ML20206T032

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of 940713 Telcon Violation.Violation Noted:On 940629, Licensee Transfered Perkin-Elmer Gas Chromatograph Containing 15 Mci of Ni-63 & Transfer Not Made to Person Holding Specific License
ML20206T032
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/08/1994
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20206T027 List:
References
SSD, NUDOCS 9902110195
Download: ML20206T032 (1)


Text

.

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AT & T Network Systems General Licensee 10 CFR 31.5 Columbus, Ohio Docket No. 9999-0003 During an NRC telephone contact on July 13, 1994, a violation of NRC requirement was identified.

In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 31.5(c)(8) requires, in part, that any person who acquires, receives, possesses, uses or transfers byproduct material in a device pursuant to a general license shall, except as provided in 10 CFR 31.5(c)(9), transfer or dispose of the device containing byproduct material only by transfer to persons holding a specific license pursuant to 10 CFR Parts 30 and 32 or from an Agreement State to receive the device.

Contrary to the above, on June 29, 1994, the licensee transferred a Perkin-Elmer gas chromatograph containing 15 mci of Ni-63, and this transfer was not made to a person holding a specific license pursuant to 10 CFR Parts 30 and 32 or from an Agreement State to receive the device, and the exceptions in 10 CFR 31.5(c)(9) did not apply.

Specifically, the device was transferred to Burton Metal Finishing, Inc., Columbus, OH, a facility that does not hold a specific license issued by the NRC or an Agreement State.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement VI).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, AT & T Network Systems is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois, 60532-4351, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice

(

of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a l

Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason i

for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, l

(2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, i

(3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois this8th day of August 1994 9902110195 940809 PDR RC SSD PDR