ML20207F159
| ML20207F159 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas, Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1986 |
| From: | Poucher F ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP. |
| To: | Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-A-0700, CON-FIN-A-700 NUDOCS 8607220485 | |
| Download: ML20207F159 (3) | |
Text
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -
..e Energy Technology Engineering Center d l f l%
Rocketdyne Division Rockwell international Corporation Rockwell
~
Canoga Park, Ca o'm 3
Internahonal (818)700-8200 Operated for U.S. Department of Energy In Reply Refer to: 86ETEC-DRF-1340 July 08, 1986 Mr. T. F. Westerman, Chief Reactor Safety Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011
Subject:
Monthly Letter Report on ETEC Technical Assistance to U. S. NRC, l
Region IV, for Preservice Inspection, FIN A0700 l
Dear Mr. Westerman:
Enclosed is the monthly business letter report which summarizes the work performed by ETEC on the subject program during the month of June 1986.
Sincerely yours p_tQ F. W. Poucher Programs Manager Energy Programs Energy Technology Engineering Center
/gb
Enclosure:
as noted cc: (w/ encl.)
R. Ireland, NRC, Region IV D. M. Meyer, NRC, Region IV M. E. Long, ETEC SO
- 0. Tomlinson, NRC, Region IV Y
72%{ h3 6
q N
1rf1340
Attachment to: 86ETEC-DRF-1340 Page 1 of 2 MONTHLY REPORT Technical Assistance for Preservice Inspection FIN: A0700 NRC Dockets:
50-498/50-446 Contract No. DE-AC03-76-SF00700 Principal Investigator:
R. Fuhrer Period of Performance: 05-30-86 to 09-30-86 Reporting Period:
June 1986 I.
PROJECT STATUS Task Order A - Review of Preservice Inspection Activities A.
Task
Description:
This task establishes a team of qualified individuals to perform and report the results of a review of Preservice Inspection Activities at the South Texas Project, Unit 1.
This review is accomplished in accordance with four NRC supplied inspection modules.
B.
Efforts Completed During This Period: A three man team was assembled and an in-depth review was accomplished based upon four inspection modules (Inspection and Enforcement Manuals 73051, 73052, 73053B and 730558).
During the period of 06-02-86 through 06-13-86, the scope of the review encompassed examination of documents, procedures, records, interviews with personnel of the preservice inspection contractor, and surveillance of hands-on magnetic particle and ultrasonic inspections at the above indicated plant. A comprehensive report of these activities was initiated and is progressing satisfactorily.
Review personnel have gained considerable experience in this review process.
The pre-established schedule of two weeks at the plant was reached.
C.
Problems or Delays Encounterd: None D.
Plans for the Next Reporting Period:
Complete and submit report summarizing the inspection activities.
i II. FINANCIAL STATUS A.
Total Cost of the Project:
The status of the total cost of the project is as follows:
Total Projected Funds Obligated Balance of Funds Project Cost To Date By Fiscal Year FY 86 FY 87
$50,000
$50,000 0
0
o f
I Attachment to: 86ETEC-DRF-1340 Page 2 of 2 B.
The total amount of funds expended during the month of June 1986 and the cumulative through June is as follows:
Period YTD FY Cumulative
- 1. Direct Labor Staff Effort 1.3 1.4 1.4 (Staff Months) 2.
Funds Direct Salaries 4,225 4,318 4,412 Materials and Services (Excluding ADP)
ADP Support Subcontracts (a)
(a)
(a)
Travel Expense (a)
(a)
(a)
Indirect Labor Costs 5,598 5,714 5,761 Other General & Administrative 519 529 534 Fee 18 18 18 10,360 10,579 10,725 (21%)
Note:
(a) Subcontractor and travel costs for June have not yet been billed.
III. FEE RECOVERY COST STATUS - Not applicable to this FIN A0700}