|
---|
Category:ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISALS
MONTHYEARML20209H9641999-07-15015 July 1999 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Issuance of Exemption That Would Reduce Amount of Onsite Property Insurance Based on Permanently Shutdown Status of TMI-2 & That Plant Suitable for Long Term Management ML20205N6561999-04-12012 April 1999 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50,App R for Facility Operating Licenses DPR-50 Issued to Licensee for Operation of Plant,Unit 1 ML20216J1481998-04-17017 April 1998 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Proposed Action to Amend License to Reflect Change in Legal Name of Operator from Gpu Nuclear Corp to Gpu Nuclear,Inc & to Reflect Registered Trade Name of Gpu Energy ML20141E8831997-06-27027 June 1997 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 970207 Application,As Supplemented 970326 & 0605,which Requested Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR70.24, Criticality Accident Requirements ML20058A5631993-11-17017 November 1993 EA & Fonsi Re Util Request for Exemption from 10CFR50.120 to Establish,Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Categories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20128C1331992-11-24024 November 1992 EA & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Proposed Rev to TS to Permit Use of Reactor Fuel Enriched to Nominal 5.0 Weight Percent U-235 for New Reload Fuel Assemblies & Rods ML20210D7331992-06-0808 June 1992 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Util 870521 Request for Exemption from 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for Irradiated SNM Samples.Eis Will Not Be Prepared ML20087A6671992-01-0606 January 1992 Environ Assessment Re Spent Fuel Pool Expansion ML20086C0221991-11-0707 November 1991 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Issuance of Exemptions from 10CFR50.46(a)(1)(i), 10CFR50.44(a) & App K to 10CFR50 ML20006F2921990-02-21021 February 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 891020 Request for Exemption from Section III.0 of App R to 10CFR50 to Permit Deletion of Lube Oil Collection Sys Beneath Sections of New Piping in Coolant Pump Oil Sys ML20247A4021989-08-31031 August 1989 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 870225 Application for Amend to License DPR-23,revising App a Tech Specs by Deleting Prohibition on Disposal of Accident Generated Water ML20205E4271988-10-24024 October 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Request for Exemption from 10CFR50,App R Requirements on Reactor Coolant Letdown Sys Valve Circuitry.Action Acceptable ML20155J0191988-10-19019 October 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) Re Schedular Requirements of Property Insurance Rule,Effective 881004 ML20207J4791988-09-20020 September 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR55 ML20151Y7521988-08-23023 August 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Util 871228 Request for Exemption from 10CFR55.59 to Eliminate Requirement That Operator Requalification Program Cover Plant Protection Sys & ESFs ML20151D3531988-07-11011 July 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 880405 Amend Request.Amend Revises Tech Spec to Support Core Reload for Cycle 7 Operation ML20151W5551988-04-26026 April 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24, Criticality Accident Requirements ML20207S5251987-03-11011 March 1987 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact on Util 870202,11,28 & 0310 Requests for Exemption from 10CFR50,App R Re Fire Protection.Action Will Not Effect Quality of Human Environ.Eis Unnecessary ML20210T1651987-02-0303 February 1987 Environ Assessment & Notice of Finding of No Significant Environ Impact Supporting Exemptions to 10CFR50,App A,Gdc 17 & 19 Requirements Re Electric Power Sys & Control Rooms ML20215F0091986-12-12012 December 1986 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Util Requests for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R ML20141G1571985-12-30030 December 1985 Environ Assessment & Notice of Finding of No Significant Environ Impact Supporting Exemption to 10CFR50.61 Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events ML20138K1741985-10-24024 October 1985 Environ Assessment & Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from 10CFR61.55 Concerning Waste Classification of Epicor II Waste Liners ML20138D3981985-10-17017 October 1985 Environ Assessment & Notice of Finding of No Significant Environ Impact Re Exemption from Inventory,Recordkeeping & Reporting Requirements of 10CFR30.51,40.61,70.51(d) & 70.53 for Core Snm,Source & Byproduct Matls ML20133P8301985-08-0808 August 1985 Environ Assessment & Notice of Finding of No Significant Environ Impact Re Issuance of Exemptions from 10CFR50 App a, GDC 34 & 37 Per Licensee 841106,850326 & 27 Requests ML20128H8081985-05-16016 May 1985 Environ Assessment & Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact Re 830411 Request for Partial Exemption from FSAR QA Plan Update Requirements of 10CFR50.54(a) ML19347E7281981-05-11011 May 1981 Suppl to Eia Evaluating Proposed TMI-1 Restart.Combined Effects of Unit 2 Cleanup W/Normal Operation of Unit 1 Will Result in Insignificant Risk to Public Health ML20205A1801979-10-0303 October 1979 Environmental Assessment,Use of EPICOR-II at Three Mile Island,Unit 2 1999-07-15
