&L) implement protective State Eoc 12/3-4/85 Met j

pathway hazards.

(J.ll-5) actions for ingestion 12/3-4/85, Al(CA #8 12/)-4/85 pathway hazards (S-II, LNED L-5).

12/3-4/85 ARCA #12 Tensas Parish EOC I

I 13.

Demonstrate ability to alert the E.6 Demonstrate ability to N/A X

12/3-4/85 NA I/26/81 w public within the 10-mile EPZ App. l' alert the public within 12/3-4/85 N J

and disseminate an initial (S&L) the 10-mile EPZ and dis-l instructional message within 15 seminata an initial in-l 3

structional message withia minut es.

i 15 minutes (L-6).

(Ob jec t ive for which ca pabili t y should be demonstrated during eac h full participation exer-cise) i i

i h

i l'

f i

I I

f 4

i.

O y

,9

0 g0 h

5 1 3 3

i 3

48 8

88 c

8 8/

//

/

c

/

/4 6

46 1 -

/2 t o 6

2 13 eL 2

/

1/

//

1 1 TAW

/

1 42 1

De 1

F v i

5 et 8

t c

/

3 ae Dje 8

4-

/

bt 3

Oa 6

A A

/

/

2

/

t 2

/

N W

S 1

1 AC n R o Ai

/tya ccno el ic,

i i e f tea DD 5

e 8

f s

/

oi 4

c er 3

t e

/

as 2

DE 1

l yl at a ni c 1

X ol o I

Z iiL tb ci i s d n A

A

/

soe

/

W W

i pt Z

rs a x

uet JRS s

l snl Z l

aeal P l

nc aE i6 or

'e r 8 i u ef e vD/

t ogom i

7 as a ti tl -

se n l

np ca6 i r a o ei/

n mi jd8 a

b e g

t e Omd r

ah en od out eR a nt c a

a s

e v f) id6 t

e o7 c n8 a

y r a/

r r

L t

e 4

t yay r

x51 st sl a

E8/

nis r 2

p

/5 ol ee 1

3 micd

/

eb er rS 2

D anoo(

1 4 e g

))

7. )

k. )L 5 c

.)

. L 6 n 0 e L

, a. L 0

0 E

- r

9. 0 1 S 1 S S

Ce J1 J(

J(

5. (S

(

Ef M e J

E UR N

e-a

- of yg-o-r

- od t n l t c t nr l t uo l t e i

t i

c i i e n

b yn.

l r m b

a b

a i

ai y

r y

ue a

v a

u l

r r

e u

a oZ ibd a

h a

i r

e c

m e aiP l

a s

l E

a l

s t

v r t a s c

st p

n a s oa n e o a as a e

i n e ue ad o n et e i

o t

l c c m c es o

c w

c rb o

i e o e n s

t t i

op u e a u i

t nt na e

aa t

v t op t n vl h

r p a

t s a

r a

ep c

n z

t pe i s e

i t i z

on i et i

p s o s c i s w ru y

z c

t y

h a

ah n e h

w ac i a n n

ni ne ct ac i

e l

ut d

t ac rt nr gr

! c gr j

l s

e r e a r u e c u r u gr b

i e s

od p o o pnr oo t o n r u f

O b

od o s

e mi m

a ut o o

t c

r f

A b

i o

e e s

e e s

i c

M.

e4 h

e e t

r b

t r s s t r r

eei t

s a

)

h o

a d

t t r n a vbl a

a

't F

at na a

i u

rdi rd t

ap r s auf rd t

c t nl n

t t

t n w. a a

I is.

u.

i n

(

i d t y

=

e, r cJ

<s.a o

t.

r C

s~J.

i Di a 4

(

a ec D

t s.

4 L n

g u et. )

a j

ul m

t.

xi

~

4 1 t

t e

t ec e.

=

lu4 a.

a y

e e.

y a

r E

D sas t i

D t

u s.

a e a u y im. 1 O

t

.m.

e 3

a c L

t 7

A 4

'2 1

I I

T 1

TAM.E 3 M p

Exercise Objective Jurisdictional Date FEMA NUREC-0654 12/3/85 and Remedial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /ANCA Objective Met FEMA Objectives Reference S/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State Local Esercise Date, Locasson State Local I

i

18. Demonstrate organizational abil-J.10.d N/A X

N/A

!!/4/81 i

ity and resou rc es necessary to (S&L) effect an orderly evacuation or mobility-impaired individuals within the plume EPZ.

19.

Demonstrate organizational abil-J.9 N/A X

N/A 11/4/81 ity and resou rc es necessary to J.10 3 effect an orderly evacuation of (S&L) schools within the plume EP2.

