ML20207L449

Handwritten Memo Advising That in-progress Audit Not Planned.Discrepancies W/Program Plan for Dcrdr Might Have Been Found If Audit Performed.Related Documentation Encl

ML20207L449
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	04/02/1984
From:	Beltracchi L NRC
To:	Bill Russell NRC
References
TAC-54497, NUDOCS 8701120174
Download: ML20207L449 (23)

Text

--.

.. -.......... ~.

p 5+Y14)t/eE 1

ruinsa

.f " N gg i

3HW$9 Q

W hA k MW W f&Lck n s

4-Avg des Zh. h, fam x-5 ee my L/w e JW lb d lu %/ d w

$fbufV

& wasr tere An6/

-u

.M

/Jko/%m.lo % bcxDL, 1

$ Jkm mo etyiF E

Y& 24%dTW

,',u L d'

v

@h bb' +

_/

~~~

saJsd uMLoc Lau af Lf mrLC.-y)Q w k

W 14

/ pean - r Ggpowwr,

8701120174 840402 PDR ADOCK 05000346 P

PDR

~

-___ _. _ _ ~.. _,

..a..._.___..._,-.m b

bI

' 7 8.

ag*!

UNITED STATES a

t I

5.,

NU LEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

WASHINGTQN

.C. 20555 q

fyr M/fr l

l L [dsE,/

I wn ygaa-m_-~a g~p r %

nndh.} 2(LJ aa AulM l g wwAk

%+dk&),$nn.:

kJa~eym*~lcidu-seu i

& tt f l6 D y 4 t w h ~s Yk2ct

%~ Buu. i LM, s

J'

'/

cw f,

pp s cL&,. L xu a yiQ knar mm L n

<M ayyof L Ap &sd'

n 1x M A-y~-

s /pwlad p,

-,/

, J l'" v%,#

b 1

!asn UNITED STATES g 4f, E

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

o 3

E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

/

1. f17 Docket No. 50-346 Mr. Richard P. Crouse Vice President - Nuclear Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza - Stop 712 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652

SUBJECT:

SUPPLEMENT 1 TO NUREG-0737: RE00EST FOR MODIFICATION OF COMMISSION ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 21, 1984, By letter dated March 20, 1984 (No. 1033), you requested that we extend the completion dates for certain items contained in the Comission Order dated February 21, 1984 relating to Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737. Your letter also brought to light a misinterpretation of Toledo Edison Company comitments with respect to the submission dates for certain implementation schedules.

We have reviewed the justifications you provided for the delays in the subnission dates for the DCRDR Summary Report and the report discussing the application of Regulatory Guide 1.97 to emergency response capabilities. We find that these justifications do not provide adeouate basis for modification of the Commission's Order. However, we agree with your assertions regarding the submission dates for the implementation schedules and are prepared to support a modification in this respect, after we have received your response to this letter.

Your letter incorrectly indicates that, at a presentation February 3,1984, the NRC staff was made aware of the potential, with a high degree of certainty, that certain dates given in response to Generic Letter 82-33 might not be met. Your letter expresses disappointment that the NRC did not take the initiative to elicit additional imput prior to issuing the Order.

l In this respect, notes taken by our staff indicate only that there could be l

slippage in the completion date for the DCRDR Summary Report - perhaps to j

April 30,1984 - but certainly not to June 30, 1984 as you are presently requesting. No slippage in the completion date for the Regulatory Guide 1.97 application report is so indicated.

In any event, the meeting to discuss the status of numerous NUREG-0737 items l

