ML20206Q203

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-285/86-32
ML20206Q203
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun 
Issue date: 04/15/1987
From: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
References
NUDOCS 8704210363
Download: ML20206Q203 (2)


See also: IR 05000285/1986032

Text

r.

" t

APR I 5'l987

In Reply Refer To:

Docket:

50-285/86-32

Omaha Public Power District

ATTN:

R. L. Andrews, Division Manager-

Nuclear Production

1623 Harney Street

Omaha, Nebraska

68102

Gentlemen:

,

Thank you for your letter of March 23, 1987, in response to our letter and

Notice of Violation dated February 20, 1987. We have reviewed your reply and

find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violation. We will

review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future inspection

to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintained.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY: .

J. E. Gagliardo, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch

cc:

W. G. Gates, Manager

'l

Fort Calhoun Station

P. O. Box 399

Fort Calhoun, Nebraska

68023

Harry H. Voigt, Esq.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW

j

Washington, D. C.

20036

Kansas Radiation Control Program Director

Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director

'

RIV:FRP

C:FRPS

C:R&SPE

C-

C:RPB

REBaer/jt

urray

WLFisher

pRHunter

JEGagi

[rdo

i / 4 /87

/87

4 /l0/87

A /\\3/87

q//

'

I

O

B704210363 870415

PDR

ADOCK 05000285

-

I \\

G

PDR

.

.-

. -

- -

--

--

--

-

. s. . r.

-

,

_

-. r -

,,7 g

Omaha Public +ower District

-2-

bcc'to DMB (IE06)_.

~

bec distrib. by-RIV:

.RPB

Resident Inspector

R. D. Martin, RA-

D. Weiss,LRM/ALF

R&SPB

Section Chief'(RPB/B)

MIS' System'-

RIV File

DRSP

'

'RSTS Operator.

RSB

Inspector ._

Section Chief

.WJ'L.. Fisher

'R. L..Bangart

R. E. Hall

Project Inspector, RPB-'

I

l

I.

I.

l

l

\\

i

i

.

l

1

,

N.- ~ -

--

--

.:

-

,.

.

.

-

.

- .

- - -

.

- -

--

,

.

. - _ _

_

_

__ _ .

'

<

1

,

_

. . _ . _

. _ _ . , , . . _ _ - - .

Omaha Public Power District

1623 Harney Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247

402/536 4000

- - - -

b b,u

-

, , _ ' f .?,' !

' [:'

.

March 23, 1987

/

"~

LIC-87-165

l,

grg p p g,

il

i

'

l

Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief

Reactor Projects 8;anch

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

'

Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000

Arlington, Texas 76011

-

References:

1.

Docket No. 50-285

T

2.

Letter from NRC (J. E. Gagliardo) to OPPD (R. L. Andrews)

dated February 20, 1987

Dear Mr. Gagliardo:

SUBJECT:

Inspection Report 86-32

The subject inspection report identified a viclation concerning failure to

follow procedures. Pursuant to the provisions of 10'CFR 2.201, please find

-

attached the Omaha Public Power District's response to this violation.

, . -

Si_cerely,

h]/rffpaJ

R. L. Andrews

Division Manager

Nuclear Production

RLA:rge

3

Attachment

c:

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae

1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.

.

Washington, DC 20036

-

_

Mi . R. D. Martin, Regional Administrator

Mr. W. A. Paulsen, NRC Project Manager

_

Mr. P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector

-

"

1Tf*'l*k#

697 os

ag.

45 5124

Employmen

Equal 0pportunity

.

. _ _ .

-

-_-

. - . - - .

- . _ - - -

-..-

.

-

-.

'

7/v

Attachment

i

.

During.an NRC inspection conducted on December 15-19, 1986, a violation of NRC

,

requirements was identified. The violation involved failure to follow proce-

< .

dures.

In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for

NRC Enforcement Actions", 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1986), the violation is

listed below:

.

$

Violation

Failure to follow orocedures

,

Technical Specification 5.8.1 requires that written procedures be implemented.

Procedure RPP-20, " Radiation Work Permit (RWP)", states the RWP specifies the

i

minimum protective clothing that must be worn in the radiologically controlled

i

areas of the plant and that any substitution must provide equal or greater

protection.

Contrary to the above,'the NRC inspector determined on December 17, 1986, that

i

personnel were not wr.aring the protective clothing specified on RWP 86-430-1

for entry into the radiologically controlled area. This_is a Severity Level V

.

violation.

(Supplement IV) (285/8632-01)

,

-

i

l

OPPD's Response

T

!

1.

Reason for Violation. if Admitted

,

Personnel were not wearing protective clothing because they were doing

routine inspections in the clean controlled areas under RWP-430-1.

]

~ Beginning December 1, 1986,-the Fort Calhoun Station changed the RWP

format from a pre-printed form to a computer generated form. During the

2

'

transition, a statement previously included on the pre-printed RWP, which

'

-

directed that protective clothing was not required in clean controlled

,_ ..

-(

areas, was omitted from the new form. This change led to personnel who

,

i

were accustomed to the pre-printed RWP continuing in the practice of not

4

wearing protective clothing in clean controlled areas. This was consis-

tent with Radiation Protection Manual- allowances- for clean controlled

areas, but was inconsistent with the RWP. This discrepancy posed no

'

i

radiological concerns.

2.

Corrective Steos Which Have Been Taken and the Results' Achieved

,

'

'When this item was brought to OPPD's attentien, action was taken to

correct affected RWP's by upgrading those RWP's to include the statement,

j

" Protective clothing should not be worn in clean controlled areas." The

computer program which generates the RWP form was changed to include the

'

'

direction for non-use of protective clothing in clean controlled areas-

which formerly_ appeared on the pre-printed RWP.

.

7

3.

Corrective Steos Which Nill Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations

1

The corrective steps taken have been effective, and no further action is.

planned.

v_

_

4.

Date When Full Comoliance Will Be Achieved

OPPD .is presently in full compliance.

..

// M&

.

-

- -

-

. - - - -.

.-

.

.

_