ML20207H766

Supports San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace & Sierra Club Request for Stay of Issuance of Amends 8 & 6 to Licenses DPR-80 & DPR-82,respectively.Problems Associated W/No Significant Hazards Determination Noted

ML20207H766
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	06/25/1986
From:	Mcdermott L CONSUMERS ORGANIZED FOR DEFENSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
To:	Asselstine J, Bernthal F, Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
CON-#386-672 OL, NUDOCS 8607250080
Download: ML20207H766 (4)

Text

,

)) . ~

~.

oL n C.O.D.E.S.

731 Pacific Street #42 W San.Luis Obispo, CA 93401 M'y ~(805) 544-7295 00CNETED 25 June 1986 USNRC Nun:lo Palladino, Chairman BY ZA9 MgIL TO COFM.

James Asse1stine. Commissioner Frederick Bernthal, Commissioner ao .AN E y g Thomas Roberts. Commissioner Lanco W. Zecn. Jr.. Commsssioner hky(g tg U. S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission BRANCH

^

Washington, D. C. 20555 9e: Commission Orcer Servec June 19. 1986 In the Matter of PG&E (DCNPO. U-1 &U-2), Docket Nos. 50-275. 50-323. Amencment No. 8 to Fac111tv Coeratinc Licence No. DDR-80 and Amendment No. 6 to Facility Oceratine Licence so DDR-82. _

Dear Cnairman Pallaalno and memoers of the Commission:

Thank you for tne occortunity to resconc to tne stay reauestec by the San Luis Ooisco Mothers for Deace and the Sierra C l u o. Santa Lucia C,acter. San Luis Obisoo, (The Intervenors).

Tne intervences recuested the stay in orcer to orevent arrecaracle narm anc to creserve tne status cuo until adviinistrative anc jucicial review of all issues uncerivin 1ssuance of the licence amencments is comolete.

CCDES nas reviewec some of che issues unc erivine t,e issuance of tne license amencments anc no significant na: arcs i determanlation that allowed the amendments to oe issued at this

. c ime. nehe are many trocedural errors imcactin all commentors

! :n .n i s arccon: ne.

4 Darcuan:  : 5; ra ~ 4 ", u ' 4 F =r ? An A6. aacific C,as anc lectric Co.; Consiceration of issuance of Amencments to Fac111tv

. Gaeration Licenge DDR-80 are D'3R-82 'or DCNo3 u '. U-2.

resoectively, and crocased no si;nificant na: arcs consiceration cetermination anc occortunity for .1earinc.

"Any comments receivec witnin 30 cays after the date of oublication of this notice will be consicered in makinc any final cetermination"

{

'he cuolic comments nave issuec in an environment of i institutional unavailibility of aoolication cocumentation.

l Porther. N9C 6taf#3 #a1; urns to 539a9 towarcs the oublic comYents i

I are frouent with misenaracterization o# : nose concerns cuttressec Jy Vague a s s e r t 1. o n s Anr bas &B.

l l 8607250080 860625 1 l

PDR ADOCK 05000275 -

l h -)9

)

D Any oerson whose interest may oe affected by tnis croceedino and who wished to particioate as a carty in this croceeding has been frequently admonished to set forth concerns and contentions with particularity and soecificity.

Like wise the acclicant ranuested an ameneman; to 1. t s coerating license is asked to sucoly a reasoneo analysis, careful acoratsal. "An insufficient.or slooov acoratsal will be returned to tne aoolicant with a recuest to co a more careful analysis."

The mischaractertration and vague resconses in section 11.

Significant Fazarcs Consiceration Comments and 12, Final No Significant Fanards Consideration of the SE9 30 May 86 and tne references emoodied in choes sections, and the lack of soecificity to the references is orofounclv cisturbino anc the ausence of specifict y and carticularity in the cases beyond to oersons w7o have an institutional unavailacility of cocument.

Public comments are referred to the entire FSAR uccate Rev. 1 acoroximately 5 feet of.cocuments anc t,e U.S. Atomic Energy -

Commission, " Safety Evaluation of the DCNo Station, Units 1 & 2",

NU9EG-0675. Oct 74 anc sucolements No. 1-33 as aoolicaole(emo ado), another siracle stacR of variec recorts anc cocumentation.