was not the proper way to request changes in schedules for actions which you had ample prior knowledge would be subject to a Commission Order.

It is the licensee's responsibility to assure adequate and timely communication of such information to the NRC via proper documentation.

Mr. Richard P. Crouse.

With regard to the delay requested for submittal of the OCRDR Summary Report, you state that the additional time is required because the program scope was expanded since the original approach planned for the DCRDR has resulted in unacceptable DCRDR efforts by other licensees. Our staff reviewed the program plan you submitted on June 15, 1983 and you were informed on December 9, 1983 that provided the plan was executed as written the review should produce results fulfilling the requirements of Supplement I to NUREG-0737. The NRC staff has not altered this conclusion regarding the acceptability of a DCRDR conducted in strict accordance with your plan as originally described.

Your letter also indicates that you modified the program in early 1984 - after you had been informed of the staff's position. We conclude that the scope nodification to the DCRDR was voluntary on your part and was done without discussion with the NRC staff regarding the need for the modification or the impact it would have upon the completion date.

With regard to the delay requested for submittal of the report describing how the requirements of Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737 are being or will be met (application of Regulatory Guide 1.97) you state that you are conducting the review to Revision 3 that was issued in May 1983. This is acceptable even thought the Order requires the review to be conducted only to Revision 2.

You state that the delay in completion date is due to the fact that Regulatory Guide 1.97 indicates that certain additional non-Q-items not currently included in the Toledo Edison Environmental Qualification (EQ) Manual be cualified under the E0 program. However, with respect to environmental qualification there is no substantive difference in the requirements between the two revisions and, in certain respects, the. requirements of Revision 3 are considered to be less stringent than Revision 2, which was available at the time you provided the schedule for this item.

Unless adequate justification can be provided for delay in the submission of the two reports discussed above, the Commission's February 21, 1984 Order will not be modified with respect to these items.

In order to provide sufficient time for evaluation of any further justifications and to permit adminis-trative processing, your reply should reach us no later than April 4,1984.

Sincerely, Gus C. Lainas, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors Division of Licensing cc: See next page

m CO;NTROL ROOM DESIGX REVIEW

SUMMARY

R3 PORT SUBMITTALS

~

30-25-y,

+' April 15, 1983 AFlE W OG

^"9" 20 -

AFIER NRC APPROVAL y

X MO. AFTER REVIEW STARTS ti d, ',.f'

.y DATE LATER W~

,/

n,r'sm'.

$j$

e io.

'A j

. m e <S1 e1 s.

R 4

p p US 15 $h'8k3 4 5, H6 No on

~ _, _ ~ _,e,c~,,.S, o

1983 1984 1985 1986 l

1987 l

h gfy7]

.sev97 W '"/"

60%

Y

1. *f taas7,u w n h /2% W Gyud: W i 1 b>uus 0 7 s, : Qpptgifw-sp W AA-D M % >yvy 5

-+ dn d # ernru' e d & - p e u z^a &

d

&aada 2* W aan M 4tayw,nty A/d9 row / to /vae64 t737.

ate J m bt 2 4 M n,v ea~ d y M s j

&W r

mzpWAsma d &'

w&MM..

% 4 - M x;C p

2 max

/ f y @s m a n f

v

• "*f W 4"% A ey>da/k. f %' s ;M /-97.#.2*uu a

o y

60>

