ML20207F050

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SALP Rept 50-267/86-12 for 850301-860506.Overall Performance Minimally Satisfactory.Next SALP Will Be Conducted on Shortened Schedule.Written Response Required within 30 Days
ML20207F050
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/17/1986
From: Martin R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Robert Williams
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO
Shared Package
ML20207F055 List:
References
NUDOCS 8607220472
Download: ML20207F050 (3)


See also: IR 05000267/1986012

Text

$

s

JUL 171906

S

In Reply Refer To:

Docket: 50-267/86-12

Public Service Company of Colorado

ATTN:

Robert 0. Williams

Vice President, Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 840

Denver, Colorado 80201-0840

Gentlemen:

This lett & forwards the report of the Systematic Assessment of Licensee

Performanc.e (SALP) for the Fort St. Vrain Generating Station.

The SALP Board

met on June 10, 1986, to evaluate the performance of the Fort St. Vrain

facility for the period March 1, 1985, through May 6, 1986. The performance

analyses and resulting recommendations are documented in the enclosed SALP

Board Report.

I judge the Fort St. Vrain Generating Station overall performance to be

minimally satisfactory during this period based on ratings described in the

following paragraphs. As a result, I intend to conduct the next SALP on a

shortened schedule.

The next SALP period will end six months after resumption

of operation, but no later than April 30, 1987.

The SALP Board determined that your performance in the functional area of plant

operations had improved to performance Category 2; however, I note that the

Board observed that some potentially serious operational problems remain.

These are discussed in the report.

In the areas of licensing and maintenance

the Board rated your performance in Category 3, but recognized that in both

there were recognizable trends of improvement. The Board took note of your

activities to strengthen the preventive maintenance program, and maintenance

scheduling and tracking.

I believe that the rising level of performance

observed in these three areas may be attributable to your Performance

Enhancement Program.

Your performance during this SALP period in the areas of physical security and

emergency preparedness was also judged to be in Category 3.

An enforcement

conference was held with you in December, 1985, to discuss deficiencies in the

security program. As a result, you committed to a range of significant

remedial actions. Although outside of the period of this assessment, we have

just completed an inspection of your physical security program.

Our inspector

noted that you are on schedule with y,our commitments and are making additional

r

e

C

I:h/A

I : RI

HQ:NR

C: B

C:

RhEarrell

KLHe tner

JPJaudon

E ow:cnm

RErg)/86

and

[/f/86

/\\/g1/86

1 /# 7 86

7// /86

1/l

7 8 A Itltto

y

h

JEGagl

r'do

HBerkh

RLBan art

'/0:DRS&P

RA

C:RPBs

HQ:

R

DRS

RD

in

h[HJohnson9/j4/86

g lL l

  • ) /n /

1/q T

'1/ t

7/86

vm +b

f

8607220472 860717

PDR

ADOCK 05000267

G

PDR

V

,

-1

Public Service Company of Colorado

-2-

improvements beyond those to which you had committed.

I believe that the PSC

management commitment to improving the physical security at Fort St. Vrain has

been instrumental in this performance turnaround.

Regarding emergency

preparedness, although you are meeting regulatory requirements, an increased

level of management attention is warranted and expected.

In the areas of outages, and quality programs and administrative controls

affecting quality, your performance was also rated in Category 3.

I am

especially concerned that your quality assurance program has continued at this

marginal level of performance for several SALP periods. Our recently completed

team followup inspection, prompted by this concern, has confirmed that

long-term and continuing major deficiencies exist in this program. An

enforcement conference will be scheduled to discuss these deficiencies and

corrective measures in the near future.

However, because of the critical

nature of the quality assurance program with respect to safety-related systems,

you should take immediate and positive action regarding this program throughout

the Fort St. Vrain facility.

You need to provide a firm management commitment

to, and a strong plant-wide endorsement of, this program, which recognizes the

involvement and responsibilities of every Fort St. Vrain employee.

The functional area of outages, which is new for this SALP period, is directed

toward assessing your capability to properly carry out those activities

associated with major outages, including developing and installing design

changes. As a result of our recent special inspection of your current outage

efforts we are satisfied that you can accomplish this with your continued

attention.

During a telephone conversation with Mr. Larry Brey of your staff on June 27,

1986, a management meeting was scheduled for August 5, 1986, to discuss the

SALP Board Report. We request that you provide a written response within

30 days after that meeting. The response should include those steps you have

taken, are taking or plan to take to maintain the positive trends we have

mentioned and to raise the performance levels in those other areas requiring

improvement. Although some of the programs initiated under your Performance

Enhancement Program seem to have made incremental improvement in several areas,

your continuing high level attention will be necessary to assure lasting

improvement.

In your response, you should address how the Performance

Enhancement Program will effect the necessary improvements, especially in the

quality assurance and outage programs identified above.

l

i

i

_ _ _ _ _

._

. - . -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _

. . _ _ _ _ _ _

. . - -

-+ ,;

,

4

s

Public Service Company of Colorado

-3-

Comments which you may submit are not subject to the clearance procedures of

the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act

of 1980, PL 96-511.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to

discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

C$tlGINAL SIGNED BY

ROBERT D. MARUN

Robert D. Martin

Regional Administrator

Enclosure: As stated

cc:

J. W. Gahm, Manager, Nuclear

Production Division

Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Station

16805 WCR 19

Platteville, Colorado 80651

L. Singleton, Manager, Quality

Assurance Division

(same address)

Colorado Radiation Control Program Director

bec to DMB (IE40)

bec distrib. by RIV:

  • RPB

DRSP

  • All RIV Resident Inspector

R. D. Martin, RA

  • Section Chief (RPB/A)
  • RSB
  • Section Chief (RSB/ES)

Records Center, INPO

  • R&SPB

J. Taylor, D/IE

  • MIS System

Chmn. L. W. Zech (MS: H-1144)

  • RSTS Operator

Comm. T. M. Roberts (MS: H-1149)

  • RIV File

Comm. J. K. Asselstine (MS: H-1149)

Comm. F. M. Bernthal (MS: H-1149)

Comm. K. M. Carr (MS: H-1149)

  • w/766