ML20207E470

Informs That Team of Five NRC Representatives Plans to Visit Facility During Wk of 870209-13 to Collect Data & Observe Maint & Surveillance Program.Areas to Be Reviewed by Survey Team Listed.Util Requested to Provide Listed Documentation

ML20207E470
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	12/23/1986
From:	Stefano J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Sylvia B DETROIT EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8701020187
Download: ML20207E470 (6)

Text

, ,

December 23, 1986 k

Docket No. 50-341 DISTRIBUTION:

3

• EN341: ;;

NRC PDR Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia Local PDR Group Vice President - Nuclear Operations BWD-3 r/f Detroit Edison Company EAdensam JPartlow 6400 North Dixie Highway JStefano EJordan Newport, Michigan 48166 EHylton BGrimes RBernero ACRS (101

Dear Mr. Sylvia:

Attorney, OGC Sub,iect: Fermi-2 Maintenance and Surveillance Program Survey This is to inform you that a team of five NRC staff representatives, headed by the NRR Division of Human Factora Technology, plan to visit the Fermi-2 plant site the week of February 9-13, 1987, for the purpose of collecting data and observing the Fermi-2 Maintenance and Surveillance Program. The survey team will be divided into two groups and will use an interview technique of informal question and answer sessions with your plant personnel, ranging from plant management to foremen and crafts personnel. The following areas will be reviewed by the survey team:

" corporate goals concerning maintenance

• spare parts / materials readiness supervision methods in the plant Maintenance Department

• preventive / predictive maintenance practices

• maintenance work order backlogs maintenance procedures

• maintenance work control

• communications

• definition of responsibilities in the maintenance organization

• maintenance training maintenance work activity planning and scheduling

' administrative procedures 8701020187 861223 PDR ADOCK 05000341 P PDR

Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia Detroit Edison Company Fermi-2 Facility cc:

Mr. Harry H. Voigt, Esq. Ronald C. Callen LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae Adv. Planning Review Section 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N. W. Michigan Public Service Commission Washington, D. C. 20036 6545 Mercantile Way P. O. Box 30221 John Flynn, Esq.- Lansing, Michigan 48909 Senior Attorney Detroit Edison Company Regional Administrator, Region III 2000 Second Avenue U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Detroit, Michigan 48226 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. Dennis R. Hahn, Chief Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office Division of Radiological Health P. O. Box 30035 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Mr. Robert Woolley Acting Supervisor-Licensing Detroit Edison Company Fermi Unit 2 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 Mr. Walt Rogers U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office 6450 W. Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 Monroe County Office of Civil Preparedness 963 South Raisinville Monroe, Michigan 48161 .

- - - , , . . . ..-.,----m_ -

1 3 enable the survey team to prepare for the site visit and survey, your ass;.tance is requested in providing the enclosed list of documentation at least two weeks prior to the scheduled visit. Five (5) copies of the enclosed documenta-tion packages should be furnished as follows:

1 copy to the Fermi-2 resident inspector 1 copy to the Director, Division of Reactor Projects, Pegion III 3 copies to the NRR Project Manager An advance copy of the enclosure was provided to your staff to help expedite preparation of the documentation package being requested. Your assistance in this effort and in making your personnel available for the interviews will be most appreciated.

Sincerely,

/S/

John J. Stefano, Sr., Project Manager BWR Project Directorate No. 3 Division of BWR Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated cc: See next page

~RW -3: DBL lap!B-3: DBL . WD  : DBL efano/vag Lion E e sam 1 ' O /86 12/g7J86 12/ 86

l cc: w/ enc 1: R. M. Bernero R. W. Houston G. C. Lainas E. G. Adensam B. A. Boger, DHFT G. C. Cwalina, DHFT T. Le, DHFT C. E. Norelius, Region III E. G. Greenman, Region III G. Wright, Region III W.G. Rogers, SRI (Fermi) k i

b i

i r

l l

k i

i i

j1

,_...~

t 4

Enclosure i

FERMI-2 MAINTENANCE AND SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: SURVEY

• Administrative Procedure: Mainten.tuce and Predictive and Preventive

• Maintenance activities.

• Organization Chart (with names) for maintenance organization and plant-wide organization.

• Composition of craft personnel for: Electrical, I&C, Mechanical (Foreman to craft ratio, etc.).

• Description of Planning Department / Activity.

• Description of daily meetings for maintenance planning, scheduling, status reports, etc.

Description of Maintenance / Operation Interface during planning, scheduling, work close-out, and post-maintenance / functional testing.

• Description of Work Control Process: 1.e., how work order is started, planned, executed, completed, closed out and equipment is returned to service. Provide procedure.

• Description of craft training ar.d retraining requirements.

. Average years of experience for each craft discipline. Turnover rate by craft 2

• Description of interface /connunication between Technical / Engineering support staff / Plant Modifications /QA-QC/ Maintenance Department

• Description of procedure control: initial write-up, validation, revision

., or upgrade. Technical review and human factors review criteria.

Requirements for conduct of maintenance work, troubleshooting, work closed

! 'out, post-maintenance / functional testing, and returning of equipment / system to normal line-up.

I' ,

• Description of methods in which the performance of the maintenance department is measured, e.g., are indicators used, how frequently, who is informed?

• Description of process on communication with vendor for technical services and latest technical information on equipment and systems installed at 1 plant site. Interface with vendor /NSSS for training, modification and i replacement.

• ProvidefiveMaintenanceprocedures(randomlyselected(ex: MOVs, PRVs, ContainmentPump/ Motor, Battery,Switchgear,etc.).

I

• Provide five Completed Maintenance Work Order Packages (randomly selected).

J C *J * . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ - . . _ _ . - . _ _ _ . _ . ~ . _ . . . _ , _ . . - _ . . ~ , _ . _ . _ _ , _ . . _ . . . . . - - . . . _ , _ _ _ . , _ . . ~ . _ - , _ _ _ _ . , _ , . .

• Description of shift work and work assignment (e.g., how foreman decides on which craft to perform what type of work).

• Complete description of the preventive maintenance program:

- How equipment is to be included

- How frequency is determined

- How execution is planned

- How it is going to be updated

• Complete description of predictive maintenance program:

- Which equipment is included

- What methods used: oil analy., vibr., thermography, etc.

- Methods of record keeping

- Is it going to be updated

• Concerning management:

- Are there goals set for the maint. dept.

- What schedule?

- What milestones?

- Are goals in performance evaluation of managers and supervisors?

- Are goals communicated to first line supervisors and crafts?

Maintenance Work Orders (MWO)

- Current number of non-outage corrective MWO by priority

- Definition of priorities

- Projected number of corrective MW0s to be outstanding at start-up by priority

- Current number of preventive maintenance work orders over due

- Rate of completion of corrective MWO in terms of number completed / month and manhours expended (by craft)/ month for the past 4 months

- Estimated manhours required to complete MW0s both current and projected t at start-up broken down by craft

- Rate of completion of preventive MWO in terms of number completed / month and manhours expended on PM MWO/uonth for the past 4 months

- Estimated manhours required to complete current overdue PM MW0s

- Status of current MW0s (e.g., number in planning, number in final sign-off, number on hold for lack of parts, number on hold for engineeringassistance,numberavailabletobeworkedon)

- Number MW0s requiring rework over past 6 months.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ ____ _ _