1. r f ic:a % s-4, w t 7"m. n.

n f

/wps k

s m dw~

Atf./th &y n

Mp p

a M es 1

• -k NWW pp)&

n a A' 7

Wf M /

m fe w p'o A ya 2<s2}

aq Ma /* A q w Aperu~

e-

,r 2ce n sf A ti 30BPtt b tis fMLf Ap@

y &jns sya= W.su w.2L ysubni$d m

'm/,M3 ed y M p H m b J4n k 9/9. 3 4 5 &

6 & P.&A~#

MP

/ ~ ~ D7za% h/$

Vw -r W s

a

~peRDR-ensc&s&?' p

&~

sfW/6"W

,+ m a y m,9 W f " 5 h ra

-a

-% /9ff -

yN

~

d] A

,akff2 jus k. D> e.,nd &- M f

e y y,,azdf'ke a w

es z* w aa-m A t

,,., 4 s'& A Afas

&E; 3& /~ Apndy'scWW n A.p&

m

~

df k m.2;c~e, & w sd-UAW V'A Aww%YfW*/

e&2 W 6iJ MMMs?37svw & $n W L,owf

( q W

$ Y 6 A > y) y M.; d;c-t Sn 97 n c<ndud n

w a.n;0 y & p /n4

/ein.

7_,^4'a a a w pddLm m

M

- @ t. O /> &

Am 76 Jk - crnb20' nt 6../ W >.

s4* :4 4u.A t o& A d y

7'o Ap M 2/g

&& oLr a w w m.xu w ana,g<Atm A+,xA eaw46~ >se6dd'AACTA4 &e

e a

N A EP W -

M, &p pur h&bL pp Aspw-kz m,* pw, A m 4, w & a m

x we w A AA o-4% ~ >> & r maXMPy pm A m)~ 25 m

W,2 wa "a s-

. 4x p dw upw O&AMA& p4 nae 1%.

bu sa~ A

,s-af p F y W y q &p@yces a~< W sw-nx mzdn Wyy mwnpMy sp'w.

epy

.5.

78C f YY7 7, 8e( 't # E7 NK: F Oaw 197 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIEN TACSNuuats*

staan TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT CONTROL FORM 4yy y y y

E_.,.

M.N,

,, NE

.N.e M ATiO~

S ECTION 4. REQUEST P ATA

. PAEpanE D a v e

a AD6 l MO DAv vR A.2)e.)?u vo t'E:

,a a3 M ARE.*

e aAlsue F AcsuTV NAME AND A554GNMENT TITListans so IJD aaeresserat*

4AZI PL ANNED ACCOMPLI $MMENT'

% yis'ggas ;

ppurtr Fop glwato Scacwsf : EmsnGsw)

~ " " " "

• rs.snust ansn-rm i,1, I, /,

c AGi fCEQUEST CONT ACT*

4 AMI REQUESTE R1 BNITI ALS 4 A51 REQUESTING ORG A86ZATION*

4AMs l MO.DAv vm.

d h

I T A E l

t f

a AJeAX: IEEQutSTING R EMARetsitanre se fJo rneraras 3 sALI MULTI PLANT ACTION NUMSE R SECTION 91. SYSTEMS CONTROL DATA

's A OPER ATING RE ACTOR ACTIONS MRITY ES AI DOC 8C ET*

W

=n

>n r

C~o-S Vla,,

tAsles l

MO. DAY VR LAvl AMENDMENT FEE CLA55' OffY u,A T in

.n ilin

,,n vn vir DA E

• t

8. TOPICAL REPORT REVIEWS VE NDOR1 N AME

' RE POmv IDE NTIFICATION SvMBOL (DAB PROPRIETARY fri eARI l

MO. DAY T R.

S A53 l

MD. D Av V R.

(E ADNON PROPRIET ARY VER510NINPi REPORT DATg ADDITtON AL INPORMATION REQUEST DATE I

I l

i I

t L

IATI i

MO. D A v v R.

c Aus i

uO. D Av V M.

4 A vl ACCEPTED (F A3 NON PROPRIET ARY REPORT D

supalT D ATg LETTE R 70 VE N :.

• DATE NOT ACCEPTED t

g l

g l

9 g

WI TP80R AWN SECTION til. REVIEft DATA 4C A3 (C Bf COMPLETSON D ATE RE VIEWE R15UhN AME RE VI E WE R1 ESTIM ATE D tNITs ALS

• MOURS (CC) ESTIMATED (CD) ACTUAL MO. DAY V M.

MO. DAY VR

4. hAust.

A,4, D l

t I

t t I I

I f

f f

I I I I I

I t

I 1

t~

l I I t

t I

f 1

t I t 1 1

I f

f I

I I f f 1

I t

i I

f f f f I

t t

t 1

l 1

1 I t

t I

t f I I t

t f

1 I

t 1 I f 1

I I

t i

I I I I e

i t

f h RC Foaiu 137 410411

==re,einE S fa vest?

r

-- -6N 7

[.

d w y)-

-4 y 7590-01 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of Docket No. 50-346 TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY AND THE 1

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING h

COMPANY ll (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,

)l Ig

'Jnit No 1)

)

s l

MODIFICATION OF ORDER CONFIRMING LICENSEES COMMITMENTS ON POST-TMI RELATED ISSUES I.