[Table view] Category:TEXT-ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20209H9641999-07-15015 July 1999 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Issuance of Exemption That Would Reduce Amount of Onsite Property Insurance Based on Permanently Shutdown Status of TMI-2 & That Plant Suitable for Long Term Management ML20205N6561999-04-12012 April 1999 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50,App R for Facility Operating Licenses DPR-50 Issued to Licensee for Operation of Plant,Unit 1 ML20206C0731998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Radioactive Effluent Releases Rept, for TMI-1 & TMI-2 ML20206E0501998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept for TMI-1 & TMI-2. with ML20216J1481998-04-17017 April 1998 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Proposed Action to Amend License to Reflect Change in Legal Name of Operator from Gpu Nuclear Corp to Gpu Nuclear,Inc & to Reflect Registered Trade Name of Gpu Energy ML20217M7191997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept, for TMI ML20217N8931997-12-31031 December 1997 Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept for 1997 ML20211C2771997-08-26026 August 1997 Renewal of NPDES Permit PA 0009920,issued to Gpu Nuclear Inc,Tmi Nuclear Station ML20141E8831997-06-27027 June 1997 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 970207 Application,As Supplemented 970326 & 0605,which Requested Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR70.24, Criticality Accident Requirements ML20148J5221996-12-31031 December 1996 TMI Nuclear Generating Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept 1996 ML20137F1151996-12-31031 December 1996 Tabulation of TMI Worker Exposures by Work & Job Function Jan-Dec 1996 ML20138B4561996-12-31031 December 1996 1996 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Tmi ML20100L6171995-12-31031 December 1995 Tabulation of TMI Worker Exposures by Work & Job Function Jan-Dec 1995 ML20080Q1851994-12-31031 December 1994 1994 TS Section 6 Annual Rept, Including Aircraft Movement Data & Leak Reduction Program Test Info ML20078C6421994-09-30030 September 1994 Nuclear Safety & Compliance Committee Semiannual Rept 21 940401-0930 ML17309A7251993-12-31031 December 1993 Combined Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Period Jul-Dec 1993. W/940228 Ltr ML20064C3081993-12-31031 December 1993 Effluent & Waste Disposal Annual Rept 1993 TMI-1 ML20029D0471993-12-31031 December 1993 1993 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for TMI-2 ML20029D0601993-12-31031 December 1993 1993 TMI Nuclear Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Rept ML20058A5631993-11-17017 November 1993 EA & Fonsi Re Util Request for Exemption from 10CFR50.120 to Establish,Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Categories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20034E3131992-12-31031 December 1992 Aircraft Movements at Harrisburg Intl Airport Annual Rept for 1992 ML20034F8091992-12-31031 December 1992 TMI-1 Effluent & Offsite Dose Rept for Period Jul-Dec 1992 ML20034F5091992-12-31031 December 1992 10CFR20.407 Personnel Exposure Rept - 1992 ML20034F8061992-12-31031 December 1992 TMI-2 Effluent & Offsite Dose Rept for Period Oct-Dec 1992 ML20128C1331992-11-24024 November 1992 EA & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Proposed Rev to TS to Permit Use of Reactor Fuel Enriched to Nominal 5.0 Weight Percent U-235 for New Reload Fuel Assemblies & Rods ML20128B8521992-09-30030 September 1992 Unit Two Effluent & Off Site Dose Rept for Jul-Sept 1992 ML20105B8031992-06-30030 June 1992 TMI-1 Semiannual Effluent Release Rept for Jan Through June 1992 ML20210D7331992-06-0808 June 1992 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Util 870521 Request for Exemption from 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for Irradiated SNM Samples.Eis Will Not Be Prepared ML20087A6671992-01-0606 January 1992 Environ Assessment Re Spent Fuel Pool Expansion ML20094G9631991-12-31031 December 1991 Number of Personnel & Man Rems by Work & Job Function Self Reading Pocket Dosimeter Data 1991 ML20090D3951991-12-31031 December 1991 Semiannual Effluent Rept for Jul-Dec 1991 ML20090A3821991-12-31031 December 1991 10CFR20.407 