ML20206S249
| ML20206S249 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/10/1998 |
| From: | Rathbun D NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA) |
| To: | Gingrich N, Gore A, Murphy R GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE, HOUSE OF REP., SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, SENATE, PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE |
| References | |
| CCS, GL-98-05, GL-98-5, NUDOCS 9901280254 | |
| Download: ML20206S249 (4) | |
Text
-
/
p UNITED STATES g
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20065 4 001
\\...o/ -
November 10, 1998 The Honorable Al Gore President of the United States Senate Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. President:
Pursuant to Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 801, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is submitting NRC Generic Letter 98-05," Boiling-Water Reactor Licensees Use of the BWRVIP-05 Report to Request Relief From Augmented Examination Requirements on Reactor Pressure Vessel Circumferential Shell Welds," that was issued on November 10,1998. This generic letter is addressed to all holders of operating licenses for nuclear power plants, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel, to inform the addressees that the NRC staff has completed its review of the "BWR Vessel and Intemals Project [BWRVIP], BWR Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Weld Inspection Recommendations (BWRVIP-05)," and that they may request permanent (i.e., for the remaining term of operation under the existing, initial license) relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) for the volumetric examination of circumferential reactor pressure vessel welds, by demonstrating that: (1) at the expiration of the license, the circumferential welds will continue to satisfy the limiting conditional failure probability for circumferential welds stated in the NRC staff's July 28,1998, safety evaluation, and (2) they have implemented operator training and established procedures that limit the frequency of cold over-pressure events to that specified in the staff's July 28,1998, safety evaluation.
Addressees will still need to perform their required inspections of " essentially 100 percent" of all axial welds.
The generic letter requires no specific action or written response. Any action on the part of an addressee to request relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g)is strictly voluntary.
A notice of availability of the generic letter will be published in the Federa/ Register. The NRC has confirmed with the Office of Management and Budget that this generic letter is not a " major rule" as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Sincerely,
.)
\\g Dennis K. Rathbun, Director Office of Congressional Affairs
(-
Enclosure:
As stated
)
~
9901290254 981110 PDR ORG NRCCO PDR
e.>" #C&q l
g
- a UNITED STATES j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20565 4 001
%..... /.
November 10, 1998 The Honorable Newt Gingrich Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515
Dear Mr. Speaker:
Pursuant to Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 801, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is submitting NRC Generic Letter 98-05, " Boiling-Water Reactor Licensees Use of the BWRVIP-05 Report to Request Relief From Augmented Examination Requirements on Reactor Pressure Vessel Circumferential Shell Welds," that was issued on November 10,1998. This generic letter is addressed to all holders of operating licenses for nuclear power plants, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel, to inform the addressees that the NRC staff has completed its review of the "BWR Vessel and internals Project [BWRVIP], BWR Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Weld inspection Recommendations (BWRVIP-05)," and that they may request permanent (i.e., for the remaining term of operation under the existing, initial license) relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) for the volumetric examination of circumferential reactor pressure vessel walos, by demonstrating that: (1) at the expiration of the license, the circumferential welds will continue to satisfy the limiting conditional failure probability for j
circumferential welds stated in the NRC staff's July 28,1998, safety evaluation, and (2) licensees have implemented operator training and established procedures that limit the frequency of cold over-pressure events to that specified in the staff's July 28,1998, safety evaluation. Addressees will still need to perform their required inspections of " essentially 100 percent" of all axial welds.
The generic letter requires no specific action or written response. Any action on the part of an addressee to request relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) is strictly voluntary.
