ML20207E960

Forwards Status Rept for Jul Re Current Review Milestones for Each Std Plant Project.Requests Notification within 1 Wk of Receipt of Memo If Problems W/Input Dates Encountered

ML20207E960
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, 05000605, 05000601
Issue date:	08/09/1988
From:	Chris Miller Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Congel F, Grimes B, Shao L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
PROJECT-669A, PROJECT-675A, PROJECT-676A NUDOCS 8808180190
Download: ML20207E960 (14)

Text

,

J,,

'o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

^,

n e

L E

W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 k.....,[

August 9, 1988 Docket No. 50-601 and 50-605 Project Nos. 669, 675, and 676 HEMORANDUM FOR:

L. Shao, Director Division of Engineering and System Technology, NRR B. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards, NRR F. Congel, Director Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness, NRR J. Roe, Director Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation, NRR R. W. Houston, Acting Director Division of Reactor Accident Analysis, RES r

FROM:

Charles L. Miller, Acting Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects, NRR S'JBJECT:

STATUS REPORT ON STANDARD PLANT DESIGN TECHNICAL REVIEWS Attached is the July status report concerning the current review milestones for each of the standard plant projects (EPRI, ABWR, RESAR SP/90, and CE System 80+).

Note the "Due Date" column reflects dates established in the January 25, 1988 "Revised Program Plan For Standard Plant Reviews" or dates for which modifica-tion was agreed to by PDSNP and the review branch.

I CONTACT:

T. Xenyon NRR/PDSNP 8808180190 880009 Ext. 21120 gDR ADOCK 05000601 I

PNU 9M

-l 2

The column "Expected Input Date" reflects input from appropriate technical branch management. Category 1 items have been discussed with the appropriate Assistant Directors.

I request any problems in meeting these input dates be identified to me by the appropriate Assistant Director within a week of receipt of this memo.

Ob ).1Y\\'&

Charles L. Miller, Acting Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects, NRR

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

T. Murley J. Sniezek F. Miraglia D. Crutchfield L. Rubenstein J. Richardson C. Y. Cheng L. B. Marsh C. McCracken A. Thadant J. Joyce J. Mauk F. Rosa J. Craig M. W. Hodges B. Grimes R. Erickson D. Matthews i

R. Barrett L. Cunningham J. Zwolinski A. Beach W. Regan, Jr.

J. Murphy G. Bagchi S. Newberry

)

August 9, 1988

.g.

The column "Expected Input Date" reflects input from apprcpriate technical branch management. Category 1 items have been discussed with the appropriate Assistant Directors.

I request any problems in meeting these input dates be identified to me by the appropriate Assistant Director within a week of receipt of this memo.

original signed by Charles L. Miller, Acting Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects, NRR

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

T. Murley J. Sniezek F. Miraglia D. Crutchfield L. Rubenstein J. Richardson C. Y. Cheng L. B. Marsh C. McCracken A. Thadani J. Joyce J. Mauk F. Rosa J. Craig M. W. Hodges B. Grimes R. Erickson D. Matthews R. Barrett L. Cunningham J. Zowlinski A. Beach W. Regan, Jr.

J. Murphy G. Bagchi S. Newberry DISTRIBUTION:

Docket File EHylton NRC PDR DScaletti PDSNP Reading TXenyon GVissing Blong CM111er PDSNP -

AD:Ph Ed

cw CM111er 07

/88 Q/t./88

's' August 9, 1988 o

2-The column "Expected Input Date" reflects input from apprcpriate technical branch management. Category 1 items have been discussed with the appropriate Assistant Directors.

I request any problems in meeting these input dates be identified to me by the appropriate Assistant Director within a week of receipt of this r.:emo.

original signed by Charles L. Miller, Acting Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects, NRR

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

T. Murley J. Sniczek F. Miraglia D. Crutchfield L. Rubenstein J. Richardson C. Y. Cheng L. B. Marsh C. McCracken A. Thadani J. Joyce J. Mauk F. Rosa J. Craig M. W. Hodges B. Grimes R. Erickson D. Matthews-R. Barrett L. Cunningham J. Zowlinski A. Beach W. Regan, Jr.

J. Murphy G. Bagchi S. Newberry DISTRIBUTION:

Whie EHylton NRC PDR DScaletti PDSNP Reading TKenyon GVissing Blong CMiller hfb PDSNP AD:PD Eg} :

w Chiller I

(

07/J /88 g/1./88 L_

D te: July 26, 1988

' ~

REVIEW STATUS REPOR7 ON GE AEWR FDA/DC REVIEW Expected Division /

SRP Due Input 1

Brrnch Reviewer Chapter Subject Milestone Date Date Cat.*

Comments DEST /SPLB Chandrasekaran 4, 5, 6, 15 Plant Systems RAIs to 6/30/88 6/30/88 4

P.M.