20.

Demonst rate ability to continu-K.3.a Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 ously monitor and control emer-b.

continuously monitor and 2/27/85 gency worker exposure.

(S&L) control emergenc y worker exposure (5-13 L-8).

(Ob jec t ive for which ca pabili ty 12/3-4/85 12/)-4/85 should be demonstrated during each full participation exer-y cise)

'O 21.

Demonstrate ability to make the J.10.f Demonstrate ability to I

Ni.*.

12/3-4/85 12/3-4/8) ARCA #6 Not Met N/A decision, based on predetermined (S&L) make the decision, based (IJf ED Hdq t rs )

12/3-4/85 criteria, whether to issue KI to on predetermined criteria, emergency workers and /or the whet he r to issue K! to general population.

emergency workers and/or the general population (5-14).

i

w

.o s

Tall 1#. 3 (Cont'd)

I Esercise Objective Jurisdictional Date FEMA i

NUkt.C-0654 12/3/85 and RearJial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /ARCA Objective Met FEMA Object ives Reference 5/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State Local Esercise Date, Locatina State Local 22.

t><monstrate at ilit y to supply J.10.e Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 Not Tested lI and aJainaster Et, once the (S&L) supply and administer KI, 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 l

dcoa aso has been made tu do so.

once the decision has been made to do so (S-15, L-9).

l' l*

23.

ta moi..trate ability to utiect an J.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A l

underly evacuation u t' onsite (S&L) p r unnel.

l 14.

1,.m.on t rat e abi li t y t o b ri ef t he C.),a Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 ARCA #14 Not Met Not Met i

s,. J a. in a clear, accurate and C.4.s brief the media in a Media Center 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85

(

t a.: t y masa.er.

(S&L) clear, accurate and timely manner (S-16, L-10).

I 25.

is ~e. trate ability to provide C.4.b Demonstrate ability to I

12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 Not Met 2/2?/85 I

.a. a u coordanation ut infor-(S&L) provide advance coordi-ARCA #14 12/3-4/85 I

a..taun releaseJ.

nation of information Media Cent er Not Met I

released (S-17, L-11).

ARCA #9 State 12/3-4/85 Ao l

1 RED l

l j

2n.

ti.e.oa.= t ra t e a bi l i t y to establish C.4.c Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85, Not Het Not Met l

4..J u pe r a t e rumor control in a establish and o pe ra te ARCA #15 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 l

cou.danated fashion.

rumur control in a co-Media Center ordinated fashion (S-18, L-12).

l l

l

L J

l t

TABLE 3 (Cee8iG f

i

i Esercise Objective Jurisdictional Date FEMA NUREC-0654 12/3/85 and Remedial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /ARCA Objective Met i

FDIA Objectives Reference 5/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State Local Exercise Date, Imcation State Local

27. Demonstrate adequacy of pro-J.12 Demonstrate adequacy of W/A X

12/3-4/85 N/A 2/27/85 cedures for registration and (S6L) procedures for registra-12/3-4/85 radiological monitoring of tion and radiological monitoring of evacuees evacuees.

(L-13).

(Objective for which capability should be demonstrated during each full participation eser-cise) 28.

Demonst rat e adequacy of facili-J.10.h N/A X

N/A l/26/8)

(Winnsboro) ties f or mass care of evacuees.

(S6L) 2/27/85 (Ferriday) 11/4/81 (Tallulah) 29.

Demonstrate adequate equipment K.5.a Demonstrate adequate X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/89 2/27/85 Ferriday $

and procedu re s for decontamina-b,

equipment and procedures tion of emergency workers equip-(S6L) for decontamination of Recept. Ctr.

, ment and vehicles, emergency workers, eq ui p-ment and vehicles (S-19, (Ob jec t ive for which ca pabilit y L-14).

should be demonstrated during each f ull pa rt ic ipat ion eser-cise)

~ ~ ' ' -

x --

_ 4 a_

6 TA11LE 3 (Cont'd)

Esercise Objective Jurisdictional Date FEMA NUREC-0654 12/3/85 and Remedial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /ARCA Objective Het FEMA Object ives Re f e renc e 5/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State Local Exercise Date, Location State Local 30.

Dem.us. s t ra t e adequacy of iMS L.4 This obiective was re-N/A X

8/7/86 12/3/85 Deficiency N/A 8/7/86 t rans po rt at ion, personnel and (S&L) demonstrated 8/7/86 by f6 Hadison Parish procedures for handling con-Mahoney Ambulance Service Hospital a-1

a. n.ated individuals including and LNED staff.