A notice of availability of the generic letter will be published in the Federa/ Register. The NRC has confirmed with the Office of Management and Budget that this generic letter is not a " major rule" as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Sincerely, f
V' m
j Dennis thbun, Director Office of Congressional Affairs
Enclosure:
As stated
l p ner
.J Q
p UNITED STATES g
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20665 0001
\\,*****/*
November 10, 1998 l
Mr. Robert P. Murphy -
i General Counsel General Accounting Office Room 7175 441 G Street, NW Washington, DO 20548
Dear Mr. Murphy:
Pursuant to Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 801, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is submitting NRC Generic Letter 98-05," Boiling-Water Reactor Licensees Use of the BWRVIP-05 Report to Request Relief From
. Augmented Examination Requirements on Reactor Pressure Vessel Circumferential Shell Welds," that was issued on November 10,1998. This generic letter is addressed to all holders of operating licenses for nuclear power plants, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel, to inform the addressees that the NRC staff has completed its review of the "BWR Vessel and Intemals Project [BWRVIP], BWR Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Weld Inspection Recommendations (BWRVIP-05)," and that they may request permanent (i.e., for the remaining term of operation under the existing, initial license) relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) for the volumetric examination of circumferential reactor pressure vessel welds, by demonstrating that: (1) at the expiration of the license, the circumferential welds will continue to satisfy the limiting conditional failure probability for circumferential welds stated in the NRC staff's July 28,1998, safety evaluation, and (2) they have implemented operator training and established procedures that limit the frequency of cold over-pressure events to that specified in the staff's July 28,1998, safety evaluation.
Addressees will still need to perform their required inspections of " essentially 100 percent" of all axial welds.
The generic letter requires no specific action or written response. Any action on the part of an addressee to request relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) is strictly voluntary.
A notice of availability of the generic letter will be published in the Federa/ Register. The NRC has confirmed with the Office of Management and Budget that this generic letter is not a " major rule" as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Sincerely,
}
f
! 1'~
Dennis K. Rathbun, Director Office of Congressional Affairs
Enclosure:
As stated l
1
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 10,1998 NRC GENERIC LETTER 98-05: BOILING WATER REACTOR LICENSEES USE OF THE BWRVIP-05 REPORT TO REQUEST RELIEF FROM AUGMENTED EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS ON REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL CIRCUMFERENTIAL SHELL WELDS Addressees All holders of operating licenses (or construction permits) for boiling water reactors (BWRs),
except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from ine reactor vessel.
Pumose The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this generic letter to inform addressees that the NRC staff has completed its review of the *BWR Vessel and intemals Project [BWRVIP], BWR Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Weld Inspection Recommendations (BWRVIP-05)," and that licensees of BWRs may request permanent (i.e., for the remaining term of operation under the existing, initial, license) relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) for the volumetric examination of circumferential reactor pressure vessel (RPV) welds. No specific action or written response is required.
Backaround By letter dated September 28,1995, as supplemented by letters dated June 24 and October 29,1996, May 16, June 4, June 13, and December 18,1997, and January 13,1998, the BWRVIP submitted the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) proprietary report TR-105697 "BWR Vessel and Intemals Project [BWRVIP], BWR Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Weld Inspection Recommendations (BWRVIP-05)." The BWRVIP-05 report evaluates the current inspection requirements for the reactor pressure vessel shell welds in BWRs, formulates recommendations for attemative inspection requirements, and provides a technical basis for these recommended requirements. It initially proposed to reduce the scope ofinspection of the BWR reactor pressure vessel (RPV) welds from essentially 100 percent of all RPV shell welds to 50 percent of the axial welds and zero percent of the circumferential welds; however, as modified, it proposes to perform inservice inspections (ISI) on essentially 100 percent of the RPV axial shell welds, and essentially zero percent of the circumferential RPV shell welds, except for the intersections'of the axial and circumferential welds. Approximately 2 - 3 percent of the circumferential welds will be inspected under this proposal.
2 110001^W
$$S
4.-
A a.
,J A.4
- -Aw..
J-4-
e_
,.w_d
+.m.
-m*
%-.m..-
GL 98-05 Novemb r 10,1998 Page 2 of 4 On August 7,1997, the NRC issued information Notice (lN) 97-63," Status of NRC Staff's Review of BWRVIP-05," regarding licensee requests for relief. IN 97-63 stated that the staff would "... consider technically-Justified requests for reliefs from the augmented examination in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i),10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii), and 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)A(5) from BWR licensees who are scheduled to perform inspections of the BWR RPV circumferential shell welds during the fall 1997 or spring 1998 outage seasons. The staff issued schedular reliefs for inspections of the BWR RPV circumferential shell welds due during the fall 1997 outage season for four units who submitted technically-Justified requests, and has issued schedular reliefs for two units during the spring 1998 outage season.