In this croceedino tne NRC Staff nas consistantly failed to neet its Maguire Doctrine resconsibilities with regard to new information. See 6 AEC 623. 625 (1973).

We are not comolaining about access to cocuments we are ,

assertino that tne institutional unavailbility of the aoolication and NRC Staff resconse to the acclication reflects a violation of the law. (BASIS / BASES WILL FOLLOW and on next pace)

Proceoural oroblems in this croceedure must be sorted out to to have cue process and eaual orotection under the law aoolicable to this case.

BAS!S/ BASES WILL FOLLOW. (In forma naucerus cro per )

And ourselves under cervasive threat of retributive cocily narm (see 0.I. and 0. I . A. Investigative cocuments recarctno 50-275/323 Harassment of aersons and retruoution towards oersons.)....

As there 12 an on-coina violatio of the law....

As there is a flagerant intransigent disregard of NRC regulations, orders, guicance ano potiev anc Position....

i As there is a rabid dirth of 10 CRF 2.101(3)(1i), 2.790(a).

Part 2 Aco. A I(a). 50. 30 (c) (2) , 50.39, 50.71(a). 50.90 DOCUTENTATION As there are 2.715(a) and amicus curiae 2.786(10 CFR 2.715{d}) cersons under cervasive tnreat of retrioutive col 11v l harm.

Furtner reauest waiver of 10 CFR 2.709 orotocol anc 10 CFR

2. 708 recuirement s wher e herein defect ive.

Recuest a 10 CFR 2.711 extension of time for tne aoove reasons.

Recuest Commission Secraterv forcearance Cnon-sic] of waiver 2

or 10 CFR 2.712 wnere aoorooriate.

IS THERE A 10 CFR 2.715 INFIRMITY? Good reason to consider a stay at.this time.

There is good reason to believe the aoolicant liecensee will not be injured by a stay at this time. The aco11 cant lieensee has regulatory recuirements anc commitments scheaiiled for tne uocomming unit 1 outage. It.is far more than Just a refueling outage. The orocedural oroblems associated with the No Significant Hazarcs Determination recuire a stay at this time.

Laurie McDermott, Co-ordinator C.O.D.E.S. Date O-1 J

3

'~

PROOF G drm/IG I, James L. McDernott, declare thatt n Jtne 25,1986, I deposited copis5 of the attached Res:onse To Camission Order dated,19 June 1986. in the thited States mail with postage twrean full) prepaid and addressed to the following; except as noted.

Dr. Jerry Harbour Mr. Leland M. Gustafson, Administrative Judge Federal Relations Manager Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm. 1726 "M" Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20036-450,2 Glenn O. Bright Philip A. Crane, Jr., Esq.

Administrative Judge Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Atomic Safety & Licensing Board P.O. Box 7442 U.S. Buclear Regulatory Comm. San Francisco, CA 94120 Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Gordon A. Silver Henry J. McGurren, Esq. Ms. Sandra A. S11vbr , ,

Lawrence J.. Chandler', Esq.- 1760 AlisalJStreek Office of the Exec. Legal Dir. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington, D.C. 20555 Dian M. Grueneich Atomic Safety & Licensing Gruencich & Imzy ***

345 Franklin St.

U.S 1 ar egulatory Comm. San Francisco, Ca. 94102 Washington, D.C. 20555 -

Mrs. Jacquelyn Wheeler B. Paul Cotter, Jr., Chairman 2455 Leona Street Administrative Judge San Luis Obispo, CA 93400 Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm. Dr. R.B. Ferguson .

Washington, D.C. 20555 Sierra Club / Santa Lucia Chapter Rocky Canyon Star Route Atomic Safety & Licensing Creston, CA 93432 , , .

Appeal Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm. Ms. Nancy Culver Washington, D.C.- 20555 192 Luneta Street San Luis Obispo, CA 934.01 Bruce Norton, Esq.

NORTON, BURKE, BERRY & FRENCH P.O. Box 10569 *** dmotes next day service Phoenix, AZ 85064 -

I am, and was at the time of the service of the attached paper, over the age of 18 and not a party to the proceeding.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing.is true and correct.

Signed- ot rj h 1 Witnesse

~ .

. . _ - . . _ _ _