DEST /SPLB Chandrasekaran 3

Plant Systems RAIs to 6/30/88

?

2 P.M.

DEST /SRXB Thomas 5, 6, 15 Reactor Systems RAIs to 6/30/88 10/01/88 1

New input date P.M.

established, (memo 7/19/88) however, pro-jected SER in-put date (3/30/89) is unacceptable.

DEST /ECEB Witt 5, 6 Chemical Engineering Draft 7/31/88 7/31/88 3

SER DREP/PRPB Brown 15 Radiation Protection Draft 7/31/88 9/30/88 2

SER DREP/PRPB Brown 2

Meteorology RAI to 6/30/88 6/29/88 4

P.M.

DEST /EMEB Rajan 4, 5, 6, 15 Mechanical Engineering Draft 7/31/88 8/08/88 3

(Code Cases)

SER o Category definitions:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attention requested

3. Dn schedule

4. Complete

Date: July 26, 1988 REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON GE ASWR FDA/DC REVIEW (Cont.)

Expected Division /

SRP Due Input Branch Reviewer Chapter Subject Milestone Date Date Cat.*

Coranents DEST /EMEB Rajan 1,2,3 Mechanical Engineering RAIs to 6/30/88

?

1 P.M.

DEST /EMTB Tsao 4, 5, 6, 15 Materials Engineering Draft 7/31/88 7/18/88 4

SER DEST /EMTB Tsao 1,2,3 Materials Engineering RAIs to 6/30/88 5/23/88 4

P.M.

DEST /ESGB Tan /Pichumani 1, 2, 3, Structural & Geosciences RAIs to 6/30/88 7/6/88 4

P.M.

o Category definitions:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attention requested

3. On schedule

4. Couplete

l D:te: July 26. 1988 l

REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON CE SYSTEM 80+

CE55 K-DC REVIEW Expected i

Division /

Due Input Br?'nch Reviewer Chapter Subject Nilestone Date Date Cat.*

Coments DEST /EMTB M. Hum 4

Reactor RAI 07/10/88 07/10/88 2

DEST /EMEB J. Rajan 5

Reactor Coolant System RAI 07/10/88 07/10/88 2

DEST /EMTB M. Hun 5

Reactor Coolant System RAI 07/10/88 07/10/88 2

DEST /SPLB J. Raval 5

Reactor Coolant System RAI 07/10/88 07/29/889 3

l DEST /SPLB J. Raval 9

Auxiliary System RAI 07/10/88 07/29/880 3

DEST /SICB J. Stewart 9

Auxiliary System RAI 07/10/88 07/27/88 4

o C;tegory definition:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attention requested

3. On schedule

4. Complete e Input delayed due to availability of reviewer.

Date: July 26, 1988

~

REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON SYSTEM 80 CESSAR-F REVIEW Expected Division /

Due Input Branch Reviewer Chapter Subject Milestone Date Date Cat.*

Connents DEST /SRXB C. Liang TAC 66400, ASPSS ISSUE Final SER 6/30/88 6/30/88**

3 On schedule to P.M.

DEST /EMEB J. Rajan TAC 66401, Steam Gen. Tube Vibration RAls to open open 3

Waiting res-P.M.

ponse from CE on RAI DEST /EMTB W. Wickman TAC 66401, Steam Gen. Tube Vibration RAIs to open open 3

Waiting res-P.M.

pense from CE on RAI L

• Category definition:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attention requested

3. On schedule

4. Complete

• • Close out issue

Date: July 26. 1988

~

REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON CE SYSTEM 80+

CESSAR-DC REVIEW AR5AP TOPIC PAPERS Expected Division /

Due Input Brrnch Reviewer Chapter Subject Milestone Date Date Cat.*

Coments RES/SAIB C. Ferre11 Topic Paper Set 10 ARSAP Issues RAI 06/15/88 08/01/88 1

Coments No. 1 provided CE at meeting 6/21/88 o Category definition:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attention requested

3. On schedule

4. Complete

D:to:

July 26, 1988 REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON 6

FDA REVIEW Expected Division /

Due Input Branch Reviewer Modules Subject

• Milestone Date Date Cat.**

Comments DEST /EMTB Johnson 1, 4, 5, 6&8, 7 Materials Engineering Draft SER 3/31/88 4/29/88 4

Complete 10 to P.M.

5/5/88 DEST /EMEB Rajan/Brasmer***

1, 4, 5, 7 Mechanical Engineering Draft SER 9/16/88 9/16/88 2

W Input to P.M.

rec'd 7/6/88 DEST /ESGB Staley 3

Hydrology Draft SER 3/31/88 3/30/88 4

Cocplete to P.M.