On May 7,1998, the staff issued IN 97-63 Supplement 1, which informed BWR licensees that the staff was extending the period in which it would "... consider technically justified requests for relief from the augmented examination in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i),
50.55a(a)(3)(ii), and 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5) from BWR licensees who are scheduled to perform inspections of the BWR RPV circumferential shell welds during the fall 1998 or spring 1999 outage seasons. Acceptablyjustified relief would be considered for inspection delays of up to two operating cycles for BWR RPV circumferential shell welds only. Licensees will still need to perform their required inspections of ' essentially 100 percent' of all axial welds."
Discussion The staff has completed its final review of the information submitted by the BWRVIP and the 1
staff's safety evaluation (SE) was transmitted to Carl Terry, Chairman of the BWRVIP, in a letter dated July 30,1998.
The staff previously concluded that beyond design-basis events occurring during plant shutdown could lead to cold over-pressure events that could challenge vessel integrity. The industry's response concluded that condensate and control rod drive pumps could cause conditions that could lead to cold over-pressure events that could challenge vesselintegrity.
The BWRVIP's estimate of the frequency of over-pressurization events that could challenge the RPV is 9.5 x 10d/yr for BWR-4 facilities and 9 x 10d/yr for other than BWR-4 facilities. After accounting for actual injections which were not included in the BWRVIP analysis, the staff conservatively estimates that the total frequency could be as high as 1 x 104/yr (a point estimate).
The initial industry review determined that the failure frequency of circumferential welds was 2.2 x 10d'/yr. This frequency was determined using importance sampling, generic weld variables and design basis events. Subsequent analyses using
- Monte Carlo" calculation methods, plant-specific weld variables and pressures and temperatures associated with cold over-pressure events, determined that the limiting plant specific conditional probability of vessel failure, P(FIE), for circumferential welds at 32 effective full power years (EFPY) were 1 x 104 from the BWRVIP's re-analysis and 8.2 x 104 from the staff's analysis. Combining the frequency of cold over pressure events with the P(FlE), the BWRVIP failure frequency for the
~. _ -..
l GL 98-05 Nov:mb:r 10,1998 Page 3 of 4 limiting circumferential welds was 9.0 x 10*/yr ((9 x 10 /yr event frequency for a BWR-3) x d
(1.0 x 104 conditional probability of failure)]. The limiting plant specific failure frequency forcircumferential welds at 32 EFPY was determined by the staff to be 8.2 x 104/yr [(1 x 104/yr eveni frequency) x (8.2 x 104 P(FjE))]. As depicted in NUREG 1560, Vol. I, core damage frequencies (CDF) for BWR plants were reported to be approximately 104/yr to 10d/yr. In addition, Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.154 indicates that PWR plants are acceptable for operation if the plant-specific analyses predict the mean frequency of through-wall crack penetration for pressurized thermal shock events is less than 5 x 104/yr. The failure frequencies of circumferential welds in BWR vessels are significantly below the criteria specified in RG 1.154.
RG 1.174 provides guidelines as to how defense-in-depth and safety margins are maintained, and states that a risk assessment should be used to address the principle that proposed increases in risk, and their cumulative effect, are small and do not cause the NRC Safety Goals to be exceeded. The estimated failure frequency of the BWR RPV circumferential welds is well below the acceptable core damage frequency (CDF) and large early release frequency (LERF) criteria discussed in RG 1.174. Although the frequency of RPV weld failure can not be directly i
compared to the frecuencies of core damage or large early release, the staff believes that the estimated frequency of RPV circumferential weld failure bounds the corresponding CDF and LERF that may result from a vessel weld failure. On the above bases, the staff has concluded that the BWRVIP-05 proposal, as modified, to eliminate BWR vessel circumferential weld examinations, is acceptable.
