ML20207F159

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Energy Technology Engineering Ctr Technical Assistance to NRC for Preservice Insp, Monthly Ltr Rept for June 1986
ML20207F159
Person / Time
Site: South Texas, Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 07/08/1986
From: Poucher F
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP.
To: Westerman T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
CON-FIN-A-0700, CON-FIN-A-700 NUDOCS 8607220485
Download: ML20207F159 (3)


Text

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -

.. ..e Energy Technology Engineering Center d l f l% >

Rocketdyne Division Rockwell international Corporation Rockwell ~

Canoga Park, Ca o'm 3 Internahonal ,

(818)700-8200 Operated for U.S. Department of Energy In Reply Refer to: 86ETEC-DRF-1340 July 08, 1986 Mr. T. F. Westerman, Chief Reactor Safety Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011

Subject:

Monthly Letter Report on ETEC Technical Assistance to U. S. NRC, l Region IV, for Preservice Inspection, FIN A0700 l

Dear Mr. Westerman:

Enclosed is the monthly business letter report which summarizes the work performed by ETEC on the subject program during the month of June 1986.

Sincerely yours p_tQ F. W. Poucher Programs Manager Energy Programs Energy Technology Engineering Center

/gb

Enclosure:

as noted cc: (w/ encl.)

R. Ireland, NRC, Region IV D. M. Meyer, NRC, Region IV M. E. Long, ETEC SO

0. Tomlinson, NRC, Region IV Y 6 < q 72%{ h3 N

1rf1340

Attachment to: 86ETEC-DRF-1340 Page 1 of 2 MONTHLY REPORT Technical Assistance for Preservice Inspection FIN: A0700 NRC Dockets: 50-498/50-446 Contract No. DE-AC03-76-SF00700 Principal Investigator: R. Fuhrer Period of Performance: 05-30-86 to 09-30-86 Reporting Period: June 1986 I. PROJECT STATUS Task Order A - Review of Preservice Inspection Activities A. Task

Description:

This task establishes a team of qualified individuals to perform and report the results of a review of Preservice Inspection Activities at the South Texas Project, Unit 1.

This review is accomplished in accordance with four NRC supplied inspection modules.

B. Efforts Completed During This Period: A three man team was assembled and an in-depth review was accomplished based upon four inspection modules (Inspection and Enforcement Manuals 73051, 73052, 73053B and 730558). During the period of 06-02-86 through 06-13-86, the scope of the review encompassed examination of documents, procedures, records, interviews with personnel of the preservice inspection contractor, and surveillance of hands-on magnetic particle and ultrasonic inspections at the above indicated plant. A comprehensive report of these activities was initiated and is progressing satisfactorily. Review personnel have gained considerable experience in this review process.

The pre-established schedule of two weeks at the plant was reached.

C. Problems or Delays Encounterd: None D. Plans for the Next Reporting Period: Complete and submit report i

summarizing the inspection activities.

II. FINANCIAL STATUS A. Total Cost of the Project:

The status of the total cost of the project is as follows:

Total Projected Funds Obligated Balance of Funds Project Cost To Date By Fiscal Year FY 86 FY 87

$50,000 $50,000 0 0

o f I Attachment to: 86ETEC-DRF-1340 Page 2 of 2 B. The total amount of funds expended during the month of June 1986 and the cumulative through June is as follows:

Period YTD FY Cumulative

1. Direct Labor Staff Effort 1.3 1.4 1.4 (Staff Months)
2. Funds Direct Salaries 4,225 4,318 4,412 Materials and Services - - -

(Excluding ADP)

ADP Support - - -

Subcontracts (a) (a) (a)

Travel Expense (a) (a) (a)

Indirect Labor Costs 5,598 5,714 5,761 Other - - -

General & Administrative 519 529 534 Fee 18 18 18 10,360 10,579 10,725 (21%)

Note: (a) Subcontractor and travel costs for June have not yet been billed.

III. FEE RECOVERY COST STATUS - Not applicable to this FIN A0700}