Glese-Koch 3

Geology & Seismology Draft SER 3/31/88 3/30/88 4

Complete to P.M.

Chan 7

Civil Engineering Draft SER 4/29/88 4/28/88 4

Complete to P.M.

I o

See Septes6er 29, 1987 mrm for cosplete listing of review assignments Category definitions:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attention requested

3. On schedule

4. Complete

• • • Brasser providing assistance

Data:

J31y 26, 1983 REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON WESTIEHOUSE RESAR SP/90 FDA REVIEW (Cont.)

Expected Division /

Due Input Branch Reviewer Modules Subject

• Milestone Date Date Cat.**

Comments DEST /ECEB liing 1, 688, 10, 13 Chemical Engineering Draft SER 3/31/88 3/17/88 4

Complete Notley 13 Fire Protection Draft SER 7/15/88 8/19/88f 2

Input rec'd to P.M.

4/28/88 DEST /SICB Burrows 9, 13, 15 Instrumentation &

Draft SER 3/31/88 4/07/88 4

Ccg lete Controls to P.M.

DEST /SELB Trehan 9, 13 Electrical Engineering Draft SER 3/31/88 4/13/88 4

Complete to P.M.

DEST /SPLB Shum (lead) 1, 10, 13 Containment Systems Draft SER 6/21/887 6/21/88 4

Cosplete to P.M.

o See September 29, 1987 memo for complete listing of review assignments Category definitions:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attention requested

3. On schedule

4. Complete i Input delayed due to availability of reviewer.

Dat2:

July 26, 1988 REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON W1.51INGHOUSE RESAR SP/90 PDA REVIEW (Cont.)

Expected Division /

Due Input Branch Reviewer Modules Subject

• Milestone Date Date Cat.**

Coments DEST /SPLB Wagner 688, 7 Plant Systems Draft SER 6/21/88 6/21/88 4

Complete i

(cont.)

to P.M.

Walker 7

Equipment Qualification Draft SER 6/21/88 6/21/88 4

Complete to P.M.

Gill 4

Plant Systems Draft SER 6/21/88 6/21//88 4

Couplete to P.M.

Lee 6&8, 10 HVAC Systems, Waste Draft SER 6/21/88 t/21/P8 4

Complete 12, 13 Management, Steam &

to P.M.

Power Conversion o

See September 29, 1987 memo for couplete listing of review assignments co Category definitions:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attention requested

3. On schedule

4. Complete

i Date:

July 26, 1988

~

REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON WESTINGHOUSE RESAR SP/90 PDA REVIEW (Cont.)

Expected Division /

Due Input Branch Reviewer Modules Subject

• Milestone Date Date Cat.**

Coments DEST /SPLB Raval 13 Plant Systems Draft SER 6/21/88 6/21/88 4

Complete (cont.)

to P.M.

DEST /SRXS Liang 1, 4, 5, 6&8, Reactor Systems Draft SER 6/28/88 6/28/88 4

Corplete 9, 10, 11, 12 to P.M.

DRIS/RSGB Mendelsohn 2

Physical Security Draft SER 3/31/88 3/22/88 4

Complete to P.M.

DLP0/LQAB Spraul 13 Ouality Assurance Draft SER 4/29/88 4/06/88 4

Corplete to P.M.

I 4

1 ice Cr-ctde 29, 1987 memo for complete listing of review assignments

• c Categcry eefinitions:

1. AD or above attention requested 2-Praxh Chief attention requested

3. cn e.hedule

1. .. Complete

o

)

Dato:

July 26, 1988 l

REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON WE5IINGHO' 5E RESAR SP/90 J

PDA REVIEW (Cont.)

Expected Divistor./

Due Input Branch Reviewer Modules Subject

• Milestone Date Date Ca t. ** Coments I

DLPQ/LHFB Lapinski 15 Control Room / Human Draft SER 3/31/88 5/05/88 4

Coglete Factors Engineering to P.M.

DREP/PRPB Spickler 1, 3, 4, 5 Radiological Accident Draft SER 8/01/88 9/09/88#

1 Add'1 vendor 6&8, 9, 10 Analysis to P.M.

input rec'd 5/27/88 Skopec 12 Process & Effluent Draft SER 7/15/88 7/13/88 4

Complete Radiological to P.M.

Monitoring & Sanpling Systems RES/PRA Chellfah/BNL 16 Probabilistic Safety Draft 7/15/88 7/15/88 4

Corplete Study - back end SER to P.M.

o See Septem6er 29, 1987 meno for complete listing of review assignments Category definitions:

1. AD or above attention requested

2. Branch Chief attentior. requested

3. On schedule

4. Complete

1. Input delayed due to availability of reviewer.