Ecrmitted Action BWR licensees may request permanent (i.e., for the remaining term of operation under the existing, initial, license) relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) for the volumetric examination of circumferential reactor pressure vessel welds (ASME Code Section XI, Table IWB 2500-1, Examination Category B-A, item 1.11, Circumferential Shell Welds) by demonstrating that: (1) at the expiration of their license, the circumferential welds will continue to satisfy the limiting conditional failure probability for circumferential welds in the staff's July 30,1998, safety evaluation, and (2) licensees have implemented operator training and established procedures that limit the frequency of cold over-pressure events to the amount specified in the staff's July 30,1998, safety evaluation. Licensees will still need to perform their required inspections of " essentially 100 percent" of all axial welds.
.m.
~
j '.
GL 98-05 l
Novsmb r 10,1998 Page 4 of 4 l
This generic letter requires no specific action or written response. Any action on the part of addressees to request relief from the inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) for the volumetric examination of the circumferer.liai reactor pressure vessel welds, in accordance with the guidance of this generic letter,is ytrictly voluntary. If you have any questions about this j
matter, please contact one of the contacts listed below.
U&
ok W. Roe, Acting Director ision of Reactor Program Management l
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contacts: B. J. Elliot, NRR C. E. Carpenter, NRR 301-415-2709 301-415-2169 E-mail: bje@nrc. gov E-mail: cec @nrc. gov
Attachment:
List of Recently issued NRC Inforrnation Notices h
l
'6
- e Attachment t
4 GL 98-05 November 10,1998 Page 1 of 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS GENERIC DATE OF LETTER SUBJECT ISSUANCE ISSUED TO 98-04 Potential for Degradation of ths 07/14/98 All holders of operating Emergoney Core Cooling System licenses for nuclear power And the Containment Spray System reactors, except those who After a Lossef-Coolant Accident have permanently ceased Because of Construction and operations and have certified l
Protective Coating Deficiencies that fuel has been j
and Foreign Materialin Containment permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
j l
98-03 NMSS Licensees' and Certificate 06/22/98 Alllicensees or certificate Holders' Year 2000 Readiness holders for uranium Programs hexafluoride production plants, uranium enrichment plants, and uranium fuel fabrication plants, except those that have permanently ceased operations 98-02 Loss of Reactor Coolant 05/28/98 All holders of OLS for PWRs, inventory and Associated except those who have Potential for Loss of Emergency permanently ceased Mitigation Functions While in a operations, and have Shutdown Condition certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
98-01 Year 2000 Readiness of 05/12/98 All holders of Ol.S for of Computer Systems at nuclear power plants, Nuclear Power Plants except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel OP = Operating License CP = Construction Permit NPR = Nuclear Power Reactors
CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE SYSTEM DOCUMENT PREPARATION CHECKLIST This check list is to be submitted with each document (or group of Os/As) sent for processing into the CCS.
1.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT (S)
A-C 2.
TYPE OF DOCUMENT X CORRESPONDENCE HEARINGS (Os/As) 3.
DOCUMENT CONTROL SENSITIVE (NRC ONLY)
X NON-SENSITIVE 4.
CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE AND SUBCOMMITTEE (if applicable)
Congressional Committee Subcommittee 5.
SUBJECT CODES (A)
(B)
(C) 6.
SOURCE OF DOCUMENTS (A) 5520 (DOCUMENT NAME i
(B)
SCAN (C)
ATTACHMENTS (D)'
OTHER 7.
SYSTEM LOG DATES (A) IlltfTOATA OCA SENT DOCUMENT TO CCS (B)
DATE CCS RECEIVED DOCUMENT (C)
DATE RETURNED TO OCA FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (D)
DATE RESUBMITTED BY OCA TO CCS (E)
DATE ENTERED INTO CCS BY (F)
DATE OCA NOTIFIED THAT DOCUMENT IS IN CCS COMMENTS:
RELEASE TO PDR"8 00 4 2 9
11N398. P;\\DISRTLIS.DMS