Toledo Edison Company and Cleveland E ectric Illuminating Company (the licensees) are holders of Facility Operating License No. NPF-3 which authorizes the operation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 (the fcility) at steady-state power levels not in excess of 2772 megawatts thermal. The facility is a Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) designed pressurized water reactor (PWR) located at the licensees' site in Ottawa County, Ohio.

}lz 9//y. -

A & & k) 22t

%-~~1F f f it 2

M

&n A et S,4& x. #*.

e

~~--,

---

w-

,-,,,rn,,w, wn,,--,-----w

-,--,---,e r--

-n n-w,

---

,--,m--,-,--,----,--~_,-n----,---,----e-.-

~

>I E

dm a-/, /W Y A N't66*'2-W WN

<> n - s>, w ~,,

CB S ' &.8$ &&

^

P far./up'73 7,+az dys-M# i.A AAMESS d

f Sh*ps W e.,-um znsm p~a n-A s w n s a rai 6 ss s w <v, n da<A o %

w M ern&+ML v r: s G f&anasJ /sWes jd 4#MEL s&47,Af/(&3 x,nt'/p-cuh&dD') W f

~^

dshosa?

D.s s sdzT~21ecsm%/9;/9f?.

& dW64'l27 #A'd 9 M ty',,4tt h & _ J'w /

e 7~* *44~& A.z@empMw'&

9

/a - ~ s~Ca " () A /. 3'~

M p A n

mm

's as& a ws49asw/uw A

' A G-rnvyr 6lte-h /2 f;#M & s u

&5 -

Th 4p+ ap-t 67

-u

<~sda n w s 2 x,4d&ses er+

n s.-- y.hpe s ace 4-g &mm

, k, a<d a**

'Am ynL sn g an.w. n n a &s s x%

spuy

-~

1. 5)u-an- $f e&tsN t}

4 ~ H /n a # w n

M AM -v&. -+h

/9J e <~-

W

^-- f4ll 1

2 a a n-y &.

z %a,. e Afc4 5

-a&

""0 3

e w

a 8

n n sw a x

& ct s w & 6 A ae A a Z +~

P ~

.cymp/<eefui & yeAM Q'

/c+ v A Sk f n suf A+/

4A wfxp.

w no

& @ y c/ W M. JaosJ m _ Z27 M 4 :

~

m v & +W6 'M A ~& C f r W

'#"V"" ~' 4 F

/.bwf q 36#DE-A A s x & y y/f d.A 4 D caos

& &.Z%U% h W f &p!

' ) & # D /2-p n ~ n &W n

/G/t/52GL -

d W P '** f p~ W b VW f,

y A -D=

A n xe~av "q, x~

n n w+

z

• y 4 A r p 4 - @ h M pE G o

' ? -

%.A-~

xa et&MmpA

. >swgace gA 2zew,emp

~

f4 cdj - A~-

a$ d.,ec em M i

A a co g & p /) # )c2p*-

7A Al

• d W

-M Br A, J. s 6ff a& ~ #2 i.

A o zA,adM a i

p n p & d s +> c a b e 2 % &a w,.

n 9 x vaw np tt m s4t gnda

.A em; dx aWM a At cab

. a-er puwD/-~

y

e e

4 I

w & scla ~k aL4 A W-y MA" m)Nf M g A.A=y/hj a+

y4 g

W i 7's' H W2ss of57 n. k y p & & g M w

/*>n ##/fM/ 4 M,/M7'.

fdWfa3,A-w/&M$h SWn'A wsnh

, srm pi s,

-y Af'

• & $ das p# -f A A wA7' silaM#

?idA w ff M a n, d e A a w

/s / [ f w 2 %

sy6 e d W A w e //

& K&

1. 4. AM zx% aAAs,Act r &a 6 %

n ey

1. aAt%A#6 b

M AJp48 6 /oca o A

'sW a/ddsJ

^ f* y # f & f M Z D

-f fy m 6 4 i-9?-]

W r'

% -e '<

tur' l

a a

s MA /\\_.

a

/. p

,,;g x

/9y esN-

)n,9

\\

.,f

&p n p a r%\\

"2 4" A>.

~

~

s

4 4

F W /. A M M ? o n ? q> g/ fAa q Mw J %

64

/. 97 A y M A & ar 6

2 AA M 3

.4 Phd l

-du A,,W A W-w$A MM ps,M y i

Ai h

h fW 4 44rn

,A m W _D=

g & H n' 3 Gne-W fd h p M a n. w w n u. e r 2 t= / A M &..A 4rA46.

Ad~uav, & & M.sf m f *4errde17'

-q-m, n p/cesa &p&

44M x 10 i

/~u pn d p h

AW'

& & /W7,5 n&

'pUA A.s ps y Ab M fo k W y+t_

y#

\\

Mt-Mu;a;.

Yq CA / 77-ble/i% C N.%ft $ f,j/rit Ax w<*a aa&

- f pW

% m Me 7eMw 6:

i AW4 wn g ~

i ZL% Q Aw.AkMf p*

4 xPWW /~M brFW a-%

y -#

Deno a L

4 H /-r 7 h m n p taa y

.-F m

y a ai(my A ntfd. f %

p - ~ sn op

" W % M d 2Pf M M.

M A P'fA.

~

/*

.A*rW

,6 w;4.

gMre d &nf tAs4&-.

ab z%D.AC dB & #@'aff. % w i

/*1 %cMw.A-6f rd 6

M M MA M Mp n&m u s w);sarpa

%} AldA-

~

licsF

/.._-.

22 M-' XC s'WeAw/r~&

" Y > f> ~ '* W M A

.a' f n & &

q # M '.s# M s w 4-M M P.

l 4"

a.Ac we;-tssids-

_./e;zt.JGa+m

,zc Mea. _2&w f~

n a.y i

P{M's -f' l

~'

,c 4

k xic M

~ p &, ny ;6 l

n,isW M y e.

v s' k a f M A Q.sw/d^g.,$ s44s l

p I

6#%d.

H ALvMm GM i.97 &