Ambulance Service pro pe r decontamination of vet. a c l e and equipment.

(obje6 Live for which ca pabi li t y

= t.u ! d be denunstrated during c a. h tull participation emer-cane) 31.

D.-moi. t rate adequac y of hospit al L.1 N/A N/A N/A W/A N/A t a6 alit ies and procedures for (S&L) has.d l a r.g contaminated indi-vnduals.

(it.a s Objective not applicable to Crand Cull) p N

D.

Deu.unst rate ability to identity C l.a.

Demon;trate ability to X

N/A 12/3-4/85 Wot N/A need

tur, request, and obtain b., (S) identify need

for, re-Tested Federal a s s i s t a nc e,

quest, and obtain Federal 12/3-4/85 assistance (S-20).

sl.

Dea.ue = t ra t e ability to estimate H.4 Demonstrate ability to X

W/A 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 N/A t ut al population exposure.

(S) estimate total population esposure (S-21).

t

TABEA 3 (CostM)

Exercise Objective Jurisdictional Date FtMA NUREC-0654 12/3/85 and Remedial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /ARCA Objective Met FEMA Objectives Reference 5/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State Local Esercise Date, Locat ism State Loc al f

34.

Demonstrate ability to determine M.!

Demonstrate the ability to I

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85, AkcA #4 Not Met State Em:

12/3-4/85 and implement apprcpriate (S&L) determine and implement measures for controlled recovery appropriate measures for 12/3-4/85, m A #8 controlled recovery and LNED Pa rt iall y 12/3-4/s5 Tested and reentry.

re-entry (S-22, L-17).

ARCA #12 12/3-4/85 Tensas Parish t.OC 11-4-81 1/26/83 35.

Demon st rat e the ability to C.4 I

X effectively call upon and (S&L) utilise outside support agencies when local capabilities are exceeded.

36.

Demonstrate the adequacy, of F.1 Demonstrate the adequacy, X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 11/3-4/85 communication procedures and (S&L) operability and effective Deficiency Al, ARCA #3 State EOC (State EOC:

use of emergency communi-

methods, 12/3-4/85 ARCA f3 cation equipment and the (Ob ject ive for which capability adequacy of cosumunications X

State EOC should be demonstrated during procedures and methods each full participation emer-(S-23, L-18).

cise) 1 e

l l

t l

)

v -e wy a,,

n

..m,

2 TAllll 3 (Cont'd)

Esercise Objective Jurisdictional Date FEMA NUREC-0654 12/3/85 and Remedial Drills Responsibility Date of Deficiency /AMCA Objective Met Ft.ptA Object ives Reference

$/14/86 and 8/6-7/86 State Local Exercise Date, Location State Local 31.

D.*~.. s t r a t e ability to monit or D.4.

Demonstrate ability to X

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 12/3-2/27/85 thign.cy clasmitication levels (S&L) monitor Emergency clas-Deficiency #1 4/85 12/3-4/85 State EOC ARCA f3 l

sification levels con-c ur.t i nuou sl y and implement pro-ceaore, in a timely manner.

tinuously and implement 12/3-4/85 ARCA f3 State EOC proc ed ure s in a timely State EOC

(<n,gstave for wh ic h ca pa bi l i t y manner (S-24 L-19).

l

.t~u l d be demonstrated during I

c t.

tull participation exer-rinc)

As.

Dt.ima s t ra t e capabil it y t u etfec-E Demonst r at e capability to Y

X 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85, ARCA #2 2/27/85 tastly pr oc e s s all incoming /out-(S&L) effectively process all State EOC Not Het 12/3-4/85 AMCA #9 12/3-4/85 12/3-4/85 g o. s.,

men agen in a timely incoming messages in a

....er.

i nc 1 ud a r.g ahe docu-time 1y manner (S-25).

IJiED n.i i. t i n g ut t,u t t.

actual and mau. lated s.essages.

i H.

N o.....t r ate that aut ho ri t y A.2.a, Demonstrate that authority W/A X

12/3-4/85 N/A 1/26/83 - p!

c.. s t s in coordinating and A.3 exists in activating a re-Winnsboro! s-4/11/84 &

a6tivating a reception center (S&L) ception center in a timely 12/3/85 -

timely manner (L-20 ).

(..

nece=sary) in a

Tall ulahl m...:.c r.

2/27/85 -

Ferriday (oor6tive for which c a pa bi l i t y 12/3-4/85 simol J be denun=trated during (Tallulah e e t.

tull pa r s i c i pat ion emer-Rec. Ct r.

case) i 4

l wE%Ea