Personnel Exposure Rept - 1991 ML20086C0221991-11-0707 November 1991 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Issuance of Exemptions from 10CFR50.46(a)(1)(i), 10CFR50.44(a) & App K to 10CFR50 ML20082M2911991-06-30030 June 1991 TMI-1 Effluent & Offsite Dose Rept for Jan-June 1991 ML20029B1611990-12-31031 December 1990 Aircraft Movement Rept & Annual Exposure Rept for TMI-2 for 1990 ML20029B1011990-12-31031 December 1990 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jul-Dec 1990 ML20059C8851990-06-30030 June 1990 TMI-1 Effluent & Offsite Dose Rept for Jan-June 1990 ML20043C3471990-03-31031 March 1990 TMI-2 Quarterly Effluent & Offsite Dose Rept,First Quarter 1990 ML20058Q1781990-03-31031 March 1990 TMI-2 Effluent & Offsite Dose Rept,First Quarter 1990 ML20006F2921990-02-21021 February 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 891020 Request for Exemption from Section III.0 of App R to 10CFR50 to Permit Deletion of Lube Oil Collection Sys Beneath Sections of New Piping in Coolant Pump Oil Sys ML20034B2301990-02-0303 February 1990 Monitoring Around TMI Stations for 900114-0203. No Alarm Reading Occurred During Reporting Period ML20033E3281989-12-31031 December 1989 TMI-2 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Third & Fourth Quarters 1989 ML20011F6681989-12-31031 December 1989 Personnel Exposure Rept for TMI-1 for CY89. W/900222 Ltr ML20059G1151989-12-31031 December 1989 TMI-1 Effluent & Offsite Dose Rept for Jul-Dec 1989 ML20042E7251989-12-31031 December 1989 TMI 1989 Annual Environ Operating Rept,Part a: Nonradiological ML20042E8891989-12-31031 December 1989 1989 Annual Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept for Tmi ML20033F1961989-09-30030 September 1989 Revised Unit 2 Third Quarter Dose Rept ML20247A4021989-08-31031 August 1989 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 870225 Application for Amend to License DPR-23,revising App a Tech Specs by Deleting Prohibition on Disposal of Accident Generated Water ML20247F7781989-08-31031 August 1989 Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Related to Decontamination and Disposal of Radioactive Wastes Resulting from March 28, 1979 Accident Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2.Final Supplement Dealing with ML20246J2631989-06-30030 June 1989 TMI-2 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for First & Second Quarters 1989 1999-07-15
[Table view] |
Text
_ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _
7590-01 I
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION DOCKET N0. 50-320 ENVIRONMENTAL ASS!SSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Connission) is considering issuance of an exeteption from the requirevnents of 10 CFR 55. Operators' Licenses, relative to facility Operating License No. DPR-73, issued to GPU NuclearCorporation(thelicensee),fortheThreeMileIslandNuclearStation Unit 2(THI-2),locatedinLondonderryTownship,DauphinCounty, Pennsylvania.
i l
By Order for Modification of License, dated July 20, 1979, the licensee's authority to operate the facility was suspended and the licensee's authority j
l was limited to maintenance of the facility in the present shutdown cooling node (44FR45271). By further Order of the Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated February 11, 1980, a new set of fonnal license requirements j
was imposed to reflect the post-accident condition of the facility and to assure the continued maintenance of the current safe, stable, long-tenn cooling condition of the facility (45 FR 11292). The license provides, among other
[
things, that it is subject to all rules, regulations and Orders of the f
i Consission now or hereafter in effect.
l 9
8809270154 880920 7
Ose=0 f
e 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of proposed Action:
The actions being considered by the Commission are exemptions from 10 CFR part 55 pertaining to the requirement to administer operating tests for operators and senior operators in a simulation facility and an exemption from the hourly watchstanding iequirements to maintain an operator's license.
Exemption from the requireu nt to administer operating test: for operators and senior operators in a simulation facility would eliminate the licensee's need for an NRC approved or certified simulation facility. Exemptions would be granted with regard to simulator requirements to sections 10 CFR 55.45(b),
Implementation - (1) Adninistration,10 CFR 55.45(b)(2) Schedule for facility licenstes,10 CFR 55.45(b)(4) Application for and approval of simulation facilities, 10 CFR 55.45(b)(5) Certification of sirulation facilities, and 10 CFR 55.59(a)(2)
Requalification requirerents.
A reduction in the ho9rly watchstanding requirerents to maintain an operating license also requires an exemption since the regulations specify the nurber of hours required.