A dl MdwM,&&& yd l

v e2%,dy p &Xuantas&vsegn A vo d t.+

. 6A

- Q,"9_ f @AWB M /)t>

y.7&

A &M* @-

l A c; y W W A M 4y y si,i1rK -...

.;6-6~ & &A-

e O

9 b

.?

c4~y>La'w A**3&)/*u/>u~ c#3 i.

mya f.s opaup Os cu b

'as) a1.u n- -.psa Yyh bd YM M

6-M n

/.A & wtryn~ M 7

nA m y.A " f' n AWI,t9JY-NA ) s-~dy% r~,% a P

~C 1)& &Apf>~l~7, %/9tY deu/A lu--4&.xyt&

Apd

/

w-W O,

shy-~%, pp:.u

-h.Ak.s a&- akaj>&

m.

p, m%2 J +) A M & w oLu W A K esuy A w M s) % /9+y Q e4 7

,~..

9

-vsv - ~ ~

sa p M W ss&-p />n6.uAsz;cwd~'l

?

z% M AaAM A a&qy.;$0 *4s

+

f0 s

Su"Ank, W ;u& ht<n.s /03,ist i, ed N/ o $75 i

. su m ogn w,

na WL 6&s

+w to 6M b :2-e 4 G b 8 #5 % 844u/M :

ah, a 4ghi

\\

\\

aM 4u n xt WL 7% >,

~

6'ub~.Ak- } & b h $ $ scdw D

/

fnA 3MD/2 %q /&pd gL M M i>J k >tkAJU/26& 0737 Nb a-JJg()A w

/ Vs m/W/fW fo a'N/WY.-2TLOSd f

l A

%yxp s,a

. nsst.d(4%,9 y#

1. "v4nar-~Cm

\\

O C(2DL

\\

A

/ze ~CA.eca g.g 'DC n

2. g 4

Av t

&y e i 6 w?ld60737 eX w A

,ond y,4padiy+ry

b,

ays><.p b

r,.

u vw W

& s+nf s w/ww.AAw.

IV.

The licensehs may request a hearing on this Order within 20 days of the date of publication of this Order in the Federal Reaister. Any request for hearing shall be submitted to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C. 20555. A copy of the reouest shall be sent to the Executive Legal Director at the same address.

f s.

P If a hearing. is to be held, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and place of any such hearing. If a hearing is. held, the issue to be considered at such a hearing shall be whether this Order should be sustained.

This Order shall become effective upon the licensees' consent or upon expiration of the time within which the licensees may request a hearing or, if a hearing is requested by the licensees, on the date specified in an Order issued following further proceedings on this Order.

JORTHENUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSION l

r is N t

i ector Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this jg[th day of T__. __ j,1984

Attachment:

Licensees' Commitments on Applicable NUREG-0737 Requirements from Generic Letter 82-05 r

i i

anaLud page i ef'2 LICEllSEES' CORillHENIS ON SupFLEMEHi 1 10 HUREG-0137 LICENSEES' E0HPLEll0N TITLE REQUIREMENT SCllEDULE (OR STATUS) 1.

Safety Parameter Display la. Submit a safety analysis and an Submitted 11/30/83 System (SPOS)

Implementation plan to the NRC.

Ib. SPDS fully operational and 11/30/84 operators tralned.

f 2.

Detailed Control Room Design 2a. Sutalt a program plan to the Review (DCRDR)

HRC.

Submitted 6/15/83 2b. Sulalt' a sumaary report ie4he 6/' 0[l[

i/i5/54 3

HRC in ' ".., _ ; n ;: n d s ^ " - % ! er -,- m !a!!re.

3 c. W kjs4 f, f 4"S**W

/f3/f 3.

Regulatory Guide 1.97 -

3a.

Sulait a report to the NRC Appilcation to Emergency describing how the requirements ag5je 4[, 30[f[

Response facilities of Supplanent I to NUREG-0737 have been or will be met, Jh.

Implement (Installation or Schedule f 'A h Y N d w f Q

_c r. p,.11ed upgrade) requirements.

g i

e

tt t LC L800004:tI L p:ge 2 c( 2 LICEllSEES' Co mIIHEMIS ON SUPPLEHEhl 1 10 NUHEG-0737 LICENSEES' COMPLEll0N

's IIILE REQUIREHENT 7

SCllEDULE (OR SIAIUS) 1 j

4.

Upgrade Emergency Operating 4a.

Submit a Procedures M

3/1/84 4

Procedures (EOPs)

Generation Package,to l

the llRC.

}

l

+4 4b.

Implement the upgraded E0Ps.

9/30/04

)

)

1 t

5.

Emergency Response Facilities

$a.

Technical Support Center Completed

• fully functional.

l Sh. Operational Support Center Completed

• l fully functional.

Sc.

Emergency Operatlens Facillty -

Completed

• j fully - functional.

I f5 lYY r

6 f

• In all respects except SPDS and Regu'2 tory Guide 1.97 t.onsiderations for which the schedule is as given in 1 and 3 above.

I l

j u

77h

.~

s'W77 UNITED STATES Og f

[

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION a

)

wasmmarow. o.c.rosss

%*e,,*/

d29(.[

Docket No.'50-346

/

D

[e ; -

a)

Mr. Richard P. Crouse f

v 4 Vice President - Nuclear b

Toledo Edison Company

{

Edison Plaza - Stop 712 b

]300MadisonAvenue Q

s

{I%4sToledo, Ohio 43652 q

s

Dear Mr. Crouse:

g

.g

$ '7 g '

SUBJECT:

SUPPLEMENT 1 TO NUREG-0737: RE0 VEST FOR MODIFICATION OF COMISSION ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 21, 1984, y

8 ')

N

.y k #

s~

n

} % k.\\ By letter f3 ed March 20, 1984 (No. 1033), you reauested that we extend the S

i completion da s for certain items contained in the Comission Order dated

'T 3 $ : " fbrought to light

' February 21,19 relating to Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737.

Your letter also h

misinterpretation of Toledo Edison Company comitments s

[]

Llwith respect to the submission dates f ertain implementation schedules.

s s

s, 43y q%

5iWehavereviewedthe,1stificati s provided for the delays in the 3

c 4 submission dates for th DCRDR umary Report and the report discussing the N

2y N appifcation of Regulator, Guid 1.97 to emergency response capabilities. We

'N

. find that these justificat. ions do not provide adeouate basis for modification I

'lof the Comission's Order.hh, ge agree with your assertions reoarding

$.k *the submission dates for the implementation schedules andf N

prep W to E"pp:{t g s,cdificetic. ir thi:

i

.Tiec ; hrt; r:_ f t w' g b s [.}Your letter incorrectly indicates that, at a presentation F Q

the NRC staff was made aware of the potential, with a high degree of 39h 4 certainty, that certain dates given in response to Generic Letter 82-33 hRhmightnotbemet. Your letter expresses disappointment that the NRC did not p j !In this respect, notes taken by our staff indicate only that there could be ltake the initiative to elicit additional imput prior to issuing the Order.

g t

3., o1.2 tslippage in the completion date for the DCRDR Summary Report - perhaps to qb IApril30,1984-but certainly not to June 30, 1984 as you are preseM4yMpai6/,

3y

.Ta n ting. No slippage in the completion date for the Regulatory Guide t

j y \\, 1.97 application report is so indicated.

N A

, j

..e, 4 f In any event, the meeting to discuss the status of numerous NUREG-0737 items

,X '1 I*lwas not the proper way to request changes in schedules for actions which you

,1 y 1 lhad ample prior knowledge would be subject to a Comission Order.

It is the

• f '.b

!11censee's responsibility to assure adequate and timely communication of such information to the NRC via proper documentation.

.~

j l

l

4 1

em 4

GA n-MXp,,6L y&mm->w & 2iteu zia p.,

~&yJ j/wmaiG5 c/AatJA;D..e; w

&p L p

E. T/w 9)t n.A x p a d, A, W n j u wT G,

J 2- @ gW sf n olr% c6-4 pf AUSb 4

E-sen96 -

6e E 1

6 faf fdwdc6E.

/ L y,w l (,+&,w z&l %j 7 Seer >dw yptu a,yn,p6G

,/j.~ n n g }f:aua

.d umw / m pf

,cf p 2

.x2ccy+ /

A y b y (Add,3asa ~,w.a y--Am-v pi%e p z4 x

z

/7n-~ g/ w anys,nnu%f g a

s,wns,n.

h$

W7G I'

A V AA w

A O/;Ml') M %j%d

, btp

% A a,~.

JSP 64

?