The exenption wculd allow the licensee to reduce the hourly watchstanding requirement for maintenance of an operator's license fron seven 8-hour shifts or five 12-hour shifts to four 8-hour shifts per quarter.
The exerption would also permit the licensee to reduce from 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> to two 8-hour shifts the watchstanding requirenents necessary tf reinstate a licensed operator who fails to meet the quarterly watchstanding requirement.
Exemptions would be granted, conditioned on the revised hourly watchstanding requirements, to sections 10 CFR 55,53(e) and 10 CFR 55.53(f).
- O 3-The Ne_ed_for__the_ Proposed Action:
TM!-2 is currently in a post-accident, cold shutdown, long term recovery rode, with sufficient decay heat reroval assured by direct heat loss from the reactor coolant system to the reactor building atnesphere.
The licensee has requested exeeptions to the requirements that licensed crerators ut11tze a sir.ulation facility when taking an operating test. Due to the unique cold shutdown, partially defueling condition of TM!-2, there is no f.
l plant-refreenced sinolater or sinolation facility that reflects the current condition of TMI-2. The tine to design, procure, install, and begin to operate a sinulation facility would exceed the period of time in which Ilcensed operators would be required at the facility.
Furthertore, due to the changing nature of the cleanur effort, any design of a siinulator would be quickly outdated.
The use of the facility as a strulation facility is not practical since this would require facility ranipulations not authorized by the facility license.
Derptien will be granted to 10 CFR 55.45(b)(1),10 CFR 55.45(b)(2),
10CFR55.45(b)(4),10CFR55.45(b)(5)and10CFR55.59(a)(2)totheextent that the regulations require a sinula' tion facility or the use of a sfrulation facility to grant or r.41ntain operator's licenses.
The licensee also has requested a reduction in the hourly watchstanding requirenents to raintain an operator's license. This reqvested reduction also requires an exerption. Curient requireeents specify the number of hour; 4 Itcensed operator rost actively perform the functions of an operator or senior
t 4
I I
t j
operator in a calendar quarter. These requirements were based on the assumption that the operators would be controlling an operating facility which is not the case at THI-2.
The TN!-2 operators function largely to prevent a criticality in a reactor in which the potential for a criticality is greatly reduced from f
operating facilities, furthermore, the potential for recriticality at TMI-2 decreases on an almost daily basis as defueling progrn s a.
In contrast to operating facilities TMI 2 is essentially in a static oc with little change l
from day to day. The principal operator activity is monitoring various plant I
parameters to assure the continued safe shutdown of the facility and assist the ongoing decontamination and defueling activities. The NRC staff recognizes tht j
a reduction in the hourly watchstanding requirerents is warranted.
Based on a review of the operator licensing requirements the NRC staff finds that reducing the hourly watchstanding requirements for maintenance of i
en operators licerse to four 8-hour shifts per quarter appropriate.
Further the staff finds that if a licensed operator fails to meet the quarterly L
i requirement, then before resunption of functions authorized by a license the
[
i licensee must coeplete a minioun of two 8-Kr shifts.
Therefore an exemption would be granted to the requirements of 10 CFR 55.53(e)and10CFR55.53(f)totheextentthatitreducesthehourly f
watchstanding requirements to the hours specified above.
i Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action:
I f
The staff has evaluated the proposed exemptions and concludes that in light of f
l the current and future condition of the facility described above, there are no j
significant radiological or nonradiological impacts to the environment as a result of this action. The exemptions remove the specific training requirements which are no longer applicable to the TMI-2 configuration, t
l l
V
O o-1 5-
.i Alternative Use of Resources:
This action does not involve the use of resources not previously considered in connection with the Final Progrannatic Environmental Impact Statement for TM!-2, dated March 1981.
Agencies and Persons Consulted The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's request.
No other agencies or l
persons were consulted.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The Comission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed exeeption.
Based upon the forego'ag environmental assesswit, we conclude that this action will not have a significant effect A
on the (uality of the hunan environment.
For further details with respect to this action, see the letter from CPUN dated Decenter 28, 1987 which is available for pubite inspection at the Connission's Public Docament Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and the State t ibrary of Pennsylvar.ta, Governunt Publications Section, Education Building,WalnutStreetandCorronwe)1thAvenue,Hariisburg,Penrisylvania17105.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of september 1988.
n FOR THE NUCLEAR REG LATORY C09941SS10N f /4 o e ". Stol, Direc t
Pr jtet Directorate 1-4 ivision of Reactor Projects 1/